SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

Worst Ship Model you have ever built

11442 views
66 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    August 2007
  • From: Toronto
Posted by BGuy on Tuesday, July 21, 2009 6:25 PM
 Wilbur Wright wrote:

After having built several Tamiya 350th ships which were fantastic , I made the mistake of buying a Hasegawa kit.

It had no detail at all. I took it back into the shop and returned it after opening it in the parking lot.

Your LHS actually lets you *retun* opened boxes?  Nice.

  • Member since
    September 2005
  • From: Groton, CT
Posted by warshipguy on Tuesday, July 21, 2009 4:13 PM

I have the Airfix Repulse, which is a GREAT kit!  Did Airfix ever release Renown?

Bill Morrison

  • Member since
    April 2005
Posted by ddp59 on Tuesday, July 21, 2009 3:53 PM
check with ebay. i've got both 1/600 repulse & renown from airfix. there is structural issues with repulse.
  • Member since
    October 2008
Posted by eatthis on Tuesday, July 21, 2009 3:19 PM

 searat12 wrote:
I'm not sure about the Airfix kits you mentioned, but one really GREAT 1/600 Airfix kit is that of HMS Repulse.  An excellent kit for its day!

i didnt know they made 1 do you know where i could get hold of it?

 

snow + 4wd + escessive hp = :)  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x7egUIS70YM

  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: Portsmouth, RI
Posted by searat12 on Monday, July 20, 2009 8:03 PM
I'm not sure about the Airfix kits you mentioned, but one really GREAT 1/600 Airfix kit is that of HMS Repulse.  An excellent kit for its day!
  • Member since
    October 2008
Posted by eatthis on Monday, July 20, 2009 2:52 PM
im a total noob compared to everybody here but the worst kit iv seen so far is airfix 1/600 scale rodney theres a 1/4 inch gap between the aft deck and the hull!! iv got bismark hood ark royal (my granded served on her r i p) belfast and fearless (my father in law served on her in the 70s) they all seem pretty crap tbh the 2 piece hulls NEVER fit together all of em were bent and the seams are terrible 

 

snow + 4wd + escessive hp = :)  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x7egUIS70YM

  • Member since
    April 2005
  • From: USA
Posted by cruichin on Saturday, July 18, 2009 7:04 AM
The Armageddon 1/72 LCT-6. Absolute horror show!
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, July 16, 2009 7:51 AM
Fujimi Oil Tanker
  • Member since
    July 2009
  • From: Fort Worth Tx.
Posted by Austyn95 on Thursday, July 16, 2009 1:04 AM
I'm goona have to say the worst model i ever built is the first model i ever built. Not the manufacturers fault. Its my fault. I got a lil super glue happy. :)
So your gonna clean that up right? No, i'm just gonna let it sit there. It'll give me something to do when theres nothing else to do.
  • Member since
    July 2009
  • From: Jacksonville, Florida
Posted by Vagabond_Astronomer on Wednesday, July 15, 2009 10:15 AM

Elsewhere in this subject, someone wrote about the Lindberg Sea Witch. I built that model and had the original Marx Swordfish (basically the same ship with different prow and a stamped metal deck). Didn't find the model that bad, actually. I guess building wooden models, and frequently having to do serious modifications means that I look at plastic as a similarly malleable material. I do recall the Lindberg had a few fit problems, due to the age of the dies.
There was a Revell 1/570 Bismarck (maybe someone mentioned that already). Not bad, but fit problems.
Aside from several wooden models (they have a whole different set of problems), the absolute worse plastic ship models I ever built were some of the Pyro/Life-Like small sailing ships. Not all of them, mind you, but a good chunk of them are just plain wrong.

Ironically, never had fit problems with the Lindberg ships, though, of course, they have other issues. Fun in the pond, though. 

 

"I have loved the stars too dearly to be fearful of the night..."
  • Member since
    September 2005
  • From: Groton, CT
Posted by warshipguy on Tuesday, July 14, 2009 7:47 AM

Tankerbuilder,

There is an FSM review of the Aurora USS Halford in the July, 1997 issue called "Kit Classics #35: Aurora's USS Halford, Was it a scale model or a toy?"

Bill Morrison

  • Member since
    August 2008
Posted by tankerbuilder on Monday, July 13, 2009 1:07 PM
 Hey spotty , sorry it took so long to reply . The CHRIS CRAFT by REVELL was bad the first year they put it out . Over the years it got really worse . And they (in the real world ) never used that boat for sport fishing !!!! I grew up around things that float large and small . If they ever did it over and put the window frames and deck planks in scale they might have a start on a decent model , But I doubt they have the brains to abandon that looser. I would rather build the absolute worse kit LINDBERG ever produced than do that one ever again .!!! TANKERBUILDER
  • Member since
    August 2008
Posted by tankerbuilder on Monday, July 13, 2009 12:58 PM
Going back in time to the post by warshipguy . Yes I remember the kit , thing is I,ve never seen one anywhere at anytime . The first I even heard mention of the HALFORD was in 1960 when my ship was in the yard . I had been transferd (T.D.Y.) to the base machine shop . So , I had regular working hours , (and no watches to stand !!)I couldn,t find it then and I, to tell you the truth have never run across anyone , myself included that has ever seen one !!!!!! TANKERBUILDER
  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: California
Posted by rabbiteatsnake on Monday, May 18, 2009 5:01 AM
As I've seen it already mentioned I'll chime in too Aurora's Bismarck, what an appalling hunk of grey styrene.  The only features they got right was the count of the primary weapons and the bow's profile.  Had the lindberg, had the revell no world beaters here, yet one could tell what ship one was building.  I seem to remember a Nichimo or hasagawa kit that was pretty good, Hellers was quite nice with only a few simple to fix errors.  Now some trivia.  did you know the model built for the movie "Sink the Bismarck" was 66ft long!. Hard to believe considering it looked like that aurora blight floating in some kids wading pool.
The devil is in the details...and somtimes he's in my sock drawer. On the bench. Airfix 1/24 bf109E scratch conv to 109 G14AS MPC1/24 ju87B conv to 87G Rev 1/48 B17G toF Trump 1/32 f4u-1D and staying a1D Scratch 1/16 TigerII.
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, April 17, 2009 9:56 AM
Looks a lot like the lifeboat from the pirated American ship where the "stand-off" took place, 'till the US Navy SEALS made the pirates go to sleep...
  • Member since
    March 2009
  • From: brisbane australia
Posted by surfsup on Friday, April 17, 2009 8:56 AM
You are lucky to have a bathtub searat. I only have a shower. Then again, it would perfectly match a rainy English Day!!!!Sign - Oops [#oops]

If i was your wife, i'd poison your tea! If Iwas your husband, I would drink it! WINSTON CHURCHILL

  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: Portsmouth, RI
Posted by searat12 on Friday, April 17, 2009 7:16 AM
Ah, go ahead and build it anyways, as you can never have enough boats in the bathtub.... 'Hang on rubber duck!  Here comes the lifeboat!!'
  • Member since
    March 2009
  • From: brisbane australia
Posted by surfsup on Friday, April 17, 2009 7:10 AM
You lot are giving me second thoughts about building the lifeboat now. It looked interesting and different when first released and reviews I have read didn't find too much wrong with it. Confused [%-)]

If i was your wife, i'd poison your tea! If Iwas your husband, I would drink it! WINSTON CHURCHILL

  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: Portsmouth, RI
Posted by searat12 on Thursday, April 16, 2009 5:32 PM
...Looks surprisingly like a fireboat model Lindberg, or maybe Pyro used to make... with squirting water cannon!
  • Member since
    June 2008
Posted by Spotty on Thursday, April 16, 2009 5:28 PM
Its cute though!  haha
  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: Weymouth, Dorset, UK
Posted by chris hall on Thursday, April 16, 2009 3:53 PM

  I built the Pyro USS Maine as a kid, and didn't know, or care, how inaccurate it was until, some years later, I found some photos of the real thing. It just looked classy, with all that gold paint!

I also built the Revell Sport Fisherman as a kid, and now realise that the fact that nothing fit wasn't my fault. I even bought another one when Revell Germany re-released it a couple of years ago as part of their 50th anniversary programme. I think I can do a decent job on it now - I even have some wood-effect decal for it when the time comes!

But the worst ship (actually boat) kit that I've actually built sice I returned to the hobby was undoubtably the Airfix 1/72 Severn-class RNLI Lifeboat. Nothing fit, soft,soapy  and inaccurate detail, worst decals, in terms of silvering, that I've seen for many a year. Lots of interior detail, none of it especially accurate, and none of it visible through the coke-bottle glazing once you've put the roof on. Even the parts layout on the sprues was so cramped and illogical that it became a major barrier to completing the kit, especially as anything thinner than about 60 thou split when you tried to cut it from the sprue. The plastic was reluctant to take either CA or liquid poly.

That said, I was building it for my LHS, so resisted the (very strong) temptation to bin it. They were very pleased with it, and have sold several of the kits on the strength of people coming into the shop and seeing the built-up model....

and it passed the capsize test:

Smile [:)]

Cheers,

Chris.

Cute and cuddly, boys, cute and cuddly!
  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: Portsmouth, RI
Posted by searat12 on Thursday, April 16, 2009 2:13 PM
Yup, the Lindberg Hood was pretty awful as a scale model... It DID however go together well, and made a very fine pool toy, which is all it was ever good for...
  • Member since
    March 2009
  • From: brisbane australia
Posted by surfsup on Saturday, April 11, 2009 6:04 PM
 What surprises me is the number on rereleases of these old kits that all of us know a truly awful. The Lidberg Hood definately comes to mind. It amazes me how many manufacturers keep doing this and putting new people off this hobby by selling these models. Why can't manufacturers put a listing on the kit box saying it is a rerelease and the original release date to make it easier to differentiate from newer mouldings. At least it will give you an age of the kit. This may help determine if it is worthwhile spending our hard earned bucks on something that could be a minefield to build. even for a novice.!!!!!!!!Banged Head [banghead]

If i was your wife, i'd poison your tea! If Iwas your husband, I would drink it! WINSTON CHURCHILL

  • Member since
    June 2008
Posted by Spotty on Saturday, April 11, 2009 5:56 PM

 tankerbuilder wrote:
..... Do you remember the REVELL model of the SPORT FISHERMAN ?? The original model was just as bad . It was a 1955 era CHRIS-CRAFT tri cabin motor yacht . That model was baaad . The re-release (above )was even worse ......

 

Oh man!. I recieved one of those as a gift (the re-release). Its sitting on my shelf right now waiting to be started. Is it really that much of a stinker??

  • Member since
    January 2009
  • From: Central CA
Posted by Division 6 on Saturday, April 11, 2009 12:37 PM
 JMart wrote:

Eric- thanks for the info! Maybe my kid will want  to re-start the ship as a Disney kit ;) cheers

I have the model and have been collecting pictures to eventually try my hand at making the correct stern and figurehead so I can do a diorama of the Disneyland site. 

 

Eric... 

  • Member since
    August 2008
Posted by tankerbuilder on Saturday, April 11, 2009 9:09 AM
HI ! I know I,ve answered here already ,but , after really thinking about it I can put another four in that category . One may not qualify as a ship but it was bad ,except , it was the only one offered on the genre . Do you remember the REVELL model of the SPORT FISHERMAN ?? The original model was just as bad . It was a 1955 era CHRIS-CRAFT tri cabin motor yacht . That model was baaad . The re-release (above )was even worse . The next one would,ve been the AURORA model of the viking ship .The next was LINDBERGS version of the L.C.T.  The last was I believe an IMAII release and it was SUPPOSED to be a COAST GUARD 40 foot patrol boat . That was like dealing with a toy! They modified so much to motorize it ,it was almost worthless . I must say though I,ve seen R.C. models right out the box just as bad ,and at ten times the price . so there        tankerbuilder
  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: NJ
Posted by JMart on Saturday, April 11, 2009 8:42 AM

Eric- thanks for the info! Maybe my kid will want  to re-start the ship as a Disney kit ;) cheers

 

 

  • Member since
    April 2009
Posted by Arby on Friday, April 10, 2009 2:20 PM
Going back a few posts and just shooting in the dark here, but there is a province in France named Maine. It could be that they had a ship by the same name. That would be why Heller, a French company, might do one.
  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Greenville,Michigan
Posted by millard on Thursday, April 9, 2009 7:23 PM

The worst for me was the Lindberg Sea Witch. Nothing on that kit fit without using and orbital sander. Everytime I see one on E bay I cringe.

Rod

JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.