SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

USS Arizona - FINISHED! 2/27

14544 views
55 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    May 2016
Posted by Revenant on Tuesday, May 24, 2016 7:11 PM

the Baron

 

 
Jester75

Thank you much gentlemen, your comments are all appreciated! It looks like there has been some housekeeping here??

 

the Baron

Ah, thanks, Jester!  I have to track it down and do another version of my conversion.

You won't be disappointed in it. Like I spoke of earlier, the worst fitting part of the kit is the lower hull to the uppper hull and its no deal breaker by any means. Heck, if I can clean it up anyone can. I am more interested in your conversion attempt though. How many changes are required to backdate the 1941 Zona to the earlier Penny with the cages (or an earlier Zona for that matter)? I have the Dragon Penny in the stash that I am very much tinkering with the idea of backdating her to the pic I posted earlier. I havent really started gathering any research on the project yet so who knows what kind of undertaking it will end up being.

 

 

 
Thanks, Jester, that really does sound like the kit I should have used (though it might not have been out, when I first started, heh!)  The fit between the upper and lower hull halves wouldn't be an issue, since I'm mounting mine on a sea base, according to this photo of the Pennsylvania cruising in Panama Bay:
 
 
Photo courtesy of the USN's Historical branch 
Around 1935, the major difference between the sisters was that the Pennsy had a taller conning tower, extending a deck higher than the Arizona's, because she served as fleet flagship.  Her stack was also a level shorter, at that time (something I missed).  Here's where my build is now, stalled at the point of adding PE rails (a White Ensign set designed for a 1941 Arizona):
 
 
You can see the conning tower immediate aft of turret B.  If I remember correctly, it's the flag bridge at that level, and there was a short catwalk leading from the door at the front of the flag bride to the top of the conning tower.  I made the conning tower by stacking styrene sheet to make a blank, then making a template of the cross-section from my photo references and cutting/filing/sanding down the shape to match that template.
 
The main issue with this Hobby Boss kit is the soft detail, coupled with the engineering choices that go all the way back to Revell's original kit, primarily that most horizontal structures were molded in top and bottom halves.  So, windows on the superstructure are all rounded and soft, as if the plastic had melted, and there are seams along each deckhouse, as we go from the main deck on up.  I didn't spend as much care as I could have or should have, to address these issues.  But addressing them would have meant replacing those vertical surfaces.  On the main deck, where the 5" guns were relocated from their original position one deck lower, I could have plated the bulkheads with styrene sheet and drilled out those portholes.  The foremast deckhouses, though, and the fighting tops, would have required more work than I wanted to spend, to come up with proper, straight, square frames.  I'll hide as much of that as I can, though, with the awnings that were often used.
 
I also removed much of the molded-on splinter shields, on the decks, and on the platforms on the masts, because those were added in 1940.  They'll get replaced with PE railings, some with tissue paper attached to replicate the canvas windbreaks that were attached to the rails.
 
I'm not a competitive modeler, but even then, the more time I spend on this kit, the more I think that I can't display it.  But I will finish it, as an exercise if nothing else.  I may not be a competitive modeler, but I'm as susceptible to AMS as the next guy.  I did fix the radio aerials mounted to the fighting top on her mainmast (the after mast).  Hobby Boss molded these as a flat piece with triangles pointing fore and aft, that you sandwich in the "layers" of the top as you assemble it.  I replaced these with pyramid shapes of stretched sprue, according to my photographic references.
 
I found this source to be very useful in this particular conversion:
 
 
I liked this booklet so much that I've picked up others in the series, for some of the other members of the US battle line in the Thirties.
 
Anyway, I'd like to have crisper detail and not have to do it all myself.
 

Digging your WiP...like how the gun turrets match the ref pic...

  • Member since
    December 2006
  • From: N. Georgia
Posted by Jester75 on Thursday, May 19, 2016 9:50 PM

Thanks Lenny, I'm glad you were inspired and would love to see some pics of your Mighty Mo!

Baron, I think your Penny looks great and would love to see more detail shots of her.

And thanks Professor, but no harm no foul. Rev probably wishes it was sitting on his shelf instead of mine!Wink

Eric

 

  • Member since
    May 2016
Posted by Revenant on Thursday, May 19, 2016 8:08 PM

jtilley

Jester, I strongly suspect that "Revenant" is a new incarnation of "The Hobbyist," who got banned from the aForum a week or so ago. I've reported the abuse to the moderators. I suspect the guy will be gone by noon tomorrow.

 

jtilley, check your PMs for a message from me...

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: Greenville, NC
Posted by jtilley on Thursday, May 19, 2016 7:37 PM

Jester, I strongly suspect that "Revenant" is a new incarnation of "The Hobbyist," who got banned from the Forum a week or so ago. I've reported the abuse to the moderators. I suspect the guy will be gone by noon tomorrow.

Youth, talent, hard work, and enthusiasm are no match for old age and treachery.

  • Member since
    May 2016
Posted by Revenant on Thursday, May 19, 2016 6:45 PM

Not bad.  Props could have been thinned Down, but...not bad.

  • Member since
    September 2006
  • From: Bethlehem PA
Posted by the Baron on Monday, May 16, 2016 11:55 AM

Jester75

Thank you much gentlemen, your comments are all appreciated! It looks like there has been some housekeeping here??

 

the Baron

Ah, thanks, Jester!  I have to track it down and do another version of my conversion.

You won't be disappointed in it. Like I spoke of earlier, the worst fitting part of the kit is the lower hull to the uppper hull and its no deal breaker by any means. Heck, if I can clean it up anyone can. I am more interested in your conversion attempt though. How many changes are required to backdate the 1941 Zona to the earlier Penny with the cages (or an earlier Zona for that matter)? I have the Dragon Penny in the stash that I am very much tinkering with the idea of backdating her to the pic I posted earlier. I havent really started gathering any research on the project yet so who knows what kind of undertaking it will end up being.

 
Thanks, Jester, that really does sound like the kit I should have used (though it might not have been out, when I first started, heh!)  The fit between the upper and lower hull halves wouldn't be an issue, since I'm mounting mine on a sea base, according to this photo of the Pennsylvania cruising in Panama Bay:
 
 
Photo courtesy of the USN's Historical branch 
Around 1935, the major difference between the sisters was that the Pennsy had a taller conning tower, extending a deck higher than the Arizona's, because she served as fleet flagship.  Her stack was also a level shorter, at that time (something I missed).  Here's where my build is now, stalled at the point of adding PE rails (a White Ensign set designed for a 1941 Arizona):
 
 
You can see the conning tower immediate aft of turret B.  If I remember correctly, it's the flag bridge at that level, and there was a short catwalk leading from the door at the front of the flag bride to the top of the conning tower.  I made the conning tower by stacking styrene sheet to make a blank, then making a template of the cross-section from my photo references and cutting/filing/sanding down the shape to match that template.
 
The main issue with this Hobby Boss kit is the soft detail, coupled with the engineering choices that go all the way back to Revell's original kit, primarily that most horizontal structures were molded in top and bottom halves.  So, windows on the superstructure are all rounded and soft, as if the plastic had melted, and there are seams along each deckhouse, as we go from the main deck on up.  I didn't spend as much care as I could have or should have, to address these issues.  But addressing them would have meant replacing those vertical surfaces.  On the main deck, where the 5" guns were relocated from their original position one deck lower, I could have plated the bulkheads with styrene sheet and drilled out those portholes.  The foremast deckhouses, though, and the fighting tops, would have required more work than I wanted to spend, to come up with proper, straight, square frames.  I'll hide as much of that as I can, though, with the awnings that were often used.
 
I also removed much of the molded-on splinter shields, on the decks, and on the platforms on the masts, because those were added in 1940.  They'll get replaced with PE railings, some with tissue paper attached to replicate the canvas windbreaks that were attached to the rails.
 
I'm not a competitive modeler, but even then, the more time I spend on this kit, the more I think that I can't display it.  But I will finish it, as an exercise if nothing else.  I may not be a competitive modeler, but I'm as susceptible to AMS as the next guy.  I did fix the radio aerials mounted to the fighting top on her mainmast (the after mast).  Hobby Boss molded these as a flat piece with triangles pointing fore and aft, that you sandwich in the "layers" of the top as you assemble it.  I replaced these with pyramid shapes of stretched sprue, according to my photographic references.
 
I found this source to be very useful in this particular conversion:
 
 
I liked this booklet so much that I've picked up others in the series, for some of the other members of the US battle line in the Thirties.
 
Anyway, I'd like to have crisper detail and not have to do it all myself.

The bigger the government, the smaller the citizen.

 

 

  • Member since
    February 2006
Posted by navy07 on Monday, May 16, 2016 10:21 AM

Really excellent build. I'm currently building Uss Missouri in 1-700 scale WW 2 configuration. Your build is an inspiration for me. My kit is the Tamiya waterline kit and the first battleship build.  I hope to get close to your great job. Lenny

  • Member since
    December 2006
  • From: N. Georgia
Posted by Jester75 on Wednesday, May 11, 2016 6:24 PM

Thank you much gentlemen, your comments are all appreciated! It looks like there has been some housekeeping here??

 

the Baron

Ah, thanks, Jester!  I have to track it down and do another version of my conversion.

 

You won't be disappointed in it. Like I spoke of earlier, the worst fitting part of the kit is the lower hull to the uppper hull and its no deal breaker by any means. Heck, if I can clean it up anyone can. I am more interested in your conversion attempt though. How many changes are required to backdate the 1941 Zona to the earlier Penny with the cages (or an earlier Zona for that matter)? I have the Dragon Penny in the stash that I am very much tinkering with the idea of backdating her to the pic I posted earlier. I havent really started gathering any research on the project yet so who knows what kind of undertaking it will end up being.

Eric

 

  • Member since
    September 2006
  • From: Bethlehem PA
Posted by the Baron on Wednesday, May 11, 2016 2:33 PM

Ah, thanks, Jester!  I have to track it down and do another version of my conversion.

The bigger the government, the smaller the citizen.

 

 

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: AandF in the Badger State
Posted by checkmateking02 on Tuesday, May 10, 2016 7:18 PM
Nice work! A great-looking ship.

 

 

 

 

  • Member since
    March 2012
  • From: Corpus Christi, Tx
Posted by mustang1989 on Tuesday, May 10, 2016 4:37 PM

Dude I was wondering what you were up to in the modeling realm and now I'm sorry I never asked! You're a braver man than me that's for damn sure! Great turnout there Eric! YesYesYesYes

                   

 Forum | Modelers Social Club Forum (proboards.com) 

  • Member since
    December 2006
  • From: N. Georgia
Posted by Jester75 on Tuesday, May 10, 2016 3:52 PM

Is there are particular area that you would like to see more of?

Eric

 

  • Member since
    December 2006
  • From: N. Georgia
Posted by Jester75 on Tuesday, May 10, 2016 3:24 PM

the Baron

Beautiful finish!  This is 1/700?  Which kit is it?  I've got the Hobby Boss Arizona in 1/700, that I'm converting to the Pennsy circa 1935.  But the kit really is crap, and I've lost interest in it.  I have to force myself to finish it.  To illustrate, I started it in 2010, and it's still not finished.  This looks like a much better kit as a starting point.

Best regards,

Brad

 

This build is Dragon's boxing of the Arizona, the Premium edition in particular which comes with brass barrels and etched railings and is 700th scale. I'm glad you like it Brad!

And thank you Professor for your flattering words on my attempt to represent this fine ship!

Eric

 

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: Greenville, NC
Posted by jtilley on Tuesday, May 10, 2016 2:23 PM

Hasegawa, to my knowledge, doesn't make a model of that ship. I've been assuming that Jester's beautiful model was based on the Dragon kit, which is generally regarded as the best Arizona on the market - in any scale.

Youth, talent, hard work, and enthusiasm are no match for old age and treachery.

  • Member since
    September 2006
  • From: Bethlehem PA
Posted by the Baron on Tuesday, May 10, 2016 11:59 AM

Beautiful finish!  This is 1/700?  Which kit is it?  I've got the Hobby Boss Arizona in 1/700, that I'm converting to the Pennsy circa 1935.  But the kit really is crap, and I've lost interest in it.  I have to force myself to finish it.  To illustrate, I started it in 2010, and it's still not finished.  This looks like a much better kit as a starting point.

Best regards,

Brad

The bigger the government, the smaller the citizen.

 

 

  • Member since
    April 2016
  • From: Russia, St.Peterburg
Posted by kirill4 on Thursday, May 5, 2016 11:00 AM

Good day,

I'm glad this link you found usefull... didn't think abt google ability to translate ... oh this modern technologies!!!

Big SmileBig SmileBig Smile

 

  • Member since
    December 2006
  • From: N. Georgia
Posted by Jester75 on Thursday, May 5, 2016 7:29 AM

templar1099

Nice justice done to an icon. Couldn't imagine tackling the cage masts on the next one.

 

Missed this, thanks Templar! I believe that Blue Ridge Hobbies may actually sell some 3d printed cages that look pretty good I'm just not sure any does them for the Pennsylvania class ships much less if there are any plastic kits that can be backdated.

Eric

 

  • Member since
    December 2006
  • From: N. Georgia
Posted by Jester75 on Thursday, May 5, 2016 7:11 AM
Wow, the level of scratch building that guy has is outstanding! Thank you for the link. Luckily for me, Google does a pretty decent job of translating the pages and makes them fairly easy to read.

Eric

 

  • Member since
    April 2016
  • From: Russia, St.Peterburg
Posted by kirill4 on Thursday, May 5, 2016 2:46 AM

Good day,

Dear Eric,

I could imagine that! such small things...unfortunately I don't have saved links to those of us how produce appropriate scale propellers...just from time to time I watch those models of our  colleagues who work with "iron" fleet, mostly w/o comments, just in gradation of "like it" or "...." :)))

and ,as I could remember, such issues with propellers blades ,often discussed, and some solutions were found...made them from fotoetched parts,or from resin casting ,found somewhere on third side,or fabricated by themself...but  such info I've found on russian modellers forums...which is not convinient due to language barier...

but once again, I guess ,it is not big issue, those propellers, they are hidden under stern,and not so visiable...

but,just for the case, I could drop link to one of those very seldom (this case ,russian) "expert" in scratch building, building his models in small scale completely" scratch"...You coud try to contact him(meanwhile I ask him for another way for communication except option sending forum private message),if he is capable to communicate in english( I think -Yes), ....he could provade you wth ness-ry links or some information,which could be usefull for you...

his name is Алексей Лежнев(Aleksey Legnev) , here is his building report http://karopka.ru/forum/forum190/topic21935/

to see his works - click to his avatar 

or here http://karopka.ru/community/user/8199/

BRGDS

Kirill

 

  • Member since
    December 2006
  • From: N. Georgia
Posted by Jester75 on Wednesday, May 4, 2016 6:47 PM
Thanks Kirill! I agree about the props. I was a bit terrified of them to be honest as they were very fragile considering how thick they look. I actually broke a blade off of one of them just looking at it! We really need someone to step up to the plate especially with 3d printing growing as it is and market some more accurate props.

Eric

 

  • Member since
    December 2015
  • From: providence ,r.i.
Posted by templar1099 on Wednesday, May 4, 2016 2:03 PM

Nice justice done to an icon. Couldn't imagine tackling the cage masts on the next one.

"le plaisir delicieux et toujours nouveau d'une occupation inutile"

  • Member since
    April 2016
  • From: Russia, St.Peterburg
Posted by kirill4 on Wednesday, May 4, 2016 12:34 PM

My congratulations Eric,

such small ...and such precisely !!!

model looks very balanced , nice to see it!

(may be propellers blades need to be thinned a little bit... but ...due to their location...guess it is not big issue)

All the Best!

Kirill

  • Member since
    December 2006
  • From: N. Georgia
Posted by Jester75 on Monday, May 2, 2016 6:05 PM

Well, I'd say I'm about 2/3rds through the construction phase on the Academy Graf Spee at the moment. Who knows after that.

Eric

 

  • Member since
    December 2006
  • From: N. Georgia
Posted by Jester75 on Sunday, May 1, 2016 11:45 AM

Really, thanks for the comments everyone. I'm stuck on ships since building this one!

Eric

 

  • Member since
    July 2013
Posted by steve5 on Saturday, April 30, 2016 10:27 PM

really lovely build , I'm with mike don't know how you do such detailed work , on so small a scale

steve5

 

  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: Rain USA, Vancouver WA
Posted by tigerman on Saturday, April 30, 2016 8:49 PM

Great work Eric. Just love all the PE and rigging. One to be proud of.

   http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y269/wing_nut_5o/PANZERJAGERGB.jpg

 Eric 

  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: Western North Carolina
Posted by Tojo72 on Saturday, April 30, 2016 11:32 AM

Very impressive build.

  • Member since
    May 2013
  • From: Indiana, USA
Posted by Greg on Saturday, April 30, 2016 11:19 AM

Sure glad this thread got bumped, I'd missed it.

If you are not a ship guy, you'd never know it, Eric. Very nice job.

 

  • Member since
    December 2006
  • From: N. Georgia
Posted by Jester75 on Saturday, April 30, 2016 9:36 AM

Thanks! I thought this thread had been relegated to the tumbleweed fields. It builds up quite well with the exception of everything below the water line but with a lower hull that looks like that, it had to be done full hull imo. I have the Pennsylvania boxing of the same kit that I'd love to do with cage masts like the pic below but am unsure as of yet what changes are needed or if its even possible using this boxing without extensive rework.

Eric

 

JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.