SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

Kuznetsov on fire

1189 views
8 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    March 2013
Kuznetsov on fire
Posted by LonCray on Friday, December 13, 2019 6:49 AM

Many articles on Google.  Apparently a spark fell on fuel oil; at least one dead.  I think that ship is snake bitten; his dry dock sank out from under him and broke.  If this fire is as extensive as thought, he may never sail again - though you never know when the Chinese may need another 'amusement park'.  

  • Member since
    April 2005
Posted by ddp59 on Friday, December 13, 2019 8:26 AM

the Chinese would not touch that carrier with a 100' pole. besides which the Chinese are building their own carriers so maybe can sell 1 to Russia as they appear not capable of building a completely working carrier themselves.

  • Member since
    August 2014
  • From: Willamette Valley, Oregon
Posted by goldhammer on Friday, December 13, 2019 9:53 AM

You have to remember what they started with.  They grabbed the Graff Z at the end of the war, and that was never finished either.

Maybe they should just give up on the idea.

  • Member since
    October 2018
Posted by PGBolt on Friday, December 13, 2019 10:06 AM

Fire at sea is about the worst thing any vessel can face, particularly a capital warship. I hope that the human toll is kept to a minimum, and that the sailors return to their home port soon.

That said, the Kuznetsov has a demonstrated record of being a real garbage scow. I'm not especially in favor of a return to the Soviet days of navies from the East roaming far and wide, but I don't really relish Russia losing an imprtant asset. We never know when we might find ourselves fighting a common enemy. Like Switzerland. I still say the neutrality bit is a ploy. We must stand ready to face the Swiss navy! 

  • Member since
    August 2014
  • From: Willamette Valley, Oregon
Posted by goldhammer on Friday, December 13, 2019 10:39 AM

Not at sea.....undergoing repairs in port from when a crane fell on it back in Oct.

  • Member since
    October 2018
Posted by PGBolt on Friday, December 13, 2019 11:20 AM

Thanks for the clarification. Still, shipboard fires are horrible.

I've been in an underground mine for about 60 hours, and just got back to the terrible weather of SurfaceWorld a few hours ago. I haven't really looked at the news. Some sparky who came down yesterday was talking about it. I guess I should read up!

  • Member since
    October 2018
Posted by PGBolt on Friday, December 13, 2019 11:24 AM

(Not really 60 hours ... just felt like it.) Wink However, it's hard to keep up with Surface World all the time.

  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk, England
Posted by Bish on Friday, December 13, 2019 3:50 PM

Are we actually sure its on fire, its hard to tell.

At least it isn't in the English channel this time.

I am a Norfolk man and i glory in being so

 

On the bench: Airfix 1/72nd Harrier GR.3/Fujimi 1/72nd Ju 87D-3

  • Member since
    October 2019
  • From: New Braunfels, Texas
Posted by Tanker-Builder on Tuesday, December 17, 2019 8:43 AM

LonCray;

       I would hope no one met their demise. If He is in as bad a shape as folks say, he'd be better on the bottom. Being a fish reef might the right way to go. Remember how many lives they wasted at CherNobyl?

JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.