SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

Aircraft Trivia Quiz

728407 views
7409 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Northern California
Posted by jeaton01 on Thursday, July 3, 2008 12:52 PM
My bet is on the Wrights, but another pretender to the throne was Lyman Gilmore, who claimed to have flown a steam powered airplane at Grass Valley, California in 1902.

John

To see build logs for my models:  http://goldeneramodel.com/mymodels/mymodels.html

 

  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: Carmel, CA
Posted by bondoman on Thursday, July 3, 2008 12:39 PM
I expect we'll be hearing shortly from Brazil!Laugh [(-D]
  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Shell Beach, California
Posted by mojodoctor on Thursday, July 3, 2008 12:38 PM

That question should result in some interesting answers!

 

I think you are refering to Gustave Whitehead who allegedly on August 14, 1901, in Fairfield, Connecticut, reportedly flew his engine-powered Number 21 800 meters at 15 meters height. No photographs exist of this flight, but a sketch was made by one of the many witnesses.

 

There is also talk the first flight was by a twenty-five year old New Zealander, Richard Pearse on March 31, 1902 in Waitohi, New Zealand just near Timaru.

Matt Fly fast, fly low, turn left!
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Crestview, Florida
Posted by MQM107 on Thursday, July 3, 2008 12:09 PM

 

Great link, lots of information. Ok lets try this one on for size. While it is routinely considered that the Wright Brothers were the first in powered flight, there is evidence, (while maybe not compelling) that someone actually beat them into the air by some two years. Name this person and what State were the flights to have taken place?  

 

Mike 

  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: Carmel, CA
Posted by bondoman on Thursday, July 3, 2008 11:47 AM

You are correct. It was treated for all intents as another gun, had a captain from the Ordnance Division who sighted it and fired it. Used basically an 8" shell. Here's a nice link:

http://home.comcast.net/~ok3wirebob/Catapults.html

Pictures, Mike?

Your turn.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Crestview, Florida
Posted by MQM107 on Thursday, July 3, 2008 11:42 AM

 

If i can remember from all of the summer trips to the USS Alabama as a kid, it was black powder.

 

Mike 

  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: Carmel, CA
Posted by bondoman on Thursday, July 3, 2008 11:00 AM

BTW I was kidding! Had to look it up.

What was the energy source for floatplane catapults in the USN, from the mid 1920's on?

  • Member since
    May 2006
  • From: Nanaimo, BC, Canada
Posted by Brews on Thursday, July 3, 2008 10:11 AM

Correct!

And they also patented it to be powered by "a jet of steam, or compressed air or gas". Prophetic.

But since patents have a life of 50 years, I doubt they made any money out of it.

  • Member since
    March 2006
Posted by simpilot34 on Thursday, July 3, 2008 7:32 AM

Imagine that 1867!!!!! The first delta wing design didn't fly until 1948 with the XF-92!!!!!!!

My question is, Did they get royalties from their patent? Just curious is all.

Cheers, Richie

Cheers, Lt. Cmdr. Richie "To be prepared for war, is one of the most effectual means of preserving the peace."-George Washington
  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: Carmel, CA
Posted by bondoman on Thursday, July 3, 2008 12:02 AM
J.W. Butler and E. Edwards, 1867. Aw, come on everyone knows that Wink [;)]
  • Member since
    May 2006
  • From: Nanaimo, BC, Canada
Posted by Brews on Wednesday, July 2, 2008 9:18 PM

Sorry for the delay.

Who patented the first delta-wing design, and in what year?

  

  • Member since
    May 2006
  • From: Nanaimo, BC, Canada
Posted by Brews on Wednesday, July 2, 2008 9:25 AM
What's not to love about ice-cream?
  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Shell Beach, California
Posted by mojodoctor on Wednesday, July 2, 2008 8:00 AM

Wow, that didn't take long!

Nice call Brews. Should have stayed online for a while longer last night, but a bowl of ice cream was calling out to me. Wink [;)]

Matt Fly fast, fly low, turn left!
  • Member since
    May 2006
  • From: Nanaimo, BC, Canada
Posted by Brews on Tuesday, July 1, 2008 11:15 PM
Boulton Paul P111
  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Shell Beach, California
Posted by mojodoctor on Tuesday, July 1, 2008 10:53 PM

I'll go ahead and post another, if that's okay?

 

Hurry now, who can get it first?

Matt Fly fast, fly low, turn left!
  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: A Computer in Adrian, (SE) Michigan.
Posted by Lucien Harpress on Tuesday, July 1, 2008 10:04 PM
Ah, yes.  The airplane build around... nothing.  Wink [;)]  Classic example of good idea/bad execution.  Looks cool, though!
That which does not kill you makes you stranger...
-The Joker
  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: Carmel, CA
Posted by bondoman on Tuesday, July 1, 2008 9:35 PM
 mojodoctor wrote:

That's got to be the Stipa-Caproni but the rudder looks smaller. Early version here, eh?

 

I'll bet that thing does great barrel rolls! Propeller [8-]

Yeah, but it doesn't hold beer for squat!!!
  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Shell Beach, California
Posted by mojodoctor on Tuesday, July 1, 2008 8:52 PM

That's got to be the Stipa-Caproni but the rudder looks smaller. Early version here, eh?

 

I'll bet that thing does great barrel rolls! Propeller [8-]

Matt Fly fast, fly low, turn left!
  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: Carmel, CA
Posted by bondoman on Tuesday, July 1, 2008 6:51 PM
I'd say that the passengers were well ventilated!
  • Member since
    January 2004
  • From: VARNA, BULARIA
Posted by congo79 on Tuesday, July 1, 2008 6:34 PM
Nope, but you`re close.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Edgware, London
Posted by osher on Tuesday, July 1, 2008 6:03 PM
Is it a Campini-Caproni CC-2?
  • Member since
    January 2004
  • From: VARNA, BULARIA
Posted by congo79 on Tuesday, July 1, 2008 4:10 PM

Sorry for the delay, it`s those damn hour differences. So with no further delays, whats this?

  • Member since
    June 2004
  • From: Tucson
Posted by cardshark_14 on Monday, June 30, 2008 4:22 PM
Bingo! Its the J22 Blixten.
Never trust anyone who refuses to drink domestic beer, laugh at the Three Stooges, or crank Back In Black.
  • Member since
    January 2004
  • From: VARNA, BULARIA
Posted by congo79 on Monday, June 30, 2008 4:18 PM
FFVS J-22? It`s definitely swedish so i guess it`s exactely that one.
  • Member since
    June 2004
  • From: Tucson
Posted by cardshark_14 on Monday, June 30, 2008 2:21 PM
Thanks, screaminhelo. I didn't know the Me.1101 was under construction. Cool!

On to the question:
What is it?


Cheers,
Alex
Never trust anyone who refuses to drink domestic beer, laugh at the Three Stooges, or crank Back In Black.
  • Member since
    April 2004
  • From: Georgia
Posted by Screaminhelo on Monday, June 30, 2008 2:05 PM

 cardshark_14 wrote:
I don't know jets, but here's my guess...
F-86 Sabre and Mig-15, both ostensibly based on the Huckebein.

Cheers,
Alex

Alex, you got the F-86, Mig-15 and Huckebein right on the nose; however, I am not aware of the Huckebein ever getting as far as the prototype stage.  There is another German project that actually had a prototype under construction that has a lineage that leads to the F-86.

The Me1101 prototype was under construction when U.S. troops came across the construction facility.  This aircraft was eventually sent to the States and was considered for completion but this was not possible due to damage during shipping and destruction of some drawings.  North American studied the aircraft and used it as a template to build the X-5 and explore different wing sweep angles at supersonic speeds.  Even though it never reached the intended speed, much of the information gained was used in the F-86.  Several design elements from the Me1101 can be seen in the Saber.

I say on to you Alex, You have the floor.

Mac

I Didn't do it!!!

  • Member since
    June 2004
  • From: Tucson
Posted by cardshark_14 on Monday, June 30, 2008 1:40 PM
I don't know jets, but here's my guess...
F-86 Sabre and Mig-15, both ostensibly based on the Huckebein.

Cheers,
Alex
Never trust anyone who refuses to drink domestic beer, laugh at the Three Stooges, or crank Back In Black.
  • Member since
    April 2004
  • From: Georgia
Posted by Screaminhelo on Monday, June 30, 2008 1:37 PM

 Hans von Hammer wrote:
My jet knowledge stops around 1953...  Only thing that comes to mind is the YF-17/-F/A-18 run-off, but I don't think the F-17 was ever put into production.  Doesn't fit all your parameters, either...  I'm officially stumped.  Carry on without me, fellers...

Not early enough Mike.  Since your jet knowledge stops in 1953 though, you should be right in the ballpark for the second half of the question.

More hints

The two production aircraft are quite well known for their conflict.

After all of the paperclips were out of the way, design#1 was very closely followed for a research aircraft to explore concepts that were not included in production aircraft#1. 

Design#2 seems to have been simply developed into a combat aircraft, although there is very little information available for the block of time between the design and production aircraft#2.

Mac

I Didn't do it!!!

  • Member since
    June 2008
  • From: Iowa
Posted by Hans von Hammer on Monday, June 30, 2008 11:55 AM

My jet knowledge stops around 1953...  Only thing that comes to mind is the YF-17/-F/A-18 run-off, but I don't think the F-17 was ever put into production.  Doesn't fit all your parameters, either...  I'm officially stumped.  Carry on without me, fellers...

 

 

  • Member since
    April 2004
  • From: Georgia
Posted by Screaminhelo on Monday, June 30, 2008 11:32 AM
Jet

Mac

I Didn't do it!!!

JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.