SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

Aircraft Trivia Quiz

728407 views
7409 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: Weymouth, Dorset, UK
Posted by chris hall on Tuesday, April 1, 2008 12:41 PM

Time for a couple of clues. This aircraft was made in the USA, and there was only one of them.

Cheers,

Chris

Cute and cuddly, boys, cute and cuddly!
  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: Weymouth, Dorset, UK
Posted by chris hall on Monday, March 31, 2008 8:23 AM
Close-ish, but no cigar.
Cute and cuddly, boys, cute and cuddly!
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Edgware, London
Posted by osher on Monday, March 31, 2008 4:46 AM
8 - being an early helicopter, possibly the La Ceira autogyro?
  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: Weymouth, Dorset, UK
Posted by chris hall on Monday, March 31, 2008 3:54 AM

Ok, I'm thinking of a 1930s experimental, two-seat, single-engined aircraft with a top speed of 20 (twenty) mph.

How many propellers did it have?

Cheers,

Chris

Cute and cuddly, boys, cute and cuddly!
  • Member since
    June 2004
  • From: Tucson
Posted by cardshark_14 on Sunday, March 30, 2008 5:33 PM
Hey Chris, you were first, so its all yours!Smile [:)]
Never trust anyone who refuses to drink domestic beer, laugh at the Three Stooges, or crank Back In Black.
  • Member since
    February 2008
  • From: Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posted by Kit builder on Sunday, March 30, 2008 9:31 AM
A Hurricane IIC and a Bristol Blenheim IV.
If only....
  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: Weymouth, Dorset, UK
Posted by chris hall on Sunday, March 30, 2008 6:43 AM

The Hurricane IIC and the Blenheim IV, for starters. Both seized when they captured Singapore.

Cheers,

Chris.

Cute and cuddly, boys, cute and cuddly!
  • Member since
    June 2004
  • From: Tucson
Posted by cardshark_14 on Sunday, March 30, 2008 5:16 AM

Hey folks!

Its late, I missed Osher's reply, and I need to go to bed, so:

Name two british aircraft captured and flown by the Japanese in WWII.Thumbs Up [tup] 

Never trust anyone who refuses to drink domestic beer, laugh at the Three Stooges, or crank Back In Black.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Edgware, London
Posted by osher on Saturday, March 29, 2008 8:26 PM
Well done Cardshark!  Yes,the BF109/ME109 family.  The prototype used the Kestrel Rolls Royce engine, and of course, Rolls Royce made the Merlin.  Rolls Royce claim to make the world's finest cars.  Mercedes owns Maybach, who claims also to make the finest car, and in WWII made the DB600 range of engines.  The BF109 was also made by the Czechs, a vassal state to the Germans, who stuffed a Junkers bomber engine into it, to make the S-199, which defended Israel, who the Germans tried to wipe out.  Later, the Spanish would make the BF-109, with a Merlin engine, called the Buchon, which stared in The Battle of Britain film.
  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Marana (Tucson), AZ
Posted by EC-130CrewChief on Saturday, March 29, 2008 7:41 PM
It sounds like a Fiat to me... though I can't place the exact model.

Damon

HC-130H/N/P, MC-130H, EC-130H Crew Chief USAF 1985-2005 "Real Planes Have Props"

  • Member since
    June 2004
  • From: Tucson
Posted by cardshark_14 on Saturday, March 29, 2008 7:40 PM

I can't piece all of your clues together, but it sure sounds like the Messerschmitt Bf 109/Me 109 family.  Israel flew them in the form of Czech Avia C.210s. It mounted various DB600 series engines at various points in its development, and they were made by Daimler Benz (Daimler-Chrysler and Mercedes Benz). Now that I think about it, I think one of the early prototypes mounted a Rolls Royce of one sort or another.

Never trust anyone who refuses to drink domestic beer, laugh at the Three Stooges, or crank Back In Black.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Edgware, London
Posted by osher on Saturday, March 29, 2008 7:08 PM

Thanks Card!  I remember reading something about the captued aircraft a long time back.  Here's my question: What fighter aircraft family is this:

It started using the engine of the country it fought against. It's greatest enemy, from this enemy country, at least for a few years, used this initial engine.  What's ironic is that, at the end of it's life, after the fighting, it carried on in production in a 3rd country, using this initial company's engines.  Of the two companies that built the engines, they both now vie for the world's best car accolade (one of them via the name of a rivalit acquired years back).

Just to muddy the waters, somewhat ironically, it found fame defending a 4th country it had tried to wipe out, after it's initial fighting was over.  However, this time it was built in yet another, a 5th, country, what had been a vassal state, using an engine not designed for it at all.

In 1969 it found fame when many of the last hybrid versions, stared in a film about a famous battle it took part in.  One bone of contention though is the correct name for this aircraft.  Either is fine (even the builders mixed up the two names!)

  • Member since
    June 2004
  • From: Tucson
Posted by cardshark_14 on Saturday, March 29, 2008 3:40 PM

Hey Osher,

Definitely the I-16!  The other is an Sb-3 by another name; its an Sb-2 bis.  Thumbs Up [tup] 

It's all yours! Make a Toast [#toast] 

Never trust anyone who refuses to drink domestic beer, laugh at the Three Stooges, or crank Back In Black.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Edgware, London
Posted by osher on Saturday, March 29, 2008 1:24 PM
Here's a guess: SB.3 and the I-16 Polikarpov?
  • Member since
    June 2004
  • From: Tucson
Posted by cardshark_14 on Saturday, March 29, 2008 4:37 AM

Thanks, Chris! 

Okay, an easy one.  Name two Russian aircraft that were captured and flown by the Japanese in WWII.Thumbs Up [tup]

Never trust anyone who refuses to drink domestic beer, laugh at the Three Stooges, or crank Back In Black.
  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: Weymouth, Dorset, UK
Posted by chris hall on Saturday, March 29, 2008 4:25 AM

14 minutes by my watch! Yup, that's the CL-52, a B-47 loaned by the USAF to the RCAF and then on to Canadair, who used it as a flying test bed for the Orenda Iroquois turbojet for the Avro Canada CF-105 Arrow interceptor. It was attached to the starboard rear fuselage simply because there was nowhere else to put it. Landings must have been fun.

Your turn, Shark!

Cheers,

Chris.

 

Cute and cuddly, boys, cute and cuddly!
  • Member since
    June 2004
  • From: Tucson
Posted by cardshark_14 on Saturday, March 29, 2008 4:06 AM

Well it took me a few minutes to see the question, but from there, it went pretty quick...

That is unmistakably the Canadair-modified B-47 testbed.  IIRC, it was testing the Orenda Iroquois turbine for use in something or other by Avro...

Never trust anyone who refuses to drink domestic beer, laugh at the Three Stooges, or crank Back In Black.
  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: Weymouth, Dorset, UK
Posted by chris hall on Saturday, March 29, 2008 3:52 AM

Right - maybe this will take more than five minutes for someone to get. What's going on here:

?

Cheers,

Chris.

Cute and cuddly, boys, cute and cuddly!
  • Member since
    June 2004
  • From: Tucson
Posted by cardshark_14 on Saturday, March 29, 2008 2:31 AM
That's it! Make a Toast [#toast]  It's all yours!
Never trust anyone who refuses to drink domestic beer, laugh at the Three Stooges, or crank Back In Black.
  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: Weymouth, Dorset, UK
Posted by chris hall on Saturday, March 29, 2008 1:59 AM

I think you may be referring to the IAR.80. This Romanian fighter had the tail and rear fuselage of the Polish PZL. P24, the forward fuselage was designed by IAR themselves, the guns came from Fabrique Nationale (of SLR fame) of Belgium, and the engine was a licence-built copy of the Gnome-Rhône Mistral Major. If you include the essentially similar IAR.81 ground attack aircraft, some 350 were produced, and it served with the Romanian AF until 1944.

It looks quite a lot like a short-nose FW.190 from a distance, and in WW2, Germany and Romania were on the same side. An allied fighter pilot mistaking an IAR.80 for a FW.190 would be in for a pleasant surprise and, probably, an easy kill. Not so much, the other way round.

How am I doing?

Chris.

Cute and cuddly, boys, cute and cuddly!
  • Member since
    June 2004
  • From: Tucson
Posted by cardshark_14 on Saturday, March 29, 2008 1:12 AM

Okay,

This aircraft's prototype was a hybrid of sorts, as it had the tail section of a PZL aircraft, the front half of another company's aircraft, guns designed by one enemy country, and an engine designed by another enemy country. It saw combat in WWII, and was often mistaken for a different, more common plane from a friendly country.  What is it?Mischief [:-,]

Never trust anyone who refuses to drink domestic beer, laugh at the Three Stooges, or crank Back In Black.
  • Member since
    January 2007
  • From: Northern California
Posted by trexx on Friday, March 28, 2008 9:09 PM

 cardshark_14 wrote:
Flettner Fl 185...an interesting solution to balancing torques...Propeller [8-]

 

Oh... YOu make me sick! LOL!

That is the CORRECT ANSWER, Propellor head!

 You're on!

  • Member since
    June 2004
  • From: Tucson
Posted by cardshark_14 on Friday, March 28, 2008 6:39 PM
Flettner Fl 185...an interesting solution to balancing torques...Propeller [8-]
Never trust anyone who refuses to drink domestic beer, laugh at the Three Stooges, or crank Back In Black.
  • Member since
    January 2007
  • From: Northern California
Posted by trexx on Friday, March 28, 2008 5:51 PM
 Matt90 wrote:

Yep! Good call!

You're it! 

 

HA! Not afraid! Blindfold [X-)]

What is this? ...name and manufacturer

  • Member since
    June 2005
  • From: New Jersey
Posted by Matt90 on Friday, March 28, 2008 5:45 PM

Yep! Good call!

You're it! 

''Do your damndest in an ostentatious manner all the time.'' -General George S. Patton
  • Member since
    January 2007
  • From: Northern California
Posted by trexx on Friday, March 28, 2008 4:36 PM
 Matt90 wrote:

Thank you! Since the last question was an identify, let's keep this up.

What is it?

 

It's French  Bugatti 110, twin motored balsa racing plane.

  • Member since
    June 2005
  • From: New Jersey
Posted by Matt90 on Friday, March 28, 2008 4:28 PM

Thank you! Since the last question was an identify, let's keep this up.

What is it?

''Do your damndest in an ostentatious manner all the time.'' -General George S. Patton
  • Member since
    June 2005
  • From: New Jersey
Posted by Matt90 on Friday, March 28, 2008 4:28 PM

Thank you! Since the last question was an identify, let's keep this up.

What is it?

''Do your damndest in an ostentatious manner all the time.'' -General George S. Patton
  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: Weymouth, Dorset, UK
Posted by chris hall on Friday, March 28, 2008 3:47 PM

Curtiss Duck (or Curtiss-Goupil Duck, to be precise) it is!

The original design dates from the 1880s, and was to be fitted with floats and a steam engine. No steam engines with apropriate power/weight ratios were, of course, available, so it stayed on the drawing board. It did, however, feature wing-warping for lateral control, and Glen Curtiss used it as evidence against the Wrights in his lawsuit, to argue that they were not the originators of this form of control.

To this end, Curtiss built one of these in 1917. He fitted it with a 100hp petrol engine, which solved the power/weight problem. It was originally fitted with floats, as per the original design, but with weight and drag of these, it was barely able to hop, Re-fitted with a conventional wheel u/c, however, it flew quite successfully.

Curtiss, of course, still lost his suit.

All things Duck here:

http://mainescenery.proboards24.com/index.cgi?board=beacon&action=display&thread=1190392868

Your turn, Matt!

Cheers,

Chris.

Cute and cuddly, boys, cute and cuddly!
  • Member since
    June 2005
  • From: New Jersey
Posted by Matt90 on Friday, March 28, 2008 3:30 PM
 chris hall wrote:

OK, folks - nice and simple - what's this:

and what important modifications to the original design were needed to make it airworthy?

Cheers,

Chris. 

 

 

Isn't that the Curtiss Duck?

I think I can recall that it was used by Curtiss in his legal battle with the Wrights as one of a few designs that could have flown before the Wright brothers built their airplane if it had had a proper engine and a few design elements.

I think they added control surfaces, landing gear, a new engine, and a modern propeller. 

Good one, the only time I had ever seen this before was in Unconvetional Aircraft 

''Do your damndest in an ostentatious manner all the time.'' -General George S. Patton
JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.