SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

auto trivia

54203 views
435 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: Scotland
Posted by Milairjunkie on Saturday, February 20, 2010 5:20 AM

Thanks simpilot.

I don't have a reasonable question to mind & I am going to have to partake in the "real world" for the next few hours, so first come first served!

 

FIRST COME, FIRST SERVED.

  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: Exeter, MO
Posted by kustommodeler1 on Saturday, February 20, 2010 5:24 PM

What car did Chrysler  use a name on during the '50s and again in the '80s that is now used by a different manufacturer?

Darrin

Setting new standards for painfully slow buildsDead

  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: Exeter, MO
Posted by kustommodeler1 on Tuesday, February 23, 2010 3:31 AM

Any ideas?

Darrin

Setting new standards for painfully slow buildsDead

  • Member since
    March 2006
Posted by simpilot34 on Tuesday, February 23, 2010 7:11 AM

Imperial?

Cheers, Lt. Cmdr. Richie "To be prepared for war, is one of the most effectual means of preserving the peace."-George Washington
  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: Exeter, MO
Posted by kustommodeler1 on Tuesday, February 23, 2010 2:00 PM

No, not Imperial......Whistling

Darrin

Setting new standards for painfully slow buildsDead

  • Member since
    March 2006
Posted by simpilot34 on Wednesday, February 24, 2010 8:00 PM

New Yorker?

Cheers, Lt. Cmdr. Richie "To be prepared for war, is one of the most effectual means of preserving the peace."-George Washington
  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: Exeter, MO
Posted by kustommodeler1 on Thursday, February 25, 2010 2:40 AM

Not New Yorker.....

 

Here's a hint

 

Evo

Darrin

Setting new standards for painfully slow buildsDead

  • Member since
    August 2009
  • From: Texas
Posted by A10wrthg on Thursday, February 25, 2010 9:57 AM

Mitsubishi Evolution

NYFAIM

  • Member since
    March 2006
Posted by simpilot34 on Thursday, February 25, 2010 8:08 PM

Lancer?

Cheers, Lt. Cmdr. Richie "To be prepared for war, is one of the most effectual means of preserving the peace."-George Washington
  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: Exeter, MO
Posted by kustommodeler1 on Friday, February 26, 2010 3:12 AM

simpilot34

Lancer?

 

You got it! The Lancer name was used by Chrysler on Dodge models in the late '50s and early '60s, then again in the mid-'80s.

 

You were close A10wrthg, as the Evolution is a sub-model of the now Mitsubishi Lancer, but the  Key word Lancer wins the pretend money.

Darrin

Setting new standards for painfully slow buildsDead

  • Member since
    March 2006
Posted by simpilot34 on Friday, February 26, 2010 12:10 PM

In 1970 Chevy  introduced another big block, but marketed it as something different. The question; What was the engine and why was it marketed as something else?

Cheers, Lt. Cmdr. Richie "To be prepared for war, is one of the most effectual means of preserving the peace."-George Washington
  • Member since
    March 2006
Posted by simpilot34 on Sunday, February 28, 2010 3:35 AM

Sorry agent that's not it. There actually was a 400ci small-block, and they were prone to overheating because the water jackets were thinner. This was a well known genuine big-block I'm looking for.

Cheers, Lt. Cmdr. Richie "To be prepared for war, is one of the most effectual means of preserving the peace."-George Washington
  • Member since
    November 2009
  • From: Tonawanda, NY
Posted by joelster on Sunday, February 28, 2010 12:01 PM

They came out with the 402 but still marketed it as a 396 in the Chevelle. 396 sounds sexier.

  • Member since
    March 2006
Posted by simpilot34 on Monday, March 1, 2010 1:36 AM

BINGO!!! we have a winner!!! That and everyone knew the 396 for many years, yes it just didn't have a ring to it. Saw a '71 Camaro SS396(402) in Warner Robins, Georgia back in late '90s on a used car lot. Had thought about trying to get it but even though it was a mere $2500, I just couldn't afford it at the time. Then I looked up the specs, and that did it. By then the 396/402 had been so degraded that the hp was down to a mere 300. However there was only about 1500 made that year. Oh well, ancient history now.

Joel ur up buddy!!

Cheers, Lt. Cmdr. Richie "To be prepared for war, is one of the most effectual means of preserving the peace."-George Washington
  • Member since
    November 2009
  • From: Tonawanda, NY
Posted by joelster on Monday, March 1, 2010 7:36 PM

I am going to keep it musclecar oriented!

Pontiac offered the WS6 package for several of its calendar years on Trans/Ams and Formula Firebirds. On the 4th generation platform (1993-2002) the WS6 package added a Ram Air hood from 1996-2002, in addition to other features. The WS6 option DID NOT offer a Ram Air hood from 1993-1995. How were you able to get a Ram Air hood on a 4th gen from 1993-1995?

  • Member since
    November 2009
  • From: Tonawanda, NY
Posted by joelster on Wednesday, March 3, 2010 6:50 PM

Geez, noone wants to take a stab at it?

 

Basically there were RamAir hoods on certain 1993,94 and 95 Firebird Formulas. In 1996 the hoods were incorporated into the WS6 package because of how popular they were. That pissed off the owners of 93-95 models, lol.

What were the "special" Formulas that had these RamAir hoods from 93-95? Dealers didn't get these cars either, a customer had to specifically order them.

  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: Exeter, MO
Posted by kustommodeler1 on Thursday, March 4, 2010 8:25 PM

Are you talking about the Firehawk?

Darrin

Setting new standards for painfully slow buildsDead

  • Member since
    November 2009
  • From: Tonawanda, NY
Posted by joelster on Saturday, March 6, 2010 9:22 AM

Yep, you got it. My brother ordered a '95 Firehawk #011, and then the following year Pontiac decided to make the hood an easily available piece, lol. He was SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO pissed, oh well.

 

The floor is yours.

  • Member since
    June 2007
Posted by squeakie on Saturday, March 6, 2010 4:53 PM

there was the 403 " engine as well as the 396" engine. Both are off the 396 Mk IV engine block

gary

  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: Exeter, MO
Posted by kustommodeler1 on Saturday, March 6, 2010 5:00 PM

I almost forgot about the Firehawk, I've only seen a couple over the years......

 

OK, here's the next question- The 1965 thru 1969 Barracuda had an option package that allowed it to out-handle most foreign and domestic cars (quite a surprising feat at the time), and gave it a very "European" feel. What was this package?

Darrin

Setting new standards for painfully slow buildsDead

  • Member since
    March 2006
Posted by simpilot34 on Saturday, March 6, 2010 6:23 PM

Was it the AAR package?

Cheers, Lt. Cmdr. Richie "To be prepared for war, is one of the most effectual means of preserving the peace."-George Washington
  • Member since
    November 2009
  • From: Tonawanda, NY
Posted by joelster on Saturday, March 6, 2010 6:43 PM

Formula S package?

  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: Exeter, MO
Posted by kustommodeler1 on Saturday, March 6, 2010 7:53 PM

Sorry, The AAR was a 1970 only package, built for only 6 weeks in March and April of 1970, to compete in the SCCA races.

 

joelster

Formula S package?

 

Formula S package it is!!. The next one is yours joelster.

Darrin

Setting new standards for painfully slow buildsDead

  • Member since
    May 2005
  • From: Left forever
Posted by Bgrigg on Saturday, March 6, 2010 7:56 PM

You don't log onto the computer for a few hours and I miss this question.

I owned a lot of muscle cars in my day, when I was in my teens, but my all time favorite and the one I regret selling the most, was my 1967 Barracuda Formula S with the Hi-Po 273 ci. It did actually handle quite nicely for an American car.

Dang!

So long folks!

  • Member since
    November 2009
  • From: Tonawanda, NY
Posted by joelster on Sunday, March 7, 2010 8:14 AM

How many US automakers offered engines larger than 450 cubic engines in their passenger cars during the 1970-1976 model years and what were their respective displacements?

  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: Exeter, MO
Posted by kustommodeler1 on Sunday, March 7, 2010 12:01 PM

Chrysler- none.

 

Ford- 460 ( Includes Lincoln and Mercury)

 

GM- Buick 455, Cadillac had 472 and 500, Chevrolet had 454, Oldsmobile had 455, and Pontiac had 455. (Note each division of GM had it's own block casting during this time, the concept of the "corporate" engine was not used by GM yet.)

 

edit: there were larger American V-8s at the time but only installed in HD trucks, not passenger cars.

Darrin

Setting new standards for painfully slow buildsDead

  • Member since
    November 2009
  • From: Tonawanda, NY
Posted by joelster on Sunday, March 7, 2010 12:13 PM

kustommodeler1 has the floor!

 

I thought everyone would forget about Cadillac, lol.

  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: Exeter, MO
Posted by kustommodeler1 on Sunday, March 7, 2010 4:19 PM

What did the Ford Windstar and AMC Pacer have in common?

Darrin

Setting new standards for painfully slow buildsDead

  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: Nashville, TN area
Posted by bobbaily on Sunday, March 7, 2010 6:47 PM

Same square footage of glass?

Bob

 

  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: Exeter, MO
Posted by kustommodeler1 on Sunday, March 7, 2010 7:21 PM

bobbaily

Same square footage of glass?

 

HaHaHa

 

Hadn't thought of that, but not the right answer.

Darrin

Setting new standards for painfully slow buildsDead

JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.