SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

Allison 501 turboprop - Completed!

6988 views
56 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    November 2009
  • From: Twin Cities of Minnesota
Posted by Don Stauffer on Sunday, July 12, 2020 2:56 PM

Got the reduction gear unit connected to the compressor/turbine unit now.  Also all the bubbles, bangles and beads on the outside.  Working on a display base and mount now.

 

Don Stauffer in Minnesota

  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Northern California
Posted by jeaton01 on Wednesday, July 15, 2020 3:40 PM

Don Stauffer

 There were gas turbine/turboshafts of a thousand horsepower driving locomotives in Europe before the Whittle and Von Ohain engines first ran.  The turbojet did not precede the turboshaft.

 

I believe the train engines were steam turbines, Don.  They just ran steam from a separate boiler through a power turbine to put power to the wheels.  The stumbling block for all gas turbines was the power section and it's high temperatures, which a steam turbine does not experience.  The reason the Me 262 engines were so unreliable was that Germany did not have advanced enough metallurgy to build the power sections.  General Electric, through it's experience with turbochargers, added the factor that made early US turbines work, and that transferred back to Great Britain.  Rolls Royce was also a factor in that after they took over Power Jets (Whittle) they aded their expertise with compressor design, which they were probably the best at in the world at the time.  Until Rolls Royce sold the Nene to the USSR they were still working with the German level of technology.   The Klimov KV-1 in the MiG 15 was the Nene with some development.

John

To see build logs for my models:  http://goldeneramodel.com/mymodels/mymodels.html

 

  • Member since
    September 2012
Posted by GMorrison on Wednesday, July 15, 2020 4:07 PM

The Union Pacific had a fleet of true gas turbine powered locomotives in the 1950's.

They were three section sets, including a fuel tender.

For freight service only through the lonely lands of Wyoming.

There were fifty five total.

Train men called them the "Big Blow".

 Modeling is an excuse to buy books.

 

  • Member since
    November 2009
  • From: Twin Cities of Minnesota
Posted by Don Stauffer on Thursday, July 16, 2020 8:37 AM

jeaton01

 

 
Don Stauffer

 There were gas turbine/turboshafts of a thousand horsepower driving locomotives in Europe before the Whittle and Von Ohain engines first ran.  The turbojet did not precede the turboshaft.

 

 

I believe the train engines were steam turbines, Don.  They just ran steam from a separate boiler through a power turbine to put power to the wheels.  The stumbling block for all gas turbines was the power section and it's high temperatures, which a steam turbine does not experience.  The reason the Me 262 engines were so unreliable was that Germany did not have advanced enough metallurgy to build the power sections.  General Electric, through it's experience with turbochargers, added the factor that made early US turbines work, and that transferred back to Great Britain.  Rolls Royce was also a factor in that after they took over Power Jets (Whittle) they aded their expertise with compressor design, which they were probably the best at in the world at the time.  Until Rolls Royce sold the Nene to the USSR they were still working with the German level of technology.   The Klimov KV-1 in the MiG 15 was the Nene with some development.

 

No, they were gas turbines, used in Switzerland.  I believe Brown Boveri was the manufacturer.  There was one used in US also, used to drive blower in steel mill.

 

Don Stauffer in Minnesota

  • Member since
    May 2013
  • From: Indiana, USA
Posted by Greg on Thursday, July 16, 2020 9:11 AM

You are doing a fine job on that Allison engine, Don. Looks good. Impressed with the painting, very convincing. Yes

 

 

 

  • Member since
    June 2017
Posted by Chemteacher on Thursday, July 16, 2020 10:07 AM
Hey, that’s awesome! It looks like it made out of metal. I can’t wait to see the finished product.

On the bench: Revell-USS Arizona; Airfix P-51D in 1/72

  • Member since
    March 2015
  • From: Close to Chicago
Posted by JohnnyK on Thursday, July 16, 2020 10:15 AM

Great paint job.

Your comments and questions are always welcome.

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • From: Formerly Bryan, now Arlington, Texas
Posted by CapnMac82 on Saturday, July 18, 2020 5:48 PM

jeaton01
I believe the train engines were steam turbines, Don.

Actually ships were the first to use turbines over pistons, and that change was about 1910-1920.  However, the naval steam turbines needed significant (read heavy) reduction gear to get to the low RPM needed at the shafts of ships.

The reciprocating driving arms for train locomotives was highly mature.  It also defined how periodic maintenance was done, too.  The "final drive" on steam locomotives was all on the outboard side of the driving wheels.  To have gone to shaft-driven wheels, the axle, and all the needed differentials would have to be between the wheels.  A realitively inaccessible area.  Also one subject to a lot of heat.

So, until electric final drive motors wer introduced, there was no reason to change from the single expansion piston used.  (There were experiements to double-expansion pistons, but they just added complexity for little gain.) 

UP's gas turbine locos just drove a generator, which gave them electric power to pass to the trucks.  They were supremely loud, and not terribly fuel efficient, for the horsepower delivered to the generator.  Now, they had fewer parts than the V-12 and V-18 diesels.  But the diesels idled better, were more familiar to the maintenance sheds & crews.

Getting an aviation-weight/efficient turbine would wait for Whittle (and his competitor over at Heinkle) in 1938.  And, even then, they did not have enough practical knowledge, acquired from use, to know just how much horsepower the power turbine could actually generate.  So, the early turbines just had inefficient compressor sections.

  • Member since
    November 2009
  • From: Twin Cities of Minnesota
Posted by Don Stauffer on Sunday, July 19, 2020 1:53 PM

Completed the model yesterday.  Sorry for the poor picture.  It is a quick grab shot in my workshot.  Today is not outside photography weather.  High heat index and very windy.  Should get nicer tomorrow or Tuesday.  I'll try to get an outdoor studio shot then.

 

To further the history discussions, yes, the success of Turbinia caused engineers all over the world to believe that a heated air turbine would, like the steam turbine, create a lighter, smaller prime mover.  First attempts used reciprocating engines to drive reciprocating compressors and free piston burners.  Low efficiency of existing IC engines and compressors made the results horribly heavy and fuel guzzlers.  GE in the US and B-B in Europe did do some preliminary work, both for locomotive engines, and B-B also for stationary power plants.  Continued work on compressor design, primarily rotary compressors, led to eventual success (with some metallurgy and cooling system schemes important too).

Don Stauffer in Minnesota

  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: Northeast WA State
Posted by armornut on Sunday, July 19, 2020 2:41 PM

   Nice finish Don, thanks for the history lesson too, neat thread and an excellent build.

we're modelers it's what we do

  • Member since
    May 2020
  • From: North East of England
Posted by Hutch6390 on Sunday, July 19, 2020 2:58 PM

Hi, Don - that engine looks like you've been spending some time with a milling machine - the finish is excellent!  I am also enjoying being educated by the conversation that's running alongside your build - there are some clever people out there.

And thank you for mentioning Turbinia - I live in the city where she was built, and where she now resides (in the Discovery Museum).  She fits the "if it looks right, it is right" criterion perfectly.  As an aside, my father completed his apprenticeship at Parsons' engineering works, but not as you might expect - he became a carpenter (we call them joiners).

Keep up the good work & thanks for sharing.

Vell, Zaphod's just zis guy, you know?

   

TakkaTakkaTakkaTakkaTakkaTakka

 

fox
  • Member since
    January 2007
  • From: Narvon, Pa.
Posted by fox on Sunday, July 19, 2020 9:48 PM

Great build Don!

Jim Captain

Stay Safe.

 Main WIP: 

   On the Bench: Artesania Latina  (aka) Artists in the Latrine 1/75 Bluenose II

I keep hitting "escape", but I'm still here.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: USA
Posted by keavdog on Sunday, July 19, 2020 10:14 PM

Great looking model and what a wonderful addition to your engines.  Pretty big model by the looks of it.  Now, wrap a plan around it ;)

Thanks,

John

  • Member since
    November 2009
  • From: Twin Cities of Minnesota
Posted by Don Stauffer on Tuesday, July 21, 2020 4:16 PM

Got  some sun and a decent temperature today, so took my portable studio and the model out to the backyard and got a better shot, though the model is almost too big for the studio bench.

Don Stauffer in Minnesota

  • Member since
    June 2008
Posted by lewbud on Tuesday, July 21, 2020 4:48 PM

Well done Don!

Buddy- Those who say there are no stupid questions have never worked in customer service.

  • Member since
    May 2011
  • From: Honolulu, Hawaii
Posted by Real G on Tuesday, July 21, 2020 5:31 PM

That turned out great Don!

Now about the other 3 engines and the C-130...  Wink

“Ya ya ya, unicorn papoi!”

  • Member since
    August 2019
  • From: Central Oregon
Posted by HooYah Deep Sea on Tuesday, July 21, 2020 7:56 PM

No, three more and an AC-130! More bang for ther buck!!!

"Why do I do this? Because the money's good, the scenery changes and they let me use explosives, okay?"

  • Member since
    May 2013
  • From: Indiana, USA
Posted by Greg on Tuesday, July 21, 2020 8:53 PM

Splendid work, Don. I mean it.

Could you share what paint you used on the blue tube fastener hardware please?

 

  • Member since
    May 2011
  • From: Honolulu, Hawaii
Posted by Real G on Tuesday, July 21, 2020 9:40 PM

HooYah Deep Sea

No, three more and an AC-130! More bang for ther buck!!!

 

I would find that modification acceptable.

“Ya ya ya, unicorn papoi!”

  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Northern California
Posted by jeaton01 on Wednesday, July 22, 2020 12:13 AM

It's a beauty, Don.  Spin up that prop!  A test cell for it would make a great diorama.

John

To see build logs for my models:  http://goldeneramodel.com/mymodels/mymodels.html

 

  • Member since
    July 2008
  • From: Summerville, SC
Posted by jeffpez on Wednesday, July 22, 2020 5:30 AM

I love the stand you made. The kit supplied one is awful and anything would be an improvement but yours is a home run. Where did you get the clear rod?

  • Member since
    November 2009
  • From: Twin Cities of Minnesota
Posted by Don Stauffer on Wednesday, July 22, 2020 12:43 PM

Greg

Splendid work, Don. I mean it.

Could you share what paint you used on the blue tube fastener hardware please?

 

 

That is Tamiya transparent blue over a Molotow chrome pen.

 

Don Stauffer in Minnesota

  • Member since
    November 2009
  • From: Twin Cities of Minnesota
Posted by Don Stauffer on Wednesday, July 22, 2020 12:45 PM

jeffpez

I love the stand you made. The kit supplied one is awful and anything would be an improvement but yours is a home run. Where did you get the clear rod?

 

Local hobby shop. It is not Evergreen, forget the name right now- mental block, but the other main source of plastic stock. It is quarter-inch acrylic rod.

Don Stauffer in Minnesota

  • Member since
    June 2018
  • From: Ohio (USA)
Posted by DRUMS01 on Wednesday, July 22, 2020 1:09 PM

Great job Don...

Wonderful details and the display with the data board are just right.

 

Ben

"Everyones the normal until you get to know them" (Unknown)

LAST COMPLETED:

1/35 Churchill Mk IV AVRE with bridge - DONE

NEXT PROJECT:

1/35 CH-54A Tarhe Helicopter

 

  • Member since
    May 2013
  • From: Indiana, USA
Posted by Greg on Wednesday, July 22, 2020 4:50 PM

Don Stauffer
That is Tamiya transparent blue over a Molotow chrome pen.

Awesome! Thanks, Don.

They look just like the real parts we used to send out to the platers to have color-anodized. Or whatever it was, I sort of forgot. Heckuva trick, you're a genius.

  • Member since
    November 2009
  • From: Twin Cities of Minnesota
Posted by Don Stauffer on Thursday, July 23, 2020 8:54 AM

Greg

 

 
Don Stauffer
That is Tamiya transparent blue over a Molotow chrome pen.

 

Awesome! Thanks, Don.

They look just like the real parts we used to send out to the platers to have color-anodized. Or whatever it was, I sort of forgot. Heckuva trick, you're a genius.

 

Yeah, I think the fittings were aluminum that was blue-anodized (oxide coating and blue dye).

 

Don Stauffer in Minnesota

  • Member since
    June 2017
Posted by Chemteacher on Thursday, July 23, 2020 5:14 PM
Beautiful job.

On the bench: Revell-USS Arizona; Airfix P-51D in 1/72

JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.