SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

Overkill???

2658 views
32 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    November 2005
Overkill???
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, May 18, 2011 1:05 PM

Dragon has just released their TWENTIETH iteration of the fabled Mk IV since 2006:

DML6526 Pz.Kpfw.IV Ausf.H, Mid-Production Sep-Nov '43  Smart Kit #DML6526This is werke number 15634500 finished on September 16, 1943 on assembly line # 9...

  • Member since
    July 2010
  • From: Tornado Alley
Posted by Echo139er on Wednesday, May 18, 2011 1:07 PM

When will stop.... 229th iteration?

  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk, England
Posted by Bish on Wednesday, May 18, 2011 1:09 PM

I agree. They are just rehashing the same kit, adding or taking away a few bits. But, i don't think its taking effort away from releaseing other kits as i doubt much effort goes into it. And i can't imagine many people would want to get every one.

I am a Norfolk man and i glory in being so

 

On the bench: Airfix 1/72nd Harrier GR.3/Fujimi 1/72nd Ju 87D-3

  • Member since
    June 2010
  • From: Austin, TX
Posted by DoogsATX on Wednesday, May 18, 2011 1:18 PM

Maybe if zee Germans had standardized the Pz.IV instead of changing it all the friggin' time, Dragon wouldn't have an excuse...

On the Bench: 1/32 Trumpeter P-47 | 1/32 Hasegawa Bf 109G | 1/144 Eduard MiG-21MF x2

On Deck:  1/350 HMS Dreadnought

Blog/Completed Builds: doogsmodels.com

 

  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk, England
Posted by Bish on Wednesday, May 18, 2011 1:21 PM

Thats it, its the Germans fault for making changes to improve there tanks Big Smile

And i like that dragon have now decided that Pz IV's should be broken down into Early Mid and late production.

I am a Norfolk man and i glory in being so

 

On the bench: Airfix 1/72nd Harrier GR.3/Fujimi 1/72nd Ju 87D-3

  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Fort Knox
Posted by Rob Gronovius on Wednesday, May 18, 2011 1:22 PM

Dragon has two unstated goals; the first is to produce a figure set that eventually includes every German soldier from WW2 and secondly to reproduce every German tank by serial number.

  • Member since
    March 2010
  • From: Democratic Peoples Republic of Illinois
Posted by Hercmech on Wednesday, May 18, 2011 1:23 PM

Maybe...


13151015

  • Member since
    April 2008
  • From: Philadelphia PA
Posted by smeagol the vile on Wednesday, May 18, 2011 1:32 PM

I forsee, by 2030 there will be more variations of the Panzer IV kit then there were invading the USSR

 

  • Member since
    February 2011
  • From: San Antonio
Posted by MAJ Mike on Wednesday, May 18, 2011 1:45 PM

Anything worth killing is worth over-killing. Wink

 

 

 "I'd "I'd rather be historically accurate than politically correct."

"Sic gorgiamus allos subjectatos nunc!"

  • Member since
    April 2015
Posted by spadx111 on Wednesday, May 18, 2011 1:52 PM

interesting .

Ron

  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Texas
Posted by wbill76 on Wednesday, May 18, 2011 2:52 PM

Definitely a case of capitalizing on their initial investment in the molds as much as possible. While I'm a fan of German armor, I don't really need to build every single variant by production month but on the flip side, can recognize that there are those who do and this allows for that without resorting to resin AM, scratchbuilding, etc. Just because Pz IV nuts just don't have the same visibility as say the Tiger or Panther nuts doesn't mean they can't be catered to by DML in styrene. Wink

  • Member since
    September 2005
  • From: Illinois: Hive of Scum and Villany
Posted by Sprue-ce Goose on Wednesday, May 18, 2011 2:54 PM

yes.............

  • Member since
    November 2008
  • From: Jefferson City, MO
Posted by iraqiwildman on Wednesday, May 18, 2011 3:03 PM

I would rather them do this overkill, then not release hardly anything new, like Tamiya does.

I wish they would concentrate on the M4 now.

Tim Wilding

  • Member since
    July 2007
  • From: Ohio
Posted by Geist on Wednesday, May 18, 2011 3:32 PM

 

As others have mentioned, it's overkill fo sure but I would rather them do this, make money on it, and then use that money to develop new molds.

 

iraqiwildman

I wish they would concentrate on the M4 now.

 

Aren't they though? How many M4's have they released lately? I don't pay attention to M4's very much but it seems like there's always a Dragon Sherman on the recently released lists I look at.

Erik

 

 

 

 

On the bench: Italeri Leopard 1A2 correction build with Perfect Scale turret and Eduard PE

  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk, England
Posted by Bish on Wednesday, May 18, 2011 3:49 PM

Geist

 

As others have mentioned, it's overkill fo sure but I would rather them do this, make money on it, and then use that money to develop new molds.

From what i can see, this is just what they are not doing. Ok, there comes a point, especially when doing things from the past, when you can't produce anything new. But i don't think that point has come yet and they just seem to be churning out kits that are variatons of somthing they already have.

I am a Norfolk man and i glory in being so

 

On the bench: Airfix 1/72nd Harrier GR.3/Fujimi 1/72nd Ju 87D-3

  • Member since
    July 2007
  • From: Ohio
Posted by Geist on Wednesday, May 18, 2011 4:27 PM

Bish

 

 Geist:

 

 

As others have mentioned, it's overkill fo sure but I would rather them do this, make money on it, and then use that money to develop new molds.

 

 

From what i can see, this is just what they are not doing. Ok, there comes a point, especially when doing things from the past, when you can't produce anything new. But i don't think that point has come yet and they just seem to be churning out kits that are variatons of somthing they already have.

 

That they are, but there has been a smattering of brand new molds released with all these variants of kits already released(RSO, M2/3 halftracks,M3 chassis, Opel Blitz, Neubaufahrzeug etc). Of course they're going to keep releasing kits that can be made with smallest cost to them.

 

 

Erik

On the bench: Italeri Leopard 1A2 correction build with Perfect Scale turret and Eduard PE

  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: Rain USA, Vancouver WA
Posted by tigerman on Wednesday, May 18, 2011 4:51 PM

Yes, just like the million Shermans and Tigers. Sooner or later they have to run out of them. Wink

   http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y269/wing_nut_5o/PANZERJAGERGB.jpg

 Eric 

  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Fort Knox
Posted by Rob Gronovius on Wednesday, May 18, 2011 5:19 PM

This just in, new Dragon PzKpfw IV Ausf G with markings of the tank Michael Wittmann walked by on his way to the chow line on Wednesday, March 11, 1944.

  • Member since
    March 2010
Posted by shoot&scoot on Wednesday, May 18, 2011 5:21 PM

Rob Gronovius

This just in, new Dragon PzKpfw IV Ausf G with markings of the tank Michael Wittmann walked by on his way to the chow line on Thursday, March 11, 1944.

at 3:57 pm during a hailstorm.........

  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk, England
Posted by Bish on Wednesday, May 18, 2011 5:37 PM

Rob Gronovius

This just in, new Dragon PzKpfw IV Ausf G with markings of the tank Michael Wittmann walked by on his way to the chow line on Wednesday, March 11, 1944.

O come on, now your just being silly.

 

Every one knows that was a Pz V

I am a Norfolk man and i glory in being so

 

On the bench: Airfix 1/72nd Harrier GR.3/Fujimi 1/72nd Ju 87D-3

  • Member since
    November 2004
  • From: Cat Central, NC
Posted by Bronto on Wednesday, May 18, 2011 6:37 PM

I don't see a problem here.  All of the kits represent different production patches of the tank.  I don't think any of the releases have repeated the variant.  (not including the original DML PZ IV kits)

  • Member since
    April 2008
  • From: Philadelphia PA
Posted by smeagol the vile on Wednesday, May 18, 2011 7:06 PM

Honestly, I think they would make more money if they made a standard kit and sold it for like... 5-10$ cheaper then they normally would, and just make the variant parts in addon kits you can use on their base kit, and charge like 5-10$ for it, to make up their costs.

 

  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Fort Knox
Posted by Rob Gronovius on Wednesday, May 18, 2011 7:09 PM

Bish

 Rob Gronovius:

This just in, new Dragon PzKpfw IV Ausf G with markings of the tank Michael Wittmann walked by on his way to the chow line on Wednesday, March 11, 1944.

 

O come on, now your just being silly.

 

Every one knows that was a Pz V

That one is next, the Pz V he used while his main ride was having the road wheels rotated and oil changed followed by the tank he drove to church on Sundays.

I know they are all "different", but it's more of a shell game at this point. It isn't really a true "new" kit. It's often a shuffle of new decals and existing sprues from various kits to give the illusion that they are releasing brand new kits.

  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: Allentown, PA
Posted by BaBill212 on Wednesday, May 18, 2011 7:20 PM

As long as people are willing to purchase,,,,   more power to them

Enjoy the ride!

 

  • Member since
    June 2010
  • From: Austin, TX
Posted by DoogsATX on Wednesday, May 18, 2011 7:25 PM

Honestly, what manufacturer doesn't do this?

You don't think Tamiya's 1/32 Spitfire VIII and XVI are new-mold kits, do you? They borrow extensively from the IX. Same's true of so many of their 1/48 kits (P-51, P-47, A6M, Mosquito, Beaufighter, F4U-1, etc). 

Accurate Miniatures back in the day with the Allison 'Stangs, the Dauntless...

Hobby Boss with the F4F-3, F4F-4, FM-1, FM-2...

How many Shermans does Tasca make again?

Heck...Dragon with the Panzer III.

It's just that the Germans made so many incremental changes to the Pz.IV resulting in a ridiculous # of variations on more-or-less the same theme...

On the Bench: 1/32 Trumpeter P-47 | 1/32 Hasegawa Bf 109G | 1/144 Eduard MiG-21MF x2

On Deck:  1/350 HMS Dreadnought

Blog/Completed Builds: doogsmodels.com

 

  • Member since
    September 2009
  • From: Rugby, England
Posted by Hinksy on Wednesday, May 18, 2011 7:40 PM

Bish

I like that Dragon have now decided that Pz IV's should be broken down into Early Mid and late production.

I agree with you on that one, Bish Ditto

I'm slowly making my way through all the Panzers with the odd Allied build thrown in when I feel like some 'Green'!

I'll be happy with the early, mid and late options - it will make things a lot easier for the average modeller who just wants to show the development of a particular piece of armour throughout it's life without getting boged down in all the Ausf. variants.

One more thing I'd like to see Dragon doing is starting to focus on a few Vietnam era kits. It was my interest in the 'Nam conflict that I learnt about early in High School that led to me becoming a '20th Century Hobby Historian' (I'm still learning, of course) and ultimately, into the world of Modelling, which has become an exciting part of my life now.

I'd like to see a decent ONTOS for a start. It's a piece of armour that I find 'mesmerising' and visually stunning - I tried the Academy version and hated it (it's an unfinished test bed for my airbrush now) so I'm now just hoping that Dragon or Tamiya releases a decent one sooner or later 

ATVB

Ben Toast

On the Bench - Dragon Pz. IV Ausf. G (L.A.H.) Yes

Your image is loading...

 

  • Member since
    December 2006
  • From: N. Georgia
Posted by Jester75 on Wednesday, May 18, 2011 9:02 PM

Rob Gronovius

This just in, new Dragon PzKpfw IV Ausf G with markings of the tank Michael Wittmann walked by on his way to the chow line on Wednesday, March 11, 1944.

Actually that would be very innaccurate as March 11, 1944 was on a Saturday .Whistling

Eric

 

  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk, England
Posted by Bish on Thursday, May 19, 2011 4:34 AM

Hinksy

 

I agree with you on that one, Bish Ditto

I'm slowly making my way through all the Panzers with the odd Allied build thrown in when I feel like some 'Green'!

I'll be happy with the early, mid and late options - it will make things a lot easier for the average modeller who just wants to show the development of a particular piece of armour throughout it's life without getting boged down in all the Ausf. variants.

I was trying to be sarcastic on that one. Whistling In reality there were now such terms as early middle or late. These are post war terms. They haven't been applied so much to Pz IV's before. And to be honest, building a tank from an early middle or late production run doesn't really reflect the changes the Germans made during production. These changes often happened monthly. So take the Tiger I for example. If you wanted to build every different version, you would have to build one from every month of its production. And rather than making it easier, it makes it harder. useing the Ausf designations is alot easier than getting bogged down in all the little changes made during each Ausf's production period.

I am a Norfolk man and i glory in being so

 

On the bench: Airfix 1/72nd Harrier GR.3/Fujimi 1/72nd Ju 87D-3

  • Member since
    September 2009
  • From: Rugby, England
Posted by Hinksy on Thursday, May 19, 2011 5:57 AM

Hello Bish,

I'm sorry buddy but I didn't detect any sarcasm there Wink the box clearly states 'Mid Production' and although I'm well aware that there were no early, middle or late Panzer IV's this addition of 'x-production' helps a lot for a relative newbie like me.

If I know that the Pz IV I'm looking at is a very early or late one I can look at it's Ausf designation and see how it would have differed from the design of other IV's.

I haven't been building long enough to know much about Ausf designations and how they affect Panzers (IV's inparticular as I am yet to build a true Panzer IV - I've only made builds that utilise the IV's chasis).

Cheers buddy,

Ben Toast

On the Bench - Dragon Pz. IV Ausf. G (L.A.H.) Yes

Your image is loading...

 

  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk, England
Posted by Bish on Thursday, May 19, 2011 6:14 AM

The whole terminology of armoured vehicles can get complicated. Even though i had been redaing about German armour for years, i only begain to realise the way things work when i went into the battalions MILAN platoon back in 95. Part of that was AFV training and i begain to see the systems that difefrent countries used and that helped my understand the German system better.

Without trying to teach you to suck eggs, the term Ausf refers to the various models. In the British Army we use Mark, for example, Challenger Mk 1 and Mk 2. The Germans of course use letters, Ausf H, Ausf J for example. The new model designations are normally given when there is a major change in the vehicle, a new gun for example. But later in the war, little things changed often on a monthly basis, but on there own they weren't big enough to justfy a new Ausf letter

Of course, models are one thing, variants are another issue by themselves. The German system is in my view one of the most complicated i have come across, the same goes for their aircraft. 

persoanlly, i wouldn't get to worried about the early mid and late production, not if you are interesed in collecting as many versions as you can. Once i have a certain Ausf, i am happy with that. Not interested in getting vehicles with all the changes within that Ausf. The only exception i have made in this is with Tigers, and thats only because i want to get vehicle from every one of the Tiger battalions.

I am a Norfolk man and i glory in being so

 

On the bench: Airfix 1/72nd Harrier GR.3/Fujimi 1/72nd Ju 87D-3

JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.