SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

1/48 Mono-cademy P-40 B "Pearl Harbor" (FINISHED)..

15547 views
48 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    February 2012
  • From: Olmsted Township, Ohio
1/48 Mono-cademy P-40 B "Pearl Harbor" (FINISHED)..
Posted by lawdog114 on Wednesday, September 17, 2014 10:50 PM

In my opinion the 1/48 P-40 B/C, the Tomahawk Model 81, is without a doubt the most under-represented subject in 1/48 scale, perhaps in any scale.  How could such an important plane go so unrecognized?  Let's see, the Monogram kit has been around since the Beatles invasion and the Hobbycraft (now Academy) version is rather "basic" and has glaring detail and inaccuracy issues.  I built the Trumpeter kit recently and it was mediocre at best, with a crumby cockpit and mad rivets, more like potholes, everywhere.  There's other stuff but they escape me at the moment.   I simply cannot believe Eduard has not tackled this subject yet with their newfound kit technology.  Like we need another Bf 109 (sorry, I like the Hasegawa versions). 

Anyways, It is generally accepted that the Monogram P-40 is the most "accurate" in outline.  The Hobbycraft has recessed panel lines and is easier to build.  Armed with this logic, I decided to try to create reasonably accurate P-40 B by splicing the two.  I intent to build one of the two P-40's that got airborne at Pearl Harbor and scored kills on the morning of December 7th 1941.   

The most noticeable problem with the Academy kit is the belly, which is too flat and is more appropriate for later P-40 variants (Monogram in olive drab plastic).

To improve this area, I then endeavored to "graft" the Monogram belly onto the Academy kit.  This would have been a piece of cake if I were to procure a Dremel tool, but I still I tend gravitate towards the hard way to do things....some day I'll learn.  I first chopped off the belly of the Monogram kit with a #11 Exacto.  It was easy because the Monogram plastic is soft and flimsy.  I used the same blade and carved out a section of the Academy belly.  I also thinned out the inside of the Monogram belly so it would be easier to manipulate into place. 

Here you can see how it should look...huge difference

Some super glue, trimming and hefty sanding was in order, but I eventually got to this point.  Some putty was needed as well

A quick test fit revealed more sanding and forming was needed but we're getting there.....

Once I thought it looked about right, I hit the area with primer to reveal any areas that needed more attention.  I think this looks about right.  Its not perfect but it will pass. 

As I said before, the kit has other issues, such as a too narrow wing root fillets and inaccurate tail planes, but I can live with these.  The belly modification should go a long way in improving things.  I also hit up Sprue Brothers for a True Details cockpit and Eduard flaps which should further enhance the kit. 

More to come soon.    

Joe

 

 

 

 "Can you fly this plane and land it?...Surely you can't be serious....I am serious, and don't call me Shirley"

 

 

 

 

  • Member since
    June 2013
Posted by bvallot on Thursday, September 18, 2014 12:04 AM

I can't wait to see this frankenstein come together! =]  And I couldn't agree more about the Hawk being underrepresented among modelers, but I suppose the "esplainin" should start with the manufactures just as you pointed out.  I seem to recall a site that outlines an approach like this.  If I can find it, I can drop it here if you'd like.

I did want to ask you about the dimensions of the two wings.  I realize the foreshortened nature of the picture makes the Revell/Monogram look smaller, but is there really much difference here other than the width and girth of the belly?  

Again...good luck!  Looking forward to seeing what you come up with.  =]

On the bench:  

Tamiya F4U-1  Kenneth Walsh

 

  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: Charleston, SC
Posted by sanderson_91 on Sunday, September 21, 2014 9:53 AM

Cool project Joe!  I have another Revell P-40B in the stash that I really don't see building.  I might have to try the same thing you're doing, I just need to pick up the Academy kit.   Definitely adding this build to my favorites!

Seve

 

 

  • Member since
    February 2012
  • From: Olmsted Township, Ohio
Posted by lawdog114 on Monday, September 22, 2014 8:21 PM

Thanks folks.  Frankenstein it is!.  I need a project once in a while to keep me honestBig Smile.   With all this talk about Dremel tools, fate would have me in the tool isle at Wal-Mart this weekend. Knowing I would be doing much more sanding in this project.  I broke down and bought one. 

It was $40.00  well spent.  Since I would be adding a True Details pit, the kit side wall detail needed to be removed.  On the "Low" setting, with a sanding drum bit, this took maybe minute.  I experienced no melting of the plastic.  The trick is to use light pressure and keep the tool moving.  I also cut out the closed radiator flaps with the cutting bit.  It was a piece of cake.  I can't believe I waiting this long to buy one. 

I turned my attention to the TD pit.  It's and ex- KMC mold that was supposed to be designed for this kit. Its beautifully detailed and relatively cheap, but the instructions are horrible.    The hardest  part was removing the resin block from the floor.  I started with a razor saw (to keep the unhealthy resin dust down) but this was taking forever and the piece kept slipping out of my hand. I eventually whipped out the Dremel and sliced it off. 

I then started working on the pit.  I concocted my own Curtiss Bronze Green with one part XF-81 RAF Green, one part XF-5 Flat Green, and two parts XF-8 Flat Blue.  If you would like to see how do my cockpits, see the tutorial in my Dauntless build here:

 http://cs.finescale.com/fsm/modeling_subjects/f/2/t/160714.aspx

I'm not crazy about the TD instrument panel.  The dials are too deep and impossible to drybrush.  I decided to add 5 minute clear epoxy to simulate glass dials. I may paint up the kit part and compare the two.  I just didn't feel like buying a PE set along with a resin pit, nor should one have to. 

I hope to get this installed soon. 

Joe

 

 

 "Can you fly this plane and land it?...Surely you can't be serious....I am serious, and don't call me Shirley"

 

 

 

 

  • Member since
    February 2006
  • From: Smithers, BC, Canada
Posted by ruddratt on Monday, September 22, 2014 9:10 PM

That's some pretty nifty doctoring there Joe, and I see the painting & weathering in the 'pit is up to your usual high quality. Good stuff so far! Yes

Mike

 "We have our own ammunition. It's filled with paint. When we fire it, it makes pretty pictures....scares the hell outta people."

 

  • Member since
    June 2013
Posted by bvallot on Monday, September 22, 2014 9:52 PM

I'm so glad to see you tackling the P-40 again.  Glad to see this happening.  =]  That front office is coming along quite nicely too. That green looks pretty good. I really enjoyed fixing up the TD cockpit.  Happy to see you doing the same one.   Did the seat get left in NMF for the early Pearl Harbor P-40s as well?  I feel like I remember seeing that somewhere...  I ended up doing the same thing for the floor of my TD set...started with a razor saw to keep the dust down and eventually said "f!@k it." Picked up my dremel, changed the bit, and made quick work of it.  =D

Can't wait to see what you have in store next!

On the bench:  

Tamiya F4U-1  Kenneth Walsh

 

  • Member since
    March 2010
  • From: MN
Posted by Nathan T on Monday, September 22, 2014 10:14 PM

Nice project here Joe. Seems every time I use a TD pit I throw away the ip and use the kit one. I find them too overscale and poor dial detail.

 

 

  • Member since
    February 2012
  • From: Olmsted Township, Ohio
Posted by lawdog114 on Monday, September 22, 2014 11:25 PM

Thanks Mike, Britt and Nathan.  

Britt, I've seen many pics of NMF P-40 seats, so I usually follow suit.  Besides, I like the contrast.  

Nathan, I wholeheartedly agree.  The TD IP's are horrible, but the seat and sidewalls shine in this set.  I probably will go ahead and use the kit IP.  I need to get a waldron punch so I can "install" my own dials.  In this case, the seat will be the most prominently seen once closed up.  Perhaps next time I'll try the Legends pit or grab an Eduard PE dash.  

Hey Britt, will this be easy to close up?  and issues to worry about?  Off to check out your WIP.....

Joe

 "Can you fly this plane and land it?...Surely you can't be serious....I am serious, and don't call me Shirley"

 

 

 

 

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Cleveland, OH
Posted by RadMax8 on Tuesday, September 23, 2014 6:51 AM
Joe, I've fixed a True Details IP by filling the craters with some glue, painting the panel, then installing some of Mike Grant's instrument panel decals. I love these things! Also, I use a belt hole punch to cut mine out. As long as you are close to the diameter it's fine. Plus it's a whole lot cheaper than the Waldron punch set!
  • Member since
    February 2012
  • From: Olmsted Township, Ohio
Posted by lawdog114 on Wednesday, September 24, 2014 12:39 AM

Yeah, I was looking into those Waldron punches.....to steep for me.  I like the belt hole punch idea.  I saw that Micro Mark has cheaper versions too.  I'll have to check out the IP decals.  

Joe

 "Can you fly this plane and land it?...Surely you can't be serious....I am serious, and don't call me Shirley"

 

 

 

 

  • Member since
    February 2007
  • From: Brunswick, Ohio
Posted by Buckeye on Wednesday, September 24, 2014 11:19 AM

Wow, that belly fix is way too ambitious for me!  I bought my dremel tool for the dogs nails but they sure do come in handy.  Looking great so far!

Mike

  • Member since
    December 2013
  • From: Greenville, TX.
Posted by Raymond G on Wednesday, September 24, 2014 11:31 AM

Great job so far Joe!!!  I didn't even think about marrying the two together, though I did buy to Revell kits to fix some of the holes and made my own spars in the wheel well.  I think you have the right idea for sure.  I'm assuming you're going to use the Academy fuselage, which should make getting the cockpit in a lot easier.  And really, the only think I remember having any real issues with was the back plate.  But, a little sanding hear a little putty there and it fits rather nicely.  

By the way, I couldn't agree with you more on the underrepresentation of this bird.  For a plane that was so widely used at such a pivotal part of the war I guess the model mfgs would rather make Mustangs and 109s.  It's a shame to, they're such a beautiful bird.  Keep us posted!  Raymond

On the Bench:

U.S.S. Arizona (Revell)

P-51D Tribute (Revell)

57 Chevy Bel Air

 

 

 

 

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Cleveland, OH
Posted by RadMax8 on Wednesday, September 24, 2014 11:51 AM

Here's a fuzzy example of the decals (from 8 years ago!!!!)

  • Member since
    June 2013
Posted by bvallot on Wednesday, September 24, 2014 2:24 PM

lawdog114

Hey Britt, will this be easy to close up?  and issues to worry about?  Off to check out your WIP.....

Joe

Yeah the TD cockpit fit fairly well into the Revell fuselage.  The floor was the only thing that needed some work to get it to play nice with the rest of it.  For the IP, I ended up using epoxy to fix it to the sides of the fuselage.  There was no other solution that came with the resin kit since it wasn't made for the RevelloGram.  I should imagine you getting away with little fuss over the TD cockpit if you're using the Academy fuselage.

On the bench:  

Tamiya F4U-1  Kenneth Walsh

 

  • Member since
    December 2002
Posted by 7474 on Wednesday, September 24, 2014 6:33 PM

Great work so far, I know you'll pull it off

  • Member since
    June 2013
Posted by bvallot on Friday, September 26, 2014 2:41 PM

I've got a quick question for you Joe.  How do the flaps match up between the two kits?  Are they of the same proportions?

On the bench:  

Tamiya F4U-1  Kenneth Walsh

 

  • Member since
    February 2012
  • From: Olmsted Township, Ohio
Posted by lawdog114 on Friday, September 26, 2014 8:29 PM

Thanks everyone.  Britt, I can't answer the flap question because I spent half the night installing Eduard flaps.  The Academy kit doesn't allow for a flap up or down option. 

I spent last night putting it all together, to include installing the Eduard flaps.  All I can say is the Academcraft P-40B is an absolute pig and I now yearn for the Trumpeter version.  Now I know why I only paid 11 bones for it.  For starters, The panel lines are soft and I dont even know if they will hold a wash later. Perhaps the mold is too old.  Also, the Monogram kit has more surface detail and its 50 years old.  I even had to scribe panel lines into the horzontal stabilizers which they forgot Huh?.  Correct me if I'm wrong, but shouldn't there be some ammo doors and such on the top of wings? 

I started my session by carving up the flap area thinning things out with the Dremel.  This made the PE wing detail sit better.  This was a nice set and should improve the area considerably, like putting lipstick on a pig.

I installed the pit, sealed up the fuselage then added the wings. At least the fit of everything was fairly painless, even with the flap detail.  I needed a smidge of putty on the port wing root.  I think the seat brace looks overscale and inaccurate. I may paint it green so it doesn't stick out so much. 

I made new radiator flaps out of styrene.  Of course I had issues with the fit of the chin (intake), which was sightly to narrow for the fuselage.  I used styrene to spread it out to reduce the sanding. 

   

I'm not sure I'm going to waste my good Pearl Harbor Defender decals on this turkey.  We'll see how it looks when painted up. 

On a side note, I got the Trumpeter kit cheap off ebay last week.  Depending how this goes, I may be trading out.    

Is it over yet????

Joe

 

 "Can you fly this plane and land it?...Surely you can't be serious....I am serious, and don't call me Shirley"

 

 

 

 

  • Member since
    June 2013
Posted by bvallot on Friday, September 26, 2014 9:34 PM

I hear ya on that.  Maybe just check the length and the angle that the flaps would match up the wing root at with the other movable part...I'm curious to see if the Academy/Hobbycraft PE Eduard flaps will fit or not.  When I do that other Pearl Harbor P-40B, I will stick to the Revell kit again.  I really didn't mind it.

As for the surface detail on top...that's sucks to hear.  There are ammo doors on top to drop in ammo boxes as well as long access panels underneath for servicing.  I can snap a couple of pictures and put on here to show this if you'd like so you can scribe it in.

Nice work on the PE.  Stuff like that is still a bit hit or miss for me.  I either nail it right away or end up making a mess of it all.  =]

On the bench:  

Tamiya F4U-1  Kenneth Walsh

 

  • Member since
    September 2005
  • From: North Pole, Alaska
Posted by richs26 on Friday, September 26, 2014 9:41 PM

Looks good.  The only question I had is that Curtiss painted the rear cockpit bulkhead a yellow zinc chromate color as in this photo from an article on AVG schemes:

http://www.ratomodeling.com/articles/AVG_cammo/. There are other photos from the Life magazine photoarchives.

WIP:  Monogram 1/72 B-26 (Snaptite) as 73rd BS B-26, 40-1408, torpedo bomber attempt on Ryujo

Monogram 1/72 B-26 (Snaptite) as 22nd BG B-26, 7-Mile Drome, New Guinea

Minicraft 1/72 B-24D as LB-30, AL-613, "Tough Boy", 28th Composite Group

  • Member since
    February 2012
  • From: Olmsted Township, Ohio
Posted by lawdog114 on Saturday, September 27, 2014 12:58 AM

Ah...Britt, now I understand what your asking...Confused.  I was confused because the flaps on the Academy kit are molded closed.  I'll check it out.  I still have the Monogram flaps in the box.  From what I know so far in my quest for a decent Hawk 81, the Trumpy kit is the lesser of three evils should an aftermarket 'pit be found for it.  The problem is the kit is still quite expensive for as flawed as it is.  I found one on Ebay recently for 20 bones including shipping.  Unless I find another Cutting Edge pit, I'll have to bite the bullet and go Aries which is the only one available.  Should I ever try a Monogram kit, It will have to be vintage from when the molds were new (60's early 70's).  The current offering is comical at best. 

Rich, great link...thanks.  I especially dig that assembly line color photo.  The alcove behind the pit where the windows go should be Neutral grey on non AVG Hawks....I may try to repaint it.  If not, next time.  I won't sweat it on this pig...

Joe

 "Can you fly this plane and land it?...Surely you can't be serious....I am serious, and don't call me Shirley"

 

 

 

 

  • Member since
    February 2012
  • From: Olmsted Township, Ohio
Posted by lawdog114 on Wednesday, October 1, 2014 11:15 PM

I sat down and got some quailty bench time in last night.  I fixed a few things here and there, to include cleaning up the leading edge wing roots which were a mess.  I added some semi-circular-shaped styrene stock and poked rivets in them with a sewing needle to leave the illusion they're supposed to be there.  Probably not "correct" but it worked and looks passible to me.  Here's the area primered and ready for paint. It's starting to look like a Hawk 81...

I preshaded all panel lines XF-1 Flat Black.  I then sprayed the inner flaps, wheel wells and gear bays XF-4 Yellow Green, the perfect zinc chromate.  After these were taped off, the bottom got XF-53 Neutral Grey.  This was then cut with XF-2 Flat White and condensation streaks were added.  I then added more XF-2 and lightened the control sufaces.  After a post shade of diluted XF-69 and XF-64, here's where I'm at.  Perhaps it could use more... 

She was flipped over and Blue Tac was used to mask off the demarcation lines thusly...

Since the Academy P-40 is so lacking in the detail department, I needed to be creative with the paint.  started off with straight Gunze Aqueous Olive Drab 1.  This is the perfect USAAC drab to my eye.  Nice and brown.  Too bad its so hard to get nowdays.

Xf-57 Buff was added and condensation streaks were added.  More XF-57 was added for the control surfaces.  I then added the postshade to highlight the areas that were detailed, such as the engine area and control surfaces.  I also added some minor exhaust streaks with diluted XF-1 then XF-53 over it to simulate heat. 

I will add some minor chipping here and there, especially at the wing root, then a gloss coat.

Joe

      

   

 "Can you fly this plane and land it?...Surely you can't be serious....I am serious, and don't call me Shirley"

 

 

 

 

  • Member since
    June 2013
Posted by bvallot on Thursday, October 2, 2014 3:43 PM

Looking pretty sharp!!   =]  How are the props fitting in the spinner?  Will they just drop in?

On the bench:  

Tamiya F4U-1  Kenneth Walsh

 

  • Member since
    February 2012
  • From: Olmsted Township, Ohio
Posted by lawdog114 on Thursday, October 2, 2014 10:44 PM

Thanks Britt.  The prop blades are simplified and shaped wrong.  I'm going to steal three from the spare parts box that were from the Hasegawa P-38.  Hopefully they will just drop right in.

Joe

 "Can you fly this plane and land it?...Surely you can't be serious....I am serious, and don't call me Shirley"

 

 

 

 

  • Member since
    December 2013
  • From: Greenville, TX.
Posted by Raymond G on Friday, October 3, 2014 2:40 AM

Looking good Joe!  I've very impressed.  I don't think we're talking Frankenstein here, rather his bride!  Keep up the good work, Raymond

On the Bench:

U.S.S. Arizona (Revell)

P-51D Tribute (Revell)

57 Chevy Bel Air

 

 

 

 

  • Member since
    June 2013
Posted by bvallot on Monday, October 6, 2014 5:13 PM

I've got another one for you Joe.  I'm looking through cockpit stuff again for that other P-40B...I recall you mentioning that the cockpit was Bronze Green for those Hawks.  I've got a book that I've been using to reference everything with that tells it as Curtiss Green still for those in Pearl Harbor.  They call it resembling a Zinc Chromate color.

So which is more correct?  Was there a time where one was used, discontinued, then a new color selected? What do your sources say?

On the bench:  

Tamiya F4U-1  Kenneth Walsh

 

  • Member since
    August 2014
Posted by Timdude on Monday, October 6, 2014 5:33 PM

The ammo is loaded in from the bottom. They are the long skinny rectangles next to the shell ejection ports.

  • Member since
    February 2012
  • From: Olmsted Township, Ohio
Posted by lawdog114 on Monday, October 6, 2014 7:09 PM

Good question Britt.  I never actually researched it.  On my AVG P-40 I built last year I used the Cutting Edge cockpit.  The instructions recommended "Bronze Green" so I figured they knew what they were talking about.  I found a recipe somewhere on line at that time and this is how it turned out.  Perhaps your references are right...who knows.  I've also been told early P-40s were destined for England, so the pits were grey green, in the likes of a Spitfire or Hurricane.  I have since discovered through photographi evidence the concave alcoves behind the pilot and rear bulkhead should be neutral grey on early B planes.     I decided to leave it as is.  This isn't no award winner anyways.

Anyways, last night I got it decaled.  I went wiith Welch's "160" machine. These were some of the best decals I've ever worked  with.   No issues whatsoever.  I was worried about the "160" but they snuggles right down under Micro Sol. 

As I said, the prop blades with this kit are comical.  They are flat and mishaped, so I raided my spare parts box for replacements.  I found some left over P-38 props which looked close.  Not too bad eh?  Probably not correct, but acceptable for a Frankestein.   I also drilled out the exhaust stubs. 

Flory wash soon.  This one shouldn't be much longer.  Did I mention I found the Trumpy kit on Ebay cheap?  

Joe 

 

 "Can you fly this plane and land it?...Surely you can't be serious....I am serious, and don't call me Shirley"

 

 

 

 

  • Member since
    June 2014
Posted by BrandonK on Monday, October 6, 2014 10:12 PM

Man, she is really starting to come to life. I need to build mine, but alas, this is not the time.

On the bench:

A lot !! And I mean A LOT!!

2024 Kits on deck / in process / completed   

                         14 / 5 / 2  

                              Tongue Tied

  • Member since
    September 2005
  • From: North Pole, Alaska
Posted by richs26 on Tuesday, October 7, 2014 1:19 AM
I'm curious about the alcoves being Neutral Gray. After going through most of the Curtiss-Wright factory photos in the Life photo archives, I did not see one that had the NG as all the photos had OD 41 from the factory, so it might have been a specific squadron color I'm guessing. And you chose correctly for the P-38 prop as they used Curtiss Electric props also.

WIP:  Monogram 1/72 B-26 (Snaptite) as 73rd BS B-26, 40-1408, torpedo bomber attempt on Ryujo

Monogram 1/72 B-26 (Snaptite) as 22nd BG B-26, 7-Mile Drome, New Guinea

Minicraft 1/72 B-24D as LB-30, AL-613, "Tough Boy", 28th Composite Group

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Cleveland, OH
Posted by RadMax8 on Tuesday, October 7, 2014 11:48 AM

Man you crank through your builds! Even tough ones. This is looking great, your paint and shading is outstanding.

So... What's next? The Trumpeter P-40 you picked up for cheap?

JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.