SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

Grumble, grumble

19974 views
71 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    November 2009
  • From: Twin Cities of Minnesota
Posted by Don Stauffer on Monday, July 9, 2012 8:40 AM

I find, even when I do use the existing button in its "way down the page" location, it doesn't always work.  Sometimes it does, but frequently when I mark all read, it still says there is a new post in a particular forum, and when I go there, the last post is the same one I have read before and marked all read afterward!

Don Stauffer in Minnesota

  • Member since
    November 2009
  • From: Twin Cities of Minnesota
Posted by Don Stauffer on Saturday, July 7, 2012 10:06 AM

We need a second button, like the "new post" button, for "mark all read".   In any forum with a lot of posts, that is a very frequently used function and we should not have to scroll way down the very long windows to get to it.  The larger windows and increased white space means we have to do more scrolling as is.  And then after marking all read, we have to scroll back up or back down to get to the path links to get to the next forum.  Suggest maybe when mark all read is exercised it automatically returns you to top of forum (if you do not put such a button up near the top).

Don Stauffer in Minnesota

  • Member since
    April 2009
  • From: Longmont, Colorado
Posted by Cadet Chuck on Friday, July 6, 2012 9:52 PM

I have no "mobile" gizmos, and no desire to aquire any, so that part doesn't matter to me.  Anyhow, the current version works fine for me on my old PC.

Gimme a pigfoot, and a bottle of beer...

  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Sonora Desert
Posted by stikpusher on Friday, July 6, 2012 3:48 PM

sub revolution

I would still like to see a response to not being able to jump pages in the threads on the mobile version, as well as the lack of a "view your discussions" button on the mobile version. Thank you for enabling pictures, though. That is a major improvement.

Yes, now that I have posted from the mobile version, that in and of itself is a major improvement over trying to do so from my cell phone while at work. But please give us both the ability to go straight off to the last post on a thread straight off and a "View Your Discussions" on Mobile.

Another fine tune I suggest on the main site (and mobile) is while under "View Your Discussions" that it has the ability as before to select forums such as Armor, Aircraft, Figures, Ships, etc. as were able to do under the prior system.

 

F is for FIRE, That burns down the whole town!

U is for URANIUM... BOMBS!

N is for NO SURVIVORS...

       - Plankton

LSM

 

  • Member since
    December 2011
  • From: AZ
Posted by Luft Modeler on Friday, July 6, 2012 1:19 AM

So far no issues found on the "normal" format but in the "mobile" version like everyone else says the not have pages is a pain. So I ended up turning off the mobile feature.

But nice work though otherwise!

  • Member since
    September 2009
  • From: Guam
Posted by sub revolution on Thursday, June 28, 2012 5:54 PM

I would still like to see a response to not being able to jump pages in the threads on the mobile version, as well as the lack of a "view your discussions" button on the mobile version. Thank you for enabling pictures, though. That is a major improvement.

Oh, and I would like to respectfully point out to the older generation that wants nothing to do with the "mobile-thingies," that we always talk about how to get younger people interested in the hobby. Well I can tell you that the more technologically accessible we make it, the more likely we are to get younger folks interested. Just my 2 cents.

NEW SIG

  • Member since
    January 2010
  • From: Nebraska, USA
Posted by CallSignOWL on Thursday, June 28, 2012 3:27 PM

Ninetalis

Look, this was somethin I would have done, which is also what manstein means I guess,

Photobucket

Just put the text and all closer together, this would make scrolling through the threads waaay easier and faster, I don't know if you know allready... people want everything as fast and easiest as possible...

I think your designer/programmer should know this by now...

With regards, Ninetalis

Id like a more condensed version too!

------------------------

Now that I'm here, where am I??

  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Sonora Desert
Posted by stikpusher on Thursday, June 28, 2012 2:56 PM

Craig Kuhlow

stikpusher

Well on the third day I think I have figured out most of the stuff I want to do here. The Mobile version is mostly improved except for the lack of photos and the inability to go to the end page of threads immediately. Now lets see if the activity level picks up here.

Didn't realize the photos weren't enabled in the mobile layout.  There's no reason it can't be so I went ahead and turned it on.  They should be appearing now.  Thanks for the heads up.

Well thats great news... now for the ability to go directly to the lat post on the mobile app... or if it's already there for me to figure out how to do so...Confused

 

F is for FIRE, That burns down the whole town!

U is for URANIUM... BOMBS!

N is for NO SURVIVORS...

       - Plankton

LSM

 

  • Member since
    August 2006
  • From: Milwaukee, WI
Posted by Craig Kuhlow on Thursday, June 28, 2012 1:51 PM

stikpusher

Well on the third day I think I have figured out most of the stuff I want to do here. The Mobile version is mostly improved except for the lack of photos and the inability to go to the end page of threads immediately. Now lets see if the activity level picks up here.

Didn't realize the photos weren't enabled in the mobile layout.  There's no reason it can't be so I went ahead and turned it on.  They should be appearing now.  Thanks for the heads up.

  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Sonora Desert
Posted by stikpusher on Thursday, June 28, 2012 1:44 PM

Well on the third day I think I have figured out most of the stuff I want to do here. The Mobile version is mostly improved except for the lack of photos and the inability to go to the end page of threads immediately. Now lets see if the activity level picks up here.

 

F is for FIRE, That burns down the whole town!

U is for URANIUM... BOMBS!

N is for NO SURVIVORS...

       - Plankton

LSM

 

  • Member since
    April 2006
  • From: ON, Canada
Posted by jgeratic on Thursday, June 28, 2012 1:21 PM

Put me down for one of those questioning the new colour scheme.  I'm not a computer programmer, but I'm certain that colours do not effect download time.  I'm guessing the muted tones are to placate the mobile users?

The colour is not just about stimulating the senses, but provides structure to the overall layout, and I think that has failed in this new design.   Right now it is relying too heavily on the small avatars and those with graphic signatures to separate the posts.  Those G.B. badge signatures look even more overpowering now.

regards,

Jack

Moderator
  • Member since
    September 2011
Posted by Tim Kidwell on Thursday, June 28, 2012 1:19 PM

Manstein's revenge

Aaron Skinner

Manstein's revenge

Tim Kidwell

The default is for threads to open with the initial post and then subsequent posts, oldest to newest, in chronological order, as was the case with the Forum before the update. The initial post that starts a thread always appears at the top of the first page, no matter how the following posts are displayed (oldest to newest/newest to oldest).

The default is accommodating for new members. Switching this would mean erecting a barrier to people joining the Forum in the future. Current members are experienced Forum users, and are better equipped to navigate the technological hurdles presented them than the typical newbie. At present, it will remain as is.

I don't understand how that is a barrier for people to join???

That's sorta the mentality that occurs when you find your cell phone carrier is offering great deals for new subscribers but doing nothing for loyal customers they have had for years...

Manny,

As has been stated, this is the way the system works. And it was the default on the old forum software. It can be easily changed by users.

Thanks, can you post a hot-link for me to that area where I can change this feature???

Sure thing. Here's part of Craig's message from earlier in the thread with the link:

"Otherwise if you prefer to always have the replies to threads go from newest to oldest so you can see the newer replies first you can change this option in your Community Settings.  Click the 'Advanced' tab and change the default post sort order [Tim's edit: It's the first option at the top of the page].  This option was built in so that every member can have their own personal preference on how posts are ordered."

--

Timothy Kidwell
tkidwell@firecrown.com
Editor
Scale Model Brands
Firecrown Media

 

  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, June 28, 2012 11:49 AM

Aaron Skinner

Manstein's revenge

Tim Kidwell

The default is for threads to open with the initial post and then subsequent posts, oldest to newest, in chronological order, as was the case with the Forum before the update. The initial post that starts a thread always appears at the top of the first page, no matter how the following posts are displayed (oldest to newest/newest to oldest).

The default is accommodating for new members. Switching this would mean erecting a barrier to people joining the Forum in the future. Current members are experienced Forum users, and are better equipped to navigate the technological hurdles presented them than the typical newbie. At present, it will remain as is.

I don't understand how that is a barrier for people to join???

That's sorta the mentality that occurs when you find your cell phone carrier is offering great deals for new subscribers but doing nothing for loyal customers they have had for years...

Manny,

As has been stated, this is the way the system works. And it was the default on the old forum software. It can be easily changed by users.

Thanks, can you post a hot-link for me to that area where I can change this feature???

  • Member since
    November 2009
  • From: SW Virginia
Posted by Gamera on Thursday, June 28, 2012 11:13 AM

Thanks Craig, that's the biggest gripe I have with the new format, breadcrumbs at the top and bottom or an option to swap them from one end to the other would be great.

Thanks!

 

Edit: Ok it's showing up at the bottom now- great!!! YesCool

Big thank you to you sir!!!

"I dream in fire but work in clay." -Arthur Machen

 

  • Member since
    August 2006
  • From: Milwaukee, WI
Posted by Craig Kuhlow on Thursday, June 28, 2012 10:46 AM

Gamera

Guys, is there anyway to move the links menu or whatever you call this:

Ahh.. the breadcrumbs.  Yea, that's a quick and easy one.  It should be appearing at the bottom of threads now as well.

  • Member since
    November 2009
  • From: SW Virginia
Posted by Gamera on Thursday, June 28, 2012 10:43 AM

Guys, is there anyway to move the links menu or whatever you call this:

"I dream in fire but work in clay." -Arthur Machen

 

Moderator
  • Member since
    April 2006
  • From: my keyboard dreaming of being at the workbench
Posted by Aaron Skinner on Thursday, June 28, 2012 9:19 AM

Manstein's revenge

Tim Kidwell

The default is for threads to open with the initial post and then subsequent posts, oldest to newest, in chronological order, as was the case with the Forum before the update. The initial post that starts a thread always appears at the top of the first page, no matter how the following posts are displayed (oldest to newest/newest to oldest).

The default is accommodating for new members. Switching this would mean erecting a barrier to people joining the Forum in the future. Current members are experienced Forum users, and are better equipped to navigate the technological hurdles presented them than the typical newbie. At present, it will remain as is.

I don't understand how that is a barrier for people to join???

That's sorta the mentality that occurs when you find your cell phone carrier is offering great deals for new subscribers but doing nothing for loyal customers they have had for years...

Manny,

As has been stated, this is the way the system works. And it was the default on the old forum software. It can be easily changed by users.

If this issue is of concern to you, feel free to contact me directly, askinner@finescale.com, 262-796-8776 x299. I am happy to discuss this or any other problems with you.

Cheers, Aaron

Aaron Skinner

Editor

FineScale Modeler

  • Member since
    August 2006
  • From: Milwaukee, WI
Posted by Craig Kuhlow on Thursday, June 28, 2012 9:15 AM

PaperPanzer
I wish the 'Who is online?" feature was here, unless it's right under my nose?

The "Users Online" listing is still here.  It just doesn't appear to be on the thread listing pages.  I'll add that in.  It will appear in the right column below the advertisements.

Here is the direct link though to the "Users Online" listing.  Keep in mind also that community members have the option to not be displayed in this list if they do not want to.

http://cs.finescale.com/p/users_online.aspx

  • Member since
    August 2006
  • From: Milwaukee, WI
Posted by Craig Kuhlow on Thursday, June 28, 2012 9:11 AM

Manstein's revenge

I dunno...having every thread start on page 1 is a non-starter for me...IMO its just stupid to start a 27 page thread on page 1 every time you click onto it...

You have the ability to change the default behavior of how replies to threads are sorted if you want.  The first post (thread starter) will always appear at the top regardless.  The replies however can be reversed in order.  By default the replies go from oldest to newest.  You can switch this order on each individual thread by changing the sort order of replies right below the first post.  

Otherwise if you prefer to always have the replies to threads go from newest to oldest so you can see the newer replies first you can change this option in your Community Settings.  Click the "Advanced" tab and change the default post sort order.  This option was built in so that every member can have their own personal preference on how posts are ordered.

There is also a FAQ question that explains this option in more detail.  It can be found here:

http://cs.finescale.com/p/help.aspx#settings11

  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk, England
Posted by Bish on Thursday, June 28, 2012 9:07 AM

I must be, because i don't see any change in how the threads open.

I am a Norfolk man and i glory in being so

 

On the bench: Airfix 1/72nd Harrier GR.3/Fujimi 1/72nd Ju 87D-3

  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, June 28, 2012 9:04 AM

I think you are missing something...

  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk, England
Posted by Bish on Thursday, June 28, 2012 9:01 AM

I don't get this issue with threads. I don't see how anything has changed in regards to how they open. If you click on the title of a thread, it took you to the firts post. If you wanted to go to the last post, you just clicked on the last page. Now you just select last post.

This all seems exactly the same, or am i missing something.

I am a Norfolk man and i glory in being so

 

On the bench: Airfix 1/72nd Harrier GR.3/Fujimi 1/72nd Ju 87D-3

  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, June 28, 2012 8:55 AM

Tim Kidwell

The default is for threads to open with the initial post and then subsequent posts, oldest to newest, in chronological order, as was the case with the Forum before the update. The initial post that starts a thread always appears at the top of the first page, no matter how the following posts are displayed (oldest to newest/newest to oldest).

The default is accommodating for new members. Switching this would mean erecting a barrier to people joining the Forum in the future. Current members are experienced Forum users, and are better equipped to navigate the technological hurdles presented them than the typical newbie. At present, it will remain as is.

I don't understand how that is a barrier for people to join???

That's sorta the mentality that occurs when you find your cell phone carrier is offering great deals for new subscribers but doing nothing for loyal customers they have had for years...

  • Member since
    January 2012
  • From: Belgium, EU
Posted by Ninetalis on Thursday, June 28, 2012 5:25 AM

Look, this was somethin I would have done, which is also what manstein means I guess,

Photobucket

Just put the text and all closer together, this would make scrolling through the threads waaay easier and faster, I don't know if you know allready... people want everything as fast and easiest as possible...

I think your designer/programmer should know this by now...

With regards, Ninetalis

  • Member since
    November 2008
  • From: Jefferson City, MO
Posted by iraqiwildman on Wednesday, June 27, 2012 9:58 PM

Plus I like the way the emails look

Tim Wilding

  • Member since
    November 2008
  • From: Jefferson City, MO
Posted by iraqiwildman on Wednesday, June 27, 2012 9:54 PM

I like it

Tim Wilding

  • Member since
    April 2012
  • From: Thousand Oaks CA
Posted by PaperPanzer on Wednesday, June 27, 2012 7:33 PM

I wish the 'Who is online?" feature was here, unless it's right under my nose?

I also think the colors are a bit garish for my taste, more neutral in the previous version.

I also liked the total number of posts that the user submitted was right next to the avatar on every one of their posts, it helped me keep track of how many posts I had submitted, less work than clicking on "manage profile" and hunting for it... but I digress.

I recently posted pics, I find it a bit more difficult than the previous version to paste them in...

The edit/ write box for a post could stand these improvements-

1.) A "unlink" button, I don't see one here.

2.) This was a problem with the older one too, when I went to paste something on another line of text (no matter if it had been cut or copied) right- click the mouse to paste, and the whole line is highlighted, so if you click "paste" the whole line is erased.Surprise

Auctung! Panzer!

- "And now for something completely different..."- Monty Python's Flying Circus


  • Member since
    March 2006
Posted by TD4438 on Wednesday, June 27, 2012 6:27 PM

I personally have no desire to familiarize myself with this forum yet again.

  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Utereg
Posted by Borg R3-MC0 on Wednesday, June 27, 2012 4:58 PM
I have not seen the new format on my pc. But i like the fact that i can now use my iphone to acces the forum.

JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.