BlackSheepTwoOneFour
Those kits look great... if you're looking for the new and restored look. In reality, most bare metal look aircrafts don't look like that during WW2 or while in active service. Yeah, they keep them clean and all but certainly not shiny. I don't care for the foil method because to me, it looks unrealistic. Each to his own.
I agree, each to his own. I also think that not every model needs to look like a beat-up WWII airplane. In last month's edition of FineScale Model it was discussed that over weathering of planes and tanks has gotten a bit out of hand. The following are two of my models. The B-17 looks like a beat-up bomber and the B-24 was painted with Testors' Metalizer. I like the B-17 because it looks like it's been around the block a few times, but it doesn't look over weathered. I think that the B-24 looks okay, but it still looks like a painted model. I am considering buying another B-24 and using Bare Metal Foil on it because I do not like the painted look. Yes, you can call me obsessive.
For some reason, a lot of modelers get really riled up when I post photos of my BMF airplanes. There was a guy on the ARC Air website that really reamed me out for using BMF. He told me that he hated my models and that I should stop modeling. Talk about nuts!
I just think that using products like Alclad or Testors' Metalizer paints do not make for a realistic NMF (my opinion). The following is a photo of two of my F-86 models. The one on the left is finished with Testors' Metalizer Aluminum and the one on the left is BMF. The one on the left does not look shiny, but it doesn't look like real aluminum. It just looks like a painted surface. The one on the right looks like a real metal surface because it is real metal.
Following are two photos that I found on the Internet of F-104 planes models (these are not my models). They were painted with a NMF paint. Both are well done models, but neither model looks like a real NMF because they were painted. Plus, IMHO, the panel lines are over accentuated. Just my opinion.
It is not possible, IMHO, to duplicate the subtlties of real metal with paint. Following is a photo of a real F-104. Checkout the appearance of the metal. It is not possible to duplicate that with paint.
Following is a close up of my F-104. Notice the subtle panel lines and the "grain' of the metal panels. I do not think that it is shiny at all. It just looks like a clean plane with a metal finish.
Just one my thing. My F-86 is very shiny because I tried to duplicate a restored F-86. The top photo is a photo of a restored F-86 and and the second photo is my model.
Now that a got that off my chest I feel better!!!!!
Back to my first statement, "I agree, each to his own." If a modeler likes using Alclad or Testors' Metalize to duplicate a NMF finish, more power to him/her. If someone likes to use BMF, more power to him or her. All that really matters is that they enjoy themselves.
By the way BlackSheepTwoOneFour, can you post some photos of your NMF airplanes? I would like to see them, maybe I can learn something new.