SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

Self-Propelled Artillery GB: Revisiting

4801 views
23 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2005
Self-Propelled Artillery GB: Revisiting
Posted by Thunderbolt379 on Tuesday, November 30, 2010 1:06 AM

Hi all,

Several months ago I mooted the idea of a group build dealing with self propelled guns -- basically any self-propelled artillery piece, any era, any scale, OOB or AM, shelf-sitters (try saying that three times fast...) and crossovers welcome.

At the time there was some discussion over what was the best timeframe and "later in the year" was opted for by many. I should in fact have launched this one anywhere up to six weeks ago, but fell sick and had an overseas trip booked more or less simultaenously, and of course the build went so far on the back burner it dropped off the radar.

While putting the feelers out for my propsed Abrams GB I was reminded about this one and would like to offer it afresh -- if those who expressed an interest in taking part in "Have Gun, Will Travel" still fancy having fun with enormous guns on tracked carriers, then I would be more than happy to launch the build on the GB forum.

Timing -- December 1st to May 31st? January 1st to June 31st? Just let me know!

Cheers, Mike/TB379

http://worldinminiature.blogspot.com/

  • Member since
    April 2009
  • From: Carmel, IN
Posted by deafpanzer on Tuesday, November 30, 2010 12:46 PM

I remember this because it sounded great.  I am already committed to three ongoing GBs... if things go well with my current builds, I will be able to join very late in spring so later dates will work better for me.  Smile

Andy

  • Member since
    September 2008
  • From: Minneapolis MN
Posted by BigSmitty on Tuesday, November 30, 2010 1:01 PM

So far I'm easing back into the hobby, but I think I could handle the Abrams GB and this one.  Besides, I already have some options for this one, including the Academy M7 Priest and Italeri's M109A6 Paladin kits.  So, count me as definitely interested!!

Matt

Matt - IPMS #46275

"Build what ya love and love what ya build..."

Build Logs, Rants and Humor

 

 

  • Member since
    April 2005
Posted by Thunderbolt379 on Tuesday, November 30, 2010 3:44 PM

Andy and Matt - excellent! Okay, if enough expressions of interest roll in over the next few weeks, I'll look at a first half of 2011 timeframe on this one. Thanks, guys!

Cheers, Mike/TB379

http://worldinminiature.blogspot.com/

  • Member since
    May 2010
  • From: texas
Posted by kruppw on Tuesday, November 30, 2010 4:10 PM

Hi Mike, I might be interested in this GB just as while. I have Dragon's M7 Priest that I'm looking at back dating to an early British version for North Africa. I've been wanting to dive in to the priest but needed to finish a couple other builds first, but if you have a set timeframe I'm willing to jump on board.

ChrisYes

  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Sonora Desert
Posted by stikpusher on Tuesday, November 30, 2010 4:40 PM

Will this be open to vehicles that fire rockets instead of shells? Wheeled,tracked,or halftacked?

 

F is for FIRE, That burns down the whole town!

U is for URANIUM... BOMBS!

N is for NO SURVIVORS...

       - Plankton

LSM

 

  • Member since
    November 2008
  • From: Jefferson City, MO
Posted by iraqiwildman on Tuesday, November 30, 2010 4:59 PM

I have the Dragon M7 I will be starting on early next year, so Jan. 1 to June 1 would be a good time frame for me. I am hoping the some aftermarket photo-etched set come out soon for this kit.

Tim Wilding

  • Member since
    March 2010
  • From: Buffalo, NY
Posted by macattack80 on Tuesday, November 30, 2010 5:32 PM

I'll play along too.  I will give the AFV Club M40 Big Shot in 1/35 scale a go.  Either time frame would be fine with me.

Kevin

[

 

  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: Rain USA, Vancouver WA
Posted by tigerman on Tuesday, November 30, 2010 8:46 PM

Tempting, but it depends on my mood and such. A maybe, later the better.

   http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y269/wing_nut_5o/PANZERJAGERGB.jpg

 Eric 

  • Member since
    April 2005
Posted by Thunderbolt379 on Wednesday, December 1, 2010 1:11 AM

Hi gents (I'm just in from work...),

This is looking better and better, we have a nice GB in the making here!

Stik -- I don't see why not. I was thinking tube artillery, but rockets have been part of artillery since gunpowder was invented, so why not? So long as it's self-propelled, that's within the definition of the project, so that would open the door to the MLRS, any Katyusha variant, any vehicle mounting a Panzerwerfer, Sherman Caliope and such, even the Stuka zu Fuss.

Tigerman -- haven't run into you in a long time! Hope you can join us, no matter how late.

Cheers, Mike/TB379

http://worldinminiature.blogspot.com/

  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: Rain USA, Vancouver WA
Posted by tigerman on Thursday, December 2, 2010 12:28 AM

Good seeing you too. Yes I'm still here, just need to get my a$% up and build something. Got a Pz IV still waiting for a good camo job.

   http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y269/wing_nut_5o/PANZERJAGERGB.jpg

 Eric 

  • Member since
    April 2005
Posted by Thunderbolt379 on Tuesday, December 28, 2010 6:23 PM

Hi guys,

This build is due to get underway at the weekend and I realised there's been no activity on the teaser thread since the beginning of the month -- could I have a quick show of hands as to who's still on board? It's a six month build so there's no immediate rush, but I'd like to know what the roll looks like for launching, and what your projects are likely to be!

Cheers, Mike/TB379

http://worldinminiature.blogspot.com/

  • Member since
    September 2008
  • From: Minneapolis MN
Posted by BigSmitty on Tuesday, December 28, 2010 6:45 PM

*raises hand*  I'm still in...

Matt - IPMS #46275

"Build what ya love and love what ya build..."

Build Logs, Rants and Humor

 

 

  • Member since
    September 2015
  • From: The Redwood Empire
Posted by Aaronw on Tuesday, December 28, 2010 7:03 PM

SP anti-air and anti-tank as well? What about primarily direct fire SP howitzers like the M8 75mm, M4 105mm, Bishop and StuH?

  • Member since
    April 2005
Posted by Thunderbolt379 on Tuesday, December 28, 2010 7:21 PM

Matt -- great!

Aaronw -- not sure about AA and AT, we've had a number of specialist GBs on those themes. I'm thinking any self-propelled artillery system intended for point target and saturation bombardment, both tube and rocket, any era... In that sense the StuH would definitely quality, as would the Hummel (if I've got that right, trying to sort my Hornets from my Rhinos...!), as would any version of the Katyusha, the Sherman Caliope, the SWS mit PzW 42... Anything carrying a big gun or rocket battery for shelling targets!

Cheers, Mike/TB379

http://worldinminiature.blogspot.com/

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: New Jersey
Posted by redleg12 on Wednesday, December 29, 2010 7:51 AM

Hummm....I don't do GBs....not my thing...but I will have to keep an eye on this.....I can have a sign

"In case of emegency artillery referee!"

Rounds Complete!!

"The Moral High Ground....A Great Place to Emplace Artillery."

  • Member since
    June 2008
  • From: Iowa
Posted by Hans von Hammer on Wednesday, December 29, 2010 8:41 AM

Anything carrying a big gun or rocket battery for shelling targets!

Bang Head

That's like saying anything with a turret and tracks can be a tank... (Only speaking as a Redleg here)

If the gunner's primary aiming point isn't a collimator or aiming posts, it ain't FA..

 

  • Member since
    November 2008
  • From: Jefferson City, MO
Posted by iraqiwildman on Wednesday, December 29, 2010 9:11 AM

I am still in with the Dragon M7 Priest.

Tim Wilding

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: 41 Degrees 52.4 minutes North; 72 Degrees 7.3 minutes West
Posted by bbrowniii on Wednesday, December 29, 2010 11:49 AM

I am tempted by this, but am not sure what my six month build schedule is looking like.  I've got three projects on the bench...  If I got them cleaned up, I could probably jump on this in the mid-spring time frame...

Now, as I read your guidelines, a vehicle like the Hummel would be in, but a Nashorn, since it was direct fire, primarily anti-tank, would not?

Let me stew on this for a day or two and I'll decide if I want in.  What's the badge going to be?

'All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing' - Edmund Burke (1770 ??)

 

  • Member since
    April 2005
Posted by Thunderbolt379 on Wednesday, December 29, 2010 4:41 PM

Hans -- I'm keeping it simple, too many interpretations limit the scope. What a spat I had defining the scope for my Early Jets GB, with varying opinions on where the generation changes fell...! If one or two subjects that don't strictly belong find their way in, it's no biggie. The object is fun, after all!

bbrowniii -- yep, that's correct. AT has been done good service in the past, for instance "The Hunters" GB about two years ago, but self-propelled artillery hasn't been a focus in the period I've been a foum user, so SP guns are the go, and, as it was especially requested, the multi-tube rocket adjunct to conventional artillery too. Not to be too specific! :-)

Cheers, Mike/TB379

http://worldinminiature.blogspot.com/

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: 41 Degrees 52.4 minutes North; 72 Degrees 7.3 minutes West
Posted by bbrowniii on Wednesday, December 29, 2010 6:13 PM

Mike

Sounds like a good 'rule of thumb' definition to me.  Like you say, no reason to get into a pissin' match with people over the definition.  Broader is better...

OK, I'll take a look at things and see if I can justify entering this one.  I'd LOVE to do my Hummel, but it was not really in the build cycle yet.  Still, it might be fun to put it up at the top of the batting order...

'All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing' - Edmund Burke (1770 ??)

 

  • Member since
    November 2009
  • From: SW Virginia
Posted by Gamera on Thursday, December 30, 2010 3:20 PM

Mike, I've been thinking about this and normally I'd love to jump in but I've got a pile of stuff left over from 2010 that I really, really need to finish.

If you did go ahead with this later this year I might be able to jump in- sorry.

"I dream in fire but work in clay." -Arthur Machen

 

  • Member since
    April 2005
Posted by Thunderbolt379 on Saturday, January 1, 2011 6:25 AM

Gents, this Group Build is now active on the GB forum.

You may slit the shrinkwrap and "fire for effect!"

Cheers, Mike/TB379

http://worldinminiature.blogspot.com/

  • Member since
    March 2010
  • From: Buffalo, NY
Posted by macattack80 on Saturday, January 1, 2011 7:50 AM

Glad you fired this GB up!  And I am already on the roster!   I was gonna do an M7 after the M40 but it looks like there are a few other participants building M7's.

Kevin

[

 

JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.