SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

Dodge Chargers ;

5611 views
27 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    January 2007
Posted by the doog on Wednesday, July 22, 2015 1:16 PM

"Paint" program in Windows is my favorite tool Tankerbuilder!

  • Member since
    August 2008
Posted by tankerbuilder on Friday, July 17, 2015 2:03 PM

Karl ;

Where did you get the bottom set of pictures  .For a moment I thought it was a Lamborghini FP 500 versus a Land Rover ?

  • Member since
    August 2008
Posted by tankerbuilder on Friday, July 17, 2015 2:01 PM

I will say this on the VIPER ;

   Driving one of those on the back roads here is like riding in the bed of a 1917 Model " T "  At least with the Vette it not as bad . It's only as bad as riding in the back of  56 Ford pickup that's empty !

  • Member since
    January 2007
Posted by the doog on Friday, July 17, 2015 7:55 AM

GMorrison

Nothing like a solid rear axle for cornering, LOL. If, and it's an if, I ever owned another Dodge product, doubtful, I would want but cannot afford a Viper.

I hear that they're absolutely BRUTAL to drive..

  • Member since
    September 2012
Posted by GMorrison on Thursday, July 16, 2015 11:49 PM

Nothing like a solid rear axle for cornering, LOL. If, and it's an if, I ever owned another Dodge product, doubtful, I would want but cannot afford a Viper.

 Modeling is an excuse to buy books.

 

  • Member since
    January 2007
Posted by the doog on Thursday, July 16, 2015 4:08 PM

My Dream Car is a '71 Road Runner 440. Not so much for the engine but for the shape and graphics. Ne'er was there made a more beautiful automobile! :)

  • Member since
    May 2013
  • From: From the Mit, but live in Mason, O high ho
Posted by hogfanfs on Thursday, July 16, 2015 11:42 AM

the doog

Yeah I'm sure it's an impressive car under the hood. I really am miffed by the styling of it though. I honestly believe that they should have named it something different and made a new line rather than to just graft the vaunted "Charger" name on it. I mean, when Charger came out, it was all about that "fuselage" shape. It was a trend-setter and groundbreaker and one of the most beautiful cars ever made, IMO. :)

The very first time I saw the "new Charger", I almost blew a gasket, lol.

I guess I failed to mention that it did take a while for the current body style to grow on me. lol

A "Charger" really should not be a 4-door car. Maybe a more appropriate name would have been "Magnum", instead of the station wagon with the same name...

Now to get Dodge to put a Hemi in a Mini-van! That would really get the monkey's off my back!

 Bruce

 

 On the bench:  1/48 Eduard MiG-21MF

                        1/35 Takom Merkava Mk.I

 

  • Member since
    September 2012
Posted by GMorrison on Thursday, July 16, 2015 11:28 AM

Kinda looks like an old Fury III

 Modeling is an excuse to buy books.

 

  • Member since
    January 2007
Posted by the doog on Thursday, July 16, 2015 10:40 AM

Yeah I'm sure it's an impressive car under the hood. I really am miffed by the styling of it though. I honestly believe that they should have named it something different and made a new line rather than to just graft the vaunted "Charger" name on it. I mean, when Charger came out, it was all about that "fuselage" shape. It was a trend-setter and groundbreaker and one of the most beautiful cars ever made, IMO. :)

The very first time I saw the "new Charger", I almost blew a gasket, lol.

  • Member since
    May 2013
  • From: From the Mit, but live in Mason, O high ho
Posted by hogfanfs on Thursday, July 16, 2015 9:33 AM

I take the new Charger for what it is... A grocery getter that offers a guy like myself a little bit of performance. Is it a far cry form the original Charger, definitely. Would I prefer an original charger to a new, definitely.  But, I still like the car... 

 Bruce

 

 On the bench:  1/48 Eduard MiG-21MF

                        1/35 Takom Merkava Mk.I

 

  • Member since
    January 2007
Posted by the doog on Thursday, July 16, 2015 8:32 AM

hogfanfs

the doog

The new Dodge "Charger" is not a Charger at all. Call it what you want, but it's some bloated, squarish, overweight, ugly blob of steel to which the misnomer "Charger" has been applied, most likely in some hallucinatory or drunken office-party haze. An absolute embarrassment to the name and the legacy.

Ouch... I like that car...

Really?? Man, it can't hold a candle to the car that holds the true title! At least the new Mustangs actually resembled the original. The new "Charger" just doesn't even look anything like its namesake.

I offer you the comparison.

Or wait....let me put it another way... lol. I mean, seriously...Big Smile

  • Member since
    May 2013
  • From: From the Mit, but live in Mason, O high ho
Posted by hogfanfs on Thursday, July 16, 2015 7:27 AM

I completely agree with you Black Sheep, but, I can only afford a Charger.  Well, a V6 Charger!

 Bruce

 

 On the bench:  1/48 Eduard MiG-21MF

                        1/35 Takom Merkava Mk.I

 

  • Member since
    January 2013
Posted by BlackSheepTwoOneFour on Wednesday, July 15, 2015 4:41 PM

Id rather have the SRT dodgeChallenger Hellcat than the new Charger. The Hellcat looks a whole lot meaner, sexier, and bad ass than the Charger. Oh yeah, it looks fast too!

  • Member since
    May 2013
  • From: From the Mit, but live in Mason, O high ho
Posted by hogfanfs on Wednesday, July 15, 2015 4:16 PM

the doog

The new Dodge "Charger" is not a Charger at all. Call it what you want, but it's some bloated, squarish, overweight, ugly blob of steel to which the misnomer "Charger" has been applied, most likely in some hallucinatory or drunken office-party haze. An absolute embarrassment to the name and the legacy.

Ouch... I like that car...

 Bruce

 

 On the bench:  1/48 Eduard MiG-21MF

                        1/35 Takom Merkava Mk.I

 

  • Member since
    January 2007
Posted by the doog on Wednesday, July 15, 2015 3:29 PM

The new Dodge "Charger" is not a Charger at all. Call it what you want, but it's some bloated, squarish, overweight, ugly blob of steel to which the misnomer "Charger" has been applied, most likely in some hallucinatory or drunken office-party haze. An absolute embarrassment to the name and the legacy.

  • Member since
    August 2008
Posted by tankerbuilder on Tuesday, July 14, 2015 10:15 AM

Yeah :

    My landlady always brings me one . Every week !

  • Member since
    September 2005
  • From: Illinois: Hive of Scum and Villany
Posted by Sprue-ce Goose on Monday, July 13, 2015 11:23 AM

I check Hobby Lobby and Michaels occasionally.

Both have 40 pct off coupons on their websites

  • Member since
    August 2008
Posted by tankerbuilder on Monday, July 13, 2015 11:15 AM

Cool ;

  I definitely will have to start looking . maybe acquire four or five . I just hope it's not to expensive .

  • Member since
    September 2005
  • From: Illinois: Hive of Scum and Villany
Posted by Sprue-ce Goose on Sunday, July 12, 2015 12:34 PM

tankerbuilder

Ya Know S.G. ;

    That is my most requested rail-road Model , And boy are they scarce !

No longer a need to search very hard for a 1/25 General steam engine.
Round Two models is re-issuing the kit.  YAYYYY ! Stick out tongue
The website says the kit release was June.....................
..............no more hobby shops so I am hoping Hobby Lobby or Michaels carry it.
  • Member since
    August 2008
Posted by tankerbuilder on Sunday, July 12, 2015 12:29 PM

Ya Know S.G. ;

    That is my most requested rail-road Model , And boy are they scarce !

  • Member since
    August 2008
Posted by tankerbuilder on Sunday, July 12, 2015 12:26 PM

I did just that S.G. ;

   Then I built another in Real Turbine Bronze Metallic with a Black Vinyl Top !

  • Member since
    September 2005
  • From: Illinois: Hive of Scum and Villany
Posted by Sprue-ce Goose on Monday, July 6, 2015 9:30 AM

The Dukes of Hazzard Dodge Monoco police car included a shotgun with the rest of the weapons, though I haven't checked to see if it is as poorly molded as the M-16Hmm

  • Member since
    February 2011
  • From: St louis
Posted by Raualduke on Monday, July 6, 2015 12:35 AM

Wow! If you could do the guy leaning out with the shotgun, that would be super sweet

  • Member since
    September 2005
  • From: Illinois: Hive of Scum and Villany
Posted by Sprue-ce Goose on Monday, July 6, 2015 12:08 AM

When the buying frenzy has subsided and there's nary a General Lee in sight..................

There's always "The General" WinkWhistling

http://www.round2models.com/models/mpc/the-general

Tags: 4-4-0 , 4-6-0 , The General
  • Member since
    September 2005
  • From: Illinois: Hive of Scum and Villany
Posted by Sprue-ce Goose on Sunday, July 5, 2015 7:12 PM

waynec

Sprue-ce Goose

Actually, I would prefer to build a Revell 1968 Dodge Charger and paint it black per the car in Bullitt.........Hmm

that would be a sweet build.

I'm kinda sorry I was too young to buy one at the time.
Gotta spend my money elsewhere these days, so a Revell kit will hafta do.Stick out tongue
  • Member since
    April 2006
  • From: Denver, Colorado
Posted by waynec on Sunday, July 5, 2015 6:03 PM

Sprue-ce Goose

Actually, I would prefer to build a Revell 1968 Dodge Charger and paint it black per the car in Bullitt.........Hmm

that would be a sweet build.

Никто не Забыт    (No one is Forgotten)
Ничто не Забыто  (Nothing is Forgotten)

 

  • Member since
    September 2005
  • From: Illinois: Hive of Scum and Villany
Posted by Sprue-ce Goose on Sunday, July 5, 2015 5:23 PM

Actually, I would prefer to build a Revell 1968 Dodge Charger and paint it black per the car in Bullitt.........Hmm

  • Member since
    August 2008
Dodge Chargers ;
Posted by tankerbuilder on Sunday, July 5, 2015 5:21 PM

     Okay what's all the fuss about ?There were many models of Dodge Chargers made . From 1966 and the intervening years and many stunk in their own right .M.P.C. never seemed to be able to get it just right .

      Monogram got it right but in 1/24 . A.M.T got it right , But , you had to be careful .They did the regular topped version and the second smooth back top from Nascar !

 Now as far as markings on the cars .If they were Nascar versions they could no longer have beer sponsors on them .They still sold .The only time I saw a model removed from the marketplace was the Unlimited Hydroplanes like " Miss Budweiser " Because of the markings . It was a very small segment of what they marketed . So rather than re-decal it or spend the money to do so , they just stopped making the model . Denying a whole group of modelers a plastic version of their favorite racing boats !

 The Charger in Pro - modeler form is a ubiquitous , Vinyl topped version you would see on the street . I have seen a few General Lees too ! The 66 Charger was originally a smooth topped version from A.M.T. The M.P.C. version was the loaded Charger with the vinyl top on it , too !

 Plain and simple the Charger was a dodge .Weather based on the Coronet or what . I never saw models of Dodges I wanted so who really cares ?As to the Flag Flap I will let those better equipped to handle it do so . I just want them to leave my models alone ! I still want the unlimited hydros back in anyone's markings and the John Player special formula one car  as well  .Most folks in America didn't even know what John Player was for gosh sakes ! That black car with those fine gold stripes was absolutely awesome to look at .

 I guess that means the Starsky and Hutch Torino will go next huh ?  Oh well , I can't help fix it so at my age I will just build what I have and sit by and listen , comment a little here and there . Then when the day comes , you can pry that cold piece of metal from my hands . ( my Zippo ? Perhaps )

      Afterthought .   When I say Charger I automatically mind - zoom to the first Charger I ever owned a Top Rung ( yeah , vinyl top and all ) 67 Charger  . Now that one was one sexy beast !

JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.