SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

Aircraft Trivia Quiz

728407 views
7409 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    March 2006
Posted by simpilot34 on Thursday, December 10, 2009 8:55 AM

777?

Cheers, Lt. Cmdr. Richie "To be prepared for war, is one of the most effectual means of preserving the peace."-George Washington
  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: Scotland
Posted by Milairjunkie on Thursday, December 10, 2009 8:41 AM

Cheers,

This A/C uses the most powerful engine of it type ever produced, which assist in giving it its great range. It is also a record holder.

  • Member since
    March 2006
Posted by simpilot34 on Thursday, December 10, 2009 8:12 AM

You are correct!!! A few of the mods were of course one being the smoke system, 4 aircraft had a stainless tail fin to wit stand theheat from the lead exhaust heat, a metal nose cone replaced the fibreglass radomes on all 9 aircraft. One detail to mention fo those that might want to build a T'bird Thud they were all 'B' models and they was a minor difference in the scalloping of the paint scheme on the nose sides. One having a deeper scallop than the other, so do your research as to which individual aircraft you would be doing.

You have the floor Milair!!

Cheers, Lt. Cmdr. Richie "To be prepared for war, is one of the most effectual means of preserving the peace."-George Washington
  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: Scotland
Posted by Milairjunkie on Thursday, December 10, 2009 6:05 AM

The Thud.

Following a show at McCord AFB, the Thunderbirds transited to Hamilton Field where they carried out some rehersals. During a hard pull up, as part of hard & fast landing, the second Thud (AF 801) piloted by Captain E.J. Devlin suffered from complete structural failure. There is a Thud with a memorial plaque to Devlin at  Nellis AFB.

The A/C had suffered from structural failure of a critical fore / aft joint, following which they were grounded & the Thunderbirds reverted to the Hun until the Phantom arrived.

For use by the Thunderbirds, the F-105 had it cannon removed, ballast added & some minor structural & aerodynamic modifications.

Still prefer the Red Arrows though.

  • Member since
    March 2006
Posted by simpilot34 on Thursday, December 10, 2009 1:58 AM

Ok , I think I'm in first?

What aircraft had the shortest stint of any used by the Thunderbirds, and why was this stint so short?

Not part of the question, but there were things different on these aircraft from normal service models.

Cheers, Lt. Cmdr. Richie "To be prepared for war, is one of the most effectual means of preserving the peace."-George Washington
  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: Scotland
Posted by Milairjunkie on Wednesday, December 9, 2009 1:16 PM

Music BUMP bump,

BUMP bump,

BUMP bump

bum, bum, bum Music.

That was a sample of the "Bump" remix of the Jaws theme. Twas done for the BUMP, not the Jaws.

Well into "first come - first served" airspace now!

  • Member since
    March 2006
Posted by simpilot34 on Friday, November 27, 2009 7:57 AM

Hear the crickets chirping again.........

Cheers, Lt. Cmdr. Richie "To be prepared for war, is one of the most effectual means of preserving the peace."-George Washington
  • Member since
    May 2009
Posted by -Neu- on Monday, November 23, 2009 6:14 PM
There you go... its actually one of my favorite novels (if you couldn't tell already)
Weekend Madness GB tag
  • Member since
    January 2009
Posted by F-8fanatic on Monday, November 23, 2009 6:05 PM

The second movie is "The Hunters", made in 1958.  The author of the book was James Salter, a 12-year USAF veteran pilot who flew F-86's on over 100 missions with the 335th Fighter Squadron.  He was a MiG-killer, having shot down a Mig-15 on 4 July, 1952.  The main character in the movie was Robert Mitchum, and he flew F-86's in the movie as well.

  • Member since
    May 2009
Posted by -Neu- on Monday, November 23, 2009 5:45 PM
 osher wrote:

If I might make a suggestion, seeing as you're new here.  Questions that require two or more disperate answers are not a good idea.  Someone might get one film, but not the other, in which case, who wins?  The only time double questions work, is when you need one, to get the other, such as the question you answered, as, 'Wellington' wouldn't be an answer, as you would need both, to be able to answer.

Anyway, to the question.  The only war film, from Korea, I can think of, is Pork Chop Hill, but I can't recall aircraft in it, so, I'm running with the B-47 from that film about a bomber squadron, who's name I can't remember...



Actually I was going to do that because I kinda guessed Toko-ri would be the one everybody got. The second novel is a bit more obscure, but launched the career of a famous American novelist. So lets just make it the second one and I'll add an additional clue; The author actually flew in the war.
Weekend Madness GB tag
  • Member since
    March 2006
Posted by simpilot34 on Monday, November 23, 2009 5:32 PM

 Jeebus wrote:
 simpilot34 wrote:
Would they be 'The Bridges at Toko-Ri' with Mickey Rooney flying the F9F Panther, and 'Jet Pilot' with John Wayne flying the F-86 Sabre? Saw both of them, great footage!!!
I think your right except it was William Holden flying the Panther, and Mickey Rooney flying a Helo.

oops lol, oh well was asking for the movies and aircraft, not actors anyway, WHEW!Smile,Wink, & Grin [swg]

Cheers, Lt. Cmdr. Richie "To be prepared for war, is one of the most effectual means of preserving the peace."-George Washington
  • Member since
    March 2005
  • From: Des Moines IA.
Posted by Jeebus on Monday, November 23, 2009 5:27 PM
 simpilot34 wrote:
Would they be 'The Bridges at Toko-Ri' with Mickey Rooney flying the F9F Panther, and 'Jet Pilot' with John Wayne flying the F-86 Sabre? Saw both of them, great footage!!!
I think your right except it was William Holden flying the Panther, and Mickey Rooney flying a Helo.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Edgware, London
Posted by osher on Monday, November 23, 2009 5:25 PM

If I might make a suggestion, seeing as you're new here.  Questions that require two or more disperate answers are not a good idea.  Someone might get one film, but not the other, in which case, who wins?  The only time double questions work, is when you need one, to get the other, such as the question you answered, as, 'Wellington' wouldn't be an answer, as you would need both, to be able to answer.

Anyway, to the question.  The only war film, from Korea, I can think of, is Pork Chop Hill, but I can't recall aircraft in it, so, I'm running with the B-47 from that film about a bomber squadron, who's name I can't remember...

  • Member since
    March 2006
Posted by simpilot34 on Monday, November 23, 2009 5:25 PM
Would they be 'The Bridges at Toko-Ri' with Mickey Rooney flying the F9F Panther, and 'Jet Pilot' with John Wayne flying the F-86 Sabre? Saw both of them, great footage!!!
Cheers, Lt. Cmdr. Richie "To be prepared for war, is one of the most effectual means of preserving the peace."-George Washington
  • Member since
    May 2009
Posted by -Neu- on Monday, November 23, 2009 5:13 PM
Okay then...

The Korean War produced two classic novels on fliers which were both adapted into movies; what were those novels and what did the protagonists fly?
Weekend Madness GB tag
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Edgware, London
Posted by osher on Monday, November 23, 2009 4:15 PM
That's it, the Vickers Wellesley & Wellington, both flew in WWII, and both named for the same man, Arthur Wellesley, Duke of Wellington.  Over to you, Neu
  • Member since
    May 2009
Posted by -Neu- on Monday, November 23, 2009 4:11 PM
Umm, is it the Vickers Wellesley/Wellington? I had to look the Wellesley up because I didn't think it actually served in WWII... but apparently it did.
Weekend Madness GB tag
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Edgware, London
Posted by osher on Monday, November 23, 2009 3:09 PM
Two aircraft, both flew in WWII, from the same manufacturer, one was, in effect, a follow on from the other.  However, whilst both had different names, they were both named for the same man.  Name the aircraft?
  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: Scotland
Posted by Milairjunkie on Monday, November 23, 2009 9:51 AM

Yes, its gorgeous;

  • Member since
    March 2006
Posted by simpilot34 on Monday, November 23, 2009 9:03 AM

I actually think the first Tu-22 looks pretty cool as well. My avatar is there only because thats the first group build I ever joined and still building there.Smile [:)] Thats the current GB badge.

Cheers, Lt. Cmdr. Richie "To be prepared for war, is one of the most effectual means of preserving the peace."-George Washington
  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: Scotland
Posted by Milairjunkie on Monday, November 23, 2009 7:30 AM

Yes we have a winner.

The Tu-22 (Blinder) was an early Soviet supersonic bomber which benefited from the then new area rule principle. It suffered control issues at supersonic speed due to skin heating causing control gear expansion. Its twin engines are mounted on the rear of the fuselage much like a small biz-jet. It saw combat action with Libyan, Iraqi & Soviet Air Forces. The latter Tu-22M was apparently named so by Tupolev in an effort to draw attention away from the fact that it was an entirely new A/C & gain more chance of funding on the basis of it being an "economical upgrade".

Here is the rather ugly & un-impressive Tu-22;

 

& here is its far more impressive younger sibling, the Tu-22M (lovely!);

 

  • Member since
    August 2006
  • From: Amherst, MA
Posted by M1 A1 A2 Tanker on Monday, November 23, 2009 7:24 AM
F-111.

 

 

 

“Computers are like Old Testament gods; lots of rules and no mercy.”  ~ Joseph Campbell

 

 

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Edgware, London
Posted by osher on Monday, November 23, 2009 7:06 AM
Do you mean the Blinder?
  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: Scotland
Posted by Milairjunkie on Monday, November 23, 2009 6:59 AM

Nope, the Bone was developed after area rule was understood (in the 50s) & area rule was an integral part of its development.

This A/C was developed during the period when Whitcomb bodies were being fitted, Coke bottles flew, wasp waists were the fashion & designs were getting overhauled mid development stage due to the further understanding of area rule. The F-102 matured into the F-106 in this period.

The Bone did not see combat in the 70s or 80s (?) 

This A/C is a twin, the Bone is not.

This A/Cs production passed 300 units.

This A/C had a feature more in keeping with a biz jet or small / medium airliner?

  • Member since
    March 2008
  • From: Cleveland
Posted by MSgtBLM on Monday, November 23, 2009 6:55 AM
I was in weapons school in 1983 and the B-1 was just coming on board at that time. Guys... combat in the 70's & 80's... this might not be an American a/c Think... who was fighting in the 70's & 80's (other than my 1st wife and me) ..
New Boxes? What new boxes?
  • Member since
    September 2009
  • From: Spring Branch, TX
Posted by satch_ip on Monday, November 23, 2009 5:58 AM
Is it the Bone?  The B-1A used the area rule fuselage and was replaced by the B-1B. 
  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: Scotland
Posted by Milairjunkie on Monday, November 23, 2009 3:55 AM

 simpilot34 wrote:
As much as I hate to suggest this plane having worked on them, but given the time frame and being a twin, is it the F-15 Eagle?

Sorry, no. The F-15 was designed well after the benefits of area rule were discovered & I would imagine that the F-15 has seen combat in every decade since its introduction - 70s, 80s, 90s & 00s.

The A/C in question was replaced by a "variant" of very similar model number - It was descirbed as a "variant" for commercial persuasion, but was / is a very different A/C.

Simpilot34 - I hope you dont mind me asking, but what is someone who has worked on F-15s got a Fleet Air Arm avatar for?

  • Member since
    March 2006
Posted by simpilot34 on Sunday, November 22, 2009 6:41 PM
As much as I hate to suggest this plane having worked on them, but given the time frame and being a twin, is it the F-15 Eagle?
Cheers, Lt. Cmdr. Richie "To be prepared for war, is one of the most effectual means of preserving the peace."-George Washington
  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: Scotland
Posted by Milairjunkie on Sunday, November 22, 2009 3:58 PM

No, the friction heating caused a control / handling problem.

It is also twin!

  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Utereg
Posted by Borg R3-MC0 on Sunday, November 22, 2009 3:01 PM
I think it is the F-102. I think I have read somewhere that the windscreen could turn white (opaque?) due to heat. And no visibility sounds like a bad thing for a supersonic fighter.

JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.