Gentlemen, I hate to ask this, but I hope you can slog through this long read and offer some advice.
Dee is my mother-in-law. She has two daughters, Kate and Liz. I'm married to Liz. Liz and I have two kids, a girl aged 7 and a boy aged 5. Kate has one son aged 7. Dee and Kate are both divorced. This is the cast of characters.
Dee is in her '60's. She has been a vegan since her mid twenties, and last year she began a diet restriction of no carbs in addition to the veganism. I guess she thinks carbs are bad. Anyway, she's lost 80lbs in the last year, and currently weighs about 85lbs. Yes, really. To me this is eating disorder territory.
Background info: I have an amiable relationship with Dee and Kate. However, they both tested this when we all joined together in a family vacation to Moab, UT last summer. Dee is a stubborn, assertive grandmother who seems to think she knows best. We had planned for her to take my kids for the day so Liz and I could do some offroading outside of Moab with my Jeep. When it came time to part ways, my son was having trouble separating from me. I was reassuring him when Dee grabbed him and pulled him out of my arms, pushing him into her car and buckling him into the car seat. In the interest of maintaining the peace (since I'm the son-in-law) I said nothing. This was probably a mistake, I admit.
The second incident in Moab happened when I caught Kate texting and driving with my daughter in her car. Kate had taken her son and my daughter to Canyonlands Nat'l Park, around a 40 mile drive from Moab. I told Liz I was extremely unhappy with Kate's judgement (or lack thereof) and said I'd never let Kate alone with my kids again if this is the sort of judgement I can expect from her. Kate is an airhead anyway.
More background info: Dee has been a lifelong avid hiker, and has traveled to many exotic, remote locations as part of her job working for the San Diego Natural History Museum. She is very headstrong and adamant that Kate and Liz sort of carry on this legacy, and this is trickling down to her grandkids (my kids and Kate's kid). She tries to involve them in a lot of adventurous activities. I have no problem with that at all, but I think a lot of this is based in part in a sort of selfish desire to validate herself and leave a legacy before she dies.
With all this in mind, last week we learned that Dee wants us all to join her in hiking to the bottom of the Grand Canyon. She is paying for an overnight stay and meals at a ranch at the bottom. We would hike one trail down on one day, and return on a different, slightly easier trail the next day. One-way it's around a 10 mile hike. Sounds like the date will be in November, 2014. Preparing for this event will cost my family around $500 because we'll have to buy gear such as backpacks and hiking boots. We'll also need to start training hikes for the kids, which will eat up a lot of time and money that i'm not sure we can afford.
Bottom line: I'm seeing poor judgement in Dee's control of her health, and I don't trust Kate to make sound decisions with my kids. To me, taking two 8yr olds and a 6yr old on a 20 mile hike, one that's been known to kill healthy adults, might not be the best idea. In November there is a risk of icy trails right next to sheer cliffs with drops of 100's of feet. Mountain lions are a concern. Hydration is a concern. This sort of trip is something I wouldn't take lightly even if it was just me and other fit adults. (I'm in pretty good shape and still have reservations about it).
It's pretty much an argument of keeping my kids safe, while maintaining family peace.
I hate for this to turn in to Dear Abby, but I was hoping someone might have some advice. What say you, FSM'ers?
Thanks for reading,
Chris