SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

Aircraft Trivia Quiz

728407 views
7409 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Edgware, London
Posted by osher on Thursday, July 8, 2010 4:40 AM

The Short Sperrin.  It was an insurance policy if the Vickers Valiant failed, which itself was insurance if the Avro Vulcan and HP Victor programmes failed.  The Sperrin used standard WWII bomber build technology, the Valiant was a bit more advanced, whilst the Vulcan and Victor pushed out into the distant unknown!  In the end, the Valiant proved itself, and became the first member of the V-force, whilst the Vulcan and Victor were developed and deployed.

  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: Scotland
Posted by Milairjunkie on Thursday, July 8, 2010 5:56 AM

simpilot34

Milair is that you and your Pup???? If so that is stunning work!!!!

No it's not - & I won't take a Manny like stance & suggest that I was the pilot in the 1st picture either.

 

Osher,

Correct with ungainly looking & named Sperrin.

The Vulcan was the only good looking aircraft from the V program, but this has to be the ugliest?

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Edgware, London
Posted by osher on Thursday, July 8, 2010 6:06 AM

Speaking of Avro: Avro developed an airliner, which was reasonably successful, and popular with the military, to replace the DC-3.  Whilst being designed, a rival was launched, and so, the Avro, was designed to be used from shorter and/or rougher airfields.  What was the rival?  (and, for a bonus, what was the Avro product - hint, it was never produced as an Avro, but a Hawker Siddeley)

  • Member since
    September 2009
  • From: Frisco, TX
Posted by B17Pilot on Thursday, July 8, 2010 1:16 PM

Rival: Fokker F27

Avro product the 748 (aka HS748 in the Hawker SIddeley nomencalture)

  

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Edgware, London
Posted by osher on Thursday, July 8, 2010 1:35 PM

Quite right, over to you!

  • Member since
    March 2006
Posted by simpilot34 on Friday, July 9, 2010 6:12 AM

Milairjunkie

 simpilot34:

Milair is that you and your Pup???? If so that is stunning work!!!!

 

No it's not - & I won't take a Manny like stance & suggest that I was the pilot in the 1st picture either.

Big Smile

Cheers, Lt. Cmdr. Richie "To be prepared for war, is one of the most effectual means of preserving the peace."-George Washington
  • Member since
    September 2009
  • From: Frisco, TX
Posted by B17Pilot on Friday, July 9, 2010 8:27 AM

This aircraft was the last Naval aircraft selected by the USAF before the F-4 Phantom.  Name the aircraft's designation for the USAF and Navy.

  

  • Member since
    March 2006
Posted by simpilot34 on Friday, July 9, 2010 10:03 AM

Would it be the Trojan?

Cheers, Lt. Cmdr. Richie "To be prepared for war, is one of the most effectual means of preserving the peace."-George Washington
  • Member since
    September 2009
  • From: Frisco, TX
Posted by B17Pilot on Friday, July 9, 2010 10:55 AM

Nope

  

  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: México
Posted by SteelSnail on Friday, July 9, 2010 4:31 PM

What about the Skyraider?

  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: Scotland
Posted by Milairjunkie on Friday, July 9, 2010 5:01 PM

A-3 Skywarrior  / B-66 Destroyer ?

  • Member since
    September 2009
  • From: Frisco, TX
Posted by B17Pilot on Friday, July 9, 2010 7:56 PM

SteelSnail

What about the Skyraider?

The Skyraider wasn't purchased by the Air Force, they where allocated to the Air Force by the Navy. This aircraft was purchased by the Navy and in a seperate order by the Air Force

  

  • Member since
    September 2009
  • From: Frisco, TX
Posted by B17Pilot on Friday, July 9, 2010 7:59 PM

The A-3 was modified to become the B-66.  This aircraft just had the navy equipment removed (i.e. tail hook).

Clue: The aircraft was a front line top of the line aircraft for both services.

  

  • Member since
    January 2007
  • From: USA
Posted by defcon1 on Saturday, July 10, 2010 12:47 AM

Just a wild guess. Is it the F-110 Spectre/F4H?

  • Member since
    September 2009
  • From: Frisco, TX
Posted by B17Pilot on Saturday, July 10, 2010 8:39 AM

Nope

Another clue:  Its not a jet.

  

  • Member since
    January 2007
  • From: USA
Posted by defcon1 on Saturday, July 10, 2010 9:34 AM

Was it C-131/R4Y?

  • Member since
    September 2009
  • From: Frisco, TX
Posted by B17Pilot on Saturday, July 10, 2010 10:30 AM

Nope.

This aircraft was originally designed for the Navy and the Air Corp so was impressed they ordered some

  

  • Member since
    January 2007
  • From: USA
Posted by defcon1 on Saturday, July 10, 2010 10:52 AM

This is tough.

How about CH-53A/HH-53B?

  • Member since
    October 2005
  • From: Yuma, Arizona
Posted by Brumbles on Saturday, July 10, 2010 10:53 AM

Douglas' SBD/A-24?

  • Member since
    September 2009
  • From: Frisco, TX
Posted by B17Pilot on Saturday, July 10, 2010 11:17 AM

Nope to the CH53 and SBD

The Air Corps tested the SBD but decided they didn't need a dive bomber, so only a few where transferred from the Navy.

  

  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: Scotland
Posted by Milairjunkie on Saturday, July 10, 2010 12:25 PM

The Beech T-34A & T-34B Mentor?

  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Sonora Desert
Posted by stikpusher on Saturday, July 10, 2010 1:14 PM

Boeing F4B/P-12

 

F is for FIRE, That burns down the whole town!

U is for URANIUM... BOMBS!

N is for NO SURVIVORS...

       - Plankton

LSM

 

  • Member since
    September 2009
  • From: Frisco, TX
Posted by B17Pilot on Saturday, July 10, 2010 2:10 PM

stikpusher

Boeing F4B/P-12

Stikpusher has it!  Over to you.

  

  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Sonora Desert
Posted by stikpusher on Monday, July 12, 2010 3:21 PM

Sorry for the delay,but I had to do soem thinkign to come up with my question for subject matter.

This aircraft was forerunner to arguably one of the most recognizable fighters ever flown. In its original form, it flew combat with good to very good results under the flags of several countries. Although it only flew combat on one occasion under the flag of its parent country.

 

F is for FIRE, That burns down the whole town!

U is for URANIUM... BOMBS!

N is for NO SURVIVORS...

       - Plankton

LSM

 

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Edgware, London
Posted by osher on Monday, July 12, 2010 4:00 PM

My usual answer - the F-5!

During Vietnam a few F-5A were taken on by the USAF and converted into F-5C 'Skoshi Tiger' for combat.  It was used, and is still used, by different operators.  It formed the basis for the YF-17, and thence, the F-18, which, surely, is a most distinctive shape.

  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Sonora Desert
Posted by stikpusher on Monday, July 12, 2010 5:31 PM

Too much of a difference between those two.

 

F is for FIRE, That burns down the whole town!

U is for URANIUM... BOMBS!

N is for NO SURVIVORS...

       - Plankton

LSM

 

  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Utereg
Posted by Borg R3-MC0 on Tuesday, July 13, 2010 3:24 AM

I think it is the P-36. It flew in combat primarily with the French, British, Finish and Dutch. The US used it only very llimitedly for combat.

Furthermore it was evolved to the P-40, with its recognizable airscoop under the nose.

  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Sonora Desert
Posted by stikpusher on Tuesday, July 13, 2010 11:40 AM

Borg has it! The P-36 was flown under the colors of all the countries mentioned and a few more. In its early combat it met with reasonable success. It was re engined with an Allison inline, to become the P-40, which in Flying Tiger colors is easily one of the most iconic fighters ever seen. It flew in combat under US colors once- at Pearl Harbor on December 7th.

Over to you Borg.

 

F is for FIRE, That burns down the whole town!

U is for URANIUM... BOMBS!

N is for NO SURVIVORS...

       - Plankton

LSM

 

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Edgware, London
Posted by osher on Tuesday, July 13, 2010 11:50 AM

Here's a bit of irony, the F-5 met all the criteria for the answer, but, grew it's name when flown in Indo-China (not so far from China), as a Skoshi Tiger, a similar name to the Flying Tigers, and of course, lead to the Tiger II

  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Sonora Desert
Posted by stikpusher on Tuesday, July 13, 2010 11:59 AM

True, but the relationship of the P-36 to P-40 would be more like the F-5E/F-20. The F-5 to F-18 has an evolutionary link of the YF-17, although in essence the F-18 is a completely new aircraft aside from planform when compared in detail. 

 

F is for FIRE, That burns down the whole town!

U is for URANIUM... BOMBS!

N is for NO SURVIVORS...

       - Plankton

LSM

 

JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.