Enter keywords or a search phrase below:
stikpusher
My use of the word "recent" was probably to defining. But you are on the right track as to what I had in mind, which was the F-15. Now what was the target?
Relax MQM, there have been more than a few instances of that happening here before in this thread. Sidebar conversations happen from time to time. It not a hijacking.
As for your question, I know of a few instances in the 91 Gulf War where unknown helicopters were destroyed with: 1) a laser guided bomb from an F-15E, and 2) the A-10's GAU-8 30mm gun. But you said recent....
F is for FIRE, That burns down the whole town!
U is for URANIUM... BOMBS!
N is for NO SURVIVORS...
- Plankton
LSM
OK so I see that this thread got Hijacked by Gunner59. There is a question on the table. Answer it or move on. Milairjunkie's question was answered and another was asked! Gunner read the original guide lines for this thread or step away from the keyboard and go play in the street.
Unlike the F-22, the F-35 is an international program. Many people besides the USAF have a vested interest in the JSF. Several of the customers specified a V/STOL carrier capability, which the F-15SE does not have. While a few countries may look into this bird, I seriously doubt the RAF/ RN FAA or USMC will buy this aircraft. This may just turn out to be another to be another F-20. A nice new concept that new one will buy.
Yep, Boeing saw the hand writing on the wall for the F-22 project in the early 2000s and has made the F-15SE, short either "Silent" or Stealth Eagle.
http://www.boeing.com/news/releases/2009/q1/090317a_nr.html
Hopefully we will soon see a kit of this model.
The stuff of legends...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jts9suWIDlU
Milair I hope they don't replace the Camero's with GTO because I think they are Butt ugly. But they are quick. Ok so lets try a easy one. In the recent unfriendliness in the middle east a aerial target was destroyed by a air to ground weapon. What was the target and what aircraft launched the weapon?
That would be correct MQM107, the U-2 with it's pogo stick wingtip gear, similar to the B-52.
As a matter of course, there is usually a "mobile" (driven by another pilot) sitting on the threashold when a U-2 comes in, primarily to call the height to the pilot as the A/C decends & also to assist in warning the pilot of any likleyhood of wing tip contact. I belive their 5.7L Camaro's are being replaced with Pontiac GTO's.
WWW.AIR-CRAFT.NET
I'm thinking the F-15 or F-16
-Matt
On The Bench: 1/48 HK B-17G "Man-O-War II"
On Deck: 1/48 Tamiya P-38H, 1/48 Revell PV-1
What old fighter has been redesigned and will replace the soon to be cancelled F-35 and supplement the small number of F-22 purchase?
That would be the U-2, to protect the wing tips from scrubbing due to the center line mounted landing gear.
Mike
OK, which Western in service A/C is routinley followed down the runway on landing & why?
As an extra clue, this A/C feature a unusual feature that the A/C from the previous question also features.
That's what I was thinking of... I would like to see some gun camera footage of that one!
Over to you...
Jon.http://public.fotki.com/dawgfighter/
The B-52 was credited with two MiG-21 kills, courtesy of their tail gunners in December 1972 during Linebacker II?
Name the largest aircraft to be credited with an air-to-air kill.
Sorry to keep you guys waiting...
I am drawing a blank for a question, so this time I am going to pass this one along. First question posted will be the next one to answer, thanks.
Thought that was going to be easy. Over to you F8
B17Pilot This aircraft featured at the time was an important innovation in the form of a gun tunnel, thus eliminating a blind spot. What is the aircraft type and what blind spot was removed?
This aircraft featured at the time was an important innovation in the form of a gun tunnel, thus eliminating a blind spot. What is the aircraft type and what blind spot was removed?
The aircraft was the German Gotha G.V, which was a WWI bomber. The gun tunnel was designed to allow for protection against attackers coming from below and behind the plane. The gun emplacement was in the bottom of the fuselage, with the gunner's field of fire covering the entire underside/rear of the plane.
B17Pilot
You are correct and step 3 was were there was a problem. Apparently there was a twisting turning motion required, which could actually make it impossible to release the latches a there goes the arms. Over to you what have you got for us?
Going to take a guess, so here goes:
Step 1: Jettison rear propeller blades
Step 2: Jettison upper tail fin
Step 3: Manually jettison the canopy
Step 4: Fire the ejection seat
OK well lets stay with this theme then. On the Pfeil there was a four step sequence that needed to be followed to escape from the plane. What was the sequence and what did each step do?
Good guess Mike! Yes, it was the Pfeil. It was thought that the test pilots, not familiar with ejector canopies, gripped the canopy too hard. Over to you...
I'll take a stab. It was the Dornier Do-335.
During testing of this aircraft, there were at least 2 fatal crashes. In both instances, there was the strange finding that the canopy had been fired, as if to eject from the doomed aircraft, but the pilots were still strapped into their ejector seats, missing both their arms! What was the aircraft?
yup, all yours, that was just a bonus question lol
"I am a leaf on the wind, watch how i soar"
Recite the litanies, fire up the Gellar field, a poo storm is coming
Check out my blog here.
What model of meteor?
Vampire, although, a single Meteor did make an appearance beforehand.
First operational jet to fly in new zealand.
I figured that with the Mossie Pathfinder being identified pretty early on, that Oboe would follow, as it is because of Oboe that the Mossie Pathfinders came to exist.
As to who's question it is - first come, first served.
Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.