SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

Aircraft Trivia Quiz

728381 views
7409 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    September 2011
  • From: Earth (usually)
Posted by Centhot on Wednesday, November 9, 2011 6:16 PM

Ooops. sorry, didn't see that you said Super 7 Borg, yes, that's it!  The MiG-21 was sold to the Chinese, but parts weren't sent, and then came the Russian/Chinese war, so, that all came to a stop.  China had enough to carry on, but the Cultural Revolution resulted in most people able to develop it being killed, or living in fear.  Either way, nothing happened, then, in the 1980's Grumman was allowed to work with China to develop the F-7, using bits from the F-20 Tigershark, such as the nose, avionics, and side intakes.  Then the Chinese ran tanks over protesting students, the Americans refused to work with the Chinese, and the whole thing came to a halt.  Is the FC-1 a re-jigged Super 7?  Well, it has some similarities, but they deny it has a heritage there.

Anyway, over to you Borg, but, great answer Phil!

2012 A/B/C: 10/3/0 (Acquired/Binned/Completed)

  • Member since
    September 2011
  • From: Earth (usually)
Posted by Centhot on Wednesday, November 9, 2011 6:11 PM

Sorry guys, was out of it for a few days.  So....

Borg, you're the closest, just need to move further along.  Phil, you are spot on with one family, that is, the F-20, and F/A-18.  One of those two, combined with something further along from Borg, and we will have a winner.  Good luck!

2012 A/B/C: 10/3/0 (Acquired/Binned/Completed)

  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Utereg
Posted by Borg R3-MC0 on Tuesday, November 8, 2011 1:49 AM

Phil_H

 Centhot:
Here is where the other aircraft comes in.  It was supposed to be a fighter, but became a trainer in the 1950's, then again a fighter, and split into two 'families' one was a radical change, whilst the other was an evolution, culminating in a design, which was lost in the 1980's partially due to politics.

This part sounds like the F-5 family

N-156 ---> F5A/B---> F-5E/F ----> F-20
           |                          |
            \--- T-38              (indirectly)
                                      |
                                       \--- YF-17 ----> F/A18

True, and the F-5 family has even more branches with the Iran development (the shafque or something like that)

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: Sydney, Australia
Posted by Phil_H on Monday, November 7, 2011 4:45 PM

Centhot
Here is where the other aircraft comes in.  It was supposed to be a fighter, but became a trainer in the 1950's, then again a fighter, and split into two 'families' one was a radical change, whilst the other was an evolution, culminating in a design, which was lost in the 1980's partially due to politics.

This part sounds like the F-5 family

N-156 ---> F5A/B---> F-5E/F ----> F-20
           |                          |
            \--- T-38              (indirectly)
                                      |
                                       \--- YF-17 ----> F/A18

  • Member since
    December 2010
  • From: T-34 Hunting
Posted by TheWildChild on Monday, November 7, 2011 8:40 AM

i was thinking the F-86 Sabre, but not sure. i mean it did get a redesigned nose in the form of the Sabre Dog. and i remember reading somewhere that a country used Sabres into the 1990s.

1/35 XM77  "Sledgehammer", 1964 Chevy Impala Derby Car

Whats next? Aircraft for Ground Attack Group Build

"I dont just tackle to make a play, I tackle to break your will." -Ray Lewis

"In the end, we're all just chalk lines on the concrete, drawn only to be washed away"- 5 Finger Death Punch

"Ahh, my old enemy.......STAIRS"- Po, Kung Fu Panda

  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Utereg
Posted by Borg R3-MC0 on Monday, November 7, 2011 1:43 AM

The Chengdu Super 7? It lineage starts at the Mig 21 (fighter), then the F-7 ...  

  • Member since
    September 2011
  • From: Earth (usually)
Posted by Centhot on Sunday, November 6, 2011 3:56 PM

OK, it's been a few weeks, so, here goes.  Back in the 1950's two rival nations developed two aircraft.  One was an advanced fighter, the other a trainer.  Over the years the fighter was sold to another nation, which it then had a war with, after selling part of the production line, and then an internal revolution in the buying country, leaving this 1950's design as it's most advanced until recently.

Here is where the other aircraft comes in.  It was supposed to be a fighter, but became a trainer in the 1950's, then again a fighter, and split into two 'families' one was a radical change, whilst the other was an evolution, culminating in a design, which was lost in the 1980's partially due to politics.

Enter in a commercial deal...  This 1950's fighter that had not changed much now had a radically re-designed nose and avionics taken from the cancelled project, and then, due to another attempted revolution, was again cancelled.  What was the name of the this last cancelled aircraft?

2012 A/B/C: 10/3/0 (Acquired/Binned/Completed)

  • Member since
    September 2011
  • From: Kingsport, Tennessee
Posted by Eighth Air Force Pilot on Tuesday, October 18, 2011 11:44 AM

Actually the F-4 Phantom predated the Tomcat in Naval Service. Not many people know though, that the Tomcat did get to see service in Vietnam!! Althougth it was just to fly Combat Air Patrol over Saigon while the last evacuations from the U.S. Embassy were taking place.

She was an amazing bird and beautiful to look at it. Surely was the end of an era...

"Speak softly and carry a big stick; you will go far," Theodore Roosevelt

 Currently on the bench:

  1. 1/48 Revell Germany Spitfire Mk.IX
  2. 1/48 Academy Spitfire Mk. XIVc
  3. 1/48 Tamiya Beaufigher TF Mk.X
  4. 1/48 Tamiya F-15C
  5. 1/48 Revell F-15E Strike Eagle
  6. 1-48 Revell B-17G

  • Member since
    July 2011
  • From: Land of Oz
Posted by MilitaryAircraft101 on Tuesday, October 18, 2011 12:58 AM

F-8 already got it mate ;)

  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: Scotland
Posted by Milairjunkie on Monday, October 17, 2011 3:37 AM

747 SCA?

  • Member since
    July 2011
  • From: Land of Oz
Posted by MilitaryAircraft101 on Monday, October 17, 2011 12:43 AM

No, not as a research aircraft, but some lessons learned did help with the Buran space shuttle :) Over to you F-8

  • Member since
    January 2009
Posted by F-8fanatic on Sunday, October 16, 2011 2:55 PM

MilitaryAircraft101

Developed to explore low speed handling which has helped to contribute to space shuttle design. First flight 1976.

 

I do believe you are referring to the MiG-105 "Lapot" lifting-body test aircraft.  Made a total of 8 flights, the first of which was in 1976.  The plane is in a museum in Monino, Russia.  This was not actually used for space shuttle research--it was more accurately a program that ended up being canceled in favor of the Buran shuttle program.  The original intent with the MiG-105 was to research for a passenger-carrying space plane.  It was designed to be launched in mid-air from a carrier aircraft, but on its first flight it did take off from the ground under its own power.

  • Member since
    July 2011
  • From: Land of Oz
Posted by MilitaryAircraft101 on Saturday, October 15, 2011 2:07 AM

Developed to explore low speed handling which has helped to contribute to space shuttle design. First flight 1976.

  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: Scotland
Posted by Milairjunkie on Friday, October 14, 2011 3:37 AM

Yes MilitaryAircraft101, the "Tin Triangle". Avro Vulcan VX770 was used as a testbed for the R.R. Conway.

VX770 test flying on 20/09/58 for R.R. which happened to coincide with the RAF Syerston "Battle of Britain at home display" & it was decided that if timing went to plan that VX770 would do 3 flypast's at the show. On VX770's first pass, as it started to pull up, the starboard wing started to kink, delaminate & ultimately fail - all four on board & three on the ground were killed. The following possibilities have been blamed for the accident;

Pilot error - it was estimated from footage of the accident & witness statements that VX770 was flying at 80 feet / 350 knots as opposed to the authorised 200>300 feet & 250>300 knots, but the early Vulcan's were known to have difficulty with accurate altitude reading at these heights.....

A know combination of overly powerful engines & a weak pre-production wing.

In the run up to the accident, VX770 had carried out several high G maneuvers, including rolls & loops, it has been suggested that the appropriate checks on the known to be weak wing were not carried out & that VX770 was more or less doomed before it left the ground.

 

 

  • Member since
    July 2011
  • From: Land of Oz
Posted by MilitaryAircraft101 on Friday, October 14, 2011 12:53 AM

I've got it! (I hope) You said we were close with the Victor and Valiant, so the remaining one would theoretically be the Vulcan, and sure enough, it flew with Conways for the beginning of the prototype stage, after replacing Sapphire turbojets. The aircraft's serial was VX770.

  • Member since
    September 2011
  • From: Earth (usually)
Posted by Centhot on Thursday, October 13, 2011 5:20 PM

I'll have a guess, the Meteor?

2012 A/B/C: 10/3/0 (Acquired/Binned/Completed)

  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: Scotland
Posted by Milairjunkie on Thursday, October 13, 2011 2:58 PM

MilitaryAircraft101

VC-10 had Conways from the outset, 1962 I think...

No, before the VC-10 & also before the Victor B.2.

This aircraft normally uses turbojet power, not turbofan & the particular aircraft (serial) met with an unfortunate end, in part due to it's turbofan engine fitment......................... 

  • Member since
    July 2011
  • From: Land of Oz
Posted by MilitaryAircraft101 on Thursday, October 13, 2011 2:43 PM

VC-10 had Conways from the outset, 1962 I think...

  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: Scotland
Posted by Milairjunkie on Thursday, October 13, 2011 2:11 PM

Anonymous

Bondo - Sorry not the Nimrod.

F-8 - Getting closer, the Valiant B.2 "Black Bomber" was originally to be fitted with the R.R. Conway / RB.80, but ended up with uprated R.R. Avon's.

Strange that, how did I manage to past as "anonymous" Tongue Tied

  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, October 13, 2011 12:58 PM

Bondo - Sorry not the Nimrod.

F-8 - Getting closer, the Valiant B.2 "Black Bomber" was originally to be fitted with the R.R. Conway / RB.80, but ended up with uprated R.R. Avon's.

  • Member since
    January 2009
Posted by F-8fanatic on Thursday, October 13, 2011 10:11 AM

OK, I think I got it....

The sole example of the Vickers Valiant B.2 first flew in September 1953.  Rolls Royce developed the RB.80, later called the RCo.2 turbofan for this aircraft.  Only one B.2 was ever built and it flew until 1958.  I have not found much about this alrcraft, but I did find that the turbofan operated flawlessly for 133 hours during testing.

  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: Carmel, CA
Posted by bondoman on Thursday, October 13, 2011 9:45 AM

Nimrod MR.1

  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: Scotland
Posted by Milairjunkie on Thursday, October 13, 2011 3:13 AM

I'm afraid it's not the Victor, although were now getting pretty close.

  • Member since
    July 2011
  • From: Land of Oz
Posted by MilitaryAircraft101 on Thursday, October 13, 2011 12:40 AM

Handley Page Victor? Rolls Royce Conway engine.

  • Member since
    January 2009
Posted by F-8fanatic on Thursday, October 13, 2011 12:28 AM

Scorpiomikey

Last guess then im going to give up.

B-52

 

No, it wasnt the B-52.  B-52s all flew with J-57 turbojets until the advent of the B-52H model, and the H model was on the drawing board when the Handley Page Victor B. 2 made its first flight--on 20 February, 1959--with Rolls Royce Conway turbofans.  The B-52H prototype first few with the TF33 turbofan in March 1961.

From what I can recall, the TF33/JT3D turbofan was flight tested mounted under a B-45 Tornado later in 1959.  This brings me to my answer that the first aircraft to fly solely under turbofan power would be the Handley Page Victor B.2.  Others operated a turbofan engine on test stands before that, but no aircraft flew solely with turbofans until the Victor.  Even the *** had a turbofan project--the  Daimler-Benz DB 670--that was successfully operated on a test stand in 1943...but with the war on, they abandoned the project.

 

  • Member since
    March 2010
  • From: New Zealand
Posted by Scorpiomikey on Wednesday, October 12, 2011 8:55 PM

Last guess then im going to give up.

B-52

"I am a leaf on the wind, watch how i soar"

Recite the litanies, fire up the Gellar field, a poo storm is coming Hmm 

My signature

Check out my blog here.

  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: Scotland
Posted by Milairjunkie on Wednesday, October 12, 2011 8:40 PM

The Spey S.2 Buccaneer is slightly late in the game.

  • Member since
    March 2010
  • From: New Zealand
Posted by Scorpiomikey on Wednesday, October 12, 2011 7:48 PM

Blackburn Buckaneer with 2 RR Speys? (I feel like this is too late in the game though.)

"I am a leaf on the wind, watch how i soar"

Recite the litanies, fire up the Gellar field, a poo storm is coming Hmm 

My signature

Check out my blog here.

  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: Scotland
Posted by Milairjunkie on Wednesday, October 12, 2011 7:33 PM

The HS.178 would be the first with turbojet power, not turbofan though..............

  • Member since
    September 2011
  • From: Earth (usually)
Posted by Centhot on Wednesday, October 12, 2011 6:59 PM

HS.178

2012 A/B/C: 10/3/0 (Acquired/Binned/Completed)

JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.