SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

Aircraft Trivia Quiz

728379 views
7409 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Utereg
Posted by Borg R3-MC0 on Sunday, October 14, 2012 3:41 AM

No, it is not the twin otter. Both DeHaviland and Viking are both Canadian. Furthermore, Viking has purchased the rights and tooling for the Otter.

Just to give you a hint. The country in which this aircraft is build is often accused of copying...

  • Member since
    February 2011
  • From: Lixnaw Co Kerry
Posted by PhilB on Sunday, October 14, 2012 8:07 AM

Ok so are we in China?

  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Utereg
Posted by Borg R3-MC0 on Sunday, October 14, 2012 9:39 AM

Yes, China is correct.

  • Member since
    March 2010
  • From: New Zealand
Posted by Scorpiomikey on Sunday, October 14, 2012 2:15 PM

MA600?

Looks like a copy of a long nose dash 8. or even an atr.

"I am a leaf on the wind, watch how i soar"

Recite the litanies, fire up the Gellar field, a poo storm is coming Hmm 

My signature

Check out my blog here.

  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Utereg
Posted by Borg R3-MC0 on Sunday, October 14, 2012 2:40 PM

You are close Scorpiomikey, but the Xian MA600 does not have a 300+ orders (I am not sure about any FAA certification) . I am looking for a bigger aircraft, the fuselage is the direct copy, the wings is a local development.

By the way, the MA 600 is not an ATR or Dash 8 copy but an An-24/26 copy.

  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: Scotland
Posted by Milairjunkie on Sunday, October 14, 2012 3:07 PM

Would I be correct in thinking that there is a bit more to it than a simple copy, more like a copy of a copy of a copy of a copy?

  • Member since
    January 2009
Posted by F-8fanatic on Sunday, October 14, 2012 5:57 PM

Is it the COMAC ARJ21?

  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Utereg
Posted by Borg R3-MC0 on Monday, October 15, 2012 4:26 AM

F-8fanatic

Is it the COMAC ARJ21?

Yes, it is the Comac. The Chinese had a license for the MD-90 (which itself is a part of the MD-80, DC-9 familiy). For the ARJ21 they use the MD-90 fuselage (it has the exact same dimensions) but have a newly designed supercritical wings (supposedly of Ukranian desing). Comac has 300 on  order and want the put this aircraft on the international market. Hence the FAA certification.
Interestingly enough they have a least 1 USA based customer, GECAS (GE Capital Aviation Services). GE has an interesting busines model. They are the supplier of the engines but also a customer for the aircraft. So, in a way, they sell to themselves being both supplier and customer..... This way they insure that GE engines get used in a lot of airliners.

Anyway, F-8Fanatic, you have the floor.

  • Member since
    January 2009
Posted by F-8fanatic on Tuesday, October 16, 2012 7:07 PM

ok,

I am looking for a plane.  I will try to keep this from getting confusing.  The manufacturer was in one country we'll call A.  This company was well known for building previous figher designs for another country that we will call B.  The plane's engine was supplied by a third country, we'll call C.  C and B were classic arch enemies.  The plane I am looking for was not built for either B or C--ironically, it flew in combat against B, and at the same time, B flew some captured examples as well.

This plane had 3 major shortcomings in its design.  Of these, there were attempts made to address two of them, with one example being modified for each attempt.  The plane was a solid design, and actually proved quite capable of defeating it's usual opponent, but with fewer than 300 built, it never really had a chance.  It did serve with several air forces, and found its greatest success in an air force that became known for having shocking success with planes that everyone else already had discarded as obsolete and crude.  I believe that only one example survives today in a museum.

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: San Francisco, CA
Posted by telsono on Wednesday, October 17, 2012 1:25 PM

Would it the Morko-Morane?, The French Morane-Saulnier 406 powered by the Soviet Klimov M-105P, modified and flown by the Finns?

Mike T.

Beware the hobby that eats.  - Ben Franklin

Do not fear mistakes. You will know failure. Continue to reach out. - Ben Franklin

The U.S. Constitution  doesn't guarantee happiness, only the pursuit of it. You have to catch up with it yourself. - Ben Franklin

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: San Francisco, CA
Posted by telsono on Thursday, October 18, 2012 11:35 AM

Morko-Morane

country A = France (producer of the Morane-Saulnier 406)

country B = Finland (modified the aircraft because of lack of spare engines)

country C = USSR (the Klimov M-105P engine from downed or captured LaGG-3 aircraft)

incidently, the Russian pilots hated the LaGG-3 and used the initials LaGG as an anagram for "Certified Varnished Coffin".

Mike T.

Beware the hobby that eats.  - Ben Franklin

Do not fear mistakes. You will know failure. Continue to reach out. - Ben Franklin

The U.S. Constitution  doesn't guarantee happiness, only the pursuit of it. You have to catch up with it yourself. - Ben Franklin

  • Member since
    January 2009
Posted by F-8fanatic on Thursday, October 18, 2012 4:26 PM

No, it isnt the Morane.  But you are in the general time frame....

  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Utereg
Posted by Borg R3-MC0 on Friday, October 19, 2012 11:45 AM

How about the Fokker D-21.

Build in the Netherlands, powered by a British engine, use against and by Germany.

  • Member since
    January 2009
Posted by F-8fanatic on Friday, October 19, 2012 11:57 PM

Yes, it is the Fokker D.XXI...

This plane had three major flaws--it was underpowered, too lightly armed, and had fixed landing gear.  One was modified to have retractable gear, and one was modified to carry 20mm cannon.  Even with these flaws, it proved to be maneuverable enough that it could handle the early BF109's fairly well.  The Finns had the best success with it, just as they did with the outdated Brewster Buffalo against the Soviets.  It was powered by a british engine.  The Luftwaffe did end up capturing a small number and flying them, but it primarily flew against Germany.  Around 150 were built, and the last remaining example is in a museum in Finland.  A museum in the Netherlands has a replica as well.  

  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Utereg
Posted by Borg R3-MC0 on Saturday, October 20, 2012 6:53 AM

I have seen the D-21 replica often. I live about 15 minutes drive from Soesterberg. In fact, I am going there tomorrow because of the Nationale Modelbouwdagen (= national modelling days). The d-21 is pretty good but the G-1 that they have is losing paint...

Anyway, a question.

This aircraft was the first of a very famous manufacturer/designer. However, the initial design work was done by another designer who fell out of grace....

The famous designer was saved by the fact he had a brother in a high political function.  

  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Utereg
Posted by Borg R3-MC0 on Sunday, October 21, 2012 2:09 PM

Bump

To easy? To vague? Need a hint?

  • Member since
    February 2011
  • From: Lixnaw Co Kerry
Posted by PhilB on Sunday, October 21, 2012 2:32 PM

MiG-1 which was initially a Polikarpov design.  Polikarpov lost favour with Stalin and Artem Mikoyan,brother of the politician Anastas took over the design.

  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Utereg
Posted by Borg R3-MC0 on Monday, October 22, 2012 4:15 AM

That is correct! The MiG-1 was intially a Polikarpov desing, the I-200.

  • Member since
    February 2011
  • From: Lixnaw Co Kerry
Posted by PhilB on Monday, October 22, 2012 4:58 AM

Only 2 of these aircraft were built by a manufacturer closely related to their first operator.  Each had a type number and shared a name though three type numbers were used during their operational lives,  Revolutionary for their time, one eventually crashed and the other was withdrawn by their second owner.

  • Member since
    January 2007
  • From: Holt, MI
Posted by Gunner59 on Monday, October 22, 2012 12:28 PM

Sounds like the Concorde

  • Member since
    February 2011
  • From: Lixnaw Co Kerry
Posted by PhilB on Monday, October 22, 2012 12:37 PM

Please explain how any of the clues relate to Concorde

  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Utereg
Posted by Borg R3-MC0 on Tuesday, October 23, 2012 3:42 AM

I think there where more then 2 Concorde's build....

My anwser is the Junkers G.38, two where build, one crashed. The remaining G.38 was transferred from the Lufthanse to the Luftwaffet ("the second owner"). And beeing the largest landplane (and sporting an "avant la lettre" blended wing design) thet where revolutionary.

  • Member since
    February 2011
  • From: Lixnaw Co Kerry
Posted by PhilB on Tuesday, October 23, 2012 3:52 AM

Not the G.38 but you are in the right era

  • Member since
    February 2011
  • From: Lixnaw Co Kerry
Posted by PhilB on Tuesday, October 23, 2012 3:47 PM

One of the aircraft had a short term military designation at the start of its career in adition to the model numbers already mentioned.

  • Member since
    February 2011
  • From: Lixnaw Co Kerry
Posted by PhilB on Thursday, October 25, 2012 1:48 AM

The manufacturer of these two aircraft had moved into civil aircraft though its main interest and much of its initial fame came from military projects

  • Member since
    February 2011
  • From: Lixnaw Co Kerry
Posted by PhilB on Friday, October 26, 2012 1:44 AM

I'm surprised this is obviously causing problems.  Think of an evolutionary machine - a cross between old and new ideas with a number of revolutionary features

  • Member since
    February 2011
  • From: Lixnaw Co Kerry
Posted by PhilB on Sunday, October 28, 2012 2:44 PM

If no-one has a crack at this during the next 12 hours I'll give the answer and come up with another question

  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Utereg
Posted by Borg R3-MC0 on Sunday, October 28, 2012 3:08 PM

Ok. How about the Loire et Olivier LeO H-47, also know as the SNCASE SE-200 Amphitrite.

  • Member since
    February 2011
  • From: Lixnaw Co Kerry
Posted by PhilB on Sunday, October 28, 2012 3:45 PM

Try a trip across the ocean!!

  • Member since
    February 2011
  • From: Lixnaw Co Kerry
Posted by PhilB on Monday, October 29, 2012 1:40 PM

I'll post the answer at 22.00 UTC today Monday.

JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.