SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

Aircraft Trivia Quiz

728407 views
7409 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2009
Posted by gmat on Monday, August 3, 2009 9:31 AM
Close enough for the last window, but as you can see below, the early C-130As had an extra nav window next to the round hatch above the cockpit. Not the same as bubble on the RAF machine. The B-17 and B-24 had a separate upward window for the nav, but the Lancaster nav window/blister was attached to the main cockpit canopy. Sorry if my terminology is not the best.
Photo via S. Igami.

Still have to find the last ones.
Here is a photo of a C-130B, which would be the same as a 57 model C-130A, for comparison.
This one and the one from the previous post are USAF photos.

My shot of a 57 year C-130D. Shows the windows under the wing.


55 and 57 year C-130As for comparison. Photo via S. Igami.




Best wishes,
Grant
  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: Scotland
Posted by Milairjunkie on Monday, August 3, 2009 8:30 AM

19 - The 18 evident in the picture & the "fitted when required" astrodome, which is fitted in place of the forward upper hatch - as required;

  • Member since
    March 2006
Posted by simpilot34 on Monday, August 3, 2009 8:00 AM
I count 18, one more being on the side exit doors aft of the mains.
Cheers, Lt. Cmdr. Richie "To be prepared for war, is one of the most effectual means of preserving the peace."-George Washington
  • Member since
    April 2009
Posted by gmat on Monday, August 3, 2009 7:40 AM
Good answer, F-8fanatic,
But everyone please take a closer look at the photo provided. After you find more windows in the photo, there is another window not shown that a B-17 and B-24 crew member might be familiar with, but I believe that a Lancaster crew member might not. The one on the C-130A is not in the same location as on the B-17 and B-24.

Best wishes,
Grant
  • Member since
    January 2009
Posted by F-8fanatic on Sunday, August 2, 2009 10:05 PM

I'm going to say 16, 8 on each side.

 

4 of them in a line, along the fuselage side, near the propeller line.  one more just aft of those, on an access door.  Two more, side by side, just above the rear portion of the fuselage bulge for the main landing gear, and one more on the rear side access door.  Both sides have these 8 windows in the same locations, hence 16 windows.

  • Member since
    April 2009
Posted by gmat on Sunday, August 2, 2009 10:52 AM
Sorry for the delay,
Hope that this generates some interest. How many round windows on a 56-XXX and earlier C-130A fuselage and where are they?



Best wishes,
Grant
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Edgware, London
Posted by osher on Saturday, August 1, 2009 8:03 AM
Indeed Sir, the Bristol Bombay, which also carried the Greek royal family to safety.  Over to you!
  • Member since
    April 2009
Posted by gmat on Saturday, August 1, 2009 3:13 AM
I think that you are perhaps thinking of the Bristol Bombay.
Best wishes,
Grant
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Edgware, London
Posted by osher on Saturday, August 1, 2009 3:00 AM
No, not the York!
  • Member since
    March 2006
Posted by simpilot34 on Saturday, August 1, 2009 2:53 AM
Would that be the Avro York?
Cheers, Lt. Cmdr. Richie "To be prepared for war, is one of the most effectual means of preserving the peace."-George Washington
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Edgware, London
Posted by osher on Saturday, August 1, 2009 2:48 AM
This aircraft was introduced in March 1939.  It was a long-range troop/cargo carrier, and also a long-range bomber.  It's name was most appropriate, but, the city it's named after, has since changed it's name.  It has also carried royalty.
  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: Scotland
Posted by Milairjunkie on Friday, July 31, 2009 2:16 PM

Yup, the floor is yours;

RNs fastest piston engined A/C, Worlds fastest wooden A/C, Worlds 2nd fatsest operational piston twin;

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Edgware, London
Posted by osher on Friday, July 31, 2009 12:13 PM
DH.Hornet?
  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: Scotland
Posted by Milairjunkie on Friday, July 31, 2009 10:48 AM

Sorry, no.

  • Member since
    April 2005
  • From: Baton Rouge, LA
Posted by T_Terrific on Friday, July 31, 2009 10:25 AM

How can you beat the F-8F Bearcat 528.33 mph world speed record?

I am not aware that no examples still exist, but its record still stands.

Tom T Cowboy [C):-)]

Tom TCowboy

“Failure is the opportunity to begin again more intelligently.”-Henry Ford

"Except in the fundamentals, think and let think"- J. Wesley

"I am impatient with stupidity, my people have learned to live without it"-Klaatu: "The Day the Earth Stood Still"

"All my men believe in God, they are ordered to"-Adolph Hitler

  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: Scotland
Posted by Milairjunkie on Friday, July 31, 2009 6:59 AM

This A/C was the fastest prop aircraft to be used by both its land & sea bound operators, for its construction was fastest of all time, & for it engine configuration was the second fastest of all time.

No examples in either land or sea based variant survive, which is a shame.

  • Member since
    July 2007
  • From: Nuevo, CA
Posted by guardsmen22 on Friday, July 31, 2009 3:31 AM

You got it, your turn.

PS

If they wanted the M-4 to reach the US then they should of just made this and strapped some booster rockets on it instead of the containerBig Smile [:D]

Helicopters can't really fly-they are just so ugly that the Earth immediately repels them. Photobucket
  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: Scotland
Posted by Milairjunkie on Thursday, July 30, 2009 3:03 PM

VM-T Atlant, Based on the M-4;

  • Member since
    July 2007
  • From: Nuevo, CA
Posted by guardsmen22 on Thursday, July 30, 2009 2:15 PM

Okay here we go this aircraft was a variant of a failed russian bomber and was designed to carry rocket boosters and once even the russian space shuttle to the cosmodrome.

What was it the plane called and what was the name of the bomber it was based on?

If you don't get it I'll give you a hint later on.

Helicopters can't really fly-they are just so ugly that the Earth immediately repels them. Photobucket
  • Member since
    March 2006
Posted by simpilot34 on Thursday, July 30, 2009 11:12 AM

BINGO!!!!! Well done guardsmen22!!!! The story I read. the first went to one of the other islands I think and didn't see the fleet, then the other went to Oahu and found the fleet. One of my current projects is a Jake in the War in the Pacific GB. Anyone with something that was used in the PTO between 1939-1945 is welcomed.(Sorry had to do a plug)Wink [;)]

Guardsmen the floor is yours!!!

Cheers, Lt. Cmdr. Richie "To be prepared for war, is one of the most effectual means of preserving the peace."-George Washington
  • Member since
    July 2007
  • From: Nuevo, CA
Posted by guardsmen22 on Thursday, July 30, 2009 2:10 AM
Okay the two cruisers were the Tone and the Chikuma of the 8th Cruiser division and they both launched a single Aichi E13A1(Jake) for weather recon over Oahu
Helicopters can't really fly-they are just so ugly that the Earth immediately repels them. Photobucket
  • Member since
    March 2006
Posted by simpilot34 on Wednesday, July 29, 2009 11:35 PM
Hint: The two ships were cruisers.
Cheers, Lt. Cmdr. Richie "To be prepared for war, is one of the most effectual means of preserving the peace."-George Washington
  • Member since
    March 2006
Posted by simpilot34 on Thursday, July 23, 2009 7:20 AM

Didn't expect to get that one right hehe. Ok for the next one, a two parter.

What type of aircraft was sent out from the task force that was to attack Pearl Harbor for reconnaissance, and what were the names of the two ships from which these aircraft took off from?

Cheers, Lt. Cmdr. Richie "To be prepared for war, is one of the most effectual means of preserving the peace."-George Washington
  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: Scotland
Posted by Milairjunkie on Thursday, July 23, 2009 2:53 AM

simpilot34, the floor is yours;

Dassault Mirage IVP aircraft picture

  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: Northern Virginia
Posted by ygmodeler4 on Thursday, July 23, 2009 12:30 AM

Gloster Javelin?

-Josiah

  • Member since
    March 2006
Posted by simpilot34 on Wednesday, July 22, 2009 8:15 PM
What about the Mirage IVA?
Cheers, Lt. Cmdr. Richie "To be prepared for war, is one of the most effectual means of preserving the peace."-George Washington
  • Member since
    October 2008
Posted by eatthis on Wednesday, July 22, 2009 6:11 PM

 osher wrote:
You don't mean the B-1?
doubt it as its not a delta

there cant be that many delta wing bombers lol what kind of era are we talkin?

 

snow + 4wd + escessive hp = :)  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x7egUIS70YM

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Edgware, London
Posted by osher on Wednesday, July 22, 2009 6:00 PM
You don't mean the B-1?
  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: Scotland
Posted by Milairjunkie on Wednesday, July 22, 2009 5:17 PM

No, The "correct line" with the Vulcan was the one way nuclear strike. Although smaller than the Vulcan, this aircraft is very much the bomber as opposed to some small fry fighter with a strap on nuclear toy.

One part of osher's last answer is nearly on the money.  

  • Member since
    June 2009
  • From: Mobile, AL
Posted by Tango Juliet on Wednesday, July 22, 2009 12:03 PM
Possibly the SAAB Viggen?

TJ Rohyans

Mobile, AL, USA

JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.