SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

Tamiya 1/35 T-34/76 ChTZ build

4926 views
18 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Sonora Desert
Tamiya 1/35 T-34/76 ChTZ build
Posted by stikpusher on Thursday, August 29, 2013 11:58 AM

I built this for the 1943 GB here. The markings are supposedly for a T-34 at Kursk. After doing a bit of  photo research on this particular type of T-34 I made a few mods (from my spares bin), replacing some of the road wheels with all steel types, and instead of using the cylindrical external fuel drums, replacing those with some empty brackets, and added a breech for the 76mm gun. I also cut out the middle of the kit tow cables and replaced those with some parachute (550) cord "gut", cut out the molded in intake fan grill screen and replaced it with some mesh, then created some armored louvres for the hole beneath the screen using strip and rod styrene. I also relaced the bow MG barrel with one made from stretched tube styrene, and added foil tie down straps for stowage.

Thanks for looking, comments and critiques welcome

 

F is for FIRE, That burns down the whole town!

U is for URANIUM... BOMBS!

N is for NO SURVIVORS...

       - Plankton

LSM

 

  • Member since
    November 2009
  • From: SW Virginia
Posted by Gamera on Thursday, August 29, 2013 12:54 PM

Wow, nice work SP! I love the dust! Is this the old Tamiya kit, Dragon, Zvesda, or something else?

"I dream in fire but work in clay." -Arthur Machen

 

  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Sonora Desert
Posted by stikpusher on Thursday, August 29, 2013 1:45 PM

Thank you sir. It's the Tamiya kit. The hull dates back to their original one from 1970 something release, but the turret is their early 1990s reboxing of that variant. Plus I added the mods that I listed above. I do have one more Zvezda and a few different Dragon T-34s in my stash still.

 

F is for FIRE, That burns down the whole town!

U is for URANIUM... BOMBS!

N is for NO SURVIVORS...

       - Plankton

LSM

 

  • Member since
    January 2007
Posted by the doog on Thursday, August 29, 2013 2:06 PM

Not bad at all---it could use a little bit of metallic grey around the hatches and on the grab handles though, to show some use. You could also use add some areas of scratches and wear on places like the side and the front/rear fenders/muffler shrouds to show crew travel by using the base coat color --paint some fine lines and maybe some sponge-chipping in spots. T34s seem to really have gotten pretty beat up from most reference I've seen. Just suggestions... :)

  • Member since
    May 2004
  • From: Mount Bretherton Model Aircraft Observatory
Posted by f8sader on Thursday, August 29, 2013 2:11 PM

Good finish and photography!

Lon-ski

  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Sonora Desert
Posted by stikpusher on Thursday, August 29, 2013 2:35 PM

Thank you F8.

Karl, I was keeping "beat up" to a minimum on this as much of the T-34 reserves at Kursk were new production and sent there to wait for the German offensive- they were trained in during the build up period, but not hard used... yet... But I certainly agree about some crew wear thru the mud and dust, just  not sure how to approach that. The base color is from a rattle can.... Oh the things to ponder...

 

F is for FIRE, That burns down the whole town!

U is for URANIUM... BOMBS!

N is for NO SURVIVORS...

       - Plankton

LSM

 

  • Member since
    January 2007
Posted by the doog on Thursday, August 29, 2013 8:39 PM

Carlos, what about the dust---can you scratch that, or rub some off somehow? If base coat is a rattle can, it may stand up to abuse?

Alternately, just spray the paint on a piece of cardboard and add it with a paint brush or sponge. It's just simple enamel.

  • Member since
    December 2008
  • From: Goffstown, NH
Posted by New Hampshire on Thursday, August 29, 2013 8:42 PM

Na Zdorovie comrade Stik!  All she needs now is her own horde of Red Army soldiers riding along on the back! Cool

Brian

  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Sonora Desert
Posted by stikpusher on Thursday, August 29, 2013 9:35 PM

Karl, I may be able to rub some of that off. I used Model Master and Tamiya acrylics for the weathering coats.  But the base green is Tamiya rattle can, which I think might be a lacquer. But spraying a bit on some cardboard is a good idea for an alternate.

Thank you NH, I do have some Zvezda and Dragon tankodesantniki figures that would work for that.

 

F is for FIRE, That burns down the whole town!

U is for URANIUM... BOMBS!

N is for NO SURVIVORS...

       - Plankton

LSM

 

  • Member since
    December 2011
Posted by Chrisk-k on Thursday, August 29, 2013 9:45 PM

I love its dusty look! Did you simply spray pigments to create dust?

Iwata HP-CS | Iwata HP-CR | Iwata HP-M2 | H&S Evolution | Iwata Smart Jet + Sparmax Tank

  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Sonora Desert
Posted by stikpusher on Friday, August 30, 2013 12:15 AM

Thank you Chris. No pigments were used on this one. 1st I brushed Future onto the running gear/lower hull and while it was still wet sprinkled on finely sifted dirt for texture. Once that dried I airbrushed on Model Master Acrylic Raw Umber, followed by Raw Sienna, and then finally a highly thinned coat of Tamiya Deck Tan

 

F is for FIRE, That burns down the whole town!

U is for URANIUM... BOMBS!

N is for NO SURVIVORS...

       - Plankton

LSM

 

  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: On my kitchen counter top somewhere in central North Carolina.
Posted by disastermaster on Friday, August 30, 2013 12:39 AM

Looks like you're using the flash.  

http://webspace.webring.com/people/ds/spideyanimations2/icon_203_flash_running.gif

This build probably would present much better if you didn't use it. Using the flash for this kind of work is  notorious for making a good paint job look washed out.

 https://i.imgur.com/LjRRaV1.png

 

 

 
  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Sonora Desert
Posted by stikpusher on Friday, August 30, 2013 10:19 AM

Yes I use a flash. Lighting situation is not conducive to photos without a flash and I do not own a tripod.  To my eye, it definitely looks better in natural light.

 

F is for FIRE, That burns down the whole town!

U is for URANIUM... BOMBS!

N is for NO SURVIVORS...

       - Plankton

LSM

 

  • Member since
    December 2008
  • From: Goffstown, NH
Posted by New Hampshire on Friday, August 30, 2013 6:15 PM

stikpusher

Yes I use a flash. Lighting situation is not conducive to photos without a flash and I do not own a tripod.  To my eye, it definitely looks better in natural light.

By chance do you have some work lights around the garage?  I ask because I basically I have a poor man's light box....I use 3 work lights (one above, 2 on either side) and soften the harshness a bit by covering the front of the light with tracing paper.  At that point all ya gotta do is set the camera on something solid (stack of books or something) of the right elevation you want and use the camera's timer function.  Voila!  Cheap, easy and it can do a surprisingly good job!  Believe me, I laughed when I first saw the price of an actual photo light box in the MicroMark catalog knowing I did the same exact thing for pennies! (well, I will admit I do have a tripod and a dSLR, but those were bought before I even took up scale modeling Wink )

Brian

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Central Wisconsin
Posted by Spamicus on Friday, August 30, 2013 10:21 PM

Very well done. The weathering looks very good.

Steve

  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Sonora Desert
Posted by stikpusher on Friday, August 30, 2013 11:18 PM

Steve, thank you for the kind words.

NH,  my work lights in the garage are this: a flourescent desk lamp, the type meant for a office work desk with pencil holder etc.; a flourescent ring type magnifyer work lamp on swivel arm attached to my work bench; and a halogen floor lamp that projects upward and I have reflecting off of the stuff in the rafters to give a bit more help in there.... but none are really movable from their spots to create a better photo set up, and doing my photos on the work bench would mean moving a ton of stuff- not practical at all with my mess... I would kill for a properly illuminated set up work area (actually I would kill for a lot less but...)

 

F is for FIRE, That burns down the whole town!

U is for URANIUM... BOMBS!

N is for NO SURVIVORS...

       - Plankton

LSM

 

  • Member since
    July 2013
  • From: Talent, OR
Posted by bitbite on Friday, August 30, 2013 11:33 PM

I think it looks friggin' awesome!  Bow Down

"Resist the urge to greedily fondle the parts . . ." - Sheperd Paine "Modeling Tanks and Military Vehicles" Page 5

  • Member since
    December 2008
  • From: Goffstown, NH
Posted by New Hampshire on Saturday, August 31, 2013 5:44 PM

OK, I gotcha Stik.  Actually I can kind of relate.  since my workbench doubles as my photography area I have to clean the mess that is my work area any time I want to snap a few shots....which is why I didn't take any of this project until now. Wink

Brian

  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Sonora Desert
Posted by stikpusher on Saturday, August 31, 2013 5:49 PM

Thanks BB! You are too kind...

NH, I take almost all my WIP shots on my workbench, but I have so much going on there... not to mention that the visually "busy" surface of my workbench is a horrible back drop- the camera often focuses on that rather than the subject kit... I would build at an even SLOWER pace than I do now if I removed all the stuff to cover it with a sheet for completion photos...

 

F is for FIRE, That burns down the whole town!

U is for URANIUM... BOMBS!

N is for NO SURVIVORS...

       - Plankton

LSM

 

JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.