If memory serves that PE also has the Campbell on it.
I meant to say that I'd personally go with the PE.
That kit like others of the era isn't pre engineered for PE of course.
Many an hour spent hacking railings of of the old Revell " flat bottoms"
Of course not back when I built them the first time around. What you don't know can't hurt you, right?, and they seemed marvelously detailed at the time.
Nice how the current kits just assume that PE is to be added.
In any case with a kit like the 'wind class, it will really pay to go through the PE set instructions (GMM are always really well done) and prep lab all of the surgery before getting in to construction. There's been criticism of the turret and replacements can be had, but that's a matter of taste I suppose and I'm not one to claim these kinds of things are better one way or the other.
I've read rumors that the kit once came with a screw forward. Mine doesn't and I've never seen it. My understanding of that is the forward screw would ca irate and reduce the hydraulic pressure under the ice, causing the bow to crush downwards and break the ice rather than try to slam forward into it.
As for ice breakers I really agree.Hasegawa made a great one of the Soya in maybe three separate voyage configurations. It's a part of an excellent line of museum ships they did,
It seems the PLN are expanding their blue water navy to achieve whatever geopolitical ambition they have including operations in the Arctic Ocean now that it's navigable year round, so look to the likes of Dragon to be kitting some possible subjects.