SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

Trumpeter T-80BV

7889 views
15 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    May 2009
  • From: Hobart, Tasmania
Trumpeter T-80BV
Posted by Konigwolf13 on Wednesday, January 29, 2014 2:27 AM
On opening the box you are met with what has become a Trumpeter standard, a box absolutely full of sprues with a small mix of photo-etch. On first inspection Trumpeter have done a lot to correct on the inaccuracies of the Dragons preceding kit, Turret and rear deck shape plus tool boxes on fenders (the most glaringly obvious points when I built Zvezda's offering during November 2013). One of the most frustrating points of the Dragon's original offering was the ERA blocks on the turret front. These were single or small grouping of blocks that were very difficult to position at the correct angles and spacing. Trumpeter have combated this by having one large ERA moulding with the lower blocks positioned against this with both plastic and photo-etch spacers then the completed unit is attached to the turret front. The kits tracks are individual link with an alignment jig provided There are a total of 27 sprues of varying sizes with some being either multiples (e.g. tracks, road wheels etc.) including on clear. 2 Photo-etch sprues, hull tub and upper turret. One decal sheet and one marking sheet with 4 camouflage variants is provided. No units or dates are named. Some web research has shown more information however. The four types : Green, Tan and Black, Standard parade version. Green, Tan and Grey, Apparently seen during Russia's withdrawal from the former East Germany? Green, Black and Grey, Sertolovo in 2001. Green, Pretty generic Russian colouring. The instruction book is 20 pages containing 21 steps. Trumpeters new T-80BV looks to be great kit that should build up to be an excellent representation of a kit that needed a more modern accurate release. Will post some build pics soon

  • Member since
    May 2009
  • From: Hobart, Tasmania
Posted by Konigwolf13 on Wednesday, January 29, 2014 2:28 AM

Why why why wont this forum keep my original format spacing???

  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Sonora Desert
Posted by stikpusher on Wednesday, January 29, 2014 1:07 PM

Those look much nicer than the old Dragon T-80. But with nearly two decades of research to use, I would hope so! I look forward to more!

 

F is for FIRE, That burns down the whole town!

U is for URANIUM... BOMBS!

N is for NO SURVIVORS...

       - Plankton

LSM

 

  • Member since
    May 2009
  • From: Hobart, Tasmania
Posted by Konigwolf13 on Sunday, February 2, 2014 1:25 AM
Well been a bit slack on the updates the last couple of day so here's where I'm at... Have the hull almost complete except for 2 lots of photo etch which I will do just before first and second hull painting. Usually I would paint at the end and then add the track and running gear. With this beast I think it will be easier to paint tracks running gear etc. add them then paint the rest of the hull after add the side skirts. Overall thoughts on the kit? Goes together exceptionally well, better even than the most recent Dragon armour I've purchased. Instructions are a little vague in some areas so I've had to spend a bit of time double checking against references. My only real gripe so far is the engine grill has been over complicated. In the kit it done as 2 sets of 8 small PE panels assembled into a grid, the fit of these wasn't perfect. It would of been better of they had followed the real version (or at least the one in my references) and just had single mesh screen with a frame over the top. In all I have been really enjoying the general ease of build and have been really happy so far. PS these shots were taken before I added the headlights      And comparing it to Dragons original T-80 Offering...     That's all for now

  • Member since
    May 2009
  • From: Hobart, Tasmania
Posted by Konigwolf13 on Sunday, February 2, 2014 2:10 AM

@ Stik, there is no way would it of been possible to of completed this version in a 48 build.

  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Sonora Desert
Posted by stikpusher on Sunday, February 2, 2014 11:11 AM

KW13, that looks WAY too complicated for a 48 hour build. It certainly looks to be a beauty of a kit.

 

F is for FIRE, That burns down the whole town!

U is for URANIUM... BOMBS!

N is for NO SURVIVORS...

       - Plankton

LSM

 

  • Member since
    May 2009
  • From: Hobart, Tasmania
Posted by Konigwolf13 on Tuesday, February 4, 2014 8:33 PM
Well another update. After a rather frustrating session working on the deep water fording equipment on Monday night, last night was much better. First up. Be aware when you get to this stage you may want to make a deviation from trumpeters instructions. Almost all images I've seen of T-80BV's show the storage boxes mounted on the snorkel gear to be mounted somewhere between horizontal and 45% from there. Trumpeter instructions say to mount them vertical, I have only seen this in a few different pictures. (Also note most tanks also have identification numbers on these boxes that trumpeter does not provide for). Boxes on fording equipment (tube on back of turret) usually mounted like so or on moderate angle.(Also note identification numbers, one per box)  Trumpeter mounted at absolute vertical like this. Seems to be more uncommon.  . So people again check your references then decide. Ok so where am I at now? I've completed the ERA on one side of the turret. While Trumpeter have come up with a better method to get the right angles than the original Dragon, getting all the blocks to align next to each other is more challenging (Note the blocks on the other side are moulded together so this will not be problem, why didn't they do the same for this side?). Everything else so far no problems. Gun and cover are not glued on yet (just sitting for looks).

  • Member since
    January 2007
Posted by the doog on Wednesday, February 5, 2014 5:45 PM

Cool Ruskie beans, man! What a neat looking tank. Thanks for taking the time to document the differences and points to consider in the pictures and text. This is what makes a GREAT modeling post!

I love that gray-green-black camo scheme!!

  • Member since
    May 2009
  • From: Hobart, Tasmania
Posted by Konigwolf13 on Thursday, February 13, 2014 4:57 AM

Been flat out the last week if your wanting to see my last couple of updates check the link below otherwise I will try to get enough time for a full update here in the next couple of days.

 

 

http://www.next-level-models.com/trumpeter-t-80bv.html

 

Edit in -link should work now.

 

  • Member since
    March 2013
  • From: Puebla, Mexico
Posted by garzonh on Thursday, February 13, 2014 7:01 AM

Hey, very nice build!

What a big storage can on the back of the turret....takes down possibilities for hiding, it is a "big" sign screaming "heeeyy...Im a tank, shoot here"....

But your kit looks nicely assembled and made the correct changes.

Definitely go for the winter scheme....looks awesome as doog said.

  • Member since
    May 2009
  • From: Hobart, Tasmania
Posted by Konigwolf13 on Thursday, February 13, 2014 5:19 PM

Thanks for the reply garzonh.

Still not 100% certain how I'm going to paint it yet. Better decide soon I guess

PS sorry all for it not being  a good link above IE explorer isn't providing correct posting option even when I use "Use rich formatting" and Firefox won't log in for me

  • Member since
    May 2009
  • From: Hobart, Tasmania
Posted by Konigwolf13 on Thursday, February 13, 2014 5:20 PM

And now it won't even let me use the quick reply box

 

Edit problem fixed, compatibility mode... "engage"

  • Member since
    November 2009
  • From: SW Virginia
Posted by Gamera on Friday, February 14, 2014 5:35 AM

Very cool! Looking forward to seeing what camo scheme you decide to go with.

"I dream in fire but work in clay." -Arthur Machen

 

  • Member since
    May 2009
  • From: Hobart, Tasmania
Posted by Konigwolf13 on Monday, March 24, 2014 10:29 PM

Well build is complete left it at parade clean. No real major issues, biggest error (and its not really that big an issue) is slightly wrong track pattern. If you really want more information you can find the whole build on my site here.

 

 

JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.