SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

Aircraft Trivia Quiz

728407 views
7409 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Utereg
Posted by Borg R3-MC0 on Wednesday, August 12, 2009 7:12 AM

Okay!

 I am looking for a highly specialized aircraft which featured an multi-ducted belly scoop and was powerd by a well known british power plant. This aicraft never did the task it was designed to do.

  • Member since
    March 2006
Posted by simpilot34 on Wednesday, August 12, 2009 6:39 AM

Borg you are right on the money!!!! Well done mate!!!! Yes, an F-15E Strike Eagle vectored in by AWACS from a call from some SAS troops in western Iraq that were discovered by the Iraqis dropped down below some weather about 3,000 feet dropped a 2,000lb LGB from about six miles. Here is an excerpt from a book called Strike Eagle by William L. Smallwood.

Borg you have the floor!!

Cheers, Lt. Cmdr. Richie "To be prepared for war, is one of the most effectual means of preserving the peace."-George Washington
  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Utereg
Posted by Borg R3-MC0 on Wednesday, August 12, 2009 4:27 AM

 simpilot34 wrote:
Sorry Guardsmen, thats not it either. Right concept though, and it was a jet that did the killing!

A jet? mmmhhh, my anwser was going to be the Antov An-2 shot from an Air America UH-1 with an AK-47.

But now I wil say it was an Iraqi Mil Mi-24 hit by an LGB dropped from a F-15E Strike Eagle.

  • Member since
    March 2006
Posted by simpilot34 on Tuesday, August 11, 2009 11:11 AM
Sorry Guardsmen, thats not it either. Right concept though, and it was a jet that did the killing!
Cheers, Lt. Cmdr. Richie "To be prepared for war, is one of the most effectual means of preserving the peace."-George Washington
  • Member since
    July 2007
  • From: Nuevo, CA
Posted by guardsmen22 on Tuesday, August 11, 2009 1:20 AM
Okay heres my last guess, F-86 killing a Mig-15 by jettisoning its external fuel tank 
Helicopters can't really fly-they are just so ugly that the Earth immediately repels them. Photobucket
  • Member since
    March 2006
Posted by simpilot34 on Monday, August 10, 2009 11:01 PM

No sorry, that's not it either. There were no guns fired at all, and I'm not talking bout the A-4 nailing a Mig-21 witha Zuni rocket pod. This is a first in USAF history!

Cheers, Lt. Cmdr. Richie "To be prepared for war, is one of the most effectual means of preserving the peace."-George Washington
  • Member since
    July 2007
  • From: Nuevo, CA
Posted by guardsmen22 on Monday, August 10, 2009 9:39 PM

was it when a L-4 Grasshopper forced a Storch to land when the crew shot at it with their 1911 service pistols?

Helicopters can't really fly-they are just so ugly that the Earth immediately repels them. Photobucket
  • Member since
    March 2006
Posted by simpilot34 on Monday, August 10, 2009 8:51 PM

Guardsmen I don't know what happened on my end but I completely lost your post!!! I was answering and it wouldn't let me post mine and then i refreshed and yours was gone!! Very bizarre!

Anyway you were not correct! As I mentioned this was a very 'UNIQUE' kill.

Cheers, Lt. Cmdr. Richie "To be prepared for war, is one of the most effectual means of preserving the peace."-George Washington
  • Member since
    March 2006
Posted by simpilot34 on Monday, August 10, 2009 6:48 PM

Ty Osher, that was a very good question!! The only thing I googled was a list of planes the IAF has used since it's beginning. The one that I kept being drawn too was the Mossie.

Ok, on to the next one! Might be easy, might not!

Name the two adversaries and the weapon used in a VERY unique air-to-air kill. The first in USAF history!

Cheers, Lt. Cmdr. Richie "To be prepared for war, is one of the most effectual means of preserving the peace."-George Washington
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Edgware, London
Posted by osher on Monday, August 10, 2009 4:24 PM

Well done Simpilot, it is, indeed, the Mosquito.  The Israelis found that the British had left behind some U/S aircraft, and loads of rubbish!  From these they were able to construct a Spitfire (and bits of REAF and RAF Spitfires that accidently fought each other), the famous Black Spitfire.  However, they couldn't get the Mosquito or Lancaster airbourne.  Later Israel would buy a number of Mosquitos, and also 3 B-17 (sans machine-guns, which the Hasagawa model wrongly shows).  The Merlin engine is not named after the mythical magician, but, rather, a type of Falcon (read up it's history, and it's naming convention makes a lot more sense, in terms of it's family tree)

Over to you Sim Pilot!

  • Member since
    April 2005
  • From: Baton Rouge, LA
Posted by T_Terrific on Monday, August 10, 2009 12:58 PM

Wouldn't be the Bristol Beaufighter, would it?

Tom T Cowboy [C):-)]

Tom TCowboy

“Failure is the opportunity to begin again more intelligently.”-Henry Ford

"Except in the fundamentals, think and let think"- J. Wesley

"I am impatient with stupidity, my people have learned to live without it"-Klaatu: "The Day the Earth Stood Still"

"All my men believe in God, they are ordered to"-Adolph Hitler

  • Member since
    July 2007
  • From: Nuevo, CA
Posted by guardsmen22 on Monday, August 10, 2009 12:55 PM

Simpilot I think you got it right because he was refering to the engines being named after a type of bird  not the plane itself, which in this case was the Rolls-Royce Merlin named for a small falcon.

So goodjob that one had me stumped for a while.

Helicopters can't really fly-they are just so ugly that the Earth immediately repels them. Photobucket
  • Member since
    March 2006
Posted by simpilot34 on Monday, August 10, 2009 11:59 AM
The one plane that keeps coming to mind is the Mosquito, but that's not a bird, unless you live in the south where get as big as choppers!!!Big Smile [:D]Wink [;)]
Cheers, Lt. Cmdr. Richie "To be prepared for war, is one of the most effectual means of preserving the peace."-George Washington
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Edgware, London
Posted by osher on Monday, August 10, 2009 4:24 AM
More clues?  This was a real multi-role aircraft, but was purchased as a Fighter Bomber.  It's design stretches back to a racing aircraft of the 1930's, via a passenger aircraft.  It's canopy was used for an early production jet fighter.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Edgware, London
Posted by osher on Friday, August 7, 2009 2:33 PM
It's a prop - with twin engines named for a type of bird.
  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Shell Beach, California
Posted by mojodoctor on Friday, August 7, 2009 2:30 PM
You don't mean the F-4 Phantom, do you?
Matt Fly fast, fly low, turn left!
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Edgware, London
Posted by osher on Friday, August 7, 2009 2:25 PM
Nope, this was a 2-man aircraft (yes, technically a 1-man version was built, but that's another story!)
  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Shell Beach, California
Posted by mojodoctor on Friday, August 7, 2009 1:59 PM

Okay, how about another wild guess?!

Maybe the de Havilland D.H. 89 Dragon Rapide?

Matt Fly fast, fly low, turn left!
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Edgware, London
Posted by osher on Friday, August 7, 2009 12:54 PM
Nope, not the Mule.  This aircraft had two engines.
  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Shell Beach, California
Posted by mojodoctor on Friday, August 7, 2009 12:49 PM
How about the Czech built Avia S-199?
Matt Fly fast, fly low, turn left!
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Edgware, London
Posted by osher on Friday, August 7, 2009 10:31 AM
Nope, not a Mirage.  This aircraft was found in Israel (I'm not sure if it was just one, maybe a few), in an unflyable condition, despite an attempt to get it to fly, it could not be.  However, a few years later, Israel purchased quantities of this aircraft.
  • Member since
    March 2006
Posted by simpilot34 on Friday, August 7, 2009 8:50 AM
Was it the Mirage III ?
Cheers, Lt. Cmdr. Richie "To be prepared for war, is one of the most effectual means of preserving the peace."-George Washington
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Edgware, London
Posted by osher on Friday, August 7, 2009 8:38 AM
OK, I'll jump in: which aircraft did the Israelis try and fly (one of), but failed, yet ended up buying instead, a few years later?
  • Member since
    March 2006
Posted by simpilot34 on Friday, August 7, 2009 7:40 AM
Well it's me but, I will let the next have a go. I just asked one, so whoever reads this and gets a question in first will be the next official question. Good Luck!!
Cheers, Lt. Cmdr. Richie "To be prepared for war, is one of the most effectual means of preserving the peace."-George Washington
  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: Scotland
Posted by Milairjunkie on Friday, August 7, 2009 7:31 AM

Well, I am away on holiday in the next few hours, so much to my dismay I have apparently more pressing to do (so the other half tells me anyway).

So the next question belongs to whoever gets here first.

  • Member since
    March 2006
Posted by simpilot34 on Friday, August 7, 2009 7:02 AM

Well Done Milair!!! Floor is yours!!Thumbs Up [tup] The model T syndrome only with engines here. You can have any engine you want as long as its an RB211.Wink [;)]

Over to you!

Cheers, Lt. Cmdr. Richie "To be prepared for war, is one of the most effectual means of preserving the peace."-George Washington
  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: Scotland
Posted by Milairjunkie on Friday, August 7, 2009 4:28 AM

Rolls Royce.

RR went bust & were then bailed out, delaying the RB211. The Tri-Star was to far down the line to accept any other form of powerplant other than the RR RB211. This delayed the Tri-Star going to market & allowed the DC-10 to "get the jump".

The same problem also helped the DC-10 get into the long range sector well before the Tri-Star could, further affecting sales. Tri-Star production was halted at 250 units, without braking even & lockheed called it a day with commercial aircraft? 

  • Member since
    March 2006
Posted by simpilot34 on Thursday, August 6, 2009 11:02 PM

I at first was thinking the Shinden, but then I read it again and noticed 'nacelles' meaning wing mounted engines, plural. Then remembered the greenhouses on the front of the Airacudas nacelles that house a gunner and gun each.

Ok, on to the next question:

What was the MAIN contributing factor in the meager sales of the Lockheed L-1011 Tri-Star?   It was a very reliable, well liked, and easy to maintain airliner, however because of this one thing, made sales not go as planned.

Hope that is enough, good luck!

Cheers, Lt. Cmdr. Richie "To be prepared for war, is one of the most effectual means of preserving the peace."-George Washington
  • Member since
    July 2007
  • From: Nuevo, CA
Posted by guardsmen22 on Thursday, August 6, 2009 10:28 PM

you got itThumbs Up [tup]

by the way what gave it away, I was kind of worried about if I had given enough of a hint.

Helicopters can't really fly-they are just so ugly that the Earth immediately repels them. Photobucket
  • Member since
    March 2006
Posted by simpilot34 on Thursday, August 6, 2009 8:50 PM

Would that be the Bell FM Airacuda?

Cheers, Lt. Cmdr. Richie "To be prepared for war, is one of the most effectual means of preserving the peace."-George Washington
JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.