Thanks Stick!
I know, I know. Its not accurate. But I'm working with a very toy-like model here. :/
I've dug through my spare decal collection and that's what I had to use. The serial numbers are from an old Churchill esci kit, the circled star, "THUNDER", and the white corner rear fender markings (not shown) are left over from my son's Revell Sherman kit.
There are even black markings on the fenders for 3^3^32 HQ5, but those are from an esci M-60Blazer kit.
The markings are nonsense.
I've settled into a cross between real and ArmyMen toy here guys. I think it looks neat and it reminds me of fond memories of playing in the dirt lol.
What you're meant to see is the techniques that I'm using here are a test run for the effects I'm using on the M-103 next. You guys seem to be getting stuck on the inaccuracies of a kit produced in 1974, and that's fine. We all get hung up on details sometimes lol.
But let me ask you this; what would you do with this kit? You certainly wouldn't spend a ton of money on fixing it, would you? Its barely worth an AM decal sheet, if you could find one in 1/48 lol.
Sometimes I build things just to see what I can do with them. This one has been fun and I'm going to be happy having it on display. I've proven the techniques used on this model will greatly enhance the M-103 and that was my goal.
But by all means, do NOT stop critiquing my work. I don't know everything, not by a long shot, and if I don't know then I definitely want you guys to teach me. Besides, its my mistake for not announcing my premise for what I'm doing with this kit. I've wanted to do this work to it when I bought it 3 years ago, but i never did.
Now was just the perfect opportunity to do so. After the M-103 I have an M-60A1 to build for my Dad. "His tank" and the techniques used on this M-48 will also benefit that build as well.
So consider this a test run.
Thank you both for taking the time to reply and offer your invaluable wisdom. I appreciate it more than you know. :)