Star Trek XI Movie!?!!

Hippy-Ed

Member since
December 2004
From: Stockton,Ca

Posted by Hippy-Ed on Thursday, May 4, 2006 1:00 PM

Keep rambling cassibill Approve [^]

I'm interested Tongue [:P]

There's alot I didn't know about Star Trek Shock [:O]

If you lose your sense of humor, you've lost everything

Reply

cassibill

Member since
February 2003
From: Indiana, USA

Posted by cassibill on Thursday, May 4, 2006 2:06 PM

And I know too much. Want to take this off thead into a PM or leave it here? Where to you want you Trek education to start? We could do a history of Romulans.

cdw My life flashes before my eyes and it mostly my life flashing before my eyes!!! Big Smile The 1/144 scale census and message board: http://144scalelist.freewebpage.org/index.html

Reply

Hippy-Ed

Member since
December 2004
From: Stockton,Ca

Posted by Hippy-Ed on Thursday, May 4, 2006 2:18 PM

we could go PM on this and start from the beginning Wink [;)]

If you lose your sense of humor, you've lost everything

Reply

cassibill

Member since
February 2003
From: Indiana, USA

Posted by cassibill on Thursday, May 4, 2006 2:28 PM

I'll start a PM then. What exactly is the beginning? Production order with Kirk and Co. or chronologically series wise with Archer or straight chrono starting with the Big Bang (A Q playing hide and seek with another Q hid there and took Voyager with him. The Guardian of Forever exists with time itself.)

cdw My life flashes before my eyes and it mostly my life flashing before my eyes!!! Big Smile The 1/144 scale census and message board: http://144scalelist.freewebpage.org/index.html

Reply

Hippy-Ed

Member since
December 2004
From: Stockton,Ca

Posted by Hippy-Ed on Thursday, May 4, 2006 2:36 PM

cassibill wrote:
I'll start a PM then. What exactly is the beginning? Production order with Kirk and Co. or chronologically series wise with Archer or straight chrono starting with the Big Bang (A Q playing hide and seek with another Q hid there and took Voyager with him. The Guardian of Forever exists with time itself.)

LoL... good question huh Big Smile [:D]

I'll ley you begin whereever yer heart desires Wink [;)]

If you lose your sense of humor, you've lost everything

Reply

DURR

Member since
July 2013

Posted by DURR on Friday, May 19, 2006 10:42 PM

on today's news i heard they might have ben affleck to play the lead in the new star trek movie

girls might go just to see him but i bet true trekkies won't

i think it an awful choice

Reply

lexesbenz

Member since
December 2005
From: Syracuse, NY

Posted by lexesbenz on Saturday, May 20, 2006 12:33 AM

If ben affleck is in the movie, say good by to the star trek movies forever, he will deffinetly ruin it, I mean come on look at daredevil. What are they gonna do give matt damon pointy ears and call him spock. Honestly they should just quite while there ahead.

The flying hamster of doom rains coconuts on your pitiful city!!!!

Reply

dkmacin

Member since
January 2003
From: Upper left side of the lower Penninsula of Mich

Posted by dkmacin on Saturday, May 20, 2006 9:02 AM

I'm not too sure on this, being a closet Trekkie and all, but Cassibill, didn't they make reference to Kirk NOT being by the book while at the Academy in the first Trek Movie?
When he "cheated" to win the no win scenario in the Romulan neutral zone?
The only cadet to ever "win" at the scenario. . .not exactly a by the book procedure.

Don

I know it's only rock and roll, but I like it.

Reply

Anonymous

Member since
November 2005

Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, May 20, 2006 10:08 AM

I wouldn't even cast Affleck as a shuttlecraft!! There are rocks with more personality!!

Reply
Edit

Hippy-Ed

Member since
December 2004
From: Stockton,Ca

Posted by Hippy-Ed on Sunday, May 21, 2006 10:14 PM

StevenQ wrote:
I wouldn't even cast Affleck as a shuttlecraft!! There are rocks with more personality!!

If you lose your sense of humor, you've lost everything

Reply

lexesbenz

Member since
December 2005
From: Syracuse, NY

Posted by lexesbenz on Sunday, May 21, 2006 11:36 PM

lol. ok, ok, guys you can stop asking, I'll play kirk.

The flying hamster of doom rains coconuts on your pitiful city!!!!

Reply

Bgrigg

Member since
May 2005
From: Left forever

Posted by Bgrigg on Sunday, May 21, 2006 11:41 PM

StevenQ wrote:
I wouldn't even cast Affleck as a shuttlecraft!! There are rocks with more personality!!

That is an affront to shuttlecraft.

And rocks!

So long folks!

Reply

Hippy-Ed

Member since
December 2004
From: Stockton,Ca

Posted by Hippy-Ed on Wednesday, May 24, 2006 9:40 PM

Bgrigg wrote:
StevenQ wrote:
I wouldn't even cast Affleck as a shuttlecraft!! There are rocks with more personality!!

That is an affront to shuttlecraft.

And rocks!

Poor shuttlecraft & rocks Angry [:(!]

If you lose your sense of humor, you've lost everything

Reply

Anonymous

Member since
November 2005

Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, May 31, 2006 4:45 PM

More likely to end with this casting

Joaquin Pheonix as Kirk "Hel-l-l-l-o there. I'm Jimmy Kirk"

and Spock will be played by Keanu Reeves, "Jim...Whoooh"

Of course if they can sign Scarlet Johansen as Kirks squeeze......I'm there!

Reply
Edit

Anonymous

Member since
November 2005

Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, June 3, 2006 3:49 PM

As a Trekker with 20 years in a Trek fan club, I am SO not going to touch THAT set of speculations with someone ELSE's wisecrack!

Joaquin Phoenix is a good actor . . . but he is NEVER going to be a Jim Kirk.

Keanu Reeves is an okay actor, good enough to earn a living . . . but I would be a MUCH better Spock (and I'm 54, fat, and short!).

On the other hand, Scarlet Johannsen as Ruth, Kirk's Academy hottie . . . OH YEAH!!!

Jim Kratzer

The mad yank

Reply
Edit

DURR

Member since
July 2013

Posted by DURR on Saturday, June 3, 2006 4:58 PM

kevin costner as spock

he is real good at keeping straight faced, and plays a stiff with the personality of a door knob real good too

Reply

lexesbenz

Member since
December 2005
From: Syracuse, NY

Posted by lexesbenz on Saturday, June 3, 2006 7:06 PM

No way costner could play kirk you cant be 50 years old and be in the academy, how about brandon routh the new superman, he might be good

The flying hamster of doom rains coconuts on your pitiful city!!!!

Reply

Anonymous

Member since
November 2005

Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, June 3, 2006 7:10 PM

Kevin Costner has the personality of, well, Ben Affleck(see shuttlecraft and rocks above)! In fact Affleck could play a young Costner, both with the depth of a piece of toast. I know, I'm insulting toast........... Big Smile [:D]

Reply
Edit

DURR

Member since
July 2013

Posted by DURR on Saturday, June 3, 2006 8:46 PM

lexesbenz wrote:
No way costner could play kirk you cant be 50 years old and be in the academy, how about brandon routh the new superman, he might be good

as spock not kirk

Reply

THE MAGAZINE

CONTACT US

RECENT ARTICLES

POPULAR TOPICS

RECENT REVIEWS

POPULAR TOPICS

RECENT REVIEWS

POPULAR TOPICS

RECENT VIDEOS

POPULAR TOPICS

RECENT THREADS

CATEGORIES

NEW PRODUCTS

OUR STORE

CURRENT ISSUE

SEARCH FINESCALE.COM