SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

New models I'd like to see produced.

5315 views
23 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    March 2013
New models I'd like to see produced.
Posted by patrick206 on Tuesday, March 12, 2013 7:39 PM

Probably not enough interest on the part of kit producers, but here is what would be a solid home run for me. All 1/48th scale.

 

1. Waco UPF-7

2. Stearman

3. Howard DGA

4. Stinson Reliant, (if only one of these possible, THIS IS IT.)

5. Fairchild 24 Rancher, (inline and radial engines.)

6. Curtis Robin.

7. Great Lakes bi plane.

All of these I consider not only functional and beautiful designs, but genuinely a major contribution to private and commercial aviation. High quality kits of these, I believe would be very well recieved by avid builders of today. 

Patrick

  • Member since
    April 2005
  • From: Montana USA
Posted by heepey on Tuesday, March 12, 2013 11:08 PM

+1 on the list plus Cessna 180-185

  • Member since
    November 2009
  • From: Twin Cities of Minnesota
Posted by Don Stauffer on Wednesday, March 13, 2013 9:21 AM

I would endorse all of these, especially the Reliant, which I have been pushing for.  Which Stearman were you talking about, Patrick?  We sure need a PT-17, even though it is not strictly a Civil aircraft unless converted to duster or just a civil owned classic.  There were, however, a number of Stearman models intended for civil service.

I still say we need a decent DC-3 and a decent Ford Trimotor!

Don Stauffer in Minnesota

  • Member since
    October 2012
  • From: Mt. Washington, KY
Posted by Geezer on Wednesday, March 13, 2013 9:31 AM

A dear friend, now gone, re-drew the plans, sold several sets and built this Great Lakes -  http://i1281.photobucket.com/albums/a520/lwillis1/DSCF0039_zps38c2aece.jpg

www.spamodeler.com/forum/index.php 

Mediocraties - my favorite Greek model builder. 

 

  • Member since
    March 2013
Posted by patrick206 on Wednesday, March 13, 2013 2:27 PM

Thanks, guys.

Heepey: Your friends Great Lakes is just beautiful.

Bick: Nice Ercoupe and Waco Cabin models, great construction and painting. The craft acrylics I bought were what Michaels said were their best in stock, there is another art supply store in town, I'll try them.

Don: Yes, for sure the PT-17. From there, modifications could easily convert it to the Navy N3N or whatever.

Thanks again.

Patrick

  • Member since
    February 2015
Posted by Bick on Wednesday, March 13, 2013 4:55 PM

Patrick,

Add a Rearwin Speedster to your list  (gotta be red, of course)- and I want all of 'em.

PS If you like the SR7 have a look HERE for Paul Bradley's micro RC Reliant - video of flight near the last page.

Moderator
  • Member since
    September 2011
Posted by Tim Kidwell on Wednesday, March 13, 2013 6:21 PM

Hey guys,

Take the FSM Most-Wanted Kits Survey:

Go to this link and vote for the models you'd most like to see manufacturers make.

We'll publish the results in the September 2013 FineScale Modeler.

Best,

Tim

--

Timothy Kidwell
tkidwell@firecrown.com
Editor
Scale Model Brands
Firecrown Media

 

  • Member since
    July 2008
  • From: Summerville, SC
Posted by jeffpez on Thursday, March 14, 2013 5:50 AM

Your survey doesn't have a catagory for something I'd love to see and that's construction equipment. How about a bulldozer or backhoe or excavator? If anyone has ever produced a kit for any of these things I've yet to find it.

  • Member since
    March 2013
Posted by patrick206 on Thursday, March 14, 2013 10:52 PM

Bick -

OK, if you get to have your Rearwin, (red,) then I'm entitled to have the Stinson Station Wagon, (maroon.)

Patrick

  • Member since
    February 2015
Posted by Bick on Friday, March 15, 2013 5:41 PM

Patrick,

Good deal! The Stinson Station Wagon was a nice airplane BUT not as sexy as the Rearwin LOL!

  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: Phoenix,Az
Posted by 9x19mm on Saturday, March 16, 2013 3:14 AM

Voted for a 1/144  MD-11, again.

  • Member since
    March 2013
Posted by Guild Aero on Monday, March 18, 2013 10:49 AM

I am planning a series of 1/48th scale civil aircraft in vac-form to keep prices down.  The Stinson Reliant is one on the list as is the Erco Ercoupe, because one was always buzzing up in the skies of my childhood near Stapleford Tawney airfield (we called it Abridge).

Possibly a Waco as Lars Operland has furnished me with a lot of info on them.  Normally it will be English subject matter, as that's what I know and like best.

Another light aircraft I like is the Super Emeraude.  But the ubiquitous Cessna 172, etc. really should be done as it is the most prolific a/c ever built!  

Austers, too.

Watch this space.  Interest so far is, frankly, woeful! So much so that I may just shelve the whole thing to the level where I just do literally what I like for the hell of it.  My son has a vac-former anyway.  And I could always sell the patterns for resins.

What really annoys me is the way the World and his wife will fawn all over the rare good build of a civil light a/c, yet wouldn't dream of building one even if they have one in their stash!

Martin

  • Member since
    March 2013
Posted by Guild Aero on Monday, March 18, 2013 11:16 AM

I have just learned that Minicraft do a new Cessna 172 model, on floats in 1/48th scale.  It is imported by a company very near me!

AND a Cessna 150 on wheels and a Piper Super Cub!  Also 1/48th scale.  Maybe things are looking up, eh?

Just read that the 172 has removable engine cowlings and engine detail!!

Martin

  • Member since
    March 2013
Posted by Guild Aero on Wednesday, March 20, 2013 2:40 PM

I'm going to give this a go with a Waco ZQC-5, on floats and skis in 1/48th scale, vac-form. My info is from Lars Opland who knows his bush planes backwards and is, of course, the man behind the excellent Khee-Kha 1/72nd scale kits.

Wish me luck.  I figure the American market is big enough to at least cover costs, whereas Britain?.....

Martiin

  • Member since
    November 2004
  • From: Cat Central, NC
Posted by Bronto on Wednesday, March 20, 2013 3:34 PM

"Your survey doesn't have a catagory for something I'd love to see and that's construction equipment. How about a bulldozer or backhoe or excavator? If anyone has ever produced a kit for any of these things I've yet to find it."

AMT did a bulldozer, front loader, scraper, in 1/25.  They aren't too hard to find.

  • Member since
    March 2010
  • From: Boston
Posted by mach71 on Wednesday, March 20, 2013 9:46 PM

A Shorts C-23 sherpa

A good large scale T-37 and T-38

  • Member since
    November 2009
  • From: Twin Cities of Minnesota
Posted by Don Stauffer on Thursday, March 21, 2013 8:50 AM

Hmm.  Never seen a civil T-37.  That would be interesting.  I have seen some nice builds of kits of the T-38.  I suppose NASA's birds could be considered civil.

Don Stauffer in Minnesota

  • Member since
    March 2010
  • From: Boston
Posted by mach71 on Friday, March 22, 2013 6:19 PM

Doh!

But I would still like them.

  • Member since
    November 2009
  • From: Twin Cities of Minnesota
Posted by Don Stauffer on Saturday, March 23, 2013 9:07 AM

I have an A-37 in my stash.  Would like to build it as a T-37, which I flew for awhile before I washed out. I have been trying to remember the differences. I think the A-37 had a different engine but whether the tailpipe was different or not I do not remember.  

I suppose one could take that A-37 kit and paint it as a civil aircraft.  Either use homemade decals or use N-numbers from some other kit.

Don Stauffer in Minnesota

  • Member since
    March 2010
  • From: Boston
Posted by mach71 on Sunday, March 24, 2013 1:59 PM

The engines were different. The A-37 used  non-afterburning J-85 T-38 engines.

The A-37 also had tip tanks and hard points on the wing. I think the cockpit was updated with a gunsight.

It also had a mini gun mounted on the forward right fuselage.

  • Member since
    November 2009
  • From: Twin Cities of Minnesota
Posted by Don Stauffer on Monday, March 25, 2013 8:47 AM

I know the engines were a different model.  Were the A engines afterburning? I'd guess that would make the tailpipe a lot different.  Yeah, I figured I could take the tanks and hardpoints off the wing with no trouble.  Gun might be a bit harder. But the tailpipes might be the hardest to fix.

Don Stauffer in Minnesota

  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Northern California
Posted by jeaton01 on Monday, March 25, 2013 8:30 PM

Don, I started to do that conversion on a Monogram kit and found that the inlets are larger on the A-37, that looked like the hardest part to me.   I am pretty certain there were no afterburners on the A-37, straight GE J-85's are plenty for it.  Same engine as the 23-28 series Lears, civil CJ-610.  The T-37 engines had real poor acceleration so they kept the idle rpm pretty high and had attenuators, flaps that could open in to the exhaust stream, they are shown in the drawing below.

Here is a T-37 3-view from the days when Cessna had a really good PR department.

John

To see build logs for my models:  http://goldeneramodel.com/mymodels/mymodels.html

 

  • Member since
    June 2006
  • From: Michigan
Posted by ps1scw on Saturday, March 30, 2013 10:43 AM
  • Member since
    November 2009
  • From: Twin Cities of Minnesota
Posted by Don Stauffer on Sunday, March 31, 2013 11:02 AM

That latest Minicraft 172 is a very nice kit- new molds.  Sharp detail.  Both a land and seaplane version are available. I have the kit and it is in the queue to my bench.

Don Stauffer in Minnesota

JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.