SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

Aircraft Trivia Quiz

728384 views
7409 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: Scotland
Posted by Milairjunkie on Tuesday, August 31, 2010 5:48 AM

Wild guess - the F-8 with J57-P-20A?

  • Member since
    January 2009
Posted by F-8fanatic on Tuesday, August 31, 2010 5:34 AM

Milairjunkie

The "Missile with a Man in it", fitted with the J79-GE-19?

The Italian F-104S was fitted with the"19" from factory & many F-104A's (& B's ?) were re-engined with the "19" ?

 

wow, I wasnt thinking about the 104.....didnt even think about that one....

Now, add the gear needed to launch and land on a carrier.....because this plane did that.

  • Member since
    March 2006
Posted by simpilot34 on Tuesday, August 31, 2010 5:10 AM

Going to take a stab at it, F-16XL?

Cheers, Lt. Cmdr. Richie "To be prepared for war, is one of the most effectual means of preserving the peace."-George Washington
  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Sonora Desert
Posted by stikpusher on Tuesday, August 31, 2010 12:36 AM

F-104A with the J79-19 engine

 

F is for FIRE, That burns down the whole town!

U is for URANIUM... BOMBS!

N is for NO SURVIVORS...

       - Plankton

LSM

 

  • Member since
    January 2009
Posted by F-8fanatic on Monday, August 30, 2010 11:27 PM

osher

Combat experience?  Twin engined?  Well, that rules out the British, American, and Swedish aircraft, leaving the French or Russian.  As such, I'll hazard a guess of 'Mirage'

 

No, not twin engined, this is a single-engine aircraft.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Edgware, London
Posted by osher on Monday, August 30, 2010 5:00 PM

Combat experience?  Twin engined?  Well, that rules out the British, American, and Swedish aircraft, leaving the French or Russian.  As such, I'll hazard a guess of 'Mirage'

  • Member since
    January 2009
Posted by F-8fanatic on Monday, August 30, 2010 4:50 PM

bondoman

Saab JAS 39 Gripen NG can supercruise, and with AAM's loaded. Not bad for a ship that can take off in 800m. Saab plans to build a Sea Gripen.

Edit: whoops, no combat experience.

 

no, good guess but not the Gripen....what makes this one so notable is that it is actually a third-generation jet aircraft.  This plane was supercruising more than 30 years ago....

  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: Scotland
Posted by Milairjunkie on Monday, August 30, 2010 4:46 PM

The "Missile with a Man in it", fitted with the J79-GE-19?

The Italian F-104S was fitted with the"19" from factory & many F-104A's (& B's ?) were re-engined with the "19" ?

  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: Carmel, CA
Posted by bondoman on Monday, August 30, 2010 12:56 PM

Saab JAS 39 Gripen NG can supercruise, and with AAM's loaded. Not bad for a ship that can take off in 800m. Saab plans to build a Sea Gripen.

Edit: whoops, no combat experience.

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Edgware, London
Posted by osher on Monday, August 30, 2010 11:50 AM

May I correct a common error.  The Short Sunderland was not called the Flying Porcupine because of it's guns, but, because the radar version had these huge vertical antenna on it's back.

  • Member since
    January 2009
Posted by F-8fanatic on Monday, August 30, 2010 5:59 AM

Alright...

EVeryone knows that one of the revolutionary technology features of the new F-22 Raptor is that it can fly supersonic without the use of afterburners.  However, this is actually not new.  There was a single-engine combat plane--meaning it actually did fly combat missions--that was able to routinely exceed the speed of sound in level flight without using afterburner.  The aircraft was given an uprated version of the original engine to make this happen, but it was done across much of the fleet of these aircraft, so it wasnt a one-time thing.  Name the specific variant of the aircraft, and if you know it, name the variant of the engine as well.

  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: Scotland
Posted by Milairjunkie on Monday, August 30, 2010 4:06 AM

Sorry, we would usually call it a toilet, but I thought over there WC was a more common name for it?

Anyway, spot on with the with the German pilot & submariners favourite, the Sunderland.

 

  • Member since
    January 2009
Posted by F-8fanatic on Sunday, August 29, 2010 7:45 PM

I'm going to take a shot with the Short Sunderland flying boat.  It had a porcelain toilet, and a detachable bollard.  It was also not liked by the enemy at all, the Germans called it "flying porcupine" because of the number of guns it carried.  It was not a target that the Luftwaffe fliers were eager to engage.  I found an account where one Sunderland was attacked by no less than 6 German Ju-88s....one Ju-88 was shot down, one was heavily damaged and the others ended up giving up the fight.

  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Sonora Desert
Posted by stikpusher on Sunday, August 29, 2010 6:21 PM

WC is water closet, aka toilet.

 

F is for FIRE, That burns down the whole town!

U is for URANIUM... BOMBS!

N is for NO SURVIVORS...

       - Plankton

LSM

 

  • Member since
    January 2009
Posted by F-8fanatic on Sunday, August 29, 2010 6:16 PM

forgive me for this, but what is a WC?

  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: Scotland
Posted by Milairjunkie on Sunday, August 29, 2010 5:56 AM

I think Blechhammer was at one point Polish?

This combat aircraft had a porcelain WC & a bollard & it wasn't much liked by the enemy either?

  • Member since
    January 2009
Posted by F-8fanatic on Saturday, August 28, 2010 6:25 PM

thats a cool story.....you threw us off with the reference to "returning from Poland" because this plane's target that day was in the center of Germany.

  • Member since
    January 2008
  • From: Tulsa, OK
Posted by acmodeler01 on Saturday, August 28, 2010 5:38 PM
  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: Scotland
Posted by Milairjunkie on Saturday, August 28, 2010 1:48 PM

Tulsamerica, 42-51430 - The last B-24 made in Tulsa, similar mission, lost on return.

The aircraft had a special connection with Tulsa, was paid for by war bonds from Tulsa & was signed by everyone involved in the making & funding of her.

On a sideline, right or not,   I see that this aircraft may have been found. Some interesting info here;

http://www.samoloty.ow.pl/str429a.htm

  • Member since
    January 2008
  • From: Tulsa, OK
Posted by acmodeler01 on Saturday, August 28, 2010 1:26 PM

You are getting pretty close.

  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: Scotland
Posted by Milairjunkie on Friday, August 27, 2010 3:48 PM

Long shot here;

B-24 "Flying Finger" was made at the Tulsa Aircraft Plant & lost while on a mission to the Polish border. Jack Cody was a gunner on this aircraft & was thrown, unconscious out of "Flying Finger" by another crew member after he ha been injured during an attack by German fighters.

Jack Cody survived & was taken POW, later to be "liberated" & go on to be recognised & properly distinguished?

  • Member since
    January 2008
  • From: Tulsa, OK
Posted by acmodeler01 on Friday, August 27, 2010 7:01 AM

OK, the challenge here is to consolidate all the clues and come up with a way to liberate the answer from the puzzle..Smile Dots

I've seen this type called the most produced American combat aircraft. Although I only found it from one source, with over 18k produced,  I'm sure that isn't an unreasonable claim.

Even though the plane I'm looking for was lost on the way home from Poland, it is (or was) close to me. I'd like you to tell me why, what Its name was, and what made it unique.

Happy searching!

  • Member since
    January 2008
  • From: Tulsa, OK
Posted by acmodeler01 on Friday, August 27, 2010 6:15 AM

Haha! How about that! It wasn't really a shot in the dark, but I wasn't able to find any pics of the pressuruzed version, I just read a few discriptions of it and it sounded about right... I'll be back with my Q in a bit..

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Edgware, London
Posted by osher on Thursday, August 26, 2010 6:03 PM

You shouldn't be so quick to dismiss your research acmodeler!  Yes, as Milair says, it's the pressurised Wellington.  3 were built with Bristol engines, 60 more with Merlins, as they boosted it to 40,000 feet.  The design had some origin with pre-war Farmen attempts at pressurisation, which resulted in the deaths of the pilots.  That is, it used a fuselage within a fuselage., with a dome for the pilot.  Some aspects of the design came from pre-war American airliner attempts at pressurisation.  The technology developed was then given to the Americans later.

So, acmodeler, over to you!

  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: Scotland
Posted by Milairjunkie on Thursday, August 26, 2010 4:55 PM

acmodeler01

I've been searching all day, the only thing I can come up with is the Wellington. How about another clue?

I think acmodeler01 may have hit the proverbial on the head with the pressurised Wellington Mk. VI? Looks like the same asthetic design team worked on the Nimrod AEW

 

  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by wdolson2 on Thursday, August 26, 2010 4:52 PM

The only other planes I can think of that were re-engined with Merlins were the Beaufighter, but it went back to the original engine after the Mk II and the Mustang, but it doesn't fit the second part of the question.

Bill

  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by wdolson2 on Thursday, August 26, 2010 4:50 PM

Lancaster?  Though I don't know what version he's talking about.

  • Member since
    March 2006
Posted by simpilot34 on Thursday, August 26, 2010 1:56 PM

I want to say Bristol Blenhem, but I don't think they ever had merlins did they?

Cheers, Lt. Cmdr. Richie "To be prepared for war, is one of the most effectual means of preserving the peace."-George Washington
  • Member since
    January 2008
  • From: Tulsa, OK
Posted by acmodeler01 on Thursday, August 26, 2010 1:40 PM

I've been searching all day, the only thing I can come up with is the Wellington. How about another clue?

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Edgware, London
Posted by osher on Tuesday, August 24, 2010 3:18 AM

Here's a clue: under it's original engine, it was reasonable, but, after just a few, a change was made to Merlin engines.  This gave a better than exepected performance.  The airframe was a pre-war design, but, in use pre-war to post war.  This unique version of the aircraft though had a unique interior, which also resulted in a unique looking front fuselage.

JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.