SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

'Q' ship reissue

29068 views
202 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    December 2005
  • From: Seattle, Colorado
Posted by onyxman on Wednesday, January 7, 2015 9:47 AM

This one shows the side ports the best, probably because the hull isn't black:

  • Member since
    December 2005
  • From: Seattle, Colorado
Posted by onyxman on Wednesday, January 7, 2015 9:07 AM

Indeed, there are some interesting photos there. Speaking of walking off a sinking ship into the water, I heard a story from a Capt Crawford when I was studying for my Chief Mate's exam. He was a young Third Mate on a small frieghter in the Gulf of Mexico when a torpedo hit. He left his stateroom, climbed into a lifeboat and released the gripes and falls as the ship sank out from under him. He remarked that the torpedo probably cost more than the old rust bucket was worth.

  • Member since
    October 2003
  • From: Canada
Posted by sharkbait on Wednesday, January 7, 2015 3:19 AM

charlesmccain.com/.../u-247

Interesting photo just down the page.

Found it while researching something else.

You have never been lost until you've been lost at Mach 3!

  • Member since
    September 2012
Posted by GMorrison on Tuesday, January 6, 2015 10:15 PM

One hand, two hand three hand bunch!

I need to look at the pics too because I need those ports.

Daylight coming and I want to go home.

 Modeling is an excuse to buy books.

 

  • Member since
    January 2015
Posted by PFJN on Tuesday, January 6, 2015 7:41 PM

Hi,

I've sanded down most of the detail off the decks, except for the chocks (though I accidentally crushed one of those, so I'll have to figure out how to repair or replace it).  I'll probably will sand the hull down later.  One thing I haven't decided on yet though is whether I should try and add a knuckle at the stern like in this image

PS.  With regards to gluing the plastic parts together, I'v been using styrene channels, I beams and angles to reinforce alot of the joints, like shown on the bottom side of some of the pieces I've been modifying below Smile

 

1st Group BuildSP

  • Member since
    December 2005
  • From: Seattle, Colorado
Posted by onyxman on Tuesday, January 6, 2015 4:19 PM
Yes, mine will be either the Carolyn or Evelyn as merchant ships. Re hull plating, mine is already sanded off, but I notice on some of the photos that there were some side-port doors. My guess is that they were used in Caribbean ports for loading cargo up a ramp into the holds by muscle power. Anyway, as you say, on the black hull details won't be too noticeable so I may not bother to add them.
  • Member since
    September 2012
Posted by GMorrison on Tuesday, January 6, 2015 2:09 PM

PJ welcome aboard. Your subject looks to be pretty close. And this'll certainly be a couple-three "pretty close" type models. I'm building a civilian too. Guessing you are too, Fred?

I'm scratchbuilding everything except the hull.

I've discovered the hard way that the plastic isn't too glue friendly, and the hull half mating surfaces were inadequate. It's come apart at the seams, kind of like the real Atik did.

I'm leaving it that way for now as I'm not too happy with the way it looks so far and it needs some reshaping.

Your back-to-back thing to match the cut outs is a great tip.

Since yours is wood, I assume you are smoothing over all the plating?

I would have even though mine is steel, because the molded in patterns are really weird. But since its going to be flat black, it wont hopefully be too noticeable.

But i am scrapping the decks for that reason.

And to answer an earlier question, Fred, I am going to model the upper deck houses and boat decks, bridges etc. as though they were all wood, which is probably the case.

Subject for another discussion- World War 1 concrete ships. There's one grounded in shallow water near where we are, and I think there's one off a beach in Virginia or NC?

EDIT: Cape May New Jersey

 Modeling is an excuse to buy books.

 

  • Member since
    January 2015
Posted by PFJN on Tuesday, January 6, 2015 12:10 PM

Hi,

I can't wait to see how your model & GMorrison's model turn out.  It's kind of fun to see all the stuff different people do with the same basic starting point.  [And to tell the truth, since the base model isn't too over detailed or complex, it actually makes it a little bit more fun & easier to me to go ahead and try out different ideas :) ]

1st Group BuildSP

  • Member since
    December 2005
  • From: Seattle, Colorado
Posted by onyxman on Tuesday, January 6, 2015 11:23 AM

Very good!  I'm scratch building everything except the hull. Work will resume soon after the holiday clean up.

  • Member since
    January 2015
Posted by PFJN on Monday, January 5, 2015 5:12 PM

Hi,

I went ahead and taped off a rough main deck line on one side of the ship so I could pencil in the new cut outs for the bulwarks on my lengthened fore and aft main decks, using a cutout of the drawing for the Parent Hull I selected as a guide, as shown in the image below.

After that I taped the two sides of the hull together (outer shell to outer shell) so I could try and make the cuts on each side similar, as shown below.

So far the two halves of the hull look pretty good, but I still need to do a little cleaning up.  After that though I went ahead and started to cut up the existing deck and superstructure to try and come close to matching my revised layout.  I decided to try and reuse as much of the existing structure as a I can so I did a lot of chopping to try and get everything close to the shape that I want.  In the end though I'm going to likely end up needing to add a fair bit of new plastic in the deck house, especially since the deck heights for my ship will be higher than that in the original design, since I'm trying to model a ship about 1/288th scale instead of 1/390th scale.  As such, I'm thinking of maybe using the existing "plastic" to serve as a framework for the lower deck or two of the superstructure, but then cover over much of it with thin sheets of styrene and/or putty to help cover any defects and to make it look nicer.

Anyway, the image below shows my 1st attempts at chopping up the existing main deck and superstructure along these lines.

From this picture you can kind of see where I'm going to have to add a fair bit of plastic on the main deck near where the cargo holds will be, as well as the start of a framework for the 1st superstructure level.

Smile

1st Group BuildSP

  • Member since
    January 2015
Posted by PFJN on Friday, January 2, 2015 6:34 PM

Hi,

I had a chance to download some of the plans from the Ferris Ship site and scale them to about the right size for the Q ship model.  Below are a couple images from the site with parts of the Q ship laid ontop for comparison.

Overall everything looks pretty good, with the Poop deck looking about the right length but I think that if I will need to trim back the Foc'sle and mid deck house a bit.    Since the existing decks have some small chocks molded in them and they seem to scale pretty well to the chocks on the Ferris ship drawings, I may try and re use some of the deck structure, but I think that everything above the deck I'll have to do from scratch, in order to get the scale right.  At about 1/288th scale, once inch will be 24 ft or 1/16 inch will be 1.5ft, so a deck height of about 6/16th (3/8th) an inch (plus or minus) would probably be reasonable and that should hopefully maybe allow me to use some standard Styrene strip sizes to try and build up a deck house.  

Other than that the foc'sle height looks OK, but I may have to raise the poop deck just a little.

Can't wait to start.

Pat

PS. I think I decided to go for a dazzle paint job, but haven't decided on a specif scheme yet.  Fortunately there appears to be some good sites on the internet for that info too, like this one - http://dazzle.risd.edu/

1st Group BuildSP

  • Member since
    December 2005
  • From: Seattle, Colorado
Posted by onyxman on Friday, January 2, 2015 10:26 AM

By all means join in the fun, Pat. That link is a great resource.

Fred

  • Member since
    January 2015
Posted by PFJN on Thursday, January 1, 2015 7:32 PM

Hi.  

I had seen a copy of this model at my local hobby store but wasn't sure if I should buy it.  However, looking over what some posters here have shown and from some other pictures of the model on the web I decided to go ahead and get a copy for myself.   I'm more interested in the hull as just an example of an early 20th century merchant ship than necessarily as a Q-ship, so if it doesn't match any real life known vessel its not a real big deal to me.  I can't decide though whether to try and model the ship just as a Tramp steamer or to maybe try and do some sort of WWI era dazzle camouflage, though.

Also, I haven't decided whether to try and complete the ship mostly as-is out of the box, with perhaps some photo-etched rails and such, or if I should try and make some more extensive changes.  One thing that I have noted is that the deck heights and such seem more or less reasonable for the 1/390th scale listed for the vessel (1in = 32.5ft or each deck equals some where around 1/4in)  but as others have noted in this thread previously the hull width seems kind of high.  However, in looking around the internet I noticed some information on wooden steam ships that were built by the US in this era which were only about 282ft long (www.cocatrez.net/.../FerrisShips.html) but appeared to have similar length to beam ratios and hull depth to length ratios as the model does.  

So, an alternative might be to try and make this ship look more or less roughly like one of those wooden vessels (or something very similar) instead.  I'd have to rescale the ship to be about 1/288th scale or so, and would have to redo the deck houses, but that might be an interesting alternative.

Anyway, I'm really excited to see how the ships that the posters Onyxman and GMorrison are building turn out, and hopefully may try and post some pictures of my own (though I doubt mine will turn out anywhere as nice looking as what they have posted so far :) ).

Happy new year,

Pat

1st Group BuildSP

  • Member since
    December 2005
  • From: Seattle, Colorado
Posted by onyxman on Friday, December 19, 2014 9:45 AM
Looking at those photos, it seems like the Boat Decks are a lighter shade than the main deck. I wonder if they could be wooden planking?
  • Member since
    October 2003
  • From: Canada
Posted by sharkbait on Friday, December 19, 2014 6:31 AM

I think this tread should be renamed "silk purse out of a sow's ear" Great Stuff!

At the beginning everyone thought this kit was $$()( but this now stands as an example of

A) the fun we had building any kit in the old daze

B) Sometimes the hobby is just fun and that is realy important.

You have never been lost until you've been lost at Mach 3!

  • Member since
    December 2005
  • From: Seattle, Colorado
Posted by onyxman on Thursday, December 18, 2014 7:53 AM

Here it is with a light coat of primer to see where I still need to sand. I found anchors in my spares. I want to do this entirely from my spares, if possible.

  • Member since
    August 2007
  • From: back country of SO-CAL, at the birth place of Naval Aviation
Posted by DUSTER on Saturday, December 13, 2014 4:46 PM

onyxman
Probably coincidental, but it's odd that this new length we have figured out is EXACTLY the length of the box.

 Thus "box scale" is born

Steve

Building the perfect model---just not quite yet  Confused

  • Member since
    December 2005
  • From: Seattle, Colorado
Posted by onyxman on Saturday, December 13, 2014 8:49 AM
Probably coincidental, but it's odd that this new length we have figured out is EXACTLY the length of the box.
  • Member since
    September 2012
Posted by GMorrison on Friday, December 12, 2014 3:24 PM

That looks pretty darn well done.

Here's my effort to correct the openings.

Bear in mind my cut outs include the areas that will have the quarter round fillets. I'll add those back in with thin sheet.

 Modeling is an excuse to buy books.

 

  • Member since
    August 2014
  • From: Willamette Valley, Oregon
Posted by goldhammer on Friday, December 12, 2014 9:23 AM

Nice.  Looks good.  Can't wait to see her with the 3 or 4 inchers in the hidden redoubts.

  • Member since
    December 2005
  • From: Seattle, Colorado
Posted by onyxman on Friday, December 12, 2014 8:39 AM

Here she is with the spacing. I ended up adding 48mm to each end. 

  • Member since
    December 2005
  • From: Seattle, Colorado
Posted by onyxman on Thursday, December 11, 2014 9:32 PM
That's interesting. They give the length as 318 ft. They also say a PBY is a four engine plane.
  • Member since
    June 2004
  • From: 29° 58' N 95° 21' W
Posted by seasick on Thursday, December 11, 2014 5:48 PM

One last research topic. I found this page at the USN Naval Historical Center:

Q-ships during World War II

Chasing the ultimate build.

  • Member since
    December 2005
  • From: Seattle, Colorado
Posted by onyxman on Thursday, December 11, 2014 11:54 AM

I finished the spacer on the fore deck. With judicious bending of the Evergreen sheet, I can get it to curve around the turn of the bilge for a full hull. Both fore and aft, it's a simple curve, not a compound curve. This morning I dry fitted the deck house and half the stack with the stern part out at the proper spacing. This silly novelty looks almost pretty! The proportions now match up. I measured what I estimated would be a deep draft and calculated it using the 1/295 scale, and it came to 21 ft. Only now do I see that 21 ft is just what is listed as deep draft for the Carolyn.

Dang it, I need to be working on my Liberty ship, but this is fun.

Fred

Pics later

  • Member since
    December 2005
  • From: Seattle, Colorado
Posted by onyxman on Thursday, December 11, 2014 6:50 AM

I'm not sure what those numbers are. I'll have to do some better measuring, but the deep draft, from the line at the top of the stern aperture, looks to be about 21 feet. Midship, the line I drew looks like a draft of around 14 feet. IF I do a waterlined hull I will give her a drag aft, but it looks like I might be able to do a full hull model at this point.

It looks to me that there are crude molded railings on the stern and forecastle. I will take them off. Also to do before I go much further: those portholes on the main hull look way oversized. But I want to compare the positions of them to pictures. Then if the positions look accurate I'll drill smaller holes before I do any sanding to eliminate my seams around the spacers. That's 4 seams, not 2 as I said earlier.

  • Member since
    September 2012
Posted by GMorrison on Wednesday, December 10, 2014 6:26 PM

Not only are the scallops too small, but they are weird shapes.  I really only have one photo to go on.

http://www.eaglespeak.us/2006/09/sunday-ship-history-q-ships.html

At the ends of reason re: scaling, I printed the underway shot and roughly scaled the basics.

Fred, whats the laden freeboard you picked? It looks to be about 12-15 ft here.

I get roughly 45 ft, 88 ft, 120 ft, 100 ft and 40 feet stem to stern. PLEASE ignore these numbers- I'll do a better job on a drafting table.

The bottom edges of the cut outs are at about deck height, plus a little. So I guess I can mark where the deck goes on the insides of each half, and glue my row of blocks to attach it to. Have to remove all the Lindberg locating ridges too. All pretty easy stuff. Then I'll mark out the ends of the cut outs, which are pretty square, make my cuts and curve the ends. Much more regular geometry than the kit., nice and square quarter round at the deck house and a gentle curve fore and aft.

In the past I've cut the openings square all the way to the bulkheads and added back quarter fillets made from thin stock. But that's probably going too far on this old sea dog.

 Modeling is an excuse to buy books.

 

  • Member since
    August 2014
  • From: Willamette Valley, Oregon
Posted by goldhammer on Wednesday, December 10, 2014 6:11 PM

GM-  are you going to lengthen the well deck "dips" on the sides toward the center section?  looks a little odd with that length of center section.  To me would be more balanced if the well deck dips and the center were all close to same length.  But that brings into the mix hold covers and crane positions.

Just curious, not a ship modeler.

  • Member since
    September 2012
Posted by GMorrison on Wednesday, December 10, 2014 6:00 PM

Looks like a real ship doesn't it?

I haven't even looked at the screw.

I suppose bilge keels would be appropriate.

And I had to chuck that rudder.

I think Bondo found a front-on photo of a T2 bridge and blew it up and traced it. Smart dude.

 Modeling is an excuse to buy books.

 

  • Member since
    December 2005
  • From: Seattle, Colorado
Posted by onyxman on Wednesday, December 10, 2014 5:55 PM
Now I see what you are doing and why. You only have one seam to sand off, while I have two. I have also started thinking about the camber. Bondoman gave me a nice camber pattern for the T-2 deck that will work well for this. I thought I would waterline mine, but I'll see how easy it is to bend my sheet styrene spacers at the turn of the bilge and keep it full hull. If that doesn't work out I can still cut off the bottom.
Fred
  • Member since
    September 2012
Posted by GMorrison on Wednesday, December 10, 2014 2:02 PM

Next, the decks. They have a pretty pronounced camber. I'm making them out of sheet styrene scrap.

I'll eyeball something and figure out a way to do it without a lot of brain damage.

I'm thinking maybe set up the transverse bulkheads at the various up and down steps in the deck first, use them to set the geometry.

Of course it will translate itself through a couple of deck levels in the accommodation.

Really try to keep it simple

 Modeling is an excuse to buy books.

 

JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.