plumline:
Ok Hans what is your take on this subject I am paying for the name is that right.
I'm SOooo gald you asked that, lol...
Sure, you pay for the name, lol.. That's certainly worth about nothing, since EVERY kit manufacturer has sold "Monday kits"... Kits that that otherwise may be pretty good, but the copy YOU got was made and QC'd after a wild weekend or spent the weekend in a truck parked in 100-degree heat and on Monday, it's got missing/broken/warped parts... But you don't know that until you crack it open...
Been wanting to do a good kit price-rant for years, but held back (occasionally throwing a few barbs out in the hopes that some manufacturer reads here) for the most part... First observastion is that many kits have gone up considerably in the past ten years, not so much because of normal inflation, but because they've been given a face-lift here& there, a new decal sheet or two, or had some panel lines added or changed, or the manufacturer threw a fret of photo-etch and a new instruction sheet with some grainy B & W pictures of the prototype and christened it "High-Tech"...
Others have seen the success of a couple of kits, and decided, hey, let's throw in another sprue of five or six parts to allow the builder a way to make different variant, or add a metal gun barrel and we'll call it "New Kit Release"... Armor modelers have gotten sucked into this "metal gun-barrel" thing so far that it's almost pathetic... Same thing with the tracks... The "new" standard is to have all link & length, or indy-link tracks sor modelers no longer have to worry about " track-sag" (instead of simply using a dowel or two and some CA, or thread to tie them down) and are willing to pay an extra 30.00 per kit for that crap... Yet, they can't include some figures... That gimmick's how they get you to buy their "crew-figures"... Hasegawa is famous for crap like that, forcing a modeler to buy an entire weapons kit for 20-25.00 if he wants his A-10 or F-4 "bombed up"...
I also hear things like "Contest-Quality" kits... That's a BS marker right there... Contest winning kits are from the skill-sets of the modeler, not the model... Judges don't (or shouldn't) care about things like whether the cockpit is loaded with greeblies or built SOB with some stretched sprue and masking tape harnesses, and they REALLY shouldn't care if that's a Lindberg (like 'em) JN4D or a Tamigawa one.... They should only focus on the build itself, and the modeler's skills, not whether a kit has engraved panel lines (which are more often than not, WAY outta scale) or raised ones.
Manufacturers' should never come into play... And many times they don't, but it happens more than I'd like..... I've seen numerous Monogram kits take the Gold away from Dragon or Tamiya kits, much to the "high-end kit-builders' astonishment... I've butted heads with other judges over this many times in the past, since I deem "Scope of Effort" quite important in judging a kit, and when a guy scratch-builds (well, I might add) a cockpit for a Monogram Spitfire or HAWK P-51, that's worth way more points than the guy who went out and bought a replacement cockpit for it, or the guy that, all other things being equal, modifies his figures for his diorama rather than the guys who build them SOB and design a diorama arond the figures, rather than making the figures fit the diorama.. (There are exceptions, though.. Von Manstein, for instance, is a master when it comes to telling stories with stock figures)... However, I digress...
I saw a letter in a recent FSM in which a reader asks about kit prices.. FSM came back with a rationalization of how much "fun" per-hour you get with a high-dollar kit vs a round of golf or something equally un-related to the hobby... Phooey... We're modelers, not golfers... A round of golf for me would be a once a year thing, if that... I buy way more models per year than that... Frankly, if a kit costs more than a couple hours pay, fergit it... Plus, I don't keep them forever... I've got a few that're two-years old (built)... The rest last maybe six months to a year before I get sick of looking at them and tear them down... I've built well over 2000 kits in my lifetime, and I've never had more than 30 or 40 on display... Usually less, since they're all in dioramas..
When a kit costs more than a week's worth of groceries for me the wife, that's wrong... There're are "Skill Level Two" kit (made for those 12 years of age & Up) that cost 50-70 dollars... Phooey.. I ain't paying it...
Bottom line for me is that I won't pay any amount for a kit that I'm not willing to let get eaten by the cat... We, as a group, need to stop rationalizing away the stupid prices, and take back control... The kit manufacturers seem to listen when when people want MORE of something... Why wouldn't they listen when we want LESS?
Eduard has something right with their "Weekend Edition" kits... Let the guys that want all the P/E and resin Greeblies in the kits pay for them, and those of us who can scratch-build 'em (and sand a plastic gun-barrel without leaving a seam and flat spot) buy the cheaper kits...
You guys can rationlize and make excuses for the manufacturers all you want, but, IMHO, you're still getting ripped off... Plus, you aren't exactly increasing your skill-sets when you're letting someone else make all the detail parts... The skill involved in gluing a P/E part in lieu of a stritched sprue part you made yourself is nil... The skill-increase comes from making the part...
That's my take on it... It ain't gonna matter, and I'm still gonna keep building Monogram, HAWK, Revell, and Lindberg kits, my "after-market" bill will still be around a buck, and I'm still gonna walk away with the gold, lol... I done it before, lol... Watch out for Fermis too... He brings in that Lindberg PT-17of his, and the 1/48th biplane guys will be SOL, lol... Unless I bring in my Glencoe J2F Duck, lol...