The thread about the criticism of overweathering really got me thinking, and made me want to explore my own modeling philosophy. I am also curious of what makes others here tick about the hobby
When I first got bit by the modeling bug - not that long ago - I never really thought about modeling philosophy, until I read an article on DoogATX's blog (LOVE that blog, btw) about modeling philosophy. It struck me that it would be a huge benefit to me to figure out what exactly my intentions, and what I want to get out of the hobby, are
What really got my attention was that DoogATX said that he will not waste time and effort on things that will not be seen. Before reading that, I very simply considered modeling to be an act of total self-indulgence and left it at that. However, after ruminating on whether I agreed with DoogATX's stance - for myself - or not, I discovered that I agreed with it, and that I also choose not to concern myself with things that will not be seen
That brings up the ultimate philosophical question: why?
If my previous idea of self-indulgence stood, then why would I not spend the time to build the interior of a closed-up AFV? Wouldn't I experience the same joy of assembling and painting the interior as I would the outside? Why does what is viewable matter and what is not doesn't?
I found the answer to the question of enjoyment was that I wouldn't enjoy it as much knowing that it would not be appreciated by a viewer. That also answered the question of why the viewable model mattered and the non-viewable did not. Apparently I do desire appreciation of my work. There is a relationship between artist and audience
I guess it was pretty easy for me to accept this philosophy due to the great amount of joy I receive in the appreciation of others' works. Perhaps I want to be a part of that. To be respected among fellow enthusiasts? To bring someone else the same good feeling I get from seeing a lovingly tendered scale model? I see nothing wrong with that
I use the word "lovingly" purposefully, instead of something like "well-built", because the appreciation I get from nearly any expression of art is not confined to technical execution, but in the care within the act. It's the same reason why I love rock and roll music so much. While I do enjoy many highly skilled players, and appreciate flawless execution of highly sophisticated techniques, most of the stuff I love is very sloppy and simplistic. It's the spirit that speaks to me - or, more appropriately, speaks to my spirit. It is a communication from one soul to another. I know that sounds like some hippy dippy stuff, but it's absolutely how I feel, and how I appreciate art
That all being said, I would be lying if I didn't freely admit that technical brilliance deeply impresses me, and motivates me to achieve my own desired results. For my own models, I hope to be as accurate as possible, but only to a point where I don't spin my wheels. Sometimes, good enough is good enough, as long as the effort is made and the intent is honestly there. It's one thing to lazily accept anything under the umbrella of "artistic expression", and quite another to seriously consider alternatives and make a judgment call for the sake of progress. That's my philosophy anyways
Hope this made sense. My head hurts