SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

USS Arizona Colors Question

26999 views
50 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    November 2010
Posted by Bigb123 on Tuesday, June 28, 2011 4:20 PM

OKay, thanks!!

  • Member since
    November 2010
Posted by Bigb123 on Saturday, July 2, 2011 8:59 AM

When she was painted in overall #5 standard navy gray, was that overall?  And by that I mean does that include the fighting tops too?  Just wanted to know for the heck of it in case I may do one in that scheme sometime in the future.  Thanks!!!!

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: EG48
Posted by Tracy White on Saturday, July 2, 2011 9:55 AM

For the most part, yes. In 1941 she was in Standard Navy Gray coming out of overhaul in January through about the end of May, so you can do her in this scheme fairly easily (Leave off the radar platform on the forward fighting top and fill in the groove for it). Turret tops 1, 2, & 4 would have been red. We suspect that the superstructure decks were linoleum but have no verification; this suspicion is based on this photo (note the color of the deck the sailors are on). The linoleum may have also been in use at the time of the attack on Pearl Harbor, giving the option of a little more color to models. I went looking for information on this my last trip down but the area on Linoleum in the Pearl Harbor Shipyard files was essentially empty.

Tracy White Researcher@Large

  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: Carmel, CA
Posted by bondoman on Saturday, July 2, 2011 10:30 AM

EdGrune

 

 

 

And to add one more layer of confusion to the anecdotal evidence ...

I was told of a visit of a USS Maryland veteran of Pearl Harbor to a hobby shop.    The owner asked the vet, what color was your ship on December 7?    The old gentleman walked over to the ModelMaster paint rack and picked up a bottle of Aircraft Interior Black.   As I'm sure you know,  interior black is a very very dark neutral gray.    Charcoal Gray would be another good description for it.

Sure, I asked my late father-in-law several times to describe the colors of his USAAF Beaufighter (reverse lend-lease).

"I don't know, I was too busy climbing in and out of the damn thing".

  • Member since
    November 2010
Posted by Bigb123 on Saturday, July 2, 2011 11:26 AM

Thanks again, Tracy.  I've got a couple of the 1/350 kits, so I may do one in std. navy gray.   And, bondoman, good one!!

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: EG48
Posted by Tracy White on Saturday, July 2, 2011 12:29 PM

That's actually turret #4 that you're seeing; the photo is looking aft. The darker deck is just wet. Note that the aircraft are gone and the port side railings have been dropped - standard for when aircraft were being launched.

Tracy White Researcher@Large

  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: Carmel, CA
Posted by bondoman on Saturday, July 2, 2011 1:10 PM

That's a fine photo. It's a little interesting that #4 is trained to the side. I guess it's a staged picture because those dudes aren't going to be standing there if the guns are being fired. But it's LIFE after all.

Also notice the pipe railings are painted black. Very sharp. Looks like linoleum deck to me. There's a wear spot at the top of the ladder too.

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • From: Formerly Bryan, now Arlington, Texas
Posted by CapnMac82 on Sunday, July 3, 2011 4:01 PM

You wash the decks down before lighting off the large-bore naval rifles, keeps the desk from charring from the flash.  You lower lifelines for similar reasons.

 

  • Member since
    September 2003
Posted by Leftie on Sunday, July 3, 2011 5:31 PM

Tracy and others,

 

   Has it been confirmed that this is the Arizona? There are quite a few different colors of grays in that photo. I'm really interested in the dark grey on the top of number 3 turret. Most think it had no color other than the  overall grey.  BTW, the Trumpeter is a purist modelers nightmare. The kit looks great at first blush but it falls apart when the rivet counter like me gets serious. Yes...To most of you guys..."looks like the Arizona to me...".

   I'll be more specific if you guys have the stomach for it. These won't be the only things wrong with this kit, just only the first few pages. Still....I think this is a kit well worth $200. But it also needs a few hundred dollars of aftermarket add-ons and modeler's skill to get it close to being right...not that many will see the flaws. Most will be wowed with the final product.

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: Mansfield, TX
Posted by EdGrune on Sunday, July 3, 2011 7:36 PM

Leftie

   Has it been confirmed that this is the Arizona? 

The caption at the Life site for the photo which Tracy linked identifies the ship as the Idaho.

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: EG48
Posted by Tracy White on Sunday, July 3, 2011 7:52 PM

Ed is correct; I wasn't trying to state that the ship in that photo was Arizona, just that some dark material, most likely linoleum, was used on some of the superstructure decks at least.

Tracy White Researcher@Large

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • From: Formerly Bryan, now Arlington, Texas
Posted by CapnMac82 on Monday, July 4, 2011 2:06 PM

Leftie
There are quite a few different colors of grays in that photo. I'm really interested in the dark grey on the top of number 3 turret. Most think it had no color other than the  overall grey.  BTW, the Trumpeter is a purist modelers nightmare.

To my eye, from the unpainted wooden decks, and the white working dress the signalmen are in, I'd say this is a pre-war photo of USS Idaho.  So the darker horizontal and lighter vertical paint scheme would be correct.

The use of russet-leather colored linoleum on an all-weather metal deck like the signal platform is striking, too.  have to wonder if that linoleum was painted over in various deck colors per the Measures, as those  came into effect.  Or, if some form of blue-gray linoleum was installed instead.

  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: USA
Posted by weebles on Tuesday, July 5, 2011 7:52 AM

I for one am intrigued with the idea of painting her in transition.  The interview with Arizona veteran, Mr. Bruner, who was on the paint crew said that they were in the process of repainting her, and that the hull and turrets were completed with 5S to me is compelling.  Now there's a run on sentence!  Tracy has gathered a great deal of information indicating orders that the fleet was in the process of color transition.  Finishing the model in the process of transition to 5S tells the story of a surprise attack and the history of the color changes to the fleet.  I hope Tracy can find the smoking gun but I suspect it has been lost to destruction and war.

  • Member since
    March 2005
  • From: West Virginia, USA
Posted by mfsob on Tuesday, July 5, 2011 9:07 AM

This is one of the advantages to building the "other ships," AKA the auxiliaries, 1) Nobody really cares all that much, and 2) You can't hardly go wrong with "Paint everything gray."

My  2 cents

  • Member since
    May 2008
Posted by tucchase on Monday, July 18, 2011 4:16 AM

For my 2 cents, I was reading Tracy's website several months ago, on the camoflage pages for Pearl Harbor in 1941, and on one of them (I think it was for the fleet in general) it stated that 5-S was to be used on all ships as per the new Measures, except the Battleships, which were to retain Measure 1 and substitute 5-S for 5-D as soon as was possible.  This was dependent upon the arrival of the new paint stocks and new tinting material stocks.  This could explain why the Helena, and others, were changed to new measures, while the battleships stayed as Measure 1 until after the first of the year 1942.  I may have mis-read the memo as I wasn't looking for that particular piece of information, but it kind of jumped out at me when I read it.  I don't remember the date of the memo, but it should have been second half of 1941, since that was the only time they were discussing the use of 5-S as a replacement for 5-D.  I must have looked at at least 30 memos that day, so I don't have a clue as to which specific section it was in.   But, if anyone is really interested, I am sure if you search all the memos Tracy has for Camoflage for Pearl Harbor in 1941, it should still be there!  

  • Member since
    June 2006
  • From: Michigan
Posted by ps1scw on Friday, June 1, 2012 1:24 PM

VERY NICE

JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.