SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

What's the most common modelers' mistake?

2505 views
21 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, July 17, 2005 10:33 PM
The greatest mistake is getting into the hobby... (And then you start spending...AND have to find a symathetic girl... Man, coke would have been a better choice: I would spend as much, but the frustration would be much, much less.)
The second greatest is to do an NMF plane... :)
  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: Rain USA, Vancouver WA
Posted by tigerman on Sunday, July 17, 2005 6:50 PM
Taking realism too seriously and forgetting what the hobby it is all about: having fun!

   http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y269/wing_nut_5o/PANZERJAGERGB.jpg

 Eric 

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: Left forever
Posted by Bgrigg on Sunday, July 17, 2005 10:21 AM
Mistake? You mean I'm only allowed one?

As my build table and kitchen table are one and the same, I would say my most common mistake is gluing or painting something just before dinner. Then having to move everything while it is still wet or curing.

Which reminds me...Breakfast is almost ready, I have to go and move my stuff!

So long folks!

  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, July 14, 2005 3:33 PM
I wonder if cell phones have a negative effect on modeling.

My biggest mistake is spilling MicroSol all over my cutting board. Turned it pale green and it still stinks. Awhile back on Hyperscale there was a topic relating to the use of MicroSet and MicroSol and one guy started a chain of people who admitted to have spilled one of them.
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, July 14, 2005 10:28 AM
The biggest mistake is: Don't drink and model. I've ruined a few kits that way.

Dan
  • Member since
    November 2004
  • From: Seminole, OK
Posted by hwells on Thursday, July 14, 2005 8:52 AM
Vapo, I can tell the difference. I build for me and I also enter contests. The model I as talking about had a ton of aftermarket stuff in and on it. That part was expertly done, better than I can do. But when you looked at the running gear from the front, the wheel were not in alignment. Also, there were some gravity defying roadwheels, and the tracks were tied together with string that was right smack in the middle of an open space between the wheels.

When you looked at the detail that was added to the model, that was awesome, but when you looked at the build as a whole, it had a lot of basic construction problems. All I'm trying to say is what the title of this tread asks for.

Ajlafleche summed it up pretty good. I have only been judging for about three or four years, but it does help me to try to be a better modeler. It gives me a chance to see how other builders are getting it done.
'Go ahead, poke it with a stick, it ain't gonna bite'
  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Massachusetts
Posted by ajlafleche on Thursday, July 14, 2005 8:11 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by maxx1969

QUOTE: Originally posted by ag918w35

I realize that at the most rareified levels of competition you have to have some way to distinguish one totally amazing model from another, but it seems like there isn't any other reason to worry about this sort of thing. Realizing that this is somewhat like questioning political and/or religious beliefs, can somebody explain the thinking here?


It's all fun and games until they pull out that dental mirrorDisapprove [V]. I have never seen any models gone over like they do at IPMS shows. It's major points for something like that. I kinda feel like hey give the guy a break, but in most cases it really comes down to rushing a build that leads to those kind of errors. You could think of it like building a brand new house that only has siding on the front because thats all people will see driving by.


I've been judging at contests for 20 years. Just about every event requires we choose the top 3 models on the tabel. AMPS and figure oriented events use a open system which is somewhat different. Sometimes, choosing the top three is quite easy. Most often, however, it involves some serious comparing of relative qualities. Sometimes, these are three super models and other times it's which are the least bad. In this type of competition, there is no cutting a break. The builder who does the best overall job, gets first. That's what's fair. If two models are equal on top and one has filled or no motor holes and the other has open motor holes, who do you think should come out on top? If I only correct the seams on the top of my plane and leave canyons on the bottom, should I get a higher award then the guy next to me who corrected both? It's no different from racing. If two cars average 190 MPH while on the track but one has to pit more often, who do you think gets the win?
As to dental mirrors (I don't have one but I do use a flashlight to compensate for often poor venue lighting) they would not be necessary of the model were to be picked up.
However, if you choose not to compete and only want to look at the top of youor models, leaving the bottoms unfinished is all up to you.

Remember, if the women don't find you handsome, they should at least find you handy.

  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, July 13, 2005 8:47 PM
I think you need to make the distinction between people who build for pleasure and people who build for competition? It's very much like photography in theat respect. I build and photograph for me, I don't do competitions, as the only person who needs to think it's good is me! If I don't like it, it won't get shown to anyone.
As for pifalls and mistakes? look, it's a skill, an art, it takes years of learning to achieve first class results, look at andys Ferrari if you doubt that statement! I would love to finish a model to that level, but I know my skill/patiance/ time available, simply would not allow it, so I have to settle at a level that A) lets me finish a model, and B)allows me to progress my hobby at a pace I can sustain in terms of time/money etc.
Each and every one of us, WILL fail at some point, in some way(or is it just me again?)
  • Member since
    November 2004
  • From: Seminole, OK
Posted by hwells on Wednesday, July 13, 2005 5:13 PM
i've judged with people who go after that with gusto. I agree with AG up there, can't see it, ain't there. Now what I do look for is wheel and track alignment. I remember a particular spg at a contest a few years ago. It was very well done, complete interior, open engine hatches, all the bells and whistles. What kept it from placing high was the wheels and tracks. All that work with resin and PE were nullified becuase the builder didn't put the same amount of effort into the running gear.
'Go ahead, poke it with a stick, it ain't gonna bite'
  • Member since
    May 2004
  • From: Oregon
Posted by maxx1969 on Wednesday, July 13, 2005 4:56 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by ag918w35

I realize that at the most rareified levels of competition you have to have some way to distinguish one totally amazing model from another, but it seems like there isn't any other reason to worry about this sort of thing. Realizing that this is somewhat like questioning political and/or religious beliefs, can somebody explain the thinking here?


It's all fun and games until they pull out that dental mirrorDisapprove [V]. I have never seen any models gone over like they do at IPMS shows. It's major points for something like that. I kinda feel like hey give the guy a break, but in most cases it really comes down to rushing a build that leads to those kind of errors. You could think of it like building a brand new house that only has siding on the front because thats all people will see driving by.
~Matt T Meyer
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, July 13, 2005 4:00 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by maxx1969
I was talking to one of the judges at an IPMS event about this and then I started to notice it to:

People who spend countless hours, tons of research, everything is perfect...except that power slot that didn't get filled on the bottom of their tank.


I was reading one of the "how to" books this past weekend and it was talking about the need to fill in the holes in the bottom of kits (e.g. the older Tamiya ones designed for powering). I'm originally from the model railroad world where one of the rules is "do not model what you cannot see." So, given that I'm not going to be able to put any sort of realistic bottom on my tank (nor do I need to unless it's been blown into a ditch or something) I'm not sure I see the point to this.

I realize that at the most rareified levels of competition you have to have some way to distinguish one totally amazing model from another, but it seems like there isn't any other reason to worry about this sort of thing. Realizing that this is somewhat like questioning political and/or religious beliefs, can somebody explain the thinking here?
  • Member since
    May 2004
  • From: Oregon
Posted by maxx1969 on Wednesday, July 13, 2005 2:46 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by styrene

THE most common problem is taking up the hobby in the first place! :)

Gip Winecoff


Laugh [(-D]

I was talking to one of the judges at an IPMS event about this and then I started to notice it to:

People who spend countless hours, tons of research, everything is perfect...except that power slot that didn't get filled on the bottom of their tank.
~Matt T Meyer
  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: 37deg 40.13' N 95deg 29.10'W
Posted by scottrc on Wednesday, July 13, 2005 2:00 PM
Forgetting that I'm using CA instead of plastic cement and wipe excess CA glue with my index finger.


Then scratch my noseDunce [D)]Oops [oops]

  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Pensacola, FL
Posted by Foster7155 on Wednesday, July 13, 2005 11:38 AM
From the construction angle, I have to agree with poor seam work and improper decal application as the two most common mistakes.

However, many of these problems can all be traced back to either impatience during constuction, the modeler trying to do too much, too soon (inexperience), or just using poor or incorrect techniques.

I think it's difficult to generalize just one "most common" or "biggest" mistake. One modeler's "common" mistake is just another modeler's relatively simple step in construction...it all depends on the kit and the modeler.

Robert Foster

Pensacola Modeleers

  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: Northern Indiana
Posted by overkillphil on Wednesday, July 13, 2005 11:10 AM
Definitely have to go with impatience. Cutting little corners may not always result in disasters, but they will erode the quality of the finished product quickly.
my favorite headache/current project: 1/48 Panda F-35 "I love the fact that dumb people don't know who they are. I hope I'm not one of them" -Scott Adams
  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: The flat lands of the Southeast
Posted by styrene on Wednesday, July 13, 2005 10:44 AM
THE most common problem is taking up the hobby in the first place! :)

Gip Winecoff

1882: "God is dead"--F. Nietzsche

1900: "Nietzsche is dead"--God

  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: A Spartan in the Wolverine State
Posted by rjkplasticmod on Wednesday, July 13, 2005 9:53 AM
From the models I've seen, both posted on the Net & in real life, improper seam filling & decal silvering seem to be the most common mistakes.

Regards, Rick
RICK At My Age, I've Seen It All, Done It All, But I Don't Remember It All...
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, July 13, 2005 9:05 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Macio4ever

I think that the biggest one is:

to be unpatient...

In my case it always causes a lots of troubles.

Macio



I have to agree - rushing things is almost always a receipe for disaster. I find it helps to have several different projects in the works so that I can do some work on one and then set it aside for everything to dry, etc. before charging ahead to the next one.

Having said that, just last night I plowed ahead on a figure painting project that really needed more drying time between coats. Rather than getting nice highlights and shadows I have a solid layer of mud Sad [:(] Live and learn (hopefully)
  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: Tochigi, Japan
Posted by J-Hulk on Wednesday, July 13, 2005 8:41 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Rob Gronovius
Drives me nuts when I putty and sand a seam then after I hit it with primer it shows a spot where I missed.


Isn't that the normal procedure? Wink [;)]

That's what I go through every time...Sad [:(]
~Brian
  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Warsaw, Poland
Posted by Macio4ever on Wednesday, July 13, 2005 8:05 AM
I think that the biggest one is:

to be unpatient...

In my case it always causes a lots of troubles.

Macio

Macio4ever http://www.macio4ever.net
  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Fort Knox
Posted by Rob Gronovius on Wednesday, July 13, 2005 5:27 AM
Most common has to do with seams. Either not filing the seams down to match (like on a gun tube or fuselage) or leaving a gap at the seam (like at a wing root or where two hull pieces meet).

Drives me nuts when I putty and sand a seam then after I hit it with primer it shows a spot where I missed.
  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Philippines
What's the most common modelers' mistake?
Posted by nkm1416@info.com.ph on Wednesday, July 13, 2005 5:24 AM
Forgetting the nose weight, applying decal upside down, interchanging the left and right part? Let' hear from the guys and gals here

Question B: What is the biggest mistake that a modeler can make?

JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.