SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

Strategic Air Command GroupBulid

49220 views
548 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    February 2006
  • From: Cincinnati Ohio
Strategic Air Command GroupBulid
Posted by DantheMan85 on Thursday, February 8, 2007 12:58 PM

Hello there, And Welcome to the group bulid.

Strategic-Air-Command GB.

Rules are very simple,

-Start date is Fedruary 9 2007, and end date October 9 2007

-Any SAC aircraft, and any prototype's, any scale rangeing from 1/200 all the way up to 1/32

-Any after maket kits or scratched bulit extra features are welcomed

-I belive SAC was from 1946 to 1992

-And last but not least, have fun and keep us updated on your progress with picuturs 

-And almost forgot cross/overs are allowed, and welcomed Cool [8D]

Im doing a 1/72 B-47EStratoJet 

A list of aircraft you can pick from will be added a little later.

On my Work Bench: Tamiya Ford GT 1/24

Up Coming: ?

           

 

  • Member since
    February 2006
  • From: Cincinnati Ohio
Posted by DantheMan85 on Thursday, February 8, 2007 11:06 PM

Here are most of the SAC aircraft that I've found,

Attack Aircraft,

Grumman SA-16, (later called HU-16)

Bomber Aircraft,

Boeing B-29,B-50 Superfortress

Convair B-58 Hustler

Boeing B-47 StratoJet,  FMModel, 1/72 B-47E Stratojet

Convair B-36 Peacemaker, Wirraway, 1/72 B-36 Peacmaker

Boeing B-52 Stratofortress, R-CMan73 1/72 B-52

? FB-111

North American RB-45C Tornado

Martin RB-57F Canberra, 

North American XB-70 Valkyrie 

Rockwell B-1, Usaf Ssgt B-1A

Cargo and Transport Aircraft,

Curtiss C-46 Commando

Douglas C-47 Skytrain

Douglas C-54 Skymaster

Boeing C-97 Stratofreigther

Fairchild C-119 Flying Boxcar

Fairchild C-123 Provider

Douglas C-124 Globemaster II

Beech C-45 Expiditer

Douglas C-54 Cargomaster

Fairchild C-119 Packet

Fairchild C-123

Douglas C-124 Globemaster II

Boeing KC-135 Stratotanker

Gates C-21 LearJet

Command AirCraft-

Boeing E-4A/B Flying Command Post, R-CMan73, 1/72 E-3 Heller/ mph34 1/72 E-3A AWACS

? EC-135 Looking Glass

? RC-135 Command Posts

Boeing E-48 NOAC

VC C-5A Galaxy

Fighter Aircraft,

Republic F-80 Shooting Star

North American F-82 Twin Mutang

Republic F-84 Thunderjet, Yardbird78 1/48 F-84F Thunderstreak

North American F-86 Sabre

North American F-51 Mustang

Lockheed F-80 Shooting Star

North American F-82 Twin Mustang

Republic RF-84K Thunderflash

McDonnell F-101A Voodoo

Convair F-102 Delta Dagger

Lockheed F-104 Starfighter

General Dynamics FB-111 Ardvard

Reconnaissance Aircraft,

Lockheed U-2A, C Spyplane small Dragon Lady

Lochheed U-2R or TR-1 Large Dragon Lady, DesertRat, 1/48 U-2R

Lockheed SR-71 Blackbird

Cessna U-3A, U-38 Blue Canoe

DeHavilland U-6 Beaver 

Tankers,

Boeing KB-29 Tanker

Boeing KC-97 Stratotanker

Boeing KC-135 Stratotanker

McDonald Douglas KC-10 tanker

Trainers,

Raytheon T-6A Texan II

North American T-28 Trojan

Lockheed T-33 Shooting Star

Northrop T-38 Talon

DeHavilland DV-18 Twin Otter

Convair T-29 Flying classroom

Lockheed T-33

North American T-39 Sabreliner

 

 

 

 

 

 

On my Work Bench: Tamiya Ford GT 1/24

Up Coming: ?

           

 

  • Member since
    November 2004
  • From: Freeport, IL USA
Posted by cdclukey on Friday, February 9, 2007 12:26 PM

Oh man, I wish I could get in on this one but I'm just not able to. I'm a SAC vet; I was a KC-135 crew chief in the early Nineties.

That brings me to the following: As you can see by my post, SAC lasted a long way past 1970. The command was broken up in 1992.

The SAC bomber assets were joined to the Tactical Air Command fighter and fighter-bomber force to form Air Combat Command. The tankers were joined with Military Airlift Command to form Air Mobility Command. The missiles were joined with the Navy's ballistic sub force to form Strategic Command, better known as STRATCOM.

  • Member since
    February 2006
  • From: Cincinnati Ohio
Posted by DantheMan85 on Friday, February 9, 2007 12:54 PM
Opps, thanks cdclukey my mistake.  Think I found that info wrong, so SAC was from 1946 up to 1992.  So you were a KC-135 crew chief, where were you located at?

On my Work Bench: Tamiya Ford GT 1/24

Up Coming: ?

           

 

  • Member since
    September 2015
  • From: The Redwood Empire
Posted by Aaronw on Friday, February 9, 2007 3:14 PM

Bah, a pox on you and your groupbuild, you tempt me sorely.

 

I have already over extended myself with GB's currently but I will re-evaluate my position in a couple months as I have been having a very strong urge to build a B-58.

 

BTW for your list the B-58 was built by Convair.

  • Member since
    February 2006
  • From: Cincinnati Ohio
Posted by DantheMan85 on Friday, February 9, 2007 4:54 PM

Thanks Aaronw, I couldn't find the name of the builder.

I've found to great sites for finding info, pictures, different models on the aircraft.

http://www.globalsecurity.org/index.html

http://www.strategic-air-command.com/home.htm

On my Work Bench: Tamiya Ford GT 1/24

Up Coming: ?

           

 

  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: SF Bay Area
Posted by chasd25 on Friday, February 9, 2007 7:04 PM

Oh man, I got one too many group builds going on right now, but I'd love to join in. Are cross-overs allowed?

Charlie

 ;;;

  • Member since
    February 2006
  • From: Cincinnati Ohio
Posted by DantheMan85 on Friday, February 9, 2007 7:50 PM

Ok listen up Cool [8D], those who are joining post what aircraft your going to do.  And I'll add your name to the master list.  More than one person can do the same aircraft to.

Charlie Sign - Welcome [#welcome], cross-overs are allowed

 

On my Work Bench: Tamiya Ford GT 1/24

Up Coming: ?

           

 

  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: 40 klicks east of the Gateway
Posted by yardbird78 on Friday, February 9, 2007 8:33 PM

I was a "SAC Weenie" or "SAC Trained Killer" for 16 years, 1963 to 1979, so I am "obligated" to enter this Group Build.  I worked with the SR-71 for 12 years so I should build one of those, but I would prefer to do something different.  I would like to enter a Monogram 1/48 F-84F Thunderstreak.

Your list of candidate aircraft includes several that I don't think were ever part of SAC and I can add several to the list that were.

First the ones that weren't part of SAC.

A-1 Skyraider

AC-119

AC-130

A-10

C-133 (it hauled SAC's missiles, but as part of TAC)

C-141

C-5A

C-9

C-17

C-27

EC-121

E-3A AWACs

E-8C

F-89

F-94

F-100

F-104

F-111, (FB-111 was, but not standard F-111)

F-4 Phantom

F-5

F-15

F-16

F-22

T-1

Darwin, O.F. Alien [alien] 

 

 ,,

The B-52 and me, we have grown old, gray and overweight together.

  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: 40 klicks east of the Gateway
Posted by yardbird78 on Friday, February 9, 2007 8:47 PM

Aircraft that WERE part of SAC include:

Grumman SA-16, (later called HU-16) Albatross

Cessna U-3A and U-3B Blue Canoe

DeHavilland U-6 Beaver

Sikorsky H-19 or S-55 Chocktaw

Bell UH-1B and UH-1N Iroquois, affectionately called "HUEY"

North American F-51 Mustang

Lockheed F-80 Shooting Star

North American F-82 Twin Mustang

Republic F-84E Thunderjet

Republic F-84F Thunderstreak 

Republic RF-84K Thunderflash

North American F-86 Sabrejet

McDonnell F-101A Voodoo

Convair F-102A Delta Dagger

North American B-25 Mitchell

Douglas A-26 or B-26 Invader

Boeing B-29 Superfortress

Convair B-36 Peacemaker

North American RB-45C Tornado

Boeing B-47 Stratojet 

Boeing B-50 Superfortress

Boeing B-52 Stratofortress

Martin RB-57D/F Canberra

Convair B-58 Hustler

North American XB-70, (not operationally, but prototype carried SAC shield)

Boeing E-4A/B Flying Command Post

Beech C-45 Expediter

Douglas C-47 Goony Bird

Douglas C-54 cargomaster

Fairchild C-82 Packet, (forerunner of C-119)

Fairchild C-119 Flying Boxcar or Dollar Nineteen

Fairchild C-123 Provider

Douglas C-124 Globemaster II

Lockheed DC-130A Hercules, drone carrier

Hiller HH-43 Pedro

Convair T-29 Flying classroom

Lockheed T-33 Shooting Star

Cessna T-37 Tweety Bird (the almighty TWEET)

Northrop T-38 Talon

North American T-39 Sabreliner

Lockheed U-2A & C, small version of Dragon Lady

Lockheed, U-2R or TR-1 large version of Dragon Lady

IThere were probably others that I am overlooking.  This list is definately not all inclusive.

Darwin, O.F. Alien [alien]

 ,,

The B-52 and me, we have grown old, gray and overweight together.

  • Member since
    February 2006
  • From: Cincinnati Ohio
Posted by DantheMan85 on Friday, February 9, 2007 9:32 PM
Yardbird, thanks for the update on the list.  Im not sure but don't think the F-117 was apart of SAC?

On my Work Bench: Tamiya Ford GT 1/24

Up Coming: ?

           

 

  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: 40 klicks east of the Gateway
Posted by yardbird78 on Saturday, February 10, 2007 5:51 AM

 FeldMarSchall Model wrote:
Yardbird, thanks for the update on the list.  Im not sure but don't think the F-117 was apart of SAC?

Correct.  The Lockheed F-117 Nighthawk was never part of SAC.

Darwin, O.F. Alien [alien]

 ,,

The B-52 and me, we have grown old, gray and overweight together.

  • Member since
    November 2004
  • From: Freeport, IL USA
Posted by cdclukey on Saturday, February 10, 2007 9:35 AM
I was with the 379th Wing at Wurtsmith and the 380th Wing at Plattsburgh. One cool thing about Plattsburgh was that I got to crew the wing's VIP jet, The Spirit of Plattsburgh.
  • Member since
    February 2006
  • From: Cincinnati Ohio
Posted by DantheMan85 on Monday, February 12, 2007 4:42 PM
Well it came today, I got it out and it doen't tell anything about what paints to use.  On some area's I tell what paint to use, then the other half got no clue.

On my Work Bench: Tamiya Ford GT 1/24

Up Coming: ?

           

 

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: South Central Wisconsin
Posted by Daywalker on Monday, February 12, 2007 6:12 PM
Wow... another GB I want to join!  Not sure if I can, as I am already part of a couple!

Frank 

 

  • Member since
    August 2006
  • From: In the Middle of a Corn Field
Posted by mr.chex on Monday, February 12, 2007 6:34 PM
I'm really tempted to enter this group build since i live close to the SAC museum and have plenty of pictures. So i think i might with i don't know what yet.
GO HUSKERS!!!! Projects 1/72 VF-102 F-14B "Diamond Backs" 1/72 German Mig-29 1/72 German RF-4 1/48 What If German F-16
  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: South Central Wisconsin
Posted by Daywalker on Monday, February 12, 2007 6:43 PM

mr.chex-

You're lucky to live near the SAC museum, I have been there many times on my way to visit my father in Lincoln.  Very cool aircraft there!

Frank 

 

  • Member since
    February 2007
  • From: Arlington, VA
Question on This GB...
Posted by flynavy1958 on Monday, February 12, 2007 8:16 PM

Hey fellas,

As the name suggests, I don't know a great deal about the USAF... but I am interested in the GB:

Does the model need to be an aircraft simply used by SAC, or should it be in SAC markings?  Would a C-54 in markings for the Berlin Airlift count?

Flynavy1958

 

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: South Central Wisconsin
Posted by Daywalker on Monday, February 12, 2007 8:50 PM
Is a Korean war F-51 considered SAC?  If not, what markings would qualify for this aircraft?  I have one I started a while back, and might brush the dust off of it for this build.

Frank 

 

  • Member since
    February 2006
  • From: Cincinnati Ohio
Posted by DantheMan85 on Monday, February 12, 2007 11:16 PM
As of now I would say the aircraft would have been used by SAC, even if the plane doesn't display the SAC markings. 

On my Work Bench: Tamiya Ford GT 1/24

Up Coming: ?

           

 

  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Canada / Czech Republic
Posted by upnorth on Tuesday, February 13, 2007 1:31 PM

I can't join the group build, but I can't help but notice that Yardbird stated SAC did not use the T-37.

While I certainly won't argue strongly with one who was actually a member of the organization; I do recall taking a tour of Fairchild AFB back in 87 when BUFFs were still there and being quite surprized by the sheer abundance of Tweets out on the tarmac. When I asked one of the bomber crew guys about it, he told me all bomber units had a fleet of T-37s or T-38s in adition to the bombers so that the bomber pilots could keep their flight hours up to quota but without the staggering expense of doing it in the bombers themselves.

I also recall an airshow in my hometown a few years later when a B-1 was brought up from Grand Forks AFB and two T-38s came with it and I do recall that at least one of the Talons had matching unit markings to the Bone.

So I suppose my question for Yardbird is, would those T-37s and T-38s attached to SAC bomber wings actually be considered SAC aircraft or just "loaners" from Training Command?

In any case, I'd think they'd be eligible for this GB as they were utilised on a regular basis by SAC crews even if Training Command might have had ultimate official jurisdiction over them.

  • Member since
    August 2006
  • From: SW Illinois
Posted by texgal45 on Tuesday, February 13, 2007 3:45 PM

I can remember T-38s flying formation with the Blackbird at Beale, but I don't know anything about the T-37 being used like that. 

Grandma L 

bred, born & raised in North Texas, now displaced to Yankee Land

  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: 40 klicks east of the Gateway
Posted by yardbird78 on Tuesday, February 13, 2007 3:57 PM
 upnorth wrote:

I can't join the group build, but I can't help but notice that Yardbird stated SAC did not use the T-37.

While I certainly won't argue strongly with one who was actually a member of the organization; I do recall taking a tour of Fairchild AFB back in 87 when BUFFs were still there and being quite surprized by the sheer abundance of Tweets out on the tarmac. When I asked one of the bomber crew guys about it, he told me all bomber units had a fleet of T-37s or T-38s in adition to the bombers so that the bomber pilots could keep their flight hours up to quota but without the staggering expense of doing it in the bombers themselves.

I also recall an airshow in my hometown a few years later when a B-1 was brought up from Grand Forks AFB and two T-38s came with it and I do recall that at least one of the Talons had matching unit markings to the Bone.

So I suppose my question for Yardbird is, would those T-37s and T-38s attached to SAC bomber wings actually be considered SAC aircraft or just "loaners" from Training Command?

In any case, I'd think they'd be eligible for this GB as they were utilised on a regular basis by SAC crews even if Training Command might have had ultimate official jurisdiction over them.

Several SAC bases definately DID use the T-38 as a proficiency trainer as indicated by upnorths description.  I am not aware of the T-37 being used in that role, but that does NOT mean that it didn't happen on one or more SAC bases.  The T-38s at Beale were used by both SR-71 and U-2 pilots, (as well as VIP officers to accrue their minimum monthly flying hours), for currency training and chase plane for the SR-71.  During the early stages of the SR program, there were two T-38 chase planes each time the SR flew a mission.  Later, this was reduced to one chase plane and still later to only when there was a problem or special need for the Talon.  Of course the T-38 could only keep up with the SR in the sub-sonic or low super sonic portions of the flight.  They were officially SAC aircraft and carried appropriate markings.

Darwin, O.F. Alien [alien]

 ,,

The B-52 and me, we have grown old, gray and overweight together.

  • Member since
    November 2004
  • From: Freeport, IL USA
Posted by cdclukey on Wednesday, February 14, 2007 12:26 PM

Allow me to settle this, if I may. When I was stationed at Wurtsmith with the 379th Bombardment Wing (Heavy), we had a number of T-37 Tweets that were used by the bomber pilots and occasionally some of the tanker pilots--it's easier to get flight time in tankers, for obvious reasons. We were a SAC wing with B-52Gs and KC-135As. My wife's post was at the weather station, which was right next to the section of ramp the Tweets were parked on...I've teased her a couple of times that when my skills get better I'm going to build her a Tweet model with a sound card in the display case so she can push a button and relive the joys of having one taxi by her window.

I cannot confirm whether these Tweets were owned by Air Training Command or the Mighty SAC, but SAC pilots were virtually the only users while they were at these bases.

So, it's not my build (and heck, I'm not even in it!) but I'd suggest the Tweets are good to go.

  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, February 14, 2007 4:54 PM
 yardbird78 wrote:
 upnorth wrote:

I can't join the group build, but I can't help but notice that Yardbird stated SAC did not use the T-37.

While I certainly won't argue strongly with one who was actually a member of the organization; I do recall taking a tour of Fairchild AFB back in 87 when BUFFs were still there and being quite surprized by the sheer abundance of Tweets out on the tarmac. When I asked one of the bomber crew guys about it, he told me all bomber units had a fleet of T-37s or T-38s in adition to the bombers so that the bomber pilots could keep their flight hours up to quota but without the staggering expense of doing it in the bombers themselves.

I also recall an airshow in my hometown a few years later when a B-1 was brought up from Grand Forks AFB and two T-38s came with it and I do recall that at least one of the Talons had matching unit markings to the Bone.

So I suppose my question for Yardbird is, would those T-37s and T-38s attached to SAC bomber wings actually be considered SAC aircraft or just "loaners" from Training Command?

In any case, I'd think they'd be eligible for this GB as they were utilised on a regular basis by SAC crews even if Training Command might have had ultimate official jurisdiction over them.

Several SAC bases definately DID use the T-38 as a proficiency trainer as indicated by upnorths description.  I am not aware of the T-37 being used in that role, but that does NOT mean that it didn't happen on one or more SAC bases.  The T-38s at Beale were used by both SR-71 and U-2 pilots, (as well as VIP officers to accrue their minimum monthly flying hours), for currency training and chase plane for the SR-71.  During the early stages of the SR program, there were two T-38 chase planes each time the SR flew a mission.  Later, this was reduced to one chase plane and still later to only when there was a problem or special need for the Talon.  Of course the T-38 could only keep up with the SR in the sub-sonic or low super sonic portions of the flight.  They were officially SAC aircraft and carried appropriate markings.

Darwin, O.F. Alien [alien]

I too was a member of SAC. Yes SAC did use T-37's as trainers. Here is a link with all aircraft that was used by my beloved SAC

http://www.strategic-air-command.com/aircraft/0-aircraft_home_page.htm

There are 68 total aircraft used by SAC

4 Attack Aircraft

9 Bombers

16 Cargo

7 Command

19 Fighters

2 Reconnaissance

4 Tankers

7 Trainers

If all is possible I was a Phase Dock Inspecter on the E-3 Awacs I would ilke to join if cross-building is allowed. All I have done at this time for another GB is some paint. If this is O.K I would like to enter with this aircraft. If it is not then I would like to do a B-52.

                                                                                       Thanks R-CMAN73

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: South Central Wisconsin
Posted by Daywalker on Wednesday, February 14, 2007 5:42 PM

I wanted to build the XB-70, but lack of space for a 32" long finished model put the kabosh on it.

Frank 

 

  • Member since
    January 2006
  • From: Pineapple Country, Queensland, Australia
Posted by Wirraway on Wednesday, February 14, 2007 11:23 PM

Herr Feldmarschall, 

 Put me down for a B57 Intruder in 1/72 by Revell (my oldest kit, and time for it to graduate OOB)

Do we hav e a GB logo yet ?  I'm sure there is someone computer literate that can do something with the SAC sash. (I've always liked that iron fist with the lightning bolts coming out of it)

"Growing old is inevitable; growing up is optional"

" A hobby should pass the time - not fill it"  -Norman Bates

 

GIF animations generator gifup.com

  • Member since
    February 2006
  • From: Cincinnati Ohio
Posted by DantheMan85 on Wednesday, February 14, 2007 11:44 PM

R-CMan73, Cross/overs are allowed.  Your entering a E-3 Awacs, and a B-52?

Wirraway, I'll put you down for that.  I've got some Sac logos, just need to resize them in photoshop.

On my Work Bench: Tamiya Ford GT 1/24

Up Coming: ?

           

 

  • Member since
    November 2004
  • From: Freeport, IL USA
Posted by cdclukey on Thursday, February 15, 2007 1:10 AM
You were a phase guy? Awesome, so was I! I was in phase with the 379th...tail inspector. When i PCS'd to Plattsburgh thy moved me out to the line.
  • Member since
    January 2006
  • From: Pineapple Country, Queensland, Australia
Posted by Wirraway on Friday, February 16, 2007 6:46 AM

Herr Feldmarschall/Yardbird

I may have jumped the gun here - the RB-57F was the long wing/recon/surveillance bird, correct ?  What I have is a B-57B.  Was that still a SAC aircraft ?

"Growing old is inevitable; growing up is optional"

" A hobby should pass the time - not fill it"  -Norman Bates

 

GIF animations generator gifup.com

JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.