SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

Ugliest Car

5266 views
64 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: Northeast WA State
Posted by armornut on Sunday, June 24, 2018 5:06 PM

   Couldn't agree more BS214, tuner cars are really annoying, coffee can exhaust tips just look ......yuck.

     One thing that kinda irritates me are low riders, trucks and cars. Someone takes a really cool classic like the 64 or 65 Impala, drop it to the deck, pound the suspension with hydraulics, and throw a halfamillion dollar noise box in the trunk then top it off with a god awful candy mettalic swirly paint job. Aces for creativity but it ain't my style.

we're modelers it's what we do

  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: Naples, FL
Posted by tempestjohnny on Sunday, June 24, 2018 6:04 PM

mississippivol

 

 
tempestjohnny

My car wasn't a beauty but it was cool

Not exactly mine but same car and color

74 Chevelle Laguna S-3

 

 

 

I had a 76 Malibu, same body style, just with the stacked headlights. Mine was silver, and it had the same color vinyl top as the one pictured. If it had a 350 instead of that anemic 305, I'd have kept it. Always thought they were pretty cars.

 

mine had a 350. Rated at 130hp good grief 

 

  • Member since
    January 2006
  • From: Pineapple Country, Queensland, Australia
Posted by Wirraway on Friday, June 29, 2018 4:41 AM

Phil_H

I'll drop a vote for the Nissan Juke. It looks like two cars merged into one by a Star Trek transporter malfunction.

http://www.nissan.com.au/cars-vehicles/juke/overview 

 

And the Nissan Cube.  Those things are an assault on my eyeballs and I want it to turn into a flaming wreck every time I see one....

"Growing old is inevitable; growing up is optional"

" A hobby should pass the time - not fill it"  -Norman Bates

 

GIF animations generator gifup.com

  • Member since
    May 2013
  • From: From the Mit, but live in Mason, O high ho
Posted by hogfanfs on Friday, June 29, 2018 7:02 AM

I agree with a couple of you about the Nissan Cube and Juke. Add to the list the Honda Element and Sicon xB. I understand they are designed to be "functional", but, that is a nice way to say they are ugly. Kind of like when you say a girl or guy has a great personality... 

 

I just realized my wife describes me as having a great personality... Hmm

 Bruce

 

 On the bench:  1/48 Eduard MiG-21MF

                        1/35 Takom Merkava Mk.I

 

  • Member since
    June 2014
  • From: New Braunfels , Texas
Posted by Tanker - Builder on Friday, June 29, 2018 7:15 AM

Hey Pawel !

 That might seem ugly . But , it looks serviceable for someone who would like it . Like me!

 I bet it could hold a lot of LEGOS !

  • Member since
    June 2014
  • From: New Braunfels , Texas
Posted by Tanker - Builder on Friday, June 29, 2018 7:21 AM

Aww; Murph !

 C'mon now . I owned two , Yes , two , Matador four door sedans ( not the sporty one ) Very serviceable family cars . Turned my first Pacer into a Pa-Camino after someone in a raised four wheel drive hit me in the rear quarter window !

 Plus , how many cars do you remember that turned into a serviceable bedroom if it was discovered the tent leaked ? The Rambler Ambassador wagon of course ! 

 I had one of the smaller four wheel drive wagons ( Forget it's name . ) But it sure was fun on the Arkansas River Bottoms  ( near the bank ).

  • Member since
    November 2009
  • From: Twin Cities of Minnesota
Posted by Don Stauffer on Friday, June 29, 2018 8:31 AM

I think any car that uses the styling theme from those apocolyptic post-nuclear-war movies results in really ugly cars, especially those SUVs with that styling theme!

Don Stauffer in Minnesota

  • Member since
    June 2007
  • From: Oakbank, MB
Posted by GregFK on Friday, June 29, 2018 3:17 PM

I remember those! Lots of them running about Lubaczow when I was a young boy!

 

Pawel

Hello!

How about this Polish beauty?

Tarpan

Its name is FSR Tarpan. The plant that used to make 'em is now a Volkswagen plant in my home town of Poznań.

Have a nice day

Paweł

 

  • Member since
    December 2008
  • From: UK
Posted by PatW on Friday, June 29, 2018 5:22 PM

I saw one of these at Le Mans one year and thought how great it was from the practicality point of view, two rows of three seats across plus a huge load space, but my wife and the others that we were with thought it so ugly............

The Fiat Multipla!

Remember , common sense is not common.

  • Member since
    July 2014
  • From: Franklin Wi
Posted by Bakster on Friday, June 29, 2018 5:24 PM

Laughing. And such a nice photo of one too. I think I am in your court on this Bill.

  • Member since
    August 2017
Posted by Doc Ward on Monday, July 2, 2018 6:35 PM
I'm going to be the odd man out here, and say that there are plenty of good looking tuner cars out there. Of course, it really becomes a matter of your definition of what constitutes a "tuner." The vehicles with the small wheels and extreme camber, slammed with a fart can exhaust and crappy or over the top paint job is not what I consider a "tuner." As much as my wife hates it when I use the word, that is what I and others I know consider "ricers." I think of tuners to be inexpensive sport compacts, from any number of Japanese vehicles, to VWs, to American vehicles like the Ford Focus and the discontinued but still ubiquitous Dodge Neon. I really know I'm going to be the odd man out when I say I own a Dodge Neon R/T, complete with short throw shifter and other mods that I hope to do more work to one of these days. I also have a soft spot for the AMC Gremlin. I would grudgingly agree it is ugly in the traditional sense of the word, but I've liked the looks of them and wanted one for a long time. At least ever since a purple Gremlin X with a built 304 embarrassed me in my Mustang! The Pontiac Aztec... Well... I will just say there is a popular nickname for them that says it all...

Gotta say, doctor, your talent for alienatin' folk is near miraculous.

  • Member since
    June 2014
  • From: New Braunfels , Texas
Posted by Tanker - Builder on Thursday, July 19, 2018 9:34 AM

OOPS! ! ! 

 The factory didn't fasten the top and windows on right ! Weird !

  • Member since
    August 2014
  • From: Willamette Valley, Oregon
Posted by goldhammer on Thursday, July 19, 2018 10:16 AM

My vote for ugly goes to some of the bug-eyed Citreon's of the 50's......no idea where their styling cues came from, if any.  Though I did like the idea of independent air suspension on at least one model in the 60's where you could raise or lower any corner without messing with the others.

Nissan Cube has an unbalanced look to it with one glass corner and one metal.

 

Scion is what I refer to as "throw away Toyota"  Had to pull the front frame rails on one (XB) a few years ago....the HS steel tore apart as soon as I got about 4500 lbs of pull on it.

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: Sydney, Australia
Posted by Phil_H on Thursday, July 19, 2018 10:27 AM

Just for laughs.... 

  • Member since
    June 2017
  • From: Winter Park, FL
Posted by fotofrank on Thursday, July 19, 2018 1:25 PM

I'm gonna go out on a limb here. I'd say that the Big 3 haven't produced a really attractive car since the end of the 1960s. In the 1970s, American production cars all began to look alike. And looking at today's cars is like watching a NASCAR race. All the cars look alike except for the badging. The only modern production cars that really stand out and that have any character are the rebooted muscle cars. The Camaro, the Challenger, and of course the Mustang. Those three cars at least look different enough that they are easy to find in a parking lot.

OK. In the stash: Way too much to build in one lifetime...

  • Member since
    September 2006
  • From: Bethlehem PA
Posted by the Baron on Thursday, July 19, 2018 3:09 PM

goldhammer

...Nissan Cube has an unbalanced look to it with one glass corner and one metal...

I agree.  I guess I don't think it's so much ugly as it is, dumb.

That, and AMC cars from the 70s.  I hated the Pacer, and the Hornet Sportabout.

The bigger the government, the smaller the citizen.

 

 

  • Member since
    January 2013
Posted by BlackSheepTwoOneFour on Thursday, July 19, 2018 5:43 PM

Phil_H

Just for laughs.... 

 

Stupid is, stupid does. Serves him right for ruining a perfectly nice automobile. Dumb@$$es....

  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: Orlando, Florida
Posted by ikar01 on Thursday, July 19, 2018 6:08 PM

I was behind one of tose low riding jumping monstrosities one day.  While waiting at the light the driver thought he would show off his car's ability and started it jumping in the line.  After about 10 seconds or so something snapped and it locked in a nose up position with a tilt to the left.  He had to drive it down the street that way.

  • Member since
    August 2014
  • From: Willamette Valley, Oregon
Posted by goldhammer on Thursday, July 19, 2018 6:14 PM

ikar01

I was behind one of tose low riding jumping monstrosities one day.  While waiting at the light the driver thought he would show off his car's ability and started it jumping in the line.  After about 10 seconds or so something snapped and it locked in a nose up position with a tilt to the left.  He had to drive it down the street that way.

 

One of SoCal's best exports, and a pure waste of good hydraulics

  • Member since
    January 2015
Posted by PFJN on Thursday, July 19, 2018 6:49 PM

fotofrank

I'm gonna go out on a limb here. I'd say that the Big 3 haven't produced a really attractive car since the end of the 1960s. In the 1970s, American production cars all began to look alike. And looking at today's cars is like watching a NASCAR race. All the cars look alike except for the badging. The only modern production cars that really stand out and that have any character are the rebooted muscle cars. The Camaro, the Challenger, and of course the Mustang. Those three cars at least look different enough that they are easy to find in a parking lot.

 

 
Hi,
I know its a matter of personal tastes, but I axtually kind of like the new Lincoln Continental, the Chrysler 200, the Chevy Malibu, and the Buick LaCrosse, myself.
 
Pat
 
Lincoln200
MalibuLaCrosse

1st Group BuildSP

  • Member since
    June 2017
  • From: Winter Park, FL
Posted by fotofrank on Thursday, July 19, 2018 8:20 PM

PFJN

 

 
fotofrank

I'm gonna go out on a limb here. I'd say that the Big 3 haven't produced a really attractive car since the end of the 1960s. In the 1970s, American production cars all began to look alike. And looking at today's cars is like watching a NASCAR race. All the cars look alike except for the badging. The only modern production cars that really stand out and that have any character are the rebooted muscle cars. The Camaro, the Challenger, and of course the Mustang. Those three cars at least look different enough that they are easy to find in a parking lot.

 

 

 
Hi,
I know its a matter of personal tastes, but I axtually kind of like the new Lincoln Continental, the Chrysler 200, the Chevy Malibu, and the Buick LaCrosse, myself.
 
Pat
 
Lincoln200
MalibuLaCrosse
 

 

I guess it's really a matter of when you grew up. I came of age in the '60s, so those are the cars I identify most.

OK. In the stash: Way too much to build in one lifetime...

  • Member since
    July 2014
Posted by modelcrazy on Thursday, July 19, 2018 8:39 PM

fotofrank

I'm gonna go out on a limb here. I'd say that the Big 3 haven't produced a really attractive car since the end of the 1960s. In the 1970s, American production cars all began to look alike. And looking at today's cars is like watching a NASCAR race. All the cars look alike except for the badging. The only modern production cars that really stand out and that have any character are the rebooted muscle cars. The Camaro, the Challenger, and of course the Mustang. Those three cars at least look different enough that they are easy to find in a parking lot.

 

It's the best aerodynamic shape for their form and function. Like all SUV's look the same, best aerodynamic shape. The manufactures are forced by the government to meet certain fuel economy standards, plus it attracts buyers.

The new muscle cars are throwbacks for us who grew up with them but actually have similar aerodynamic shapes to everything else. 

Steve

Building a kit from your stash is like cutting a head off a Hydra, two more take it's place.

 

 

http://www.spamodeler.com/forum/

  • Member since
    January 2015
Posted by PFJN on Thursday, July 19, 2018 10:18 PM

fotofrank

I guess it's really a matter of when you grew up. I came of age in the '60s, so those are the cars I identify most.

Hi,

I hear ya.  Eventhough the actual cars  pre-date me by a bit, right now I'm kind of hooked on the style and look of 1940s and early 1950s cars myself, I think in part because those were the model kits most available (and/or most affordable) for building when I was a little kid Smile

1st Group BuildSP

  • Member since
    June 2014
  • From: New Braunfels , Texas
Posted by Tanker - Builder on Saturday, July 21, 2018 8:37 AM

Oh-Oh !

 I think you forgot a very neat American Morors car .The MARLIN ! 

  • Member since
    June 2014
  • From: New Braunfels , Texas
Posted by Tanker - Builder on Saturday, July 21, 2018 8:41 AM

Hey , Glodhammer !

 I don't think they had " styling Cues ' back then .At least when folks look at my car they smile . After all how many cars do you see being occupied and partied in by a bunch of Hyper Hamsters ? Besides even as a little box it gets 29 to 32 MPGs in Town !

  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: East Bethel, MN
Posted by midnightprowler on Sunday, July 22, 2018 8:08 AM

PFJN

 

 
fotofrank

I'm gonna go out on a limb here. I'd say that the Big 3 haven't produced a really attractive car since the end of the 1960s. In the 1970s, American production cars all began to look alike. And looking at today's cars is like watching a NASCAR race. All the cars look alike except for the badging. The only modern production cars that really stand out and that have any character are the rebooted muscle cars. The Camaro, the Challenger, and of course the Mustang. Those three cars at least look different enough that they are easy to find in a parking lot.

 

 

 
Hi,
I know its a matter of personal tastes, but I axtually kind of like the new Lincoln Continental, the Chrysler 200, the Chevy Malibu, and the Buick LaCrosse, myself.
 
Pat
 
Lincoln200
MalibuLaCrosse
 

I think this proves fotofrank's point. They all look pretty much alike.

Hi, I am Lee, I am a plastiholic.

Co. A, 682 Engineers, Ltchfield, MN, 1980-1986

1 Thessalonians 4:13-18 1 Corinthians 15:51-54

Ask me about Speedway Decals

  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: East Bethel, MN
Posted by midnightprowler on Sunday, July 22, 2018 8:09 AM

littletimmy

 

 
plasticjunkie
Anybody remember the Yugo?

 

With it's "Spunky" three cylinder's....

The very first mini-vans ( Dodge ? )  were gawd-awful ugly !

But I think, for me, The "ugliest" car was the Renault  Le - car.

 

I owned one, lol. They were a 4 cylinder, not a 3 cylinder. I owned a Geo Metro, that one was a 3 cylinder.

Hi, I am Lee, I am a plastiholic.

Co. A, 682 Engineers, Ltchfield, MN, 1980-1986

1 Thessalonians 4:13-18 1 Corinthians 15:51-54

Ask me about Speedway Decals

  • Member since
    January 2015
Posted by PFJN on Sunday, July 22, 2018 11:46 AM

midnightprowler

 fotofrank

... The only modern production cars that really stand out and that have any character are the rebooted muscle cars. The Camaro, the Challenger, and of course the Mustang. Those three cars at least look different enough that they are easy to find in a parking lot.

 
Hi,
I know its a matter of personal tastes, but I axtually kind of like the new Lincoln Continental, the Chrysler 200, the Chevy Malibu, and the Buick LaCrosse, myself.
 
Pat
 

I think this proves fotofrank's point. They all look pretty much alike.

Hi,

Like I said, I think its a matter of personal tastes (and maybe personal interests), but I see just as much differentation between the cars that I posted about, and the four cars shown below, myself.

CamaroChallenger

1st Group BuildSP

  • Member since
    April 2016
  • From: N. Burbs of ChiKawgo
Posted by GlennH on Sunday, July 22, 2018 2:36 PM
Mid 60's Citroen. Every time I saw one I shook my head and wondered why. Maybe I was and am missing something.

A number Army Viet Nam scans from hundreds yet to be done:

https://www.flickr.com/photos/southwestdreams/albums/72157621855914355

Have had the great fortune to be on every side of the howitzers.

  • Member since
    January 2013
Posted by BlackSheepTwoOneFour on Sunday, July 22, 2018 5:16 PM

There aren’t any ugly cars, just ill designed automobiles. One day, they’re going to be gone forever or harder to find. Remember this, Beauty is in the eye of the Beholder. 

Lucky for me, there is a car museum an hour south from me in Norwich, NY called Northeast Classic Car Museum. The last time I went there was at least 30 years ago when they only had 70 automobiles. We went there this past Friday and had a grand old time. It now houses 170 automobiles and vintage motorcycles from 1900 thru the late 70s. I’m talking Packards, Fords, Chevys, Buicks, Franklins (manufactured and made in Syracuse, NY), Nash, etc...

JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.