SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

Aircraft Trivia Quiz

728407 views
7409 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    May 2006
  • From: Nanaimo, BC, Canada
Posted by Brews on Friday, April 25, 2008 2:50 PM
 bondoman wrote:

Airbus has standardized on a two person cockpit that allows commonality across all airframes.

Over 40 years ago two airliners built by different companies shared the same forward section.

Which were they?

The question is valid, IMO. Service entry of the Caravelle was 1959 ... which was 49yrs ago, which is over 40 years ago. 

  • Member since
    March 2006
Posted by simpilot34 on Friday, April 25, 2008 11:21 AM
 bondoman wrote:
 chris hall wrote:

 Brews wrote:
DH Comet and SA Caravelle

Give that man a krill pastie!

That sounds really nasty, what is it?

You are correct Brews, nice job.

Bondo, your time frame was 40 years, not 50 years.

Cheers, Lt. Cmdr. Richie "To be prepared for war, is one of the most effectual means of preserving the peace."-George Washington
  • Member since
    May 2006
  • From: Nanaimo, BC, Canada
Posted by Brews on Friday, April 25, 2008 9:37 AM

For ANZAC Day, April 25 (An Australian and New Zealand Statutory Holiday in remembrance of all those fallen in all wars, on the anniversary of those nations' first combat experience under their own nationalities):

Part 1: Which New Zealander played a significant role in the Battle of Britain?

Part 2: On May 11, 1918, an Australian pilot achieved the rare feat of shooting down four planes in one patrol.

a) What was his name (lest we forget)?

b) What was he flying?

c) What were his victims (three different a/c types)

 

  • Member since
    May 2006
  • From: Nanaimo, BC, Canada
Posted by Brews on Friday, April 25, 2008 9:25 AM

The Krill Pasty is a Chris Hall penguin colony delicacy dished out, I think, by the particular penguin named Pastrycook.

 

  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: Carmel, CA
Posted by bondoman on Friday, April 25, 2008 12:19 AM
 chris hall wrote:

 Brews wrote:
DH Comet and SA Caravelle

Give that man a krill pastie!

That sounds really nasty, what is it?

You are correct Brews, nice job.

  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: Weymouth, Dorset, UK
Posted by chris hall on Friday, April 25, 2008 12:12 AM

 Brews wrote:
DH Comet and SA Caravelle

Give that man a krill pastie!

Cute and cuddly, boys, cute and cuddly!
  • Member since
    May 2006
  • From: Nanaimo, BC, Canada
Posted by Brews on Thursday, April 24, 2008 11:56 PM
DH Comet and SA Caravelle
  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: Carmel, CA
Posted by bondoman on Thursday, April 24, 2008 11:20 PM
You're on to something in the second sentence but ignoring my time frame in the third.
  • Member since
    March 2006
Posted by simpilot34 on Thursday, April 24, 2008 11:12 PM

If I'm reading the question wrong forgive me. Airbus is not just one company so that should count. The planes might be the A300 and the A310?

Cheers

Cheers, Lt. Cmdr. Richie "To be prepared for war, is one of the most effectual means of preserving the peace."-George Washington
  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: Carmel, CA
Posted by bondoman on Thursday, April 24, 2008 11:03 PM
 bondoman wrote:

Airbus has standardized on a two person cockpit that allows commonality across all airframes.

Over 40 years ago two airliners built by different companies shared the same forward section.

Which were they?

Come people do we need a hint? Look at the first sentence in the question.
  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: Carmel, CA
Posted by bondoman on Thursday, April 24, 2008 11:00 PM
 Kit builder wrote:

By the way, the Bristol Brabazon was not a military aircraft, nor a freighter. It was designed from the outset as a high capacity airliner for trans-Atlantic routes, to a design requirement set by the Brabazon Committee.

It was plauged by engine and propeller gearbox problems and by the time it showed promise, the jet airliner was in the wings, rendering it obsolete.

Though it never flew with a full load of passengers, it did fly with groups of technicians and Bristol employees and their families. It was built at and flown from Filton, where the runway was extended to meet its forecast take-off run, but the extension was never needed, as the Brab became airbourne well within the original available length.

Somewhat off topic, I know. Sorry. 

That runway was later used for Concorde, Which ran up it's engines at the east end on tie downs. The road was diverted eastwardish around it. Spent a number of summers there as a kid while my father worked on evaluations of same.

http://www.mapquest.co.uk/mq/maps/mapAddress.do

Brabazon was not intended to be a mass carrier, but a luxury ship with berths, lounges and other accommodations, like the 377. Good call on the Belfast, that had me stumped.

  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: Carmel, CA
Posted by bondoman on Thursday, April 24, 2008 8:20 PM

Airbus has standardized on a two person cockpit that allows commonality across all airframes.

Over 40 years ago two airliners built by different companies shared the same forward section.

Which were they?

  • Member since
    June 2004
  • From: Tucson
Posted by cardshark_14 on Thursday, April 24, 2008 3:50 PM
No problem! Thanks for the interesting tidbits of information! Smile [:)]
Never trust anyone who refuses to drink domestic beer, laugh at the Three Stooges, or crank Back In Black.
  • Member since
    February 2008
  • From: Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posted by Kit builder on Thursday, April 24, 2008 3:42 PM

By the way, the Bristol Brabazon was not a military aircraft, nor a freighter. It was designed from the outset as a high capacity airliner for trans-Atlantic routes, to a design requirement set by the Brabazon Committee.

It was plauged by engine and propeller gearbox problems and by the time it showed promise, the jet airliner was in the wings, rendering it obsolete.

Though it never flew with a full load of passengers, it did fly with groups of technicians and Bristol employees and their families. It was built at and flown from Filton, where the runway was extended to meet its forecast take-off run, but the extension was never needed, as the Brab became airbourne well within the original available length.

Somewhat off topic, I know. Sorry. 

If only....
  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: Weymouth, Dorset, UK
Posted by chris hall on Thursday, April 24, 2008 3:09 PM

Well done, Shark!

The Belfast had a theoretical capacity of 200 troops, though I don't think it was ever used for more than 150. In fact, it was hardly ever used as a troop carrier. For paradrops it was easier to use Argosies and C-130s, even Beverleys, and for routine trooping, Transport Command had sufficient supplies of Comets, Britannias and VC-10s.

Cheers,

Chris.

Cute and cuddly, boys, cute and cuddly!
  • Member since
    June 2004
  • From: Tucson
Posted by cardshark_14 on Thursday, April 24, 2008 2:55 PM

Done and done.

  • AN-22

  • TU-114

  • C-124

  • XC-99

  • Hughes H-4

  • C-133

  • Short Belfast

    I yield the next question to Bondo, as he did the vast majority of the work...

    Put this one to rest...Dead </li>[xx(] 

  • Never trust anyone who refuses to drink domestic beer, laugh at the Three Stooges, or crank Back In Black.
    • Member since
      February 2004
    • From: Weymouth, Dorset, UK
    Posted by chris hall on Thursday, April 24, 2008 2:19 PM

    C-133 is one of them. Designed for 200 passengers, though never actually used as such. Wasn't aware of the R6V - but only had an official capacity of 169 troops, so doesn't qualify.

    50 built, 9 crashed. That's a worse safety record than the B-58, isn't it?

    The last type of aircraft was made in the United Kingdom, but not in Britain. Only ten were made. They were retired early, and then spent most of their remaining lives being hired back by the RAF for jobs which couldn't be done by the C-130s they bought to replace them, flown by crews who used to fly them with the RAF, earning far more money as civvy contractors....

    Please, someone, surely I've given enough clues?

    Cheers,

    Chris.

    Cute and cuddly, boys, cute and cuddly!
    • Member since
      September 2003
    • From: North East Texas
    Posted by roadkill_275 on Thursday, April 24, 2008 2:04 PM
     cardshark_14 wrote:

    I forgot...

    with questions like these, who needs enemies?Dead [xx(] 

    Wake me up when we get a new one...Wink [;)] 

     

    Amen to that Bro.

     

     

    Pirate [oX)]

    Kevin M. Bodkins "Meddle not in the affairs of dragons, for thou art crunchy and taste good with ketchup" American By Birth, Southern By the Grace of God! www.milavia.com Christian Modelers For McCain
    • Member since
      June 2004
    • From: Tucson
    Posted by cardshark_14 on Thursday, April 24, 2008 2:01 PM

    I forgot...

    with questions like these, who needs enemies?Dead [xx(] 

    Wake me up when we get a new one...Wink [;)] 

    Never trust anyone who refuses to drink domestic beer, laugh at the Three Stooges, or crank Back In Black.
    • Member since
      January 2007
    • From: Northern California
    Posted by trexx on Thursday, April 24, 2008 1:55 PM

    Uhh...

    What was the question? Zzz [zzz]

    • Member since
      June 2004
    • From: Tucson
    Posted by cardshark_14 on Thursday, April 24, 2008 12:22 PM
    C-133 Cargomaster, which was pretty much the black sheep of MATS could supposedly carry 200 troops in fitted airline-style seats.  You couldn't get me to buckle in though...Dead [xx(]
    Never trust anyone who refuses to drink domestic beer, laugh at the Three Stooges, or crank Back In Black.
    • Member since
      December 2002
    • From: Northern California
    Posted by jeaton01 on Thursday, April 24, 2008 11:53 AM

    The Lockheed R6V probably will qualify, in a Bomberguy video the narrator quotes 400 troops, 190 passengers as flown by the Navy and proposed as an airliner. 

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Ss9ZyidjlI 

    John

    To see build logs for my models:  http://goldeneramodel.com/mymodels/mymodels.html

     

    • Member since
      September 2003
    • From: North East Texas
    Posted by roadkill_275 on Thursday, April 24, 2008 11:33 AM
     simpilot34 wrote:

    Ur not talking about the Super Guppy are you?        By the way, the Boeing 377 is not a military transport, the C-97 is.My 2 cents [2c]

    Cheers

     

    And the Brabazon was British.

     

     

     

     

     

    Pirate [oX)]

    Kevin M. Bodkins "Meddle not in the affairs of dragons, for thou art crunchy and taste good with ketchup" American By Birth, Southern By the Grace of God! www.milavia.com Christian Modelers For McCain
    • Member since
      March 2006
    Posted by simpilot34 on Thursday, April 24, 2008 11:28 AM

    Ur not talking about the Super Guppy are you?        By the way, the Boeing 377 is not a military transport, the C-97 is.My 2 cents [2c]

    Cheers

    Cheers, Lt. Cmdr. Richie "To be prepared for war, is one of the most effectual means of preserving the peace."-George Washington
    • Member since
      February 2004
    • From: Weymouth, Dorset, UK
    Posted by chris hall on Thursday, April 24, 2008 10:14 AM

     leemitcheltree wrote:
    The British most assuredly did build some of the ugliest things
     that ever did fly....they created some amazing innovation and some truly beautiful designs ...but there's some airframes that are truly painful to view....Anyway.....back to the Quiz.....

    Coming from the country which gave the world this:

    that's just a little rich, don't you think? Smile,Wink, & Grin [swg]

    Anyway, as you say, back to the quiz. A further hint. One of the two aircraft that nobody's mentioned yet was designed primarily to transport Polaris missiles. And the other, IIRC, had the Atlas ICBM as one of it's main intended payloads.

    Cheers,

    Chris.

    Cute and cuddly, boys, cute and cuddly!
    • Member since
      January 2003
    • From: Washington State
    Posted by leemitcheltree on Thursday, April 24, 2008 7:16 AM
    LOL...The Beverly.....my goodness...The British most assuredly did build some of the ugliest things
     that ever did fly....they created some amazing innovation and some truly beautiful designs (Spitfire, Comet, Mossie, Harrier), but there's some airframes that are truly painful to view....the Gannet, Bristol Freighter, Wellesley, Shadower.....shudder....and many more....
    I didnt mean to hijack the thread.....I'd just never seen a Beverly before....and was a little shellshocked...LOL.....
    Anyway.....back to the Quiz.....

    Cheers, LeeTree
    Remember, Safety Fast!!!

    • Member since
      February 2004
    • From: Weymouth, Dorset, UK
    Posted by chris hall on Thursday, April 24, 2008 3:40 AM

    Beverley only had 94 passenger seats - all in the tail boom. Must have done wonders for the cg, and the abiility of the passengers to get out in an emergency.

    Getting there, though....Wink [;)]

    Cheers,

    Chris.

    Cute and cuddly, boys, cute and cuddly!
    • Member since
      April 2003
    • From: Edgware, London
    Posted by osher on Thursday, April 24, 2008 3:00 AM
    I can only think of the Blackburn Beverly, and maybe something big from Short's?
    • Member since
      February 2004
    • From: Weymouth, Dorset, UK
    Posted by chris hall on Thursday, April 24, 2008 12:37 AM

     roadkill_275 wrote:
    The only two that I can think of off the top of my  head that's not on the list above are the Brabazon and possibly the Boeing 377.

    Nope. they're both military freight transports, and the full passenger capacity, though part of the design brief, was never,AFAIK, actually used.

    Also remember that the US and the Soviet Union are/ were not the only countries to make large propeller-driven transport aircraft.

    Cheers,

    Chris.

    Cute and cuddly, boys, cute and cuddly!
    • Member since
      September 2003
    • From: North East Texas
    Posted by roadkill_275 on Wednesday, April 23, 2008 3:49 PM
    The only two that I can think of off the top of my  head that's not on the list above are the Brabazon and possibly the Boeing 377.
    Kevin M. Bodkins "Meddle not in the affairs of dragons, for thou art crunchy and taste good with ketchup" American By Birth, Southern By the Grace of God! www.milavia.com Christian Modelers For McCain
    JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

    Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

    SEARCH FORUMS
    FREE NEWSLETTER
    By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.