SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

UH-1B/C RAN....help needed.

16160 views
39 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    February 2007
UH-1B/C RAN....help needed.
Posted by Boomerang on Friday, September 28, 2007 9:50 PM

   G'day all. I am building a UH-1B/C for the ADF Group Build. Can any body here help with pics of the roof area. I was hoping someone here may have some pics of the winch that is on the right side of the roof too.......

   With thanks ........

   Boomer...

  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Valrico, FL
Posted by HeavyArty on Friday, September 28, 2007 10:54 PM

Here are a few pics that show the roof area and winch.  This one looks like a Naval model, but is still the same basic set-up. 

Hope that helps.

Gino P. Quintiliani - Field Artillery - The KING of BATTLE!!!

Check out my Gallery: https://app.photobucket.com/u/HeavyArty

"People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf." -- George Orwell

  • Member since
    February 2007
Posted by Boomerang on Friday, September 28, 2007 11:17 PM

   Thanks very much Gino. I have a few pictures in my collection and they are mostly like yours. Distant shots that don't show lots of detail. 898 is the bird that i want to build. It serves with the RAN Historic Flight and i have seen it at airshows before. I am not sure if it is still flying. I may pay the RAN Museum at HMAS Albatross a visit over Xmas and get some close ups. 

   Any pics are good pics, so again, thanks so much!!

   Boomer...

  • Member since
    June 2003
Posted by supercobra on Saturday, September 29, 2007 8:14 AM
I don't know anything about these RAN models but from pictures Gino posted it looks like the same hoist setup as the UH-1E, TH-1L, and some HH-1Ks.  Do a search for those.  I posted a bunch of those pics on ARC awhile back.
  • Member since
    January 2007
  • From: Auburn, Alabama
Posted by rotorwash on Saturday, September 29, 2007 8:22 PM

Boomer,

   My records show the Australian Navy purchasing both UH-1B's and UH-1C's but not UH-1L, TH-1L, UH-1E's or HH-1K's.  In any event, the kit you will modify should be a UH-1B and NOT a UH-1C.  The photos of 898 clearly show the narrow chord horizontal stabs, narrow chord blade, blade counterweights, and nose mounted pitot tube characteristic of the B model.  There is no kit of the TH-1L, UH-1L, HH-1K or UH-1E in any scale that I am aware of.  The rescue hoist is exactly the same as that seen on UH-1E's, HH-1K's, etc.  Here is a photo page with at least one decent shot of the hoist:

http://apma.org.au/reference/ranfaa/huey/huey.html 

Also, 898 has the later style particle seperator instead of the bell mouth intake seen in most of the pics in the link above.  Let us know what scale you are building in and maybe we can point you to the right kits.  In any event, your bird will basically be a B model with a rescue hoist.  Here are a roof shot of a B model:

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket" border="0" />

Here's a closeup of the particle seperator on a UH-1M (UH-1C with T53-L13 engine).  This type seperator was also retrofitted to B models:

[img]http://Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket[

Let us know the specifics of what you need and someone here will surely post more pics.  Also try searching the forum for the Navy and Marine Hueys (check the Huey Links thread).  Good luck with your build and keep us posted!

   Ray
 

 

  • Member since
    February 2007
Posted by Boomerang on Sunday, September 30, 2007 8:27 PM

  Thanks for the help so far guys..

  The kit i have is the old Monogram Huey Hog in 1/48 scale. It is an old kit and needs lots of clean up and TLC.  As far as i can see it close enough to a RAN UH-1B. Adding the roof hoist and motor housing should make it look more like a RAN bird.

  Someone from here sent me an email to my private address with some very useful pics and diagrams. One pic i already have in my collection, but your line drawings were perfect. Thanks whoever you are on here..........lol. Here they are....

  Line drawings of the hoist set up...

 

   And a great shot of the roof. This is a C model right?

 

  Rotorwash.....  Thanks for the pics. The first one didn't come out though. You mentioned about the narrow chord stabs and rotors. What does the Monogram kit have in it? I would not be able to tell the difference myself.

 

   Boomer...

  • Member since
    January 2007
  • From: Auburn, Alabama
Posted by rotorwash on Sunday, September 30, 2007 9:53 PM

Boomer,

  When you say the first pic didn't come out, do you mean the picture of the UH-1B roof or the link to the pictures?

Assuming the RAN never got the Marine or Navy Huey models mentioned earlier, the photo  is of a UH-1B with a roof mounted winch.  It is definitely not a Charlie model.  There is no roof mounted pitot (charcteristic of the C model) and the rotor head is the typical 204 rotor head found on Bravos as opposed to the 540 rotor charcteristic of the Charlie.  Also note that this bird has the bell mouth intake not the particle separator found on the bird you are building.

  So your building in 1/48.  The monogram kit is an OK starting point, but you have some mods to make in order to get an accurate B model.  Unfortunately, the kit is a mixture of both B and C features.  There are several threads on this forum dealing with converting the HUEY HOG to either a B or C, but here are a few tips.  First off, your lucky in my estimation that you are building a Bravo.  The kit comes with a B model tail and horizontal stabs.  The roof mounted pitot tube should be left off and a nose mounted one scratchbuilt.  The particle seperator for your bird is also in the kit.  The one major issue is the rotor.  the rotor that comes in the kit is the 540 rotor found on Charlies but not on Bravos.  The B model also has a rotor chord of 21 inches vs. 27 inches for the C model.   My suggestion is to get a rotor from a UH-1D ESCI or Italeri kit.  The rotor head will work great and the blade is the right chord.  Unfortunately, the diameter of the blades are 4 scale feet too long (44ft-B model vs. 48 ft.-D model).  Other than shortening the blades,  you only need to add the blade counterweights and you are in buissness.  If you need pics of some of this stuff, just give a holler.  good luck!

    Ray
 

  • Member since
    February 2007
Posted by Boomerang on Monday, October 1, 2007 7:34 AM

  Well, now i am really not sure what is a B or what is a C when it comes to RAN Huey's......lol. You say that pic of the crashed 895 is not a C because it does not have a roof mounted pitot. Other references i have showing C models don't have roof mounted pitot's either. They show a single small pitot just below the co-pilots windscreen.........the more pics i find the harder it is to tell. It appears that either air intake system could be fitted to eithe model. One of my references states that the C was quite rare.

  My HAWKEYE MODELS decal sheet shows 895 as a C model but with a filter intake instead of a scoop. The book VAMPIRE, MACCHI AND IROQUOIS IN AUSTRALIAN SERVICE shows it(and incidentally as a C model) with a scoop as in the crash photo. So i am confused.....Sigh [sigh]

 

  Its a bummer about the rotor. I had the old Esci UH-1D years ago. It got broken up and went to model heaven. Just proves you should never throw anything out! Ok, just to set the story straight. It went out in a blaze of glory. It was hovering above my bed and was taken out by enemy AA (mum making my bed...lol). A total write off. 

  Right then, i am set on modelling 898. It is close to the kit i have and being on the airshow circuit for years, there are plenty of pics around.

  Oh by the way Rotorwash, your post had a square with a red box in it. I just assumed that one of your pics didn't turn out.

  Boomer...

  • Member since
    February 2007
Posted by Boomerang on Monday, October 1, 2007 8:01 AM

   These pics of 893 and 898 also show an antenna of some sort on the roof. It is not present on all RAN Huey's either. Just another something to confuse me......LOL.  Banged Head [banghead]

  

  

   Oh, i did read somwhere once, another forum maybe or another site that white ensgins were never on the drop tanks. 893 has them.....Thumbs Up [tup]

   Boomer...

  • Member since
    January 2007
  • From: Auburn, Alabama
Posted by rotorwash on Monday, October 1, 2007 8:25 AM

Boomer,

  I feel you pain about the confusion between B and C models.  I was trying to keep things simple.  The earliest C models had the bell mouth intake, however, NO C model that I have ever seen had a nose mounted pitot and NO B model I have ever seen had a roof mounted pitot. I will never say never because somebody will surely post a pic proving me wrong, but it's as close to a rule as I can find.  The one feature that will definitively distinguish a B from a C is the fuel filler location.  The Bravo has the fuel filler on the right side and the Charlie has the fuel filler on the left side.  Also, the 540 rotor system is significantly different from the 204 rotor system.  There are many misslabeled photos in refs so you have to be careful.  For instance, many UH-1B's suffered from cracked tail booms during Vietnam.  Many of these were replaced with UH-1C tailbooms which had a wider chord tail.  However, these birds still retained the narrow chord horizontal stabs and the 204 rotor system of a B model.  Also, the particle seperator was used on both B and C models even though some refs indicate it was a difference between the two.  Nose mounted FM antennae on US Army birds were found mostly on UH-1B's.  However, UH-1C's early in production had them as well.  There is no way to give you all the info you probably want in a few paragraphs.  All of this stuff has been hashed out here in the forums and your best bet is to go to the Huey Threads link and start surfing.  There are tons of photos with good documentation that will help you learn the differences between the two.  By the way, you are correct that Charlie models were less common than Bravos.  The C model was an interim model between the B model and the AH-1G Cobra gunship.  That is one reason why I don't think the RAN ever flew Charlies, at least until after VN.  Like I say, though, I Never say Never!

    Good luck,

           Ray
 

  • Member since
    January 2007
  • From: Auburn, Alabama
Posted by rotorwash on Monday, October 1, 2007 8:39 AM

[img]http://Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

Boomer,

  I'm not sure exactly which antenna that is on the roof.  However, here are the features that identify this bird as a UH-1B (again assuming that the RAN didn't get any Navy or Marine Hueys).   The blue arrow points to the blade counterweights.  The yellow arrow to the symmetrical narrow chord horizontal stabs.  The green arrow points to the nose mounted pitot. Fianlly, the red arrow points to teh right handed fuel filler cap.  This bird is defnitely NOT a Charlie model.  I hope that helps.

     Ray
 

  • Member since
    February 2007
Posted by Boomerang on Thursday, October 4, 2007 4:54 AM

   Thanks for all your info and pics Rotorwash. Also thank you for your patience and time you have put into your posts. I am very grateful and it has helped me very much.

    THANK YOU....Make a Toast [#toast]

   Boomer...

  • Member since
    January 2007
  • From: Auburn, Alabama
Posted by rotorwash on Thursday, October 4, 2007 7:23 AM

Boomer,

  My pleasure, Mate.  Keep us informed of your progress.  Good luck with the build!

            Ray

  • Member since
    October 2007
Posted by EXBIRDY on Monday, October 15, 2007 9:17 PM

The RAAF and RAN early Hueys were standard UH-1B's. The only different ones were navy 894 & 898 which had the C model fuel tank arrangement. The filler cap was on the left hand side and the tank on that side was extended to the top of the cabin door in height. The winch was the same as used on the UH-1E and other US navy and marine rescue versions. I have some photos and drawings which I will dig out and post.

John

  • Member since
    February 2007
Posted by Boomerang on Saturday, October 20, 2007 8:43 PM

   Thanks EXBIRDY. Thanks for your private email too. I appreciate all the help given to me so far. And if you have any pics, well, any reference material is always usefull. So please post them, that would be great.

   My build is slow. The fit of this kit i have is not real great.....lol. Putting up a bit of a chalenge. A lot of trial fitting and trimming going on.......Banged Head [banghead].

   Boomer...

BMK
  • Member since
    January 2007
  • From: Adelaide Australia
Posted by BMK on Thursday, October 25, 2007 9:20 PM

 

Boomer 

I've got a few overhead photos if needed. contact me off line as I don't know how to post photos here on the site.

 Brian

Brian

"I start to many and finish none"

  • Member since
    October 2007
Posted by EXBIRDY on Saturday, October 27, 2007 9:39 PM

Here is a link to some of my photos. The close up shots I found on the web. I am uploading more soon.

http://s197.photobucket.com/albums/aa78/JJELLIS_PHOTO/

John

  • Member since
    February 2007
Posted by Boomerang on Wednesday, October 31, 2007 4:12 AM

     EXRIRDY.......  Thanks for the link to your photos. I am curious. The two clour close up's, what model Huey are they from? I noticed that the close up of the winch motor housing shows that the housing protrudes over the green roof glazing. Pictures of RAN birds i have show the housing set further back. Those two pics are great though, they show some good detail........

     BMK.......  thanks for the offer of the pictures you have. I have emailed you....

    Boomer...

  • Member since
    November 2007
Posted by aussiemodeler on Wednesday, November 7, 2007 2:24 AM

Just read Stewart Wilson's vampire,macchiand iroquois in aus servise and it states the RAN took charge of 7 iroquois 3 bravo's and 4 charlie's the b model number codes are 857 887 897. the c model codes are 893 894 895 898.  the c model has 2 tiny what seem to be arial's just in front of the bottom of the 2 windscreens near the middle! thay also have no "towel rack" antanae and the pitot tube on the roof.  the winch is the pitot is in the same place as the uh-1D the c also has a small fin type antanae just in front of the beacon light on top of the exhaust cowling.  RAN #898 is the only charlie that has the defused grill on the intake! it also hlate in its career have the late uhf fm antanae on the roof like the uh-1H anything else please ask! cheers ind the spelling just had an op on my brain so unless its in fron of me i can't spell proper yet too well! cheers

  • Member since
    December 2002
Posted by Hatter50 on Wednesday, November 7, 2007 5:53 AM

Aussiemodeler,

Your source may very well be correct, as long as the Navy moved number codes around between aircraft (to confuse the enemy Big Smile [:D] ).  I say that because in the photos posted above, at least 893 and 898 are UH-1Bs.  The evidence is in the rotorheads.  These are early 204 heads (with the counter weights) and not the 540 head that is the defining difference of the "C" model.  You can add and remove "fiddlies" all over it but it's all in the rotorhead that makes the difference (other assorted differences included of course).

Regards
Steve

  • Member since
    January 2007
  • From: Auburn, Alabama
Posted by rotorwash on Wednesday, November 7, 2007 9:22 AM

   I agree with Steve about the RAN birds being B models.  There is no way those birds are Charlies.  It's more than just the rotorhead (although that seals the deal). Its the horizontal stabs, tail, pitot tube and fuel filler loactions.  Unless those numbers were used on other birds, the ones you listed as C models are ALL Bravos or bravo derivatives (check pics of those birds in this thread).  Sorry that the refs apparently have that mixed up.  As I mentioned before, it is unlikely that the US would have parted with any Charlies until after VN, at least. Also, there were comparatively few Charlies built in the first place. 

    Ray
 

  • Member since
    February 2007
Posted by Boomerang on Thursday, November 8, 2007 1:37 AM

   The references sure are confusing Sigh [sigh]. I have deduced from all that has been posted here that i am building a UH-1C, not a B model as i thought....Laugh [(-D]. The main differences seem to be the fuel fillers and the rotorheads, after that, it all gets too confusing. Aerials and pitot tubes seem to change with no rhyme or reason with the different models.

   Anyway, i am building a C model and thats final!....Whistling [:-^]

   Boomer...

  • Member since
    November 2007
Posted by aussiemodeler on Thursday, November 8, 2007 5:25 AM
very wise booma! the australian govenment has never ordered anything"out of the box" and so seems our C model iroqui's i vagely remember speaking to an ex RAN chopper pilot who is a friend of the family and he said to me he flew one of the RAN's charlie's so thats why i was so addament, but i have not got the eye to notice the rotors or other "confermable's" i was going on what i knew  and read in black and white! is ther any chance the govenment skimped and used the older b model parts on the "c"????
  • Member since
    January 2007
  • From: Auburn, Alabama
Posted by rotorwash on Thursday, November 8, 2007 8:04 AM

Boomer and aussiemodeler,

  You guys build to please yourself.  If you want to build a D model RAN bird that's fine.  Just have fun!  Steve and I were just trying to help as best we can from our side of the pond.  I will tell you that NONE of the pics that are posted in this thread show a single Charlie model feature.  I hope the build goes well and keep us posted.

     Ray

  • Member since
    January 2007
  • From: Auburn, Alabama
Posted by rotorwash on Thursday, November 8, 2007 8:25 PM

Boomer, Check this site:

http://www.adf-serials.com/3a2.shtml

It gives serials for RAAF Hueys and the Codes used by the RAN for their birds. Here is the entry fr the ship you say you are interested in building:

N9-883UH-1B63-12955883Delivered 05/64. RAN Code:858/898. Served with 723 Sqn RAN. Crashed 11/11/64. Near Jervis Bay NSW. Flown by Leut(P) G.O'Day RAN and a pupil. Crashed among trees near Jervis Bay Airfield when pilot was demonstrating a forced landing. Pilot seriously injured but recovered. Aircraft written off.

You will also notice that there are NO Uh-1C's listed in the RAAF, Army, or RAN enventory.  I hope that helps.

    Ray
 

  • Member since
    January 2007
  • From: Auburn, Alabama
Posted by rotorwash on Thursday, November 8, 2007 9:01 PM

It occurs to me that those reading this thread trying to decide whether they are looking at a Bravo or a Charlie model haven't seen a C model posted here yet.  So for comparisons sake, her first are two B models:

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

[img]http://Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket" border="0" />

Here are a couple of C models fr comparison:

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket" border="0" />

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket" border="0" />

Compare the following features between the B and C models:  Rotoheads- 204 rotor in B model vs. 540 rotor in C model, Rotor chord- 21 inches in B model vs. 27 inches in C model, Pitot tube- On the nose in the B model vs. on the roof in the C model, Tail fin- marrow in the B model vs. much wider in the C model, Horizontal stabs- Narrow with symmetrical airfoil in the B model vs. Wide with assymetrical airfoil in the C model, Fuel filler- on the right in the B model vs on the leaft in the C model.  Those are the best characters I know of for differentiating teh two models.  Maybe this will help clear up some of the confusion.

    Ray

  • Member since
    November 2007
Posted by aussiemodeler on Monday, November 19, 2007 4:08 AM
rotorwash!! i wasn't being rude or anything like that!!! i was simply suggesting the fact the adf has never stuck to the norm! i also since read another book made by the adf which never mentioned charlies!!! and like i said early on i have no idea about rotory wing aircraft!!!!!! cheers
  • Member since
    January 2007
  • From: Auburn, Alabama
Posted by rotorwash on Monday, November 19, 2007 9:06 AM

Aussiemodeler,

  No offense taken, man.  Posting is so impersonal, but I promise that I wasn't upset.  I know how frustrating refs on Hueys can be, trust me.  I was just trying to help out the other guys who read this thread that are also having a hard time sorting out the details.  I guess I have to start using the emoticons again Cool [8D].  See now doesn't that just make a statement look happier!  Good luck with your build!Make a Toast [#toast]

     Ray 

  • Member since
    November 2007
Posted by aussiemodeler on Tuesday, November 20, 2007 5:54 AM
cheers rotorwash!!! Big Smile [:D] am a bit peeved with the "new" details , need to move the fuel filler some how make a new main rotor and downsize the tailplane, drat!! oh well thats modeling. does anyone know of a rescue crane for the uh1e? thank you.
  • Member since
    January 2007
  • From: Auburn, Alabama
Posted by rotorwash on Tuesday, November 20, 2007 8:09 AM

Aussiemodeler,

  Which kit ya building?


               Ray

JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.