SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

Cromwell '46 X-tanks .... winter camo update

50830 views
37 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by T26E4 on Wednesday, April 29, 2009 3:54 PM

Just a side note regarding the 12.8cm Krupp Pak 44.  You mentioned that some fifty were mounted on other chasses, ex-French and Russian. 

Ian Hogg states as much but the fact is the Krupp and Rheinmetall Pak 44s only had prototypes completed.  None were constructed for actual deployment.  Indeed, the barrels were mostly diverted to be used with the french and russian chasses -- but these fell under the Kanone 81 project nomenclature.

Here's a pic of my Azimut kit of the 12.8cm K 81

 

I know this is a nitpick but wanted to add this to the discussion.  I have the Krupp Pak 44 in 1/35 and it's a beauty -- no issues with the recoil springs' length though.

 

Roy Chow 

Join AMPS!

http://www.amps-armor.org

 

 

  • Member since
    April 2009
  • From: Sunny Napier, New Zealand
Posted by DaGreatQueeg on Wednesday, April 29, 2009 3:42 PM

Although its not something I normally do this time I checked my stash of ref pics during assembly to make sure eveything got in the right place  ......  :blink:

And a couple of minor issues. The elevation balance rams are too short, by about 2.5mm. If glued in place as is, the weapon will sit quite nose down. Its an issue because the shield rests on the top face of them. The shield should really be a little further forward, on the real thing when the gun is level the shield should be above the rams and not parallel, the gap has about a 10o difference to it. I think to make things easy and for a bit of extra strength they decided to use the rams for support.

Anyway I cut off the ram end connectors and added some pins of the right length. The detail isnt correct but it does the job and gives the weapon the right "sit" ......  no other issues at all with assembly on the PaK.


 

And did the OD base on the Americans. I dont do a lot of US stuff and so I must admit US OD is a bit of a mystery to me. It looks like so nondesript and can vary hugely in shade as it weathers. After much review of my "net" model pic collection and looking up some online discussions I decided on a shade I wanted to represent.

So I always prime with enamel, in this case ModelMaster OD. This is a bit grey and light for the top colour I had in mind but its really only for coverage so its not critical. I do all my top coats with Acrylics so this is a mix of Vallejo OD and GW Catachen Green. I intend to add a slightly brownish hue to it during the blending process.

 

And I guess I should make a brief mention of assembly on these guys too although this is probably more of a PLOG (painting log) than anything else.

The T28 needed a little care. The right hand outer track unit was a little lonnger than the main hull. Without seeing another kit its hard to tell whether its differential shrinkage or the master at fault.  Anyway I had to even the difference out with a little overhang both front and back. The mountings used to bolt the two sections together then didn't line up either so I cut them and re-joined them. I replaced the legs on the cupola with brass rod for a bit of added strength, all else was fine. 

 

 

 

The T29 only had a few minor breakages. Some of the very finely cast lifting rings and a few track duck-bills were shipping casualties. I replaced the track extenders and will do the lifting rings later. I also leave off most of the fiddly bits until the base colours are laid in. Because I brush it saves on breakages while handling .........

 


  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: Dublin Rep Of Ireland
Posted by terry35 on Wednesday, April 29, 2009 2:57 PM

Thumbs Up [tup], Looking forward to seeing you getting a splash of colour on these gems.

Terry.

  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by T26E4 on Wednesday, April 29, 2009 1:48 PM

That's the $64000 question Manny.  Cromwell, while producing EXCELLENT kits, is a very small operation and the owner, Gordon Brown, has had to handle family affairs.  As such, their output seems to far lag behind demand.  Ordering direct from them seems to be the only half-way reliable means to get the kits.  I don't think any stores handle their wares due to the production issues.

But that being said, I can vouch for them 100% that the kits are suh-WEET!  I built up their Churchill Mk IV, their 8.8cm Flak 41 and have yet to finish their 12.8cm Krupp Pak 44 (all in 1/35 scale).

Roy Chow 

Join AMPS!

http://www.amps-armor.org

 

 

  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, April 29, 2009 1:44 PM
Where can you get these awesome Cromwell brand tanks?
  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Texas
Posted by wbill76 on Wednesday, April 29, 2009 1:39 PM
Always neat to see the "what if" type of designs...definitely some crazy things going on with both sides in terms of considering various scenarios and eventualities. Nice little collection you've got going there!
  • Member since
    September 2006
  • From: Dripping Springs, TX, USA
Posted by RBaer on Wednesday, April 29, 2009 11:05 AM
I think AA does the T28.

Apprentice rivet counter.

  • Member since
    January 2008
  • From: Woodbine, MD
Posted by 666Irish on Wednesday, April 29, 2009 4:02 AM

All of those are just fantastic!

 

I'd love to find that T28 Super Heavy in 1/35!

She was only a whiskey maker, but he loved her still.

  • Member since
    April 2009
  • From: Sunny Napier, New Zealand
Cromwell '46 X-tanks .... winter camo update
Posted by DaGreatQueeg on Wednesday, April 29, 2009 2:04 AM

Thought I'd share a few wips from one of my "pet" projects. And for a change its not commission stuff - its for my own Project '46 wargaming stash. Anyway thought I'd start with a few of the new 1/72nd Cromwell Xperimental releases ............

 

First up is the T28/T95 GMC Assault tank.  Technically an SPG rather than a Tank it was an attempt to provide a vehicle cabable of Bunker busting through the Siegfried line. In the event the line fell before the tank was completed and it was never required.

For those interested it weighed in at a massive 95tons and so proved that the allies were equally capable of producing impractical designs.  The surviving prototype vehicle was "re-discovered" in a field in 1974 and is now on display at the Patton Cavalry and Armour Museum in Kentucky.   




 

The next is from a series of Heavy Tank designs, T29/T30/T32/T34 which were hurriedly rushed onto the drawing board as it was thought that the Pershings wouldnt be capable of coping with the heavier German designs if the war dragged on.  Based on a stretched and uparmoured M26 chassis mounting a new 105mm gun, the combat weights would have been around the 70ton range. 

 




 

 

Ok while not experimental I thought I'd chuck this in anyway as its still pretty rare - the Krupp 12.8 cm PaK 44. Called for after problems dealing with Russian armour during 1943, the first prototypes were delivered for testing during late '44. Weighing in at 11tons however it wasnt a practical field mount and only 50 were produced, mounted on a mix of ex French and Soviet chassis.




 

 

And a true X-Tank this time as it existed only as a design brief. Originally part of the Geschutzwagen-Grille series the version shown here is based on a drawing for a Sturmpanzer using the same chassis and weapon as the Grille30 and originally proposed in 1943 by Krupp. The weapon is a Skoda 305mm GrW L/16 mortar while the chassis is the modifed TigerII/Panther hybrid. As proposed it would have weighed in at a crazy 120tons, interestingly the Sturmtiger was designed and produced after this proposal ...... 

 


 

cheers

Brent

JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.