SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

The Official 1943 70th Anniversary Group Build

88706 views
650 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    October 2008
  • From: Georgia
Posted by Rigidrider on Friday, February 15, 2013 5:01 AM

Hey Bish... Some (most) came with the kit, Some larger lettering and numerals were dry rub on transfers. There was very little info on the aircraft, most sites only wanting to show the "aces" Ruddle  and such, so a lot of Guesstimation went into it.

Nathan and Greentracker,

LOL... I was going to buy some cannon barrels but tried hollowing out the cones and a bit into the barrell and decided to use them instead. A little metalized paint and some buffing and they turned out acceptable, I tried to duplicate the controls and sighting lenses from pictures with minimal success, I guess they came out ok. I'd like to try another set sometime and do a bit better.

Problem was the tweezers I use are slightly magnetic and small pieces of wire are not easily positioned if you know what I mean. I'm looking for some better ones .

When Life Hands You A Bucket Of Lemons...

Make Lemonade!

Then Sell It Back At $2 Bucks A Glass...

  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk, England
Posted by Bish on Friday, February 15, 2013 11:55 AM

Unfortunatly for me thereare not enough photo's of Rudels aircraft. Theres plenty of his G-2 and a few of his D-5, but the others seem hard to find. Thats certainly an interesting combination and i have not seen that on the tail of a Stuka before.

I am a Norfolk man and i glory in being so

 

On the bench: Airfix 1/72nd Harrier GR.3/Fujimi 1/72nd Ju 87D-3

  • Member since
    October 2008
  • From: Georgia
Posted by Rigidrider on Saturday, February 16, 2013 6:13 AM

Gotta admit Bish ,,, I did take a liberty or two ... I do have a book on the STUKA and a book on the Luftwaffe squadrons during the war, but neither offered much in the way of usuable info, there were alot of facts, but very few examples or illustrations on this theme. The Battle of Kursk was mentioned but not indepth, I guess I should have got one on thet event alone! Take care...

Doug

When Life Hands You A Bucket Of Lemons...

Make Lemonade!

Then Sell It Back At $2 Bucks A Glass...

  • Member since
    February 2010
  • From: Berkeley CA/St. Paul MN
Posted by EBergerud on Saturday, February 16, 2013 3:00 PM

Very nice work: should make a neat dio indeed.

I remember reading Rudel's "Stuka Pilot" as a kid and thinking even then that the guy was stretching the story. Not sure if the LW had any kind of formal "kill" protocol for ground targets - I'd be surprised. I don't doubt that the gent knew his job, but every micro-study done on air to air kills has shown actual kills to be at most 60% of claimed and usually lower. And I can't imagine how an aircraft pilot could have known a tank was destroyed, lightly damaged or missed - gun camera films are normally pretty vague unless something really went boom. I do have a volume of the interesting series done in the UK on German weapons based edited propaganda films (a few million miles worth)  - maybe 20 DVDs - on the Stuka. They point out that Rudel (who was turned into a major hero by Goebbels) was one of the last leaders to insist that his men keep up skill in dive bombing throughout the war just as the technique was showing itself to be a dead end - just as the Brits had predicted. You either came in too hot (a problem that plagued the US Helldiver) or were a sitting duck at the end of the dive and vulnerable to flak or fighters. The answer was either "glide bombing" or "mast-head" attack. That's why Germany's most important ground support aircraft after 1943 was a version of the FW-190 (often flown by Rudel) or the Henschel. (On American CVs, the Hellcat proved a splendid "Jabo" and became the close range attack plane of choice - one reason why the Helldiver had no successor. The A-1 in theory could dive bomb but was really a titanic Jabo. The USAAF had never like dive bombers and were vindicated by brutal efficiency of all US fighters at ground attack by 1944.)  Stukas proved of great value throughout the war in those rare instances where the LW could gain local air superiority - but were dogmeat for Rooskie or allied fighters if caught in the wrong circumstances and increasingly vulnerable as everyone deployed more flak.  Hence the G was really designed for "masthead" attack - a lot like the IL-2 -  and only rarely used to dive bomb. For a few days during Kursk (especially in the southern section of the Kursk salient,) the LW gained the upper hand in the fierce air battles and allowed the Stukas to show their stuff. The same situation periodically appeared in North Africa and Italy and when given the chance Stukas proved dangerous. (Indeed, the LW did a better job of sinking allied ships in 1943 than the Japanese did.)  So the Stuka, which was on the LW chopping block before the war started, was produced throughout the war. Like the US Dauntless or even the Japanese Val it was a splendid weapon given the right circumstances - but those circumstances were increasingly hard to come by as every military increased air defense ability. The thing sure has striking lines - one of the archetype WWII aircraft. Surprised there aren't more kits of it. (I've got the Italieri/Tamiya early war kit and am looking forward to the build.)

 

A model boat is much cheaper than a real one and won't sink with you in it.

  • Member since
    October 2008
  • From: Georgia
Posted by Rigidrider on Saturday, February 16, 2013 5:05 PM

EB... As a kid I was always fascinated by the STUKA and would read and watch anything I could to see one. And yes Your right about the venerable old bird, she was on the chopping block at the on set of hostilities. But, it soldiered on until the very end. I have the book Combat Legand JU87 Stuka, and I read in it that the Ju87G was one of the last aircraft to strike a futile yet defiant blow when on May 8th 1945 Rudel took the remnants of his group (3 Stukas and 4 Fw190s I believe)  took off and dive bombed a Russian armour column in Czechoslovakia then leads the remnants of SG2 to  an American held airfield in Kitzingen and crashlanded them.

I started on the dio this morning, Maybe by next week...

Thanks for the info... Doug

When Life Hands You A Bucket Of Lemons...

Make Lemonade!

Then Sell It Back At $2 Bucks A Glass...

  • Member since
    February 2010
  • From: Berkeley CA/St. Paul MN
Posted by EBergerud on Sunday, February 17, 2013 4:24 AM

I was caught in St. Paul with ten days to spare and needed a styrene fix. In my mini-stash there was a very old Tamiya 1/35 M3 Stuart MK1 (Honey). I didn't want to drag a complex project across the country, so I thought I'd give it a go.

There has to be a place in the world for kits like this. It was simple and fit like a glove. Pure zen. Had I wanted to do so, I could have had this kit ready in a weekend. (Eduard fans must have very long weekends for the planes they peddle under that banner.) But the real world was getting in the way and I decided to turn the little thing into another medical experiment on what one can do with all acrylic weathering. I'll write this up properly in the next few days. Suffice it to say the model emulates one of eight Australian Stuart tanks that were instrumental in winning the campaign the sordid campaign at Buna/Sandananda in December1942-January 1943. Eight tanks were involved but they helped prevent two allied divisions from collapsing. More after I tidy up.

Eric

 

 

A model boat is much cheaper than a real one and won't sink with you in it.

  • Member since
    October 2008
  • From: Georgia
Posted by Rigidrider on Sunday, February 17, 2013 5:41 PM

That is one kick butt looking tank! Bravo!!!

When Life Hands You A Bucket Of Lemons...

Make Lemonade!

Then Sell It Back At $2 Bucks A Glass...

  • Member since
    February 2010
  • From: Berkeley CA/St. Paul MN
Posted by EBergerud on Wednesday, February 20, 2013 10:16 PM

1/35 Tamiya M3 Stuart Tank (MkI “Honey”)

Paints: Vallejo Model Color

Weathering: Vallejo acrylic washes, Vallejo Model Color and Golden Fluid Acrylics, Iwata Com.Art paints, MIG & Sennelier Pigments with Liquitex matte and gloss varnish

Ok, here's my humble Stuart complete. The kit was old but a delight to build. I experimented with all acrylic weathering again. There is a build article in Armor if anyone is interested in the techniques employed under the heading “Old Tamiya Stuart Helps Aussies Take Buna.” Here I'd like to briefly explore why a handful of Australian light tanks had a huge impact on one of the largest, most important and certainly most sordid campaigns in the early Pacific War. You'll have to indulge me here because I wrote extensively about this subject and interviewed many of the participants – consider this an occupational hazard faced by military historians. And it's a lot faster and cheaper than going to Amazon and tracking down the original which thankfully is still in print. Those who agree with Henry Ford (I do myself sometimes) that “history is bunk” are invited to check the pics.

More than any WWII campaign I can think of, the road to Buna had the kind of insane inevitability one finds in a Greek tragedy. In early 1941 Japan decided to join the “New World Order” they believed would come after the nearly certain victory of Nazi Germany by conquering Southeast Asia, then controlled by European powers and the USA, to seize the oils and other resources needed to create a great industrial power. Barbarossa, which promised to remove the USSR, hastened things. Pearl Harbor was the result, followed by an amazing maritime blitzkrieg that swept up all of Southeast Asia in three months. Tokyo never intended to conquer the US. They hoped that a triumphant Germany would force Washington to focus its growing military power toward the Atlantic and create a situation where America would “see reason” and cut a deal to stop the Pacific War. In case the US proved stubborn, Japan also seized a string of islands across the Pacific that would serve as a kind of maritime Maginot Line that would protect the Home Islands and the SEA “resource zone.” Behind this line Combined Fleet would lay, ready for a Pacific Trafalgar against the US which Japan would win. In short, they hoped 1941 would be a repeat of 1905 on steroids.

Fierce arguments took place between the Japanese Army and Navy concerning the size of the island line and the number of troops available to man it. To save a nickle the Army made a staggering mistake by refusing to occupy southern New Guinea, an area that flanked a newly conquered defensive “crown jewel” in the Southwest Pacific, the marvelous harbor on New Britain at Rabaul. In early 1942, despite the Japanese blitz, the US showed no signs of searching for peace. (Ironically, the day before Nagumo's planes launched for Pearl Harbor, the Soviets launched their great counter-attack at Moscow thus putting a Nazi victory into jeopardy. It was an “oops” moment because a German defeat meant doom for Japan and every government knew it. Tokyo desperately hoped for a Nazi victory in the 1942 Stalingrad offensive.)

In January 1942 the Japanese could have grabbed all of New Guinea with two battalions. The only port and airfield, the ramshackle coconut transport point at Port Moresby, was almost undefended. But WWII moved fast. Pearl Harbor shocked Australia which feared a direct invasion. The Aussies had four splendidly trained and equipped divisions. As these units (called Imperial Divisions – or AIF) were volunteer only they were intended for deployment in Europe. At Pearl Harbor three were in North Africa. (A fourth was squandered at Singapore.) Canberra demanded an immediate return of all AIF units to defend the homeland. Desperate to keep at least one in the Mideast, Churchill convinced Roosevelt to send two US National Guard Divisions to Oz in April 42 – the first US units deployed abroad. Soon afterward, two of the AIF divisions returned and MacArthur was sent to Oz (at the request of Australian PM Curtin – not because of any desire of FDR) to plan a counter-blow.

The Japanese finally got the message and decided to rectify their error and seize Port Moresby with maritime forces. The result was the stunning Battle of the Coral Sea which led the IJN to abandon the invasion. Infuriated but another botch, the IJA decided to do the job themselves just as Combined Fleet sailed for Midway. With only a few transports available, the attack would be with elite infantry over the rugged Owen Stanley Mountains. At this time New Guinea was less known than the Amazon basin. There were no roads, towns, or anything that would pass for infrastructure. The IJA did know, however, that the Australians had charted a trail (or track – Aussies still argue about the term) across the Owen Stanleys from Port Moresby in the west about 100 miles to a coconut plantation at Kakoda in the east. Twenty miles farther was the little beach side settlement of Buna which had a population of about 200. Ironically MacArthur saw the same thing and in June 42 sent US engineers to Buna to see if it could be developed as a base for a offensive operations north. While there, the Americans found strategic gold. Under dense kunai grass was a plateau of relatively firm clay soil that could be used as an air base. Immediate plans were made to reinforce Buna with AIF units. But the Japanese got there first, landing over the beach at Gona (another hole in the wall ten miles north) and Buna on July 21 with eventually about 12,000 men. Knowing little about the debacle at Midway and even less about the terrain in New Guinea, the Japanese began marching southeast toward Moresby. The AIF rushed to Moresby and moved northwest. The result was the epic Kokoda campaign, the defining moment of the Pacific War for Australia. By November AIF pressure and serious supply difficulties forced a Japanese withdrawal to their original beach head at Buna-Gona.

Knowing little about Japanese dispositions, US intelligence told MacArthur that the Buna area was almost undefended. Hence the US 32d division was ordered to land on the eastern shore south of Buna , march north, and meet the Australians to annihilate the Japanese in a fortnight. Then work could begin on the airbase at Dobodura which indeed became the major hub for later operations. (The Japanese completely missed the location and thus greatly underestimated the peril posed by an allied presence at Buna.) To make matters interesting, the US Marines landed at Guadalcanal in August, causing the IJN to devote almost all resources to the Solmons and to neglect New Guinea. (A small expedition to Milne Bay near Moresby in September ended in humiliating withdrawal in face of AIF resistance. My father spent a year building the base and enjoying the 10” of rain per day, 95degree with 99% humidity temperatures and epic boredom.) Things looked good for the allies.

What followed was a vicious three month battle of attrition over a ten mile long strip of land that was mostly Mangrove swamp. Fearing uncharted reefs and possible the USN and RAN refused to risk warships or transports near Buna. All supplies had to be landed over the beach and hand carried to Buna. US C-47s were able to airdrop ammo and food but little else. Allied aircraft could bomb the fortified zone but had no visible targets. There were no roads, no trucks and no supply ships. Consequently, the allies fought their only WWII campaign completely lacking in artillery. Worse, some 3,000 Japanese combat engineers had landed with the original attack planning to make a proper road out of the Kokada track. When seeing the terrain, they knew it was a fool's errand. (Kokoda is still unpaved.) Thus the Japanese engineers spent three months fortifying the beachhead area. One commodity of which there was no shortage was tough coconut logs which were ideal for bunkers. Not as cautious as the allies, the Japanese did risk night time transport runs to bring reinforcements and stockpile supplies for a siege. The terrain was mostly swamp, interspersed with kunai grass over soft ground, the fringe of a tropical rain forest and all resting in the most malarial land on planet earth.

Expecting to walk into Buna, the 32d Division found itself mired into a Southwest Pacific Battle of the Somme with advances (when made) measured in yards. By December Dobodura was in operations but this could only help medical evacuation and light supplies. Badly trained in general and completely unready for the vicious terrain the 32d Division was tortured, although one company had taken part of Buna almost by accident. The elite AIF battalions did little better. Beyond the terrain itself, the worst problem facing the allies was a network of almost invisible bunkers and pillboxes. Artillery was non-existant and airpower blind. So it was that Australian engineers figured out how to put twelve Stuart tanks on barges at Milne Bay and float them to Buna. One barge with four tanks sunk. The other eight Stuarts arrived in December. They were welcome as the 32d Division was near collapse and the AIF literally stuck in the mud. AIF officers, many who had served in WWI during their youth, were openly talking about Gallipoli. Tank support, even in miniscule portions, was a huge boost to morale and, per machine, was probably never more effective.

The Japanese Army was not expecting tanks and had no anti-tank guns, although a few flak pieces posed a danger. Starting a series of attacks in late December, Australian tanks would crawl forward (the ground was so soft that was often maximum speed regardless) followed by infantry. As they closed on the Japanese, some of the bunkers visible and could be destroyed by the tanks themselves or following infantry. Usually the attacks gained little (two tanks were destroyed and breakdowns frequent) but sometimes they could break a portion of the Japanese line. The real enemy of the Japanese garrison was starvation, but there's no doubt that the tanks attacks saved much allied blood. In the final, and utterly wretched engagement between Gona and Buna (highlighted by a firefight inside a Japanese military hospital) the last tank attack in January 1943 helped trigger a break down of the Japanese resistance. A desperate Japanese plan for withdrawal came to nothing. A few days later several hundred remaining Japanese soldiers left their positions and stumbled around in a parody of a banzai charge with scores simply walking into the ocean and committing suicide with hand grenades. Only a handful of IJA troops survived. At the same time the Japanese were destroyed at Buna, the IJN withdrew from Guadalcanal and 6th Army surrendered at Stalingrad. The war was turning.

The allies lost 2,500 killed at Buna/Gona – double that of Guadalcanal. If you count diseases like malaria or worse as “casualties” the Aussies and Americans lost 80% of the men engaged. Yet despite the mistakes made the campaign was unavoidable if the allies wished to use New Guinea to outflank Japanese position in the Southwest Pacific. MacArthur swore “no more Bunas” and was good to his word. After a brilliant Aussie/US campaign in New Guinea during 1943 – which drew 200,000 Japanese reinforcements to the island – MacArthur pulled his greatest coup in early 1944 by occupying the Admiralty Islands. This cut-off both New Guinea and Rabaul transforming the Southwest Pacific into the world's biggest POW camp. Reeling the Japanese stripped Manchuria and China and sent 500,000 men to the Philippines where in turn they were later trapped. This was no small matter as places like Saipan, Iwo and Okinawa were under-manned because the IJA squandered a third of their army to thwart MacArthur's portion of the Pacific drive.

Eric

Pics of Beautiful Buna and the Aussie Stuart below (the last Buna photo is one of the Japanese bunkers that made life miserable for two allied divisions):

 

A model boat is much cheaper than a real one and won't sink with you in it.

G-J
  • Member since
    July 2012
Posted by G-J on Thursday, February 21, 2013 8:14 PM

Awesome tank.

And thanks for the history...I always love to read the stories behind the models.  Really cool!

On the bench:  Tamyia Mosquito Mk. VI for the '44 group build.  Yes, still.

On deck: 

  • Member since
    October 2008
  • From: Georgia
Posted by Rigidrider on Saturday, February 23, 2013 9:20 PM

Well here it is, sorry its a large dio and hard to get a good over all shot of. The Battle of Kursk was a turning point for the German forces in the East, During July and August 1943, The battle began and at first the German forces were advancing and doing well, but suddenly the momentum shifted and the Soviet troops began pushing the German forces back. Kursk was the first failure of the Blitzkreig attacks that had served Germany so well in the past. To maintain an effective fighting force a luftwaffe air group had to maintain a minimum 50% airworthy force. With their supply lines streched to the breaking point and replacement parts all but non existant due to the constant bombing of the plants by the allied forces, parts that were manufactured were going to the production of new aircraft. Planes that had suffered damage and did not have parts to repair them were stripped and their parts were used to keep other aircraft flying. What I've tried to do here is show the brave but futile effort put forth around the clock by the ground crews determined to keep their aircraft flying. This is a fictional build and I admit to taking many liberties in my rendition. In this build an older "B" model Stuka has been nearly picked clean and some of her parts are being installed in the newer "G" model to keep her going a little longer. Thanks for looking and hope you enjoy!

Thanks...

Doug

When Life Hands You A Bucket Of Lemons...

Make Lemonade!

Then Sell It Back At $2 Bucks A Glass...

  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk, England
Posted by Bish on Sunday, February 24, 2013 3:03 AM

Nice looking tank there.

Doug, nice work on the dio. Thats a nice loking scene.

I am a Norfolk man and i glory in being so

 

On the bench: Airfix 1/72nd Harrier GR.3/Fujimi 1/72nd Ju 87D-3

  • Member since
    February 2010
  • From: Berkeley CA/St. Paul MN
Posted by EBergerud on Wednesday, February 27, 2013 4:02 AM

Doug: that's absolutely crackerjack. I'm not a heroic modeller and don't do dios, but unless one is a real wizard, I'd really say less is more. That dio - one plane - one wreck - sitting in the tress (very convincingly portrayed I'd say) - says -  Germany is screwed. Not a bad message for Kursk. Hats off.

Eric

 

A model boat is much cheaper than a real one and won't sink with you in it.

  • Member since
    October 2008
  • From: Georgia
Posted by Rigidrider on Wednesday, February 27, 2013 4:48 AM

Thank you ... I'm working on getting a new camera , one thats a bit more versiatile. I used to not do dios, but find that they really help to bring the build to life, helps to tell the story behind it. Don't always do them, sometime I just make a simple base to mount them to. Thanks again...

Doug

When Life Hands You A Bucket Of Lemons...

Make Lemonade!

Then Sell It Back At $2 Bucks A Glass...

  • Member since
    February 2010
  • From: Berkeley CA/St. Paul MN
Posted by EBergerud on Wednesday, February 27, 2013 5:43 AM

I have space problems so that's a good excuse to convince myself that I'd better learn to make good models before taking on another hobby like diorama construction. A poor or even so-so dio can make even a really fine model look lame. (The people that are good at it - like some ship makers or railroaders - have a fine eye and I'd guess a lot of experience.) One of the best dios I've seen was a Wingnut Wings Albatros sitting on the grass next to a shed and some tools on a table with the engine exposed. And just some grass. Yours reminds me of it.

Will have to figure out foliage though. Need that for serious tank building. Folks slave getting the right camo and weathering and then leave off the garden found on every vehicle operating in some fronts.

Eric

 

A model boat is much cheaper than a real one and won't sink with you in it.

  • Member since
    March 2010
  • From: MN
Posted by Nathan T on Wednesday, February 27, 2013 8:38 AM

Nicely done dio Doug! I like the trees and the barren landscape. Kursk was indeed a big turning point in the east, as it spelled the end of the Werhmacts offensive in the east. You are right, Blitzkrieg doesn't work so well when the enemy knows you're coming, and you give them months to dig in...!

Eric, nice job on the M3. You captured the weathering nicely!

Now finally my own update on the Yak 1b:

Got it all painted up in AMT 4 and 6, with the light blue underneath. I mixed all the colors, but think I got the blue a little too dark...who knows...it seems to look ok in the light, but maybe still too stark. The camo pattern on yak 1s varied a fair amount, but they all seemed to have this general outline. This will represent Borris Yeromin's machine (second from top in the pic) which was donated to him thus the inscription on the sides. This machine was eventually re-painted with a weird, non-standard camo scheme (same colors though) and then put on display in Saratov, and is still there I believe. I chose to follow the camo pattern of war machines, not the one this plane wears while on display. The red tail stripes were airbrushed, and I hope they match the red stars when it comes time to decal.

 

 

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: AandF in the Badger State
Posted by checkmateking02 on Wednesday, February 27, 2013 3:01 PM

Good-looking scenario, Doug.  Nicely rendered.

 

 

 

 

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: AandF in the Badger State
Posted by checkmateking02 on Wednesday, February 27, 2013 3:03 PM

Sharp paint scheme for the Yak, Nathan.  Nice work applying it too; really smooth finish.

 

 

 

 

  • Member since
    August 2009
  • From: Borlando Fla home of the rat
Posted by TREYZX10R on Wednesday, February 27, 2013 4:05 PM

Doug thats a great looking Dio!

  • Member since
    March 2010
  • From: MN
Posted by Nathan T on Wednesday, February 27, 2013 4:21 PM

Thanks Checkmate

 

 

  • Member since
    October 2008
  • From: Georgia
Posted by Rigidrider on Wednesday, February 27, 2013 7:41 PM

Again one and all... Thank you, I'm humbled by the appreciation...

Nathan... again , and as always, Killer job so far on the YAK!

Eric... alot of folks buy the woodland scenic "grass" and folige and its good stuff, The trees I was able to make were actual tree twigs with clump foliage glued to the limbs with contact cement. Now for the grass... very easy and cheap to do, first go to the baking section of your local grocery store and buy a box or two of food coloring. With easter coming up an egg coloring kit? Now, go to (or might find in said grocery store) your local Wally Mart or where ever you might choose and get a ball of Jute twine, (loose woven brown twine, not poly or nylon) . Un ravel and cut to length desired, 1/8 to 1/4 in. is usually a good length for grass on a dio, once you have a pile enough to do your scene push aside , place in a bag , whatever. Now get a few plastic cups and mix up a varity of colors from straignt green to straight yellow and blend a few custom colors as desired. Leave some of the jute brown. place in the colors and dye the jute, remove, allow to dry, mix dyed jute together and you have some of the best looking grass available. Glue down in little clumps to desired density and what a cool looking grassy area you will have. Another hint, plywood looks darn near like real ground totally bare and uncolored when your "grass" is properly applied.

Hope that gives you some ideas,,, And yes, space can be a problem, sometimes the local kids will come by to see what I'm working on and I'll give them one with a promise that they will care for it!(lol)

Take care!

Doug

When Life Hands You A Bucket Of Lemons...

Make Lemonade!

Then Sell It Back At $2 Bucks A Glass...

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: AandF in the Badger State
Posted by checkmateking02 on Saturday, March 2, 2013 9:49 AM

Here's the box art for Hasegawa's USS Alabama BB-60.

The instructions show two paint schemes, for 1942 and 1944, but according to Snyder & Short, she was in Measure 22 in 1943, so that's what I'll go for.

The first thing I like to do with ships is assemble the hull.  Hasegawa also markets the kit as USS North Dakota.  They didn't modify their moulds to account for the differences in armament.  South Dakota apparently carried three 40mm gun tubs at the bow which Alabama didn't have, but the bases for these where left in the mould, so I had to sand these off.

The deck is moulded to the hull in the middle, with the bow and stern pieces separately.

Bow with gun tub bases removed

Stern

The waterline plate is moulded in the red color manufacturers seem to like for this piece.  There is also a thin metal bar that goes into the waterline plate to weight the model down so she doesn't capsize.

Looking at photos of the ship, it appears that Hasegawa got the anchor and hawser too large and located it too far down the hull.  They seem to have been closer to the top.

Last photo for now shows the deck masked for painting.  Measure 22 involved three main colors:  5-N Navy Blue for the hull from the boot up to the lowest level; everything vertical above this was Haze Gray, including the fore part of the hull.  Decks and horizontals were 20-B Deck Blue.  I am using WEM Colourcoats for Alabama.  These are really good paints.

I painted the deck Haze Gray first, then masked around all the gun shields.  I cut the tape about twice as high as needed, wrapped it around the shields and squeezed the top shut, trying to prevent the Deck Blue from migrating inside.

So far everything is going together very well, fit is good.  For an older kit, Hasegawa did a nice job with it.  Thanks for looking.

 

 

 

 

 

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: AandF in the Badger State
Posted by checkmateking02 on Sunday, March 3, 2013 9:33 PM

Hull and deck finished and decaled.

 

 

 

 

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: AandF in the Badger State
Posted by checkmateking02 on Tuesday, March 5, 2013 10:21 AM

Construction step one.

Little parts:

Assembled parts:

 

 

 

 

  • Member since
    October 2008
  • From: Georgia
Posted by Rigidrider on Tuesday, March 5, 2013 5:33 PM

This is gonna be a cool looking ship build! Great work so far!

Doug

When Life Hands You A Bucket Of Lemons...

Make Lemonade!

Then Sell It Back At $2 Bucks A Glass...

  • Member since
    October 2008
  • From: Georgia
Posted by Rigidrider on Tuesday, March 5, 2013 5:35 PM

Forgot to ask, are you going to "float her"? Diorama plans? They look so good in water scenes.

Doug

When Life Hands You A Bucket Of Lemons...

Make Lemonade!

Then Sell It Back At $2 Bucks A Glass...

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: AandF in the Badger State
Posted by checkmateking02 on Tuesday, March 5, 2013 10:18 PM

Thanks, Doug.  I found an article on the net about making "water" with aluminum foil.  Thought I'd try that when it comes time to take finished photos.

 

 

 

 

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: AandF in the Badger State
Posted by checkmateking02 on Thursday, March 7, 2013 2:03 PM

Construction step two.

Masked and unmasked turrets for the main battery.

Components for  the 16 inch guns.

Assembled 16 inch guns, with a bottle cap for size reference.

 

 

 

 

  • Member since
    October 2008
  • From: Georgia
Posted by Rigidrider on Thursday, March 7, 2013 4:53 PM

Checkmate... I did a foil water scene one time on pg 18 of the Gruman Iron Works GB last year, It looked pretty good I guess, a little tough straightening out the crumpled foil with out tearing, but all in all it made a convincing water. I love ships, specially the old battle ships like your doing, but every time I stray from my beloved Luftwaffe, I always wind up back there.  Really enjoying your work so far... Keep up the good work !

Doug

When Life Hands You A Bucket Of Lemons...

Make Lemonade!

Then Sell It Back At $2 Bucks A Glass...

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: AandF in the Badger State
Posted by checkmateking02 on Thursday, March 7, 2013 5:07 PM

Thanks, again, Doug.  I will look at your work.  Foil sounded easier to work with than plaster and gels and stuff, plus I'm not sure I want to "sink" the ships into something permanent, when I've had no experience making waves.

 

 

 

 

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: AandF in the Badger State
Posted by checkmateking02 on Thursday, March 7, 2013 5:15 PM

Nice work on the water, Doug, and the forced perspective is outstanding.  Really makes for an interesting scene that draws the viewer into the action.

Here's the article link I found.

http://www.modelshipwrights.com/modules.php?op=modload&name=Sections&file=index&req=viewarticle&artid=2527&page=1

Thanks again for the suggestion.

 

 

 

 

JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.