SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

auto trivia

54203 views
435 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2009
  • From: Las Vegas, NV
Posted by Camaroaddict on Thursday, January 21, 2010 10:32 AM

Simpilot, you are correct, and you have the podium!

Just a car modeler who wants to build a few planes. current project: Revell 1/48 P-40B
  • Member since
    March 2006
Posted by simpilot34 on Thursday, January 21, 2010 8:27 PM

Don't know if I'm wording this right but here goes,

How did Chevrolet's big-block performance engines come full-circle in their design and use?

Cheers, Lt. Cmdr. Richie "To be prepared for war, is one of the most effectual means of preserving the peace."-George Washington
  • Member since
    March 2006
Posted by simpilot34 on Saturday, January 23, 2010 7:27 PM

Hint: They didn't start, or end up in the vehicles they made famous.

Cheers, Lt. Cmdr. Richie "To be prepared for war, is one of the most effectual means of preserving the peace."-George Washington
  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: Scotland
Posted by Milairjunkie on Sunday, January 24, 2010 2:07 PM

They started in truck's & are now being fitted in trucks again?

  • Member since
    November 2009
  • From: Tonawanda, NY
Posted by joelster on Sunday, January 24, 2010 2:48 PM

They didn't start in trucks. They started in NASCAR and qualified 1-2-3. The first one installed in a production vehicle was the 396/425hp Vette and Z16 Chevelle in 1965. Not sure what you mean by come full circle, but the last one rolled off of the Tonawanda assembly plant a few months ago.

  • Member since
    March 2006
Posted by simpilot34 on Sunday, January 24, 2010 7:07 PM

Milairjunkie

They started in truck's & are now being fitted in trucks again?

BINGO!!! The 348 W-Series engine that was put into the '58 Impala started out as a truck engine with a higher intake manifold, tweaked and tuned was then used as the first big-block engine put into production. Which lead to the 409, upon reaching it's limit because of design the 396 was born in '65. Development of the big-block reaching the 454 by 1970. With the decline of the muscle car, the 454 was then used in trucks. Hence, the design and development came full circle.

Over to you Milair!!!

Cheers, Lt. Cmdr. Richie "To be prepared for war, is one of the most effectual means of preserving the peace."-George Washington
  • Member since
    November 2009
  • From: Tonawanda, NY
Posted by joelster on Sunday, January 24, 2010 7:47 PM

348/409 aren't big-blocks. They are "W" blocks. They were bigger than small-blocks, but nobody considers them 'big-blocks", they simply have their own "W" designation.

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: Left forever
Posted by Bgrigg on Sunday, January 24, 2010 8:04 PM

Sorry, Joelster, but I respectfully disagree. They were the first big block engine. From Wikipedia (emphasis mine):

The first ever production big block V8 Chevrolet engine was the "W" series, released in 1958 for passenger car and truck use. This engine was an overhead valve design, with offset valves and unique scalloped rocker covers, giving it a distinctive appearance. The "W" series was produced from 1958 to 1965, with three displacements offered: 348 cubic inches (5.7 L), available from 1958 to 1961 in cars and through 1964 in trucks; 409 cubic inches (6.7 L), available from 1961 to 1965; and 427 cubic inches (7.0 L), available only in 1963.

So long folks!

  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: Scotland
Posted by Milairjunkie on Monday, January 25, 2010 3:47 AM

Some controversy!

Anyway, what connects the Corvette ZR-1 (amongst other vehicles) with the airship?

  • Member since
    August 2009
  • From: Texas
Posted by A10wrthg on Wednesday, January 27, 2010 10:32 AM

they are both extremely powerful and supercharged?

NYFAIM

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: Left forever
Posted by Bgrigg on Wednesday, January 27, 2010 10:46 AM

Neither handle all that well? Big Smile

So long folks!

  • Member since
    November 2009
  • From: Tonawanda, NY
Posted by joelster on Wednesday, January 27, 2010 11:05 AM

Bgrigg, I can accept your disagreement, but really........348's and 409's were never called "big-blocks". I don't care what wikipedia says. I am a car junkie and have owned/own 6 Z28's, wrenched on a zillion other cars, and been around them my whole life. Big block Chevies are MarkIV +. 396/402/427/454etc.....

The very last big-block rolled off the assembly line months ago at Tonawanda (2 miles from me), and that 8100 motor still has some parts compatibility with the 1965 396, even though it went through several upgrades. Both motors look very similar when you take off the accessories.

  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: Scotland
Posted by Milairjunkie on Wednesday, January 27, 2010 11:48 AM

Well it isn't because Lotus assisted with the airship, & I also doubt you will find a cartspring on an airship.

Anyways, ther connection between C4 ZR-1 & the airship is connected to the vehicles powertrain - **it also turns out that this connection is not applicable only to the ZR-1, but C4s 1989 onwards** (my mistake).

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: Left forever
Posted by Bgrigg on Wednesday, January 27, 2010 12:20 PM

Well, that's what differences are for. I grew up in the car industry, specifically GM, and the parts of my youth that weren't misspent were well spent in the dealership garages. I've wrenched on quite a few muscle cars as well. I used the Wikipedia article as a reference solely because it appears first in a search for references.

How about Super Chevy Magazine? Would you accept their description of the first big block being the 348/409 W series? Or maybe Peter Sessler's book "Ultimate American V-Eight Engine Data Book, 1948-1974, this excerpt from page 49, Chapter 6, Chevrolet W-Series Engines 348, 409 & 427 (emphasis mine):

Almost at the heels of the successful small-block V-8s, Chevrolet came out with a big-block engine that would develop more low end torque for large passenger cars and trucks. Rather than just make a bigger version of the small-block, Chevrolet decided to experiment, and the result was the W-series big-block with its unusual cylinder head desing. In 1958, Chevrolet released the first version of its new Turbo-Thrust engine, which measured 348 cid.

As the development of the big block progressed, GM retroactively dubbed the "W" series the Mark I. The Mark II was an experimental engine used by Junior Johnson at Daytona in 1963, which qualified fastest, but did not finish. The Mark III never got off the design bench. GM called the Mark IV block "Generation 2", to differentiate from their first attempt with the "W" series. The Mark IV was the first big block to be called a "Rat Motor" as opposed to the small block "Mouse Motor". Want to make a 481 cid engine? Put a crankshaft from a 454 into a 409 block. Go ahead, they bolt right in without any modifications. Indeed, many of the parts from the "W" series were used in the Mark IV engines.

So long folks!

  • Member since
    March 2006
Posted by simpilot34 on Thursday, January 28, 2010 8:39 AM

Bgrigg

Well, that's what differences are for. I grew up in the car industry, specifically GM, and the parts of my youth that weren't misspent were well spent in the dealership garages. I've wrenched on quite a few muscle cars as well. I used the Wikipedia article as a reference solely because it appears first in a search for references.

How about Super Chevy Magazine? Would you accept their description of the first big block being the 348/409 W series? Or maybe Peter Sessler's book "Ultimate American V-Eight Engine Data Book, 1948-1974, this excerpt from page 49, Chapter 6, Chevrolet W-Series Engines 348, 409 & 427 (emphasis mine):

Almost at the heels of the successful small-block V-8s, Chevrolet came out with a big-block engine that would develop more low end torque for large passenger cars and trucks. Rather than just make a bigger version of the small-block, Chevrolet decided to experiment, and the result was the W-series big-block with its unusual cylinder head desing. In 1958, Chevrolet released the first version of its new Turbo-Thrust engine, which measured 348 cid.

As the development of the big block progressed, GM retroactively dubbed the "W" series the Mark I. The Mark II was an experimental engine used by Junior Johnson at Daytona in 1963, which qualified fastest, but did not finish. The Mark III never got off the design bench. GM called the Mark IV block "Generation 2", to differentiate from their first attempt with the "W" series. The Mark IV was the first big block to be called a "Rat Motor" as opposed to the small block "Mouse Motor". Want to make a 481 cid engine? Put a crankshaft from a 454 into a 409 block. Go ahead, they bolt right in without any modifications. Indeed, many of the parts from the "W" series were used in the Mark IV engines.

Toast

Cheers, Lt. Cmdr. Richie "To be prepared for war, is one of the most effectual means of preserving the peace."-George Washington
  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: Exeter, MO
Posted by kustommodeler1 on Saturday, January 30, 2010 6:57 PM

Milairjunkie

Well it isn't because Lotus assisted with the airship, & I also doubt you will find a cartspring on an airship.

Anyways, ther connection between C4 ZR-1 & the airship is connected to the vehicles powertrain - **it also turns out that this connection is not applicable only to the ZR-1, but C4s 1989 onwards** (my mistake).

 

They both have parts made by Good-Year?

Darrin

Setting new standards for painfully slow buildsDead

  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: Scotland
Posted by Milairjunkie on Saturday, January 30, 2010 7:52 PM

Its has to do with the transmission.

  • Member since
    March 2006
Posted by simpilot34 on Saturday, January 30, 2010 9:08 PM

Did Lotus make the gear reduction for the props on the airship?

Cheers, Lt. Cmdr. Richie "To be prepared for war, is one of the most effectual means of preserving the peace."-George Washington
  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: Exeter, MO
Posted by kustommodeler1 on Sunday, January 31, 2010 12:04 AM

The gear sets for both were built by ZF Friedrichshafen AG, or just ZF for short.

Darrin

Setting new standards for painfully slow buildsDead

  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: Scotland
Posted by Milairjunkie on Sunday, January 31, 2010 7:42 AM

Yes, correct.

ZF was set up due to the requirement of compact, hard wearing gears specifcally for Zeppelin airship power units, & I belive Zeppelin himself was involved in the founding of the company, & of course the C4 gained a ZF box in 1989.

  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: Exeter, MO
Posted by kustommodeler1 on Sunday, January 31, 2010 1:52 PM

WOO HOO! I was just guessing....... I had to get modern airship out of my mind and think of the old zeppelins. Chrysler switched from Saginaw to ZF for power steering pumps gradually over a few year span starting in the late '80s

 

OK here's my Question:  From 1985 to 1989 Toyota, and from 1989 to 1993 Nissan both had some attractive cars called the Carina ED and Laurel respectively. Why could they not sell them in the U.S. market?

Darrin

Setting new standards for painfully slow buildsDead

  • Member since
    March 2006
Posted by simpilot34 on Monday, February 1, 2010 1:00 AM

Is it the same reason the Skyline can't be sold in the US market? Because of the engineering of them, it would be impossible to produce them in the left hand drive configuration?

Cheers, Lt. Cmdr. Richie "To be prepared for war, is one of the most effectual means of preserving the peace."-George Washington
  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: Exeter, MO
Posted by kustommodeler1 on Tuesday, February 2, 2010 12:47 AM

No, not that. Anything that can be made in right hand drive can be made left hand too.Smile Burger

Darrin

Setting new standards for painfully slow buildsDead

  • Member since
    November 2009
  • From: Tonawanda, NY
Posted by joelster on Tuesday, February 2, 2010 5:58 AM

2 guesses...............

1.They were never crash tested here.

2.They never emission tested here.

  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: Exeter, MO
Posted by kustommodeler1 on Wednesday, February 3, 2010 12:47 AM

joelster

2 guesses...............

1.They were never crash tested here.

2.They never emission tested here.

 

Nope, but guess #1 has a key word.............

Darrin

Setting new standards for painfully slow buildsDead

  • Member since
    August 2009
  • From: Texas
Posted by A10wrthg on Wednesday, February 3, 2010 1:47 PM

they didnt pass the US crash test

NYFAIM

  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: Exeter, MO
Posted by kustommodeler1 on Wednesday, February 3, 2010 3:52 PM

Correct for the most part, but which test and why?

Darrin

Setting new standards for painfully slow buildsDead

  • Member since
    August 2009
  • From: Texas
Posted by A10wrthg on Thursday, February 4, 2010 3:31 PM

the roll test because the top wasn't strong enough???

NYFAIM

  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: Exeter, MO
Posted by kustommodeler1 on Friday, February 5, 2010 12:42 AM

I guess I'll go ahead and award the answer to A10wrthg, because he got the words failed crash test and top. Dont want to keep the quiz tied up too long.

 

The Failed crash test was the side impact test because the year models stated in my original question were 4-door hard tops. the post supporting the rear door wasn't capable of meeting U.S. standards of preventing intrusion into the passenger compartment in a side impact.

 

Shame too, if you can find pictures of those two with all four windows down, that hard top looks sweet!!

Darrin

Setting new standards for painfully slow buildsDead

  • Member since
    August 2009
  • From: Texas
Posted by A10wrthg on Saturday, February 6, 2010 4:45 PM

what 2 shelby's were created just for lemans?

NYFAIM

JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.