SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

Aircraft Trivia Quiz

728407 views
7409 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    June 2004
  • From: Tucson
Posted by cardshark_14 on Tuesday, December 16, 2008 4:01 PM
Not the Hawk either, but keep up the good guesswork.  Does the Hawk's layout differ from other birds in its class?  Also, here's another hint, this aircraft is not a jet.

Cheers,
Alex
Never trust anyone who refuses to drink domestic beer, laugh at the Three Stooges, or crank Back In Black.
  • Member since
    September 2008
  • From: North Carolina
Posted by WarHammer25 on Tuesday, December 16, 2008 3:54 PM
Ok. How about the BAE Hawk?
The only easy day was yesterday - U.S. Navy Seals
  • Member since
    June 2004
  • From: Tucson
Posted by cardshark_14 on Tuesday, December 16, 2008 3:42 PM
Good guess, Warhammer, but no.  The Texan had an incredibly powerful engine compared to this bird.  Also, the Texan's conventional layout is not at odds with other comparable aircraft in its class.  The cloned version of this bird flew with the RAF starting in the 70s.  Also, I've said its name once...Good luck! Thumbs Up [tup]

Cheers,
Alex
Never trust anyone who refuses to drink domestic beer, laugh at the Three Stooges, or crank Back In Black.
  • Member since
    September 2008
  • From: North Carolina
Posted by WarHammer25 on Tuesday, December 16, 2008 3:29 PM
T-6 Texan? It weighed over two ton and only had a 600hp engine. I would say that it was underpowered.
The only easy day was yesterday - U.S. Navy Seals
  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: Carmel, CA
Posted by bondoman on Tuesday, December 16, 2008 3:06 PM
 Brews wrote:

Yes, the Do 23 is the machine. I feel comfortable with the question in terms of uniqueness. There would be few machines in the Luftwaffe that would be less famous. I wouldn't count most of those that were among the incorrect answers as "less-famous".  Should I have posed it as "which Dornier machine designed as a bomber but obsolete by the beginning of WWII ..."? I don't think so :)

Makes sense to me, and I suck at making up questions myself.
  • Member since
    June 2004
  • From: Tucson
Posted by cardshark_14 on Tuesday, December 16, 2008 2:41 PM
Hmm, no nibbles, eh?  Ok, hint in a few.  

Cheers,
Alex
Never trust anyone who refuses to drink domestic beer, laugh at the Three Stooges, or crank Back In Black.
  • Member since
    June 2004
  • From: Tucson
Posted by cardshark_14 on Monday, December 15, 2008 11:52 AM
Hey folks, sorry for the delay, I had trouble posting to FSM all day yesterday.  This training aircraft was in service for 19 years.  It had a conventional layout, and is fairly odd in its class because of it.  It had a terrible power to weight ratio, but I would venture to say that it was still extremely safe.  I will accept either the name of the original model, or that of another country's clone.

Cheers,
Alex
Never trust anyone who refuses to drink domestic beer, laugh at the Three Stooges, or crank Back In Black.
  • Member since
    May 2006
  • From: Nanaimo, BC, Canada
Posted by Brews on Sunday, December 14, 2008 2:40 PM

Yes, the Do 23 is the machine. I feel comfortable with the question in terms of uniqueness. There would be few machines in the Luftwaffe that would be less famous. I wouldn't count most of those that were among the incorrect answers as "less-famous".  Should I have posed it as "which Dornier machine designed as a bomber but obsolete by the beginning of WWII ..."? I don't think so :)

  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Barrow in Furness, Cumbria, UK.
Posted by davros on Sunday, December 14, 2008 3:46 AM

Looks like they don't allow direct linking to their images. The picture only appeared, on my screen, after I got the link from the properties so I had the image on my computer.

 

Here is the link... http://www.luftarchiv.de/flugzeuge/dornier/do23_mine.jpg

 

  • Member since
    June 2004
  • From: Tucson
Posted by cardshark_14 on Sunday, December 14, 2008 3:29 AM

Ok, I think I've got it...Do 23MS - and this one's not pretty!



Cheers,
Alex

Never trust anyone who refuses to drink domestic beer, laugh at the Three Stooges, or crank Back In Black.
  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: Carmel, CA
Posted by bondoman on Sunday, December 14, 2008 1:40 AM

A true trivia question has only one answer Brews, and I'd submit that you've gotten about five that fit the bill, myself not considered.

I'd say two things would help this thread-

end date/time for each ?? so those of us who work all day can answer at our convenience.

Recognition of the first answer that fits the ??

Just my My 2 cents [2c]

  • Member since
    May 2006
  • From: Nanaimo, BC, Canada
Posted by Brews on Sunday, December 14, 2008 1:24 AM
Much less capable than either the Do 18 or Do 26 (most beautiful flying boat, kitted by Mach 2). The subject of the answer to the question was not a flying boat.
  • Member since
    September 2008
  • From: North Carolina
Posted by WarHammer25 on Saturday, December 13, 2008 6:52 PM
Do-26?? Can't find a picture.
The only easy day was yesterday - U.S. Navy Seals
  • Member since
    May 2006
  • From: Nanaimo, BC, Canada
Posted by Brews on Saturday, December 13, 2008 11:24 AM

Valiant attempt, Cardshark. I had not seen that photograph! :)

The aircraft indeed comes from the Dornier factory, but it's not the Do 24 or Do 18.

  • Member since
    September 2008
  • From: North Carolina
Posted by WarHammer25 on Friday, December 12, 2008 7:04 PM
Do-18??
The only easy day was yesterday - U.S. Navy Seals
  • Member since
    June 2004
  • From: Tucson
Posted by cardshark_14 on Friday, December 12, 2008 7:02 PM
Oooh, ooooh!  I know!  One of my pretty flying boats!  At least one Do 24T had a minesweeping rig set up. Oddly, it was not given the designation Do 24MS like most minesweepers.



I'm pretty sure this is the only picture of this bird.

If you dig that, Kora makes a resin ring and beaching gear for the Italeri kit.

Cheers,
Alex
Never trust anyone who refuses to drink domestic beer, laugh at the Three Stooges, or crank Back In Black.
  • Member since
    January 2007
  • From: Northern California
Posted by trexx on Friday, December 12, 2008 7:01 PM
 Brews wrote:

I'll be away for the evening.

To recap, we're looking for less-well-known Luftwaffe a/c, but not from Bv, Fw, He or  Ju stables.

That narrows it down quite  bit, I'd say :)

A:

Arado 196

  • Member since
    May 2006
  • From: Nanaimo, BC, Canada
Posted by Brews on Friday, December 12, 2008 6:44 PM

I'll be away for the evening.

To recap, we're looking for less-well-known Luftwaffe a/c, but not from Bv, Fw, He or  Ju stables.

That narrows it down quite  bit, I'd say :)

  • Member since
    May 2006
  • From: Nanaimo, BC, Canada
Posted by Brews on Thursday, December 11, 2008 8:54 PM
Anyway, what I'm looking for here is neither a Heinkel, Airbus ... errr ... Focke-Wulf, Junkers or Blohm und Voss.
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: San Francisco, CA
Posted by telsono on Thursday, December 11, 2008 3:29 PM

I believe that the Japanese requested a conversion of the FW 200 to a bomber that gave way to the militarized version. It always seem to have a weakness in the spine as the military weight was too much for the original fuselage design.

Mike T.

Beware the hobby that eats.  - Ben Franklin

Do not fear mistakes. You will know failure. Continue to reach out. - Ben Franklin

The U.S. Constitution  doesn't guarantee happiness, only the pursuit of it. You have to catch up with it yourself. - Ben Franklin

  • Member since
    October 2005
  • From: Yuma, Arizona
Posted by Brumbles on Thursday, December 11, 2008 9:49 AM
You're right, Brews, the Fw 200 was designed for Lufthansa as an airliner -- adapted by the Luftwaffe for their purposes into many roles it was never meant for!
  • Member since
    May 2006
  • From: Nanaimo, BC, Canada
Posted by Brews on Thursday, December 11, 2008 9:40 AM
I could be wrong, but I didin't think that the Fw 200 was designed as a bomber. I wouldn't be surprised, but I just thought that it wasn't. Regardless, this did not come out of Bremen. Wikipedia won't help you on this, by the way, because the entry there for this a/c does not mention "de-gaussing" of minefields.
  • Member since
    October 2005
  • From: Yuma, Arizona
Posted by Brumbles on Thursday, December 11, 2008 9:19 AM

Focke-Wulf 200 Condor? 

 

 

  • Member since
    May 2006
  • From: Nanaimo, BC, Canada
Posted by Brews on Thursday, December 11, 2008 1:47 AM
I would venture that this particular a/c was not as capable as either of those. It was originally designed as a bomber, but that wasn't its original role.
  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Sudbury MA
Posted by Got Hinomaru? on Wednesday, December 10, 2008 10:47 PM

He 59 and He 115 were used for pretty much everything under the sun so I will guess 1 of those.

 

                                          Andrew

 

 

Respect all, fear none.
  • Member since
    May 2006
  • From: Nanaimo, BC, Canada
Posted by Brews on Wednesday, December 10, 2008 10:03 PM

No, none of the above. Not even the right manufacturer.

I like the photo of the model of the Ha 139, though. It's a striking piece of machinery, as is the Do 26 to its port side. Incidentally, the collection of models at the Museum of Flight is quite impressive in its own right, though it's a pity that the colours applied to many of the models are inappropriate.

  • Member since
    January 2007
  • From: Northern California
Posted by trexx on Wednesday, December 10, 2008 7:13 PM

A:

Ju-52

  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: Carmel, CA
Posted by bondoman on Wednesday, December 10, 2008 4:29 PM
  • Member since
    September 2008
  • From: North Carolina
Posted by WarHammer25 on Wednesday, December 10, 2008 4:00 PM

Bv 138??

The only easy day was yesterday - U.S. Navy Seals
  • Member since
    May 2006
  • From: Nanaimo, BC, Canada
Posted by Brews on Wednesday, December 10, 2008 3:22 PM

*Squinting*, no, I'm the bad one. Or at least, my eyesight must be. I thought you wrote "Improved" and so I deduced that the Mk 82 Retarded was an improvement on the Mk 82.

Question:

Which Luftwaffe aircraft (possibly one of the least-famous) was in use at least in the early part of WW2 as a maritime minesweeper (amongst other duties). A link to a picture would be nice. 

JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.