SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

Aircraft Trivia Quiz

728407 views
7409 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Sonora Desert
Posted by stikpusher on Wednesday, September 1, 2010 9:31 AM

How about the Mirage III?

 

F is for FIRE, That burns down the whole town!

U is for URANIUM... BOMBS!

N is for NO SURVIVORS...

       - Plankton

LSM

 

  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: Scotland
Posted by Milairjunkie on Wednesday, September 1, 2010 10:03 AM

stikpusher

How about the Mirage III?

No, not the aircraft I was thinking about. Did the Mirage III have offspring which weren't delta?

  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Sonora Desert
Posted by stikpusher on Wednesday, September 1, 2010 10:22 AM

Yes, the Mirage F-1C, as well as a swing wing variant that was never went in to production.

 

F is for FIRE, That burns down the whole town!

U is for URANIUM... BOMBS!

N is for NO SURVIVORS...

       - Plankton

LSM

 

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Edgware, London
Posted by osher on Wednesday, September 1, 2010 10:46 AM

I know there was an 8 engined variant of the Mirage, but a twin engined too?

  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: Carmel, CA
Posted by bondoman on Wednesday, September 1, 2010 11:00 AM

DH Vampire- single engine, straight wing.

DH Venom- single engine, straightish wing

DH Sea Vixen- twin engine, swept wing

Alas, no longer in service.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Edgware, London
Posted by osher on Wednesday, September 1, 2010 11:35 AM

Can't be the DH jet range, as the Vampire first flew at the end of WWII, and even used parts from the Mosquito...

  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: Scotland
Posted by Milairjunkie on Wednesday, September 1, 2010 1:20 PM

Stickpusher - point taken.

Osher - the Mirage IV was loosley speaking an enlarged twin engined Mirage III. The Mirage 4000, which some political wrangling "put to bed" was also a twin.

The aircraft in question had 5 notable production models, all made in reasonably quantity.

 

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Edgware, London
Posted by osher on Wednesday, September 1, 2010 1:46 PM

SU-9?  It was re-developed into the SU-11, and the SU-24 with twin engines, and it first flew in 1957.  The 24 is swing wing, the SU-9 fixed delta.

  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: Scotland
Posted by Milairjunkie on Wednesday, September 1, 2010 1:52 PM

Osher - OH so close.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Edgware, London
Posted by osher on Wednesday, September 1, 2010 1:58 PM

SU-7?

  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: Scotland
Posted by Milairjunkie on Wednesday, September 1, 2010 2:11 PM

osher

SU-7?

Spot on, the Su-7 led to the Su-9, to the Su-11, to the Su-15, to the Su-17. The Su-15 was fitted with twin engines & the Su-17 had variable geometry.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Edgware, London
Posted by osher on Wednesday, September 1, 2010 2:28 PM

and the SU-24 too!

OK, I guess that means it's my turn.  So, what was the first allied bomber to fly using a jet engine?

  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Barrow in Furness, Cumbria, UK.
Posted by davros on Wednesday, September 1, 2010 3:16 PM

I think  Lancaster bombers served as a test-beds for early jet engines or it could have been the passenger conversion, the Lancastrian. Would that count?

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Edgware, London
Posted by osher on Wednesday, September 1, 2010 3:48 PM

Nope, not the Lancaster, in fact, I believe this aircraft flew before the Lancaster entered service.

  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Sonora Desert
Posted by stikpusher on Wednesday, September 1, 2010 9:30 PM

The Martin B-26 was used as a test bed for SNECMA Atar jet engines by France.

 

F is for FIRE, That burns down the whole town!

U is for URANIUM... BOMBS!

N is for NO SURVIVORS...

       - Plankton

LSM

 

  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: Carmel, CA
Posted by bondoman on Thursday, September 2, 2010 12:45 AM

So was the He 274. But I suppose that's not an "allied" bomber....

Would someone please sell a new and improved Vautour.

  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Sonora Desert
Posted by stikpusher on Thursday, September 2, 2010 1:02 AM

The B-45 was the first operational US jet powered bomber...

 

F is for FIRE, That burns down the whole town!

U is for URANIUM... BOMBS!

N is for NO SURVIVORS...

       - Plankton

LSM

 

  • Member since
    January 2009
Posted by F-8fanatic on Thursday, September 2, 2010 5:39 AM

It wasnt the B-26, the first Atar engine wasnt built until March 1948.....the first YB-49 jet flying wing bomber flew in October 1947, five months prior.  Before that, the XB-45 Tornado first flew in March 1947.  There was also the Douglas XB-43 Jetmaster, which first flew in May 1946.  That is the earliest one I could find--before that, jet engines were used on fighters and not bombers, aside from the Ar-234 German jet bomber.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Edgware, London
Posted by osher on Thursday, September 2, 2010 5:47 AM

This aircraft was not a production jet, but, did use the Power Jet W.1 jet engine.

  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: Scotland
Posted by Milairjunkie on Thursday, September 2, 2010 6:44 AM

Wellington W5516/G;

Image

?

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Edgware, London
Posted by osher on Thursday, September 2, 2010 7:31 AM

Spot on!  I can't see the picture (logging on from work and Photobucket is barred), but, yes, before the Gloster was used, a Wellington was used to test the engine out, making the first allied jet a bomber.

  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: Scotland
Posted by Milairjunkie on Thursday, September 2, 2010 8:05 AM

Cheers.

 

This is a twin engined, twin seat, high wing, ground attack (primarily) aircraft which remains in service. It suffered a protracted development & uses a license built version of a well known powerplant.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Edgware, London
Posted by osher on Thursday, September 2, 2010 8:12 AM

Nanchang Q-5 - twin engined, using a copy of a Russian engine, ground attack, high(ish) wing, and two seats in some variants

  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: Scotland
Posted by Milairjunkie on Thursday, September 2, 2010 8:55 AM

Sorry, no - I think the crew would be in for a tight squeeze in that one?

The aircraft in question uses a licensed built version of a Western engine.

  • Member since
    March 2006
Posted by simpilot34 on Friday, September 3, 2010 8:08 AM

Taking a stab here, Panavia Tornado?

Cheers, Lt. Cmdr. Richie "To be prepared for war, is one of the most effectual means of preserving the peace."-George Washington
  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: Scotland
Posted by Milairjunkie on Friday, September 3, 2010 8:25 AM

simpilot34

Taking a stab here, Panavia Tornado?

No, sorry. The RB199 was built by the Turbo Union consortium, not license built as such & was only fitted to the Tornado. The aircraft in question uses a strictly licensed built version of an engine which has been fitted to several aircraft - the engine pre-dates the RB199 & is more powerful.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Edgware, London
Posted by osher on Friday, September 3, 2010 9:20 AM

I was close first time!  It's the Xian JH-7 also called the JBC-1 Flying Leopard, a Chinese twin seat twin engined high wing ground attack, using a licence built RR Spey engine.

  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: Scotland
Posted by Milairjunkie on Friday, September 3, 2010 9:40 AM

Yes indeed, the Xian JH-7A. You are the man!

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Edgware, London
Posted by osher on Friday, September 3, 2010 9:46 AM

OK, identical question as before, except, this aircraft is single seat for attack, and twin seat for advanced weapons training.

  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Sonora Desert
Posted by stikpusher on Friday, September 3, 2010 2:48 PM

How about Mitsubishi F-1 (single seat attack) and T-2 (twin seat trainer) using a license built Rolls Royce Turbomeca Adour- the Ishikawajima-Harima TF40-IHI-801A

 

F is for FIRE, That burns down the whole town!

U is for URANIUM... BOMBS!

N is for NO SURVIVORS...

       - Plankton

LSM

 

JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.