SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

Revell's Post-WWII German destroyer v. Lindberg's

861 views
3 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    October 2010
  • From: Arlington, VT
Posted by WallyM3 on Saturday, February 12, 2011 8:11 PM

Ed,

I wanted you to know that I acted on your advice and sometime during the first quarter of the century will be receiving the Revell kit.

If it doesn't come out right, I will loudly and publicly declare it your fault.Wink

Thanks for your reply. I'm looking forward to this one.Bow Down

 

Wally.

  • Member since
    October 2010
  • From: Arlington, VT
Posted by WallyM3 on Saturday, February 12, 2011 10:31 AM

Ed, thank you! That is exactly the two that I meant.

I have a copy of Herne's article in my file for the Lindberg build (right next to the belt sander and cutting torch).

I was a "tin can" sailor myself and these larger scale renderings really interest me. Seems like Destroyers came out of the yards looking different with each visit, and frequently got modified between full yard overhauls. It could lead to some swell arguments about which month a particular configuration represents. (LOL)

 

Wally.

 

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: Mansfield, TX
Posted by EdGrune on Saturday, February 12, 2011 8:00 AM

WallyM3

Can anyone tell me: are these two kits one-in-the-same?

Edit (I just noticed that there's only two letters demarking that thin line between "edit" and "idiot"): The Revell kit is tricked out with lots of different rigging and what not. My interest focuses primarily on the hull and super.

The scale declarations are different, of course. But the hull lengths, base on mealy-mouthed descriptions, are quite similar.

Are you talking about the RoG 1:144 scale Fletcher transferred to the West German Navy post-WWII compared to the 1:125 scale Lindberg Blue Devil destroyer, also a Fletcher-class?

Night and day!

The Lindberg kit is wrong in so many ways from hull to superstructure to armament.    It has broken many modelers, including some who ignored the advice they were given.   See Jeff Herne's article on SteelNavy describing what he did to master the kit.  http://www.steelnavy.com/BDFletcher.htm  Its titled 'Trial by Ordeal' to give you an appreciation.    And don't call Herne mealy mouthed.

The Revell kit is state of the art.   Shapes are accurate.  Scale is accurate.   The model as kitted for the German Navy represents a single post-war evolution.   One of the 5-inch gun housesis deleted,  different secondary gun layout from the WWII standard,  windscreen around the round bridge.

If you want to do a USN model opt for the original Fletcher with all five 5-inch gunhouses.   Even the, out of the box it will only represent a couple of ships in the class from a limited time period.  Aftermarket is available to expand your options.  

The Revell is much recommended over the Lindberg.

  • Member since
    October 2010
  • From: Arlington, VT
Revell's Post-WWII German destroyer v. Lindberg's
Posted by WallyM3 on Friday, February 11, 2011 11:42 PM

Can anyone tell me: are these two kits one-in-the-same?

Edit (I just noticed that there's only two letters demarking that thin line between "edit" and "idiot"): The Revell kit is tricked out with lots of different rigging and what not. My interest focuses primarily on the hull and super.

The scale declarations are different, of course. But the hull lengths, base on mealy-mouthed descriptions, are quite similar.

JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.