SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

Upcoming 1/35 Guadalcanal Marines

3564 views
13 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    March 2008
  • From: Cincinnati, Ohio USA
Posted by Drew Cook on Wednesday, January 14, 2009 3:23 PM

Sweet -- bare pots, boondockers, Springfields and a "POS" Reising...

Reminds me of Tom O'Reilly, the old 1st Mar Div gyrene I knew who had been on the 'Canal and showed me how they developed a "rapid-fire" technique with their Springfields...

They pulled the trigger with their middle finger, hooked the bolt, threw it up, and pulled it to the rear with the index finger, then threw the bolt back home and down with the thumb, pulling the trigger again with the middle finger...

The five rounds go out one after the other, as fast as possible, "rapid fire"-style...   

  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Sonora Desert
Posted by stikpusher on Sunday, January 11, 2009 7:08 PM
This set has not yet been released, only announced. But it is not Gen2.

 

F is for FIRE, That burns down the whole town!

U is for URANIUM... BOMBS!

N is for NO SURVIVORS...

       - Plankton

LSM

 

  • Member since
    April 2008
  • From: Charlottesville Va
Posted by Stern0 on Sunday, January 11, 2009 4:55 PM
Just picked up the 2nd MarDiv (ooh rah) figures on Tarawa. How much older is this set than the Guadalcanal devil dogs? It looks great, love the Gen 2 figs, even has the photo-eched chinstraps hang'n like John WayneWink [;)]
Always Faithful U.S.M.C
  • Member since
    June 2008
  • From: Iowa
Posted by Hans von Hammer on Sunday, January 11, 2009 1:14 PM
 Huxy wrote:

 

 

 agentg wrote:
At least they got the weapons right. 03's, BAR's and Reisings, only Marine M1's on the 'canal were stolen borrowed from the Army. Whistling [:-^]

 

Really? They didn't get Garands issued? 

Garands were just starting to get issued (in any real numbers) to the Marines in mid-1942.  The Army had dibs on the M-1 production prior to 1942 initially, doing a complete change-out by regiment... The Marine Corps policy prior to 7 Dec 41 was to change to the M-1 individually as the '03s wore out...  The typical Marine's "attitude" towards the M-1 (in the early days) was that it was a "Buck Rogers P.O.S. and REAL rifles had bolt-actions"... Considering the general consensus among the other world-armies (equipped with K-98, Lee-Enfields, and Arisakas) they weren't alone...

I felt the same way about the M-16A1 vs A2 until I got (and fired) an A-2...  (I still feel that way about the M-4...Wink [;)])

  • Member since
    April 2008
  • From: Kristiansund, Norway
Posted by Huxy on Saturday, January 10, 2009 5:11 PM
 stikpusher wrote:

The Tenaru River Battle was the first major fight on Guadalcanal proper after the landings-which had been unopposed. Neighboring Tulagi, Florida, Gavutu, and Tonambago (sp?) were opposed landings also made on by the Marines August 7th, 1942. But back to Tenaru, the Japanese landed a force under the command of one Col Ichiki in preperation to counterattack and retake the airfield. He had roughly a battalion size element under his command. He was to assess the Marine positions and wait for the remainder of his Regiemnt before making the attack. Instead, on August 21st, he attacked the superior Marine force in prepared positions along the Tenaru River with his battalion and was majorly defeated, losing some 800 men. Col. Ichiki retreated with his survivors into the jungle, burned his colors, and committed suicide. During the battle Marine tanks, M2 and M3 lights, were used to eliminate the Japanese pockets along the beach area.

 

Thanks! Big Smile [:D]  Yet another thing learned.. 

"Every War Starts And Ends With An Invasion".

  • Member since
    March 2008
  • From: Colorado
Posted by TacoBuff on Saturday, January 10, 2009 4:03 PM
Well, I agree with most of your points now that I look at it.
As far as tanks go, yes, the m3 did fit their needs, especially the Marine Corps who favored it manuverability, but they still operating machines that were quickly becoming obsolete.
Thanks for explaining.
  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Sonora Desert
Posted by stikpusher on Saturday, January 10, 2009 3:32 PM

The Tenaru River Battle was the first major fight on Guadalcanal proper after the landings-which had been unopposed. Neighboring Tulagi, Florida, Gavutu, and Tonambago (sp?) were opposed landings also made on by the Marines August 7th, 1942. But back to Tenaru, the Japanese landed a force under the command of one Col Ichiki in preperation to counterattack and retake the airfield. He had roughly a battalion size element under his command. He was to assess the Marine positions and wait for the remainder of his Regiemnt before making the attack. Instead, on August 21st, he attacked the superior Marine force in prepared positions along the Tenaru River with his battalion and was majorly defeated, losing some 800 men. Col. Ichiki retreated with his survivors into the jungle, burned his colors, and committed suicide. During the battle Marine tanks, M2 and M3 lights, were used to eliminate the Japanese pockets along the beach area.

I must disagree on some of your points TacoBuff. The Pacific War certainly was racist, on both sides. But the troops there were equipped very similarly to their ETO counterparts at the same time. The WWI equipment was mainly because they were in action first with what they had. US Rangers going in to action at Dieppe a few weeks after August 7th were similarly equipped and armed (but not uniformed) as their Marine counterparts. As far as tanks go, all US armor was superior to anything used by the Japanese so there was not the pressing need for the more heavily armored, upgunned tanks that there was in the ETO. The M4 75mm and US armored doctrine was a good match for the needs of the PTO. As has been stated in so many places, both the US and GB decided on a Europe first stategy at the outbreak of the war. But, the overwhelming Japanese victories at the outset of the Pacific War, the manner in which Japan commenced the war incensing US public opinion, and the actual threat posed by Japan, forced a greater commitment to the PTO than was orginally intended early on. Numericly less ground forces and equipment were used in the PTO, at least until late 1944, but qualitatively they were pretty much on par with their ETO comrades.

 

F is for FIRE, That burns down the whole town!

U is for URANIUM... BOMBS!

N is for NO SURVIVORS...

       - Plankton

LSM

 

  • Member since
    March 2008
  • From: Colorado
Posted by TacoBuff on Saturday, January 10, 2009 1:23 PM
the soldiers in the PTO were poorly equipped, as the US thought Hitler and ETO were a greater threat.
If you look at it in a grander scale, the reason we put less into the pacific was because racist ideaolgies of the last century, that the war there would go faster, and require less material. Some marine tank units were using m3a1s up into 1944.
  • Member since
    April 2008
  • From: Kristiansund, Norway
Posted by Huxy on Saturday, January 10, 2009 12:07 PM

Tenaru riverbattle? never heard of... well, I am all blank when it comes to the pacific.. but indeed a very nice set! 

 

 agentg wrote:
At least they got the weapons right. 03's, BAR's and Reisings, only Marine M1's on the 'canal were stolen borrowed from the Army. Whistling [:-^]

 

Really? They didn't get Garands issued? 

"Every War Starts And Ends With An Invasion".

  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Sonora Desert
Posted by stikpusher on Friday, January 9, 2009 11:10 PM

The Pacific theater saw a lot more variety in US uniforms and equipment than the ETO, from khakis and doughboy helmets to steel pots and arctic gear to camo uniforms and soft caps. But the Marines in particular are sadly under represented in plastic figures. I've already built the old Italeri set and am currently painting the Hasegawa/Fine Molds set. This is Dragon's third (if you dont count the "Windtalkers" release of the combined Iwo Jima Marines and IJA) Marine figure set, and I will defintely pick this one up too. Hans, the Tenaru river battle is exactly what I had in mind for these figures with a M3 light.

Now, for their next set I nominate either some Marine Raiders or Paras. Perfect for Bloody Ridge.

 

F is for FIRE, That burns down the whole town!

U is for URANIUM... BOMBS!

N is for NO SURVIVORS...

       - Plankton

LSM

 

  • Member since
    June 2008
  • From: Iowa
Posted by Hans von Hammer on Friday, January 9, 2009 10:38 PM

'Bout time... Only early Jarhead figures I've ever had before were the Italeri figgies.  I've used a lot of GIs for Marines in the past, but itll be nice not to have to putty over leggins and sand off pockets...

I see a good diorama possibility witht hese guys and a M3 Light Tank...

Same here... One Tenaru River Battle dio has already popped into m' head... Bloody Ridge too...

Also gives me a reason finally to buy some Jap infantry figures...

  • Member since
    March 2008
  • From: Colorado
Posted by TacoBuff on Friday, January 9, 2009 8:21 PM
I'm totally buying like 3 sets of these guys lol.  There are too few marines in plastic.  My uncle was a Marine in Vietnam so I have a special place for them in my heart.  Has anybody built any of Dragon's other Marine kits?  They look fantastic, so I might pick 'em up, especially those Gen 2 figs.
  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Sonora Desert
Upcoming 1/35 Guadalcanal Marines
Posted by stikpusher on Thursday, January 8, 2009 9:55 PM

This is a set long overdue! And the uncommon early WWII weapons! I see a good diorama possibility witht hese guys and a M3 Light Tank...

http://www.dragonmodelsusa.com/dmlusa/prodd.asp?pid=DRA6379

 

 

F is for FIRE, That burns down the whole town!

U is for URANIUM... BOMBS!

N is for NO SURVIVORS...

       - Plankton

LSM

 

JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.