SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

1/350 CVL

1226 views
11 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    January 2003
Posted by Jeff Herne on Friday, January 7, 2005 1:14 PM
Nah, it's not superior intellect...it's just called 'been there, done that, and bought the T-shirt'

Big Smile [:D]

Jeff
  • Member since
    April 2004
Posted by boscotdg on Friday, January 7, 2005 12:15 PM
I will defer to superior intellect . In addition it would be more historically correct for a manufacturer to build a CL first then build a CVL just like FDR and the Navy did in WWII
  • Member since
    January 2003
Posted by Jeff Herne on Wednesday, January 5, 2005 12:34 PM
Hahaha...I wish...

Jeff
  • Member since
    March 2004
  • From: Spartanburg, SC
Posted by subfixer on Wednesday, January 5, 2005 9:49 AM
Trust Jeff's logic, he has magic powers.

I'm from the government and I'm here to help.

  • Member since
    April 2004
Posted by boscotdg on Wednesday, January 5, 2005 9:30 AM
Or the logic could be build a CVL you have the hull and you could build a CL off that !
  • Member since
    January 2003
Posted by Jeff Herne on Tuesday, January 4, 2005 1:03 PM
The logic is thus...if someone releases a Cleveland Class cruiser, then the hull is already done for a Independence Class CVL...if the kit is engineered properly, you can build up from the deck and you've got yourself a carrier for not too much additional effort.

J
  • Member since
    April 2004
Posted by boscotdg on Tuesday, January 4, 2005 12:03 PM
While I am not one to doubt deductive reasoning could one argue that manufacturers tend to put out models of ships that have been sunk in action etc over those were not ? That's because they have more name recognition and therefore sell better So would a manufacturer be more likely to put out a CVL like the Princeton which was lost than a Clevland CL which never suffered a combat loss ? Of course there were many more cleveland class CL's so maybe they would sell better unless they could get Pres. Bush 1 to sell the CVL's since he flew off one in WW II All makes sense to me !!!
  • Member since
    January 2003
Posted by Jeff Herne on Monday, January 3, 2005 6:19 AM
Now, have I ever been known to divulge specific information prior to the release of a kit?? :-p

Well, there's already a CVE in resin, so chances are I'm not talking about resin...and since the most famous class of CVE is probably the Casablanca Class, chances are that's going to be the one chosen for a new kit sometime in the future.

As for CVL, it's an Independence Class without a doubt, which means a Cleveland hull, and at this point in time, the only folks who produce a Cleveland is Iron Shipwrights, in resin. If you're hoping for it in plastic, chances are we'll see a Cleveland first, since they'd sell more units than a CVL.

Call it...deductive logic.

Jeff
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, January 3, 2005 1:31 AM
L'Arsenal is the only one I have heard of working on a 1/350 CVL. It is however probably not a top priority at the moment.
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, January 2, 2005 8:25 PM
What kind of talk?

Injection or resin? When? And which class?

Any CVE's would be good!
  • Member since
    January 2003
Posted by Jeff Herne on Sunday, January 2, 2005 10:52 AM
No news on any CVL that I've heard...there's talk of a CVE though.

Jeff
  • Member since
    November 2005
1/350 CVL
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, January 2, 2005 8:23 AM
Any news on 1/350 CVL's

Looks like 1/350 is heating up with all the recent releases! As someone said on previous postings "it's a great time to be a 1/350 ship modeler"

I'm glad I only came recently to the game.

JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.