SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

Aircraft Trivia Quiz

728382 views
7409 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    May 2006
  • From: Nanaimo, BC, Canada
Posted by Brews on Friday, December 14, 2007 6:00 PM

This is a military action dominated by aircraft. It features the following:

  • Suppression of enemy air action by harrassment of airfields - no enemy aeroplane left the ground;
  • Communication and HQ were destroyed;
  • the road along which an army was retreating was subject to aerial bombing and strafing so that it was blocked with transports / vehicles;
  • The road mentioned above was the only way route of retreat, and the enemy forces were trapped on it; and their transports and guns were destroyed.

What was the largest bomber involved?

 

  • Member since
    May 2006
  • From: Nanaimo, BC, Canada
Posted by Brews on Saturday, December 15, 2007 5:14 PM
Hint: It is a British aeroplane.
  • Member since
    May 2006
  • From: Nanaimo, BC, Canada
Posted by Brews on Sunday, December 16, 2007 1:03 PM

Do we need a better hint or a prefer a new question? 

  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: Scotland
Posted by Milairjunkie on Monday, December 17, 2007 8:21 PM

More clues would be better, so far I have thought of the Iraqi Revolt & the Six Day War, but neither fit the bill.

An idea on the era would be good. 

  • Member since
    May 2006
  • From: Nanaimo, BC, Canada
Posted by Brews on Monday, December 17, 2007 8:35 PM
We're looking at a minor theatre of WW1, but not so minor as Mesopotamia. The reputation was cemented of the British General, who adopted the name of the battle, in the manner of Sir Arthur Wellesley before him, and Sir Bernard Montgomery afterwards.
  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Newnan, Ga
Posted by bostonbruins34 on Tuesday, December 18, 2007 8:46 AM
The Handley Page 0/400 I believe was the largest with a wingspan of exactly 100 feet. That would be my guess...
The existence of flamethrowers is proof that someone, somewhere, said to himself, "I want to set those people over there on fire, but I don't feel like walking over there to do it." Group Build
  • Member since
    May 2006
  • From: Nanaimo, BC, Canada
Posted by Brews on Tuesday, December 18, 2007 9:15 AM
I don't think that the O/400 was in this theatre. Blindingly close guess, though.
  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: Scotland
Posted by Milairjunkie on Wednesday, December 19, 2007 8:14 AM

So it was the O/100 then?

Still cant find reference to the mission you describe.

  • Member since
    May 2006
  • From: Nanaimo, BC, Canada
Posted by Brews on Wednesday, December 19, 2007 9:24 AM

Bingo.

The action was the Battle of Armeggeddon (Meggido), the General was Allenby, and one HP 0/100 was in Palestine, operating for a time with 1 Squadron Australian Flying Corps, who were mostly flying Bristol Fighters. The next largest plane was probably the BE2e. Turkey signed an armistice promptly after the battle. 

This was one theatre in WW1 where a Camel was not necessarily rotary-engined.

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Newnan, Ga
Posted by bostonbruins34 on Wednesday, December 19, 2007 10:09 AM

This is cool! It is so unlike any other forums I've been on! Everyone acts so cool and there are no attitudes.

So what is the next question???

The existence of flamethrowers is proof that someone, somewhere, said to himself, "I want to set those people over there on fire, but I don't feel like walking over there to do it." Group Build
  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: Scotland
Posted by Milairjunkie on Wednesday, December 19, 2007 7:57 PM

This aircraft came from a company with a rather illustrious heritage (mainly due to a product of the WW2 era), the company ceased to exist shortly after the production of the aircraft in question.

This is a twin turbojet, single seat, nuclear capable strike aircraft. Notable were:-

The early use of "Attinello Flaps",

Blistering low level performance,

A loss rate in excess of 50%,

& never used in anger. 

 

  • Member since
    December 2007
Posted by BearFan44 on Thursday, December 20, 2007 12:25 AM

 

 

A-5 Vigilante?

  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: Scotland
Posted by Milairjunkie on Thursday, December 20, 2007 4:52 AM

No, sorry - The Vigilante was two seat, used in combat in vietnam & North American survived for about 30 years after it introduction.

If it helps, there are 3 examples of this aircraft that survive, one being in the US.

  • Member since
    May 2006
  • From: Nanaimo, BC, Canada
Posted by Brews on Thursday, December 20, 2007 1:28 PM
Supermarine Scimitar?
  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: Scotland
Posted by Milairjunkie on Friday, December 21, 2007 5:15 AM

Yes, correct - You got that one easily - damn!

Apparently the Scimitar on one engine could easily out-perform the F4 running at max dry thrust at low level.  

Anyway onto you.

  • Member since
    May 2006
  • From: Nanaimo, BC, Canada
Posted by Brews on Friday, December 21, 2007 9:34 AM

I have a Skybirds '86 1:72 Scimitar in my stash Big Smile [:D]

One easy answer deserves an easy question:

Which "enemy" aircraft was referred to as the "foolish ..... fish"? 

Note that "enemy" is in quotation marks because it was the opponents of the aeroplane in question who delivered  this moniker. 

  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: Scotland
Posted by Milairjunkie on Friday, December 21, 2007 12:23 PM
Wild guess - Fairey Swordfish AKA Stringback & blackfish?
  • Member since
    May 2006
  • From: Nanaimo, BC, Canada
Posted by Brews on Friday, December 21, 2007 12:58 PM
Not the Swordfish.
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by wdolson2 on Friday, December 21, 2007 2:50 PM

There is the Mig-21 Fishbed, but that doesn't mean "foolish fish".  There is the Japanese Ohka flying bomb that was called the Baka Bomb by the Allies, and it was a sort of a torpedo.

 Bill 

  • Member since
    May 2006
  • From: Nanaimo, BC, Canada
Posted by Brews on Friday, December 21, 2007 5:24 PM

No. The Swordfish was closer, at least it had the right number of wings. If you have a copy of Norman Franks' "Aircraft vs Aircraft" you will find the answer.

The name of the plane fits into the quote in the question:

"foolish [insert name of plane here] fish"

  • Member since
    May 2006
  • From: Nanaimo, BC, Canada
Posted by Brews on Friday, December 21, 2007 11:17 PM
It really is easy! How many biplanes look like fish?
  • Member since
    May 2006
  • From: Nanaimo, BC, Canada
Posted by Brews on Saturday, December 22, 2007 9:09 PM
Think "phonetic alliteration".
  • Member since
    May 2006
  • From: Nanaimo, BC, Canada
Posted by Brews on Wednesday, December 26, 2007 1:31 PM
Think Bavarian.
  • Member since
    May 2006
  • From: Nanaimo, BC, Canada
Posted by Brews on Thursday, December 27, 2007 10:06 AM

It's not the "foolish Fokker fish"

or the "foolish Albatros fish"

or the "foolish Roland fish"

or the "foolish Halberstadt fish"

or the "foolish Gotha fish"

or the "foolish DFW fish"

or the "foolish Hannover fish" 

HTH

  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: Scotland
Posted by Milairjunkie on Thursday, December 27, 2007 6:21 PM
Sorry - I'm done.
  • Member since
    May 2006
  • From: Nanaimo, BC, Canada
Posted by Brews on Thursday, December 27, 2007 8:02 PM
starts with "p"
  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: Scotland
Posted by Milairjunkie on Thursday, December 27, 2007 8:30 PM
Pfalz D.III ???
  • Member since
    May 2006
  • From: Nanaimo, BC, Canada
Posted by Brews on Friday, December 28, 2007 1:15 AM

Pfalz! YES. Finally.:)

The Foolish Pfalz Fish - described as "very split-arse" which was the RFC term for "maneuvrable" in the way that pilots flew by "the seat of their pants" and what we now term "pulling g" meant that the pilot's butt-cheeks pulled apart.

The "split-S" maneuvre is derived from the term "split-arse". Here endeth the lesson.

Over to you. I wish you good luck with your choice of question!

  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: Scotland
Posted by Milairjunkie on Friday, December 28, 2007 5:16 AM

As you can probably tell, old stuff isn't my strong point;

This is a small, single seat, single engined attack/fighter aircraft which first flew in the 60s. It managed successful "export arrangements" & has seen action in several conflicts. The most notorious version of this aircraft has now been retired. This aircraft is not very noteworthy in design, with the exception of one feature.

  • Member since
    September 2007
  • From: galt, ca.
Posted by dirtball on Friday, December 28, 2007 10:02 AM
F5A??
"I once shot an elephant in my pajamas. How he got in my pajamas, I`ll never know!"
JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.