SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

Ship Trivia Quiz

452453 views
3119 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: Maastricht, The Netherlands
Posted by bryan01 on Friday, January 16, 2009 2:07 AM

Getting close...

 

Bryan
  • Member since
    February 2016
Posted by alumni72 on Thursday, January 15, 2009 2:20 PM

GROG!!!

They would ideally want to cross the International Date Line on the day they get their Grog ration, so the next day they can get it again?

  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: Maastricht, The Netherlands
Posted by bryan01 on Thursday, January 15, 2009 2:13 PM

The International Date Line is correct. But the reason isn't.

Seamen, especially those on sailing vessels, were concerned about something far more important (they usually weren't paid until they signed off at arrival back at their home port anyway).

 

Bryan
  • Member since
    March 2004
  • From: Spartanburg, SC
Posted by subfixer on Thursday, January 15, 2009 10:51 AM
The International Dateline the day before payday? (going west to east?)

I'm from the government and I'm here to help.

  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: Maastricht, The Netherlands
Posted by bryan01 on Thursday, January 15, 2009 7:52 AM

Thank you Rick.

Next QUESTION:

Sailors wouldn't want to cross this line on just any day of the week! Why?

 

Bryan
  • Member since
    February 2006
  • From: Norfolk, UK
Posted by RickF on Thursday, January 15, 2009 4:18 AM

Bryan is correct. The turtle ships were, I think, wooden vessels with  iron plating.

The Nemesis, built by Lairds for the Bengal Marine, a naval arrm of the Honorable East India Company, was an iron-hulled paddle frigate. Ordered in 1835 and launched in 1839, she was armed with two 32-pounder and four 6-pounder guns and served with distinction during the First Opium War (1841-43).

Over to you again, Bryan.

  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: Maastricht, The Netherlands
Posted by bryan01 on Thursday, January 15, 2009 3:36 AM

Could it be the HEIC Nemesis 1839? HEIC stands for Honourable East India Company. I suppose they were kind of a navy. The company no longer exists as it was dissolved in 1874.

 

Bryan
  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Monterey Bay, CA
Posted by schoonerbumm on Wednesday, January 14, 2009 11:27 PM
I'm going to guess the Korean "Turtle Ships" of the late 16th century. These were believed to be the first ironclads, used against the invading Japanese.

Alan

"Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy." Benjamin Franklin

  • Member since
    February 2006
  • From: Norfolk, UK
Posted by RickF on Wednesday, January 14, 2009 6:49 PM

Thanks Bryan. For my question, I'm going back to "firsts"...

The first operational iron warship was built for a navy no longer in existence. What was the name of the ship and which navy?

Rick

  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: Maastricht, The Netherlands
Posted by bryan01 on Wednesday, January 14, 2009 2:27 AM

Great stunt wasn't it!? I can imagine Hitler having one of his fits of rage over it Evil [}:)]

You're up Rick!

 

Bryan
  • Member since
    February 2006
  • From: Norfolk, UK
Posted by RickF on Tuesday, January 13, 2009 5:42 PM

They were expecting to find RMS Queen Elizabeth, which was due to sail from the Clyde to Southampton for fitting out. The crew were signed on, hotels booked in Southampton and parts sent overland from Glasgow. However, it was all a ruse, the ship was intecepted at sea and sailed directly to New York.

Rick

  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: Maastricht, The Netherlands
Posted by bryan01 on Tuesday, January 13, 2009 4:59 PM

Thank you for your kind words George!

Next QUESTION:

On this particular day in March 1940 the skies above Southampton were filled with Luftwaffe bombers expecting to find a very coveted target there. What was the target and what went ‘wrong'?

 

Bryan
  • Member since
    February 2006
  • From: The green shires of England
Posted by GeorgeW on Tuesday, January 13, 2009 10:39 AM

Doesn't need much of a hint for you to get the range of the Question Bryan, that is the answer I was looking for.

The British Navy abandoned breech loading in 1864, because they couldn't get the breech seal right, it took the Thunderer accident and Questions in the house to get them to re-adopt the system post 1879, although in truth I suspect they had been working on it anyway, particularly as the French had it in operation.

 

  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: Maastricht, The Netherlands
Posted by bryan01 on Tuesday, January 13, 2009 10:14 AM

Is it HMS Thunderer (again a Devastation class battleship)? She had two major incidents. First there was a boiler explosion in 1876 which killed 45 people. Then, in 1879, one of her 12-inch muzzle-loading guns exploded due to double-loading after a misfire. This time 11 people were killed. This incident led to the introduction of breech-loading guns (already used in France and Prussia).

 

Bryan
  • Member since
    February 2006
  • From: The green shires of England
Posted by GeorgeW on Tuesday, January 13, 2009 8:18 AM

A clue;

We've seen her like before, but she was not as lucky; she had two disasters but it was the second one that changed thinking.

  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: Maastricht, The Netherlands
Posted by bryan01 on Tuesday, January 13, 2009 2:31 AM

bump

Maybe a hint!? Blush [:I]

 

Bryan
  • Member since
    February 2006
  • From: The green shires of England
Posted by GeorgeW on Friday, January 9, 2009 11:43 AM

I really must stop doing this, I am not getting any work done on my current build Smile [:)]

Long before the turn of the twentieth century, the French had worked this out, the Prussians had worked it out but the dear old Admiralty clung onto old ways, until a happening on this ship forced them to reconsider.

What was the ship

What was the happening

What was the outcome.

 

ps; once you have the ship you should have the others.

  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: Maastricht, The Netherlands
Posted by bryan01 on Friday, January 9, 2009 10:52 AM

Damn, that was quick! I reckoned most people would have thought HMS Dreadnought was the first.

Well done George, you're next!

 

Bryan
  • Member since
    February 2006
  • From: The green shires of England
Posted by GeorgeW on Friday, January 9, 2009 10:12 AM

I think the Turbinia was the first vessel to have a steam turbine, and I  believe the French were fitting them in a motor torpedo boat, (which put the wind up the Admiralty when they saw how fast they were) - but I exclude them as not being ships.

Is it HMS Viper, a destroyer.

 

  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: Maastricht, The Netherlands
Posted by bryan01 on Friday, January 9, 2009 9:00 AM

Thank you George!

Well, and another first then.

QUESTION: What was the first warship powered by steam turbines?

 

Bryan
  • Member since
    February 2006
  • From: The green shires of England
Posted by GeorgeW on Friday, January 9, 2009 2:46 AM

Excellent bryan, I'm impressed,

 It is HMS Devastation, (1873) the first specifically designed ocean going  battleship not to carry sails. She was armed with two turrets each with two 12" guns, and is the direct ancestor of the modern battleship.

here shown in 1896

note; the cryptic clue refers her depiction on the Englands Glory matchboxes.

Back to you again

 

  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: Maastricht, The Netherlands
Posted by bryan01 on Friday, January 9, 2009 2:38 AM

Then I guess it must be HMS Warrior!?

 

Bryan
  • Member since
    February 2006
  • From: The green shires of England
Posted by GeorgeW on Friday, January 9, 2009 2:33 AM

No she's neither of these, just to clarify it is the 1906 Dreadnought she pre dates by some thirty years, although she also pre-dates the earlier one.

Slightly cryptic clue - she is Englands Glory

  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: Maastricht, The Netherlands
Posted by bryan01 on Friday, January 9, 2009 2:30 AM

Devastation class battleships. They were the first class of ocean-going battleships which did not carry sails, and the first which mounted the entire main armament on top of the hull rather than inside it.

 

Bryan
  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: Portsmouth, RI
Posted by searat12 on Thursday, January 8, 2009 8:06 PM
How about USS Holland (SS-1) the first practical submarine warship?  If it ain't, and HMS Dreadnought is it either, then you better have one heckuva unusual ship in mind.......
  • Member since
    November 2008
Posted by frenchie on Thursday, January 8, 2009 7:15 PM

e USS Forrestal CVA59

  • Member since
    February 2006
  • From: The green shires of England
Posted by GeorgeW on Thursday, January 8, 2009 6:55 PM
None of those yet mentioned Gentlemen, she post dates Gloire, and pre dates Dreadnought by some thirty years.
  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: Portsmouth, RI
Posted by searat12 on Thursday, January 8, 2009 5:36 PM
Swiftsure?
  • Member since
    December 2006
Posted by woodburner on Thursday, January 8, 2009 5:34 PM
I would have thought Dreadnaught to be more evolutionary, compared to Ericsson's design. But she certainly had a greater practical influence, that is very true.

By the way, an earlier, Elizabethan Dreadnaught had an eighty foot keel, just like a certain other ship . . .

Jim
  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: Portsmouth, RI
Posted by searat12 on Thursday, January 8, 2009 5:17 PM

HMS Dreadnought, as she was designed not only with an all-big-gun battery, but with turbine engines as well......

JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.