SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

The X-Files Group Build

18361 views
224 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
GAF
  • Member since
    June 2012
  • From: Anniston, AL
Posted by GAF on Wednesday, January 17, 2024 10:53 AM

Nakajima G10N Fugaku (Mount Fuji)

The Nakajima G10N was a planned Japanese ultra-long-range heavy bomber designed during World War II. It was conceived as a method for mounting aerial attacks from Japan against industrial targets along the west coast (e.g., San Francisco) and in the Midwest (e.g., Detroit, Milwaukee, Chicago, and Wichita) and the northeast (e.g., New York City and Norfolk) of the United States. Japan's worsening war situation resulted in the project's cancellation in 1944 and no prototype was ever built.

The Fugaku had its origins in "Project Z (bomber project)", a 1942 Imperial Japanese Army specification for an intercontinental bomber which could take off from the Kuril Islands, bomb the continental United States, then continue onward to land in German-occupied France. Once there, it would be refueled and rearmed and make another return sortie.

Project Z called for three variations on the airframe: heavy bomber, transport (capable of carrying 300 troops), and a gunship armed with forty downward-firing machine guns in the fuselage for intense ground attacks at the rate of 640 rounds per second (i.e. 38,400 rounds per minute).

The project was conceived by Nakajima Aircraft Company head Chikuhei Nakajima. The design had straight wings and contra-rotating four-blade propellers. To save weight, some of the landing gear was to be jettisoned after takeoff (being unnecessary on landing with emptied bomb load), as had been planned on some of the more developed German Amerika Bomber competing designs. It used six engines, as with the later Amerikabomber design competitors, to compensate for nearly all German aircraft engines being limited to 1,500 kW (2,000 hp) maximum output levels apiece.

Development was initiated in January 1943 and a design and manufacturing facility built in Mitaka, Tokyo. Nakajima's 4-row 36-cylinder 5,000 hp Ha-54 (Ha-505) engine was abandoned as too complex.

Project Z was cancelled in July 1944, and the Fugaku was never built.

 

GAF
  • Member since
    June 2012
  • From: Anniston, AL
Posted by GAF on Wednesday, January 17, 2024 10:43 AM

Bob,

Thanks!  Things are going slowly.  I managed to put the hatch on today, which means more puttying and sanding.  Then we can worry about the second coat.

You're right about the "stay at home" weather!  Dipped into the single digits last night!

Gary

  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: Nashville, TN area
Posted by bobbaily on Saturday, January 13, 2024 5:35 PM

Gary-the white looks good-funny how white is so hard to get 'right'.

 John-love the X-15...it looks fast sitting still.

The Olds Aerotech is still sitting in the box waiting for me to paint the small parts and do some assembly....hoping to get motived next week since the weather looks like 'stay at home' weather....

Bob

 

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: USA
Posted by keavdog on Saturday, January 13, 2024 9:32 AM

Thanks.  I'm doing her black - wicked looking.  With the silver tanks like this pic but in flight

Thanks,

John

GAF
  • Member since
    June 2012
  • From: Anniston, AL
Posted by GAF on Friday, January 12, 2024 11:48 PM

That's neat, John!  Are you going to paint it as the later version with the white coating?

Gary

  • Member since
    November 2009
  • From: SW Virginia
Posted by Gamera on Friday, January 12, 2024 10:26 PM

Nice work, she's coming along great! 

"I dream in fire but work in clay." -Arthur Machen

 

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: USA
Posted by keavdog on Friday, January 12, 2024 8:23 PM

4,520 miles per hour - still holds the record.  The build is under way

Thanks,

John

  • Member since
    November 2009
  • From: SW Virginia
Posted by Gamera on Thursday, January 11, 2024 3:19 PM

Very true! I generally use a couple coats of white primer and then flat white. I ended up stumbling on this though a lot of expermentation. I wish you guys had been around to tell me all this back then! Wink

"I dream in fire but work in clay." -Arthur Machen

 

GAF
  • Member since
    June 2012
  • From: Anniston, AL
Posted by GAF on Thursday, January 11, 2024 3:09 PM

It helped that the model was in white plastic to start.  Spraying it with Mr. Surfacer 1000 helped even it out (though it was grey).  A few more details and I intend to give it a second coat of flat white paint.  Gloss White I find tends to be more of a mess than I like to deal with.

Gary

  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Northern California
Posted by jeaton01 on Thursday, January 11, 2024 1:00 PM

I used to hate painting white, I remember building the two Revell D 558 kits many years ago and also a 1/72 Yak UT-1 and putting on about six layers of MM Gloss White and (not) waiting long enough for each coat to dry.  What I do now is use flat white, regardless of the ultimate gloss/matt final finish, and either let a clear gloss overcoat bring up the shine, or just put a final thin layer of gloss white on over the top of the flat white if no clear coat is to be used, sometimes a good thing if there is a concern of the gloss yellowing over time.

John

To see build logs for my models:  http://goldeneramodel.com/mymodels/mymodels.html

 

  • Member since
    November 2009
  • From: SW Virginia
Posted by Gamera on Thursday, January 11, 2024 12:28 PM

That looks perfect to me. I hate painting white since of course it won't cover anything. Looks dang good to me Gary. Yes

"I dream in fire but work in clay." -Arthur Machen

 

GAF
  • Member since
    June 2012
  • From: Anniston, AL
Posted by GAF on Tuesday, January 9, 2024 11:53 AM

I've managed to get the first coat on the D-558-2, though it will need a second coat.  Work on the pit is progressing, and I'll gussy it up a bit before gluing the canopy on.  I'm attempting to make a pilot for the aircraft, though it's very crude (but you'll probably not be able to see much after the hatch is closed.

Weather has been kinda miserable for the first part of January, which has slowed progress.  Maybe it will improve later this week.

Gary

  • Member since
    November 2009
  • From: SW Virginia
Posted by Gamera on Thursday, January 4, 2024 5:02 PM

Looks good Gary! Always good to see something ready for paint. 

 

If they're flying in formation not sure the Bf-109 is going to be able to keep up... 

"I dream in fire but work in clay." -Arthur Machen

 

GAF
  • Member since
    June 2012
  • From: Anniston, AL
Posted by GAF on Thursday, January 4, 2024 1:34 AM

Managed to get a primer coat of Mr. Surfacer 1000 on the D-558-2. After a bit of filling and sanding, she's ready for a first coat.  Then the interior and canopy.

The Bf-109 is a Tamiya F4/7 Tropical I'm finishing up (which has nothing to do with this GB).

Thanks for looking!

Gary

GAF
  • Member since
    June 2012
  • From: Anniston, AL
Posted by GAF on Saturday, December 30, 2023 7:34 AM

Work has kinda slowed down due to the holidays and cold weather making it difficult to finish painting.  Weather affecting aircraft!  Who would have thunk? Wink

Gary

GAF
  • Member since
    June 2012
  • From: Anniston, AL
Posted by GAF on Saturday, December 30, 2023 7:31 AM

DFW T.28 Floh

The DFW T28 Floh (Flea) was an early biplane fighter designed for use by the German Empire. To get an edge over then current monoplane fighters, the T28 was designed with aerodynamics and speed in mind. The result was an aircraft that looked straight out of a cartoon. Despite its appearance, the aircraft performed well during testing, maxing out at 112mph (180 km/h). Although its speed was good, its large body and the placement of the wings reduced visibility for the pilot, making landings with the craft difficult. This was enough for officials to decline production of the type despite its respectable top speed.

In mid 1915, a new head engineer, Dipl-Ing (Engineer) Hermann Dorner was appointed at DFW.   Dorner had speed in mind with his fighter design.  Work began on a prototype of Dorner’s fighter in late 1915 at DFW’s facility in Lubeck-Travemunde.  The construction of the aircraft, now known as the DFW T28 Floh, was supervised by Theo Rockenfeller at the plant. The final T28 looked like it flew straight out of a cartoon, possessing a very tall fuselage with small wings. This proportional difference made the aircraft appear more like a caricature than a combat aircraft of the time period.

Despite its design, the aircraft was still designed for speed, and would have a 100hp (74.5kW) Mercedes D I engine, which was completely enclosed in the fuselage. Armament would be a single machine gun mounted in front of the pilot. The T28 would take flight shortly after its construction, but the exact date is unknown. The design choices of the aircraft to make it fly faster worked well, as it was able to achieve a top speed of 112 mph (180 km/h), which was extremely impressive for the time period. However, its design wasn’t perfect and the choices made to improve speed negatively affected other aspects of the aircraft, in particular, its landing characteristics. The tall profile of the craft, the location of the upper wing, and the placement of the pilot’s position, gave him a superb view above the plane but was severely restricted frontally and below. The prototype Floh would be damaged due to this reason upon landing on its first flight, due to the pilot misjudging his height, as well as having a fast landing speed. This issue also affected takeoff, as the high placement of the pilot required him to stand up during taxiing to see. The design was reworked a few times after its first flight, mainly with improving the tail surfaces.

Despite achieving the speed Dorner wanted, the military officials showed little interest in the design, with some sources citing that it was just too fast for the military. Further work on the aircraft was stopped after this. Exactly what happened to the aircraft after being declined for production is unknown, whether it was simply scrapped or if it was continually used at DFW’s facilities for training and testing are possible theories. Many prototype German aircraft of the First World War would go on to serve as trainers for their various companies once production declined.

  • Member since
    November 2009
  • From: SW Virginia
Posted by Gamera on Monday, December 25, 2023 9:07 PM

GAF

Talk about the "broadside of a barn"!  That looks like it belongs on a destroyer instead of a tank!

Looks good!

Gary

 

Yeah, no kidding! I hear in World of Tanks their version of the FV2005 is called s**tbarn of doom... Indifferent

There are a few patches in the paint I want to get evened out before I get the painted version up. Hopefully soon. 

"I dream in fire but work in clay." -Arthur Machen

 

GAF
  • Member since
    June 2012
  • From: Anniston, AL
Posted by GAF on Monday, December 25, 2023 7:10 PM

Talk about the "broadside of a barn"!  That looks like it belongs on a destroyer instead of a tank!

Looks good!

Gary

  • Member since
    November 2009
  • From: SW Virginia
Posted by Gamera on Monday, December 25, 2023 5:08 PM

The FV2005 is almost assembled. I put down a few coats of British bronze green a few days ago. I had to paint some of the vehicle before adding stuff like the muffler guards since there's no way to paint behind them after assembly.

 

"I dream in fire but work in clay." -Arthur Machen

 

  • Member since
    November 2009
  • From: SW Virginia
Posted by Gamera on Monday, December 25, 2023 5:02 PM

Yeah those look fantastic Cary! 

Great job on them!!!

"I dream in fire but work in clay." -Arthur Machen

 

GAF
  • Member since
    June 2012
  • From: Anniston, AL
Posted by GAF on Sunday, December 24, 2023 11:00 PM

Those look superb, Cary!  I'll get you up on the front page ASAP.  Congrats!

Gary

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: USA
Posted by keavdog on Sunday, December 24, 2023 5:05 PM

Nice job!  Those things are quite beastly, understandable due to there role.

Thanks,

John

  • Member since
    August 2004
  • From: Forest Hill, Maryland
Posted by cwalker3 on Sunday, December 24, 2023 11:49 AM

I'm calling these two done. Both were fun little builds. These were massive machines in real life so that even in 1/72, there weren't many tiny parts. Minimal weathering on the Raumer S as it was only ever a prototype. The minenraumer did get a little dirty on a test trip through a minefield or two though.

  " />

  " />

  " />

  " />

Cary

 


  • Member since
    August 2004
  • From: Forest Hill, Maryland
Posted by cwalker3 on Sunday, December 24, 2023 11:42 AM

Beautiful paint job on the X-1, Gary. The paint might have been the biggest problem but it sure did turn out pretty.

 

Cary

 


  • Member since
    November 2009
  • From: SW Virginia
Posted by Gamera on Monday, December 18, 2023 7:49 PM

Yeah wow, that's so cool Trabi! I've seen it in books but had no idea anyone made a model of it. 

"I dream in fire but work in clay." -Arthur Machen

 

GAF
  • Member since
    June 2012
  • From: Anniston, AL
Posted by GAF on Monday, December 18, 2023 2:15 PM

Welcome, Trabi!  That is a unusual aircraft.  It almost looks like one of the "egg" aircraft put out by Hasegawa!   I'll get you on the list.

Gary

  • Member since
    September 2007
  • From: Finland funland
Posted by Trabi on Sunday, December 17, 2023 1:58 PM

Hi GAF! I would like to join this GB. I just finished "Box art" GB and I try to attend one GB at the time that all my builds would not end to "Get it done!" GB Embarrassed

My kit is ELF Models DFWT28 Floh WW1 fighter prototype.

"Space may be the final frontier, but it´s made in Hollywood basement." RHCP, Californication

GAF
  • Member since
    June 2012
  • From: Anniston, AL
Posted by GAF on Friday, December 15, 2023 2:57 AM

Krupp Räumer S

One of the most bizarre vehicles created during the Second World War is the Räumer S, a massive 130-ton machine built by the German company Krupp. It is comprised of two separate halves, connected in the centre and able to articulate, each end is powered by its own engine.

 Germany’s rapid re-armament from 1934 onwards focused mainly on ground warfare capabilities, along with a well-equipped air force to support the army on the battlefield. With the rapid acquisition of large numbers of tanks and other armoured fighting vehicles, the German Army command recognised the need for a specialised mechanical mine clearing system with the ability to keep up with armoured spearheads in the field.

In September 1940 the General Army Office (AHA) issued a formal requirement for a heavy mine-clearing vehicle, and on the 16th of that month the Weapons Office ordered a prototype from the Alkett group of companies. Later, the Krupp conglomerate was also invited to respond to the design proposal.

The design concept had strict parameters: the vehicle should be armoured, self-propelled and fitted with rollers that could clear a path three metres wide. It was not to weigh more than 40 tons, and no taller than 2.7 metres, wider than three metres and no longer than 10 metres. The crew had to be totally protected from artillery fragments, small arms fire and naturally, the blast from detonating mines.

Both companies proceeded with their separate design proposals, but experienced repeated and prolonged delays due to problems sourcing some components, and a lack of urgency on part of the government and German Army towards some projects like these. The Alkett design was presented to the general staff in August of 1942, but this prototype, which was known as the VsKfz 617 Minenräumer, was deemed unsatisfactory, and work was suspended on this vehicle by the company.

Krupp showcased their competing design in September 1942, and this prototype was also judged to be unsuitable but enough redeeming features were found for further development to be authorised.

Krupp developed their original proposal into the Räumer S, and this new design was much larger and heavier, but was an innovative blueprint that promised great efficiency if manufactured according to Krupp’s new specifications. The new design plans were forwarded to the Weapons Office in June 1943, and these were approved for prototyping shortly thereafter.

Construction on the prototype proceeded slowly, and further delays occurred when the Krupp factory in Essen was bombed, which necessitated the relocation of the project to a facility near Hillersleben. The project vehicle was shown in an incomplete state to the general staff on the 10th August 1944, and although Krupp promised to have the prototype finished by September, it was not shown to the Weapons Office as completed until November 1944.

With Germany obviously losing the war by 1944, any urgency for the project ceased as it was obvious that no more large-scale mechanised offensives were going to be conducted again by the Wehrmacht, and the prototype never left the Hillersleben facility. It was captured intact by the United States Army in 1945, and taken to Paris for testing.

Due to a lack of records the vehicle fades from history at this point, but one fragment of an American assessment of the Räumer S speculated that the vehicle could also tow a trailer for mine clearing duties, to enhance the total area being cleared of mines.

The Räumer S was an innovative concept, and Krupp were able to finalise a design that fit well within the technical hurdles they were trying to overcome. For crew safety and battlefield mobility a ‘penny-farthing’ concept was used for the vehicle wheels, which were nearly three metres in diameter.

The Räumer S was designed as having two cabins with an axle each, and these segments were joined by a pivoting pin, which swivelled when impelled by hydraulic cylinders.
Each half of the vehicle was equipped with its own power plant, and had a separate driving station that allowed the Räumer S to be driven either forward or in reverse. This was done because the turning circle of the vehicle was overly large, and having two driver stations allowed tactical retreats to be made in relative safety.

The crew consisted of eight personnel, one driver and seven observers/sappers. All crew were seated on sprung seats, and the crew pods had plating to 25 mm in thickness – the high ground clearance of 1.4 metres along with the armour and sprung seats ensured the crew did not suffer any ill-effects from mines detonating in close proximity.

The dimensions of the Räumer S were certainly impressive, and far exceeded the original specifications outlined in the 1940 design proposal. The vehicle had a length of 15.63 metres, a height of 2.93 metres and the different lengths of the two axles (this was done to increase the total of the ground area covered in mine-clearing operations) meant that the Räumer S had a wheel-track width of 3.3 metres.

The total weight of the Räumer S was a staggering 130 tons, and this weight reached the high ground pressures needed for triggering pressure-sensitive mines.

The wheels were 2.7 metres in diameter, and had a width of 530 mm. Each wheel was fitted with massive rubber pads up to 15 centimetres in thickness, and each axle had a very long suspension travel. This was necessary because a wheel could be blown up to half a meter in the air by the blast of a mine, or suddenly drop up to a metre into a mine crater, while still supporting the vehicle body.

The Räumer S was completely unarmed, though the crew had provisions to carry their personal weapons in the vehicle cabins.

The vehicle was fitted with two Maybach HL-90-P-20-K engines, which produced 350 BHP each, with one engine in each of the vehicle’s halves. It was capable of travelling at 15.5 mph (25 km/h) on the road, and operated at 2.5-5 mph (4-8 km/h) when in mine clearing mode.

The German war effort in the Second World War is littered with examples of weapon systems proposals that either never came to fruition, entered service too late to provide a technical advantage over the enemy, or employed in numbers too small to make any appreciable impact on the course of the conflict.

GAF
  • Member since
    June 2012
  • From: Anniston, AL
Posted by GAF on Friday, December 15, 2023 2:34 AM

Thanks, John!  Those are neat representations of the Sky Rocket, especially the early one!

Well done!

Gary

  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Northern California
Posted by jeaton01 on Thursday, December 14, 2023 12:32 AM

Since the D-558 II is being posted, here are two of the Revell kits I did 15 or more years ago, though I count them as "not quite" finished.  The one with a flush canopy is how the airplane was for it's first flight but after takeoff visibility was nil over the nose for most of the flight so it was changed to the shape we are used to seeing.

John

To see build logs for my models:  http://goldeneramodel.com/mymodels/mymodels.html

 

JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.