SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

Ship Trivia Quiz

452450 views
3119 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    March 2004
  • From: Spartanburg, SC
Posted by subfixer on Thursday, November 6, 2008 7:05 PM
You hit the nail on the head, Rick. You're up.

I'm from the government and I'm here to help.

  • Member since
    February 2006
  • From: Norfolk, UK
Posted by RickF on Friday, November 7, 2008 3:36 AM

Thanks. Here's a quickie that should not last long!

Going on from my earlier question, which unique USN ship was fitted with three 15-inch guns?

Rick

  • Member since
    February 2016
Posted by eaglecentral on Friday, November 7, 2008 7:01 AM

Ahoy RickF,

This ship was Dnyamite!

I believe you refer to the cruiser USS Vesuvius.    It's main battery consited of three 15 inch dynamite guns designed by Edmund Zalinski.  The guns were used in action to bombard Satiago, Cuba in 1898 and got a good report by Admiral Sampson. 

Tom S.

  • Member since
    March 2004
  • From: Spartanburg, SC
Posted by subfixer on Friday, November 7, 2008 7:14 AM
If I'm not mistaken, those guns were pneumatic which allowed the dynamite to be "fired" without flash, therefore, not giving the ship's position away at night.

I'm from the government and I'm here to help.

  • Member since
    February 2016
Posted by eaglecentral on Friday, November 7, 2008 8:42 AM

The projectiles were indeed moved by compressed air.  The pressure was adjusted to control the range.

The design was an attempt to launch a large amount of explosives without setting it off in the process.  Range was a problem and one model was able to propel a quarter ton of dynamite four miles, however, the Vesuvius range was reported to be about a mile and a half.  The biggest drawback to the design was that the ship itself had to be aimed at the target because the guns were built into the longitudinal axis of the hull.

Tom S.

  • Member since
    February 2006
  • From: Norfolk, UK
Posted by RickF on Friday, November 7, 2008 5:55 PM

Didn't think that one would last long!

Apparently the pneumatic dynamite gun's best feature was its psychological effect - since the enemy didn't hear it fire, the resulting surprise arrival of a 15-inch shell did not improve their morale!

Over to you again, Tom.

  • Member since
    February 2016
Posted by eaglecentral on Friday, November 7, 2008 7:54 PM

In the summer of 1941, the US Secretary of State, in friendly negotiations with the Soviet Union, was able to borrow a "specialty" ship from the USSR for one year.

QUESTION:   What was the name of the borrowed ship and what class of American naval vessels was the result?

  • Member since
    February 2016
Posted by eaglecentral on Saturday, November 8, 2008 1:09 PM

Hmmmmm....no bites yet.......I think I'll give a hint:

When the US Secretary of State asked to borrow the ship, he was asking on behalf of the Secretary of the Treasury.

Gotta be some connection there somewhere.

Tom S.

  • Member since
    February 2016
Posted by eaglecentral on Sunday, November 9, 2008 8:05 AM

Time for another hint.....?

From among the class of ships that resulted from the loan, three of them were loaned to the Soviet Union under lend lease and were returned in the early '50s.

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: Greenville, NC
Posted by jtilley on Sunday, November 9, 2008 10:14 PM
I've figured out that the original vessel in question was a Soviet icebreaker, which served as the inspiration for the Coast Guard's "Wind" class.  I don't remember the name of the Soviet ship, though.  I hope somebody else does; I'm not at all confident of my ability to come up with another question that would hold its own in this august company.

Youth, talent, hard work, and enthusiasm are no match for old age and treachery.

  • Member since
    February 2016
Posted by alumni72 on Sunday, November 9, 2008 10:49 PM
jtilley, if I can dream up a reasonable (for me, at least) question, I'm sure you can come up with a real poser.  My best guess for this was the Liberty ships, and I knew that wasn't right.  Icebreakers made sense, since Russia was involved, but I figured that the US had icebreakers before ww2, so I just gave up.  I did learn a lot about Hull and Morgenthau, though. Propeller [8-]
  • Member since
    February 2016
Posted by eaglecentral on Monday, November 10, 2008 6:19 AM

jtilley,

Even without the name of the ship in question, which was Leonid Krasin, I'm going to give you an OK on this question.

The Leonid Krassin was a purposely designed ice breaker built in Britain in 1916-1917 and launched under the name Svyatogor.  It had a long and interesting career.  When it was loaned to the US in 1941, it was in pretty poor condition, the survey of the ship found thousands of loose rivets, however, Congress appropriated $500,000 for it.  Before the deal to lease/purchase the ship was closed, the Germans invaded Russia and the Russians took the ship back for immediate war duty.  The ship was in regular service up through 1972 and made it's last voyage among Northern European ports in 1990.

The Leonid Krasin is a member of the International Historic Naval Ships Association and is now a floating icebreaker museum in St Petersburg.

As a result of the survey, many of it's features were built into the American Wind class icebreakers which served with the Russian, American, and Canadian navies in WWII and beyond.

jtilley, you've got the next question.

Tom S.

  • Member since
    February 2016
Posted by eaglecentral on Thursday, November 13, 2008 7:01 AM

In view of jtilley's reluctance to provide a question, I'll declare the floor open to any interested party to provide the next question.

Tom S.

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: Greenville, NC
Posted by jtilley on Thursday, November 13, 2008 8:22 AM
Thanks, eaglecentral.  I'm in full agreement; my poor old haflzeimer's-afflicted brain hasn't been able to come up with a decent (or indecent) question.  Please consider the floor open.

Youth, talent, hard work, and enthusiasm are no match for old age and treachery.

  • Member since
    March 2004
  • From: Spartanburg, SC
Posted by subfixer on Thursday, November 13, 2008 8:52 AM

 jtilley wrote:
Thanks, eaglecentral.  I'm in full agreement; my poor old haflzeimer's-afflicted brain hasn't been able to come up with a decent (or indecent) question.  Please consider the floor open.

Hey! What's up with that, Professor?? !!  I'll bet your students would appreciate your halfzeimer's brain at test time, but you are an honored member of an elite (except for me) forum here. C'mon now, just a half hearted question... we won't laugh.

I'm from the government and I'm here to help.

  • Member since
    July 2005
  • From: Dayton, Ohio
Posted by warhorse3 on Saturday, November 15, 2008 5:06 PM
Professor, if most of the members of this forum are like me in having a deep apreciation for the vast amount of information that you have so generously shared with us, then I do believe that the next question is still yours. Even a 1/700 hearted one like what ship hit an iceberg and sank in April 1912.  About the only thing I'd snicker at would be if you said doog was going to use his hairspray rust technique on a PT boat hull.
Regards, Bill
  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: Greenville, NC
Posted by jtilley on Monday, November 17, 2008 11:48 AM

Well, ok; here goes.  This is a movie-related question - the sort that calls for "connecting" movies by way of actors who starred in them.

What's the connection between two movies that featured (arguably) the most famous warship sinking in American history and (just about unarguably) the most famous merchant ship sinking in anybody's history? 

Youth, talent, hard work, and enthusiasm are no match for old age and treachery.

  • Member since
    March 2004
  • From: Spartanburg, SC
Posted by subfixer on Wednesday, November 19, 2008 12:04 PM

Well guys, I guess we asked for this one, didn't we? The next time our good professor answers a question correctly and is reluctant to ask a follow-up, we might not want to pressure him so hard or we'll end up with a LuLu like this one! 

I am supposing that John is referring to the Arizona and Titanic. (Maybe the Maine and Lusitania?)

I'm from the government and I'm here to help.

  • Member since
    February 2006
  • From: Norfolk, UK
Posted by RickF on Wednesday, November 19, 2008 5:44 PM

Yes, it's a good one!

My first thoughts were Maine and Titanic too, but if there are any feature films about the Maine, I've been unable to find them. Does it make a "cameo appearance" in another Spanish-American War film? "Message to Garcia", maybe?

Rick

  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Monterey Bay, CA
Posted by schoonerbumm on Wednesday, November 19, 2008 10:26 PM
I doubt that this is the answer that the Professor is looking for, but Jason Robards played an Admiral in Raise the Titanic and a General in Tora Tora Tora.

Alan

"Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy." Benjamin Franklin

  • Member since
    February 2016
Posted by alumni72 on Wednesday, November 19, 2008 11:20 PM

Arizona seems the obvious answer for the warship, but when he specified "merchant ship" I immediately thought of the Exxon Valdez.  About as many movies about that ship as of the Maine, though.

For the Arizona, for some reason best known to the demons inside my head I focused on Pearl Harbor rather than Tora Tora Tora.  I never thought I would laud the qualities of TTT over another movie, but it has Pearl Harbor beat hands-down.  But try as I might, I couldn't find any connections.

Is there a movie, perhaps, about the Edmund Fitzgerald?

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: Greenville, NC
Posted by jtilley on Wednesday, November 19, 2008 11:50 PM
Schoonerbum was thinking in the right direction.  I confess I hadn't thought of Jason Robards (perhaps because my brain had, mercifully, blotted out its memory of "Raise the Titanic"); I guess we'll have to consider Schoonerbum the winner if nobody comes up with the answer I had in mind.  But the latter is, I think, better and more interesting.  Let's wait another day and see if, with the above hints, anybody gets it.

Youth, talent, hard work, and enthusiasm are no match for old age and treachery.

  • Member since
    April 2005
Posted by ddp59 on Thursday, November 20, 2008 4:38 PM
alumni, Exxon Valdez was in a movie by kevin costner called water world. didn't know it was her til she sank that you see her name on the stern before it went underwater.
  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: Greenville, NC
Posted by jtilley on Thursday, November 20, 2008 10:20 PM

Guess it's time to spill the beans.

The 1934 movie "Here Comes the Navy," starring the 34-year-old James Cagney, was nominated for the Best Picture Oscar, but apparently faded from most movie enthusiasts' memories pretty quickly.  It doesn't even get listed in most "TV movies" books; so far as I know it hasn't been released on either VHS or DVD.  But it has shown up a couple of times in recent years on the Turner Classic Movies cable network - usually late at night or very early in the morning. 

Much of the movie was shot on board the U.S.S. Arizona.  There are quite a few interesting on board scenes - including one in which, with all the officers wearing their dress uniforms, swords, and fore-and-aft hats, Cagney gets presented with a medal.  There's also a memorable explosion inside a 14" turret.  (Paul Stillwell, in his book about the Arizona, suggests that those scenes may have been shot inside a studio mockup of the turret interior - but if so the moviemakers were mighty careful to get it right.) 

The plot (such as it is) revolves around a rivalry between Cagney, a young, swaggering sailor, and Pat O'Brian, who plays an older, relatively straight-laced chief petty officer.  In the grand finale, the two of them jump out of the airship Macon (which crashed a year after the movie was released), and are saved by one parachute.

The two male leads are also involved in a love triangle, the hypotenuse of which is the 24-year-old Gloria Stuart.  Sixty-three years later, she played the old lady with the diamond in "Titanic."

Here's the Wikipedia entry for "Here Comes the Navy":  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Here_Comes_the_Navy

Definitely worth staying up late the next time TCM shows it.

Schoonerbum's answer wasn't the one I had in mind, but I guess it meets the criteria.  I therefore suggest that we award Schoonerbum the next question.

Youth, talent, hard work, and enthusiasm are no match for old age and treachery.

  • Member since
    February 2016
Posted by alumni72 on Thursday, November 20, 2008 10:31 PM

I found myself thinking I was having great ideas - I moved out from the Tora Tora Tora/Pearl Harbor core to In Harm's Way and even 1941.  And I tried replacing Titanic with Poseidon Adventure.  I didn't find any matches, but I did find that David Warner was in 2 different Titanic movies - Titanic and SOS Titanic; I found a link between the movies Titanic and Tombstone; and ultimately that whoever lists the all the bit players on IMDB.com has WAY too much time on their hands.

I've wanted to watch Here Comes the Navy for years, but when it was on last, we did have TiVo but also had a new TV that didn't get along with TiVo, so I missed out yet again.   It's not available on DVD, but you can go to TCM.com and cast a vote for it - they track the votes by email address, so if you have more than one you can vote more than once.

  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Monterey Bay, CA
Posted by schoonerbumm on Friday, November 21, 2008 11:22 AM

Ok, for you Royal Navy aficionados....

What is the connection between a New Zealand dog dinner (yes, a tasty, canine main course), Captain Cook (the main course at another dinner?) and Copenhagen (no, not the smokeless tobacco)?

Alan

"Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy." Benjamin Franklin

  • Member since
    February 2006
  • From: Norfolk, UK
Posted by RickF on Friday, November 21, 2008 6:34 PM

Alan,

I've a famous name that connects Captain Cook and the Battle of Copenhagen (1801), but can't make the New Zealand culinary connection.  Am I on the right lines?

Rick

  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Monterey Bay, CA
Posted by schoonerbumm on Friday, November 21, 2008 7:45 PM

sounds like you are barking up the right tree...

 

Alan

"Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy." Benjamin Franklin

  • Member since
    February 2006
  • From: Norfolk, UK
Posted by RickF on Saturday, November 22, 2008 4:24 AM

Well, my first thought was William Bligh, who sailed with Cook and commanded HMS Glatton at Copenhagen but, as I said above, I couldn't connect the dog.

Looking deeper I came up with Edward Riou, who served on both Resolution and Discovery during Cook's last expedition, ending up as a midshipman

During the voyage Riou acquired a native dog at Queen Charlotte Sound, New Zealand. The dog apparently bit several of Riou's colleagues so when Riou was ashore one day the dog was given a mock trial, found guilty, killed and cooked. This was referred to as the "Trial of the Cannibal Dog".

In 1799, he was given command of HMS Amazon, a new 5th rate of 38 guns. The Amazon joined the Baltic Fleet in 1801 and took part in the Battle of Copenhagen on 2 April 1801.  During the battle, Riou was severely wounded in the head by a splinter and then killed when a cannon-ball cut him in two.

Rick

  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Monterey Bay, CA
Posted by schoonerbumm on Sunday, November 23, 2008 11:04 AM

Rick has found the correct connections.

Though Nelson only knew Riou by his reputation before the Copenhagen operation, Riou greatly impressed the Admiral during their short association. He performed flawlessly in marking the channels approaching the city and Nelson included the frigate captain in his planning sessions, along with Admirals and Commodores.

Riou became the victim of other officer's screwups during the battle, ending up facing shore batteries in a frigate. When Hyde Parker lost his nerve and ordered a withdrawal, Riou had no choice to comply, unlike Nelson, who could afford to turn a "blind eye". In order to withdraw, Riou's vessels had to cease fire, which lifted their protective cloak of smoke, and turn their sterns to batteries that had not been suppressed. Riou was cut in half by a cannon ball and Amazon's crew suffered horrendous casualties.

If events at Copenhagen had gone to plan, it might have been "kiss me Riou"....

For those interested in more, check out:

http://www.angelfire.com/trek/guardian/ 

and an excellent book by Dudley Pope, The Great Gamble, Nelson at Copenhagen.

The dog story, and undertones, can be found in Anne Salmond's book, The Trial of the Cannibal Dog, The Remarkable Story of Captain Cook's Encounters in the South Seas"

Rick, the floor is yours.

 

Alan

"Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy." Benjamin Franklin

JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.