SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

Ship Trivia Quiz

452285 views
3119 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    January 2009
Posted by F-8fanatic on Saturday, March 2, 2013 1:21 PM

I believe youre looking for the USS Bluejack--SS-581.  She was the second of three Barbel class subs, launched in 1959 and decommissioned in 1990.  She was the last of the Barbel class to be decommissioned.....Bonefish was decommissioned in 1988 after a fire, and Barbel was decommissioned in 1989.  

The Barbel class was the last class of US subs to be built with diesel-electric propulsion.  They were also the first production submarines to be built with the round "teardrop" hull that just about every military submarine in the world today uses.  The hull designs previously had focused on performance on the surface, while this teardrop design allowed for better speed and quieter performance while submerged.  It also allowed the entire bow of the sub to be used to house the main sonar array.

  • Member since
    August 2010
  • From: Beaverton, OR
Posted by Ghostrider114 on Friday, March 1, 2013 10:46 AM

the original Seawolf was a one off, not a class ship, this class's powerplant was a much more common design.

Let me rephrase one of the clues, this class was the first non-experimental vessels to utilize a major design feature, one not present in the Seawolf design.

  • Member since
    March 2004
  • From: Spartanburg, SC
Posted by subfixer on Friday, March 1, 2013 8:05 AM

USS Seawolf SSN-575 had a liquid sodium cooled reactor until it was replace by a pressurized water reactor.

File:USS Seawolf (SSN-575).jpg

I'm from the government and I'm here to help.

  • Member since
    August 2010
  • From: Beaverton, OR
Posted by Ghostrider114 on Friday, March 1, 2013 1:30 AM

nope, you're getting warmer though

  • Member since
    March 2009
  • From: Yorkville, IL
Posted by wolfhammer1 on Thursday, February 28, 2013 11:53 PM

skipjack submarine?

  • Member since
    August 2010
  • From: Beaverton, OR
Posted by Ghostrider114 on Thursday, February 28, 2013 7:25 PM

Nope,

Ranger was going to be a museum, in fact the proposed site wasn't far from where I live, but that doesn't look like it's going to happen.

Also, unless I'm mistaken, the Kitty Hawk class (technically the JFK subclass) are the last carriers to be built with boilers, not the Forrestals.

Keep guessing.

Think smaller.

This design change is equally as revolutionary for this classes type as the angled deck was for carriers.

  • Member since
    September 2012
Posted by GMorrison on Thursday, February 28, 2013 5:23 PM

USS Ranger CV-61. AKA the bridge killer.

First class of US carriers to fully adopt the angled deck.

Last class of US carriers to use fuel oil boiler/ turbine power.

Not sure though about the museum. I understand she is waiting for the torch.

 Modeling is an excuse to buy books.

 

  • Member since
    August 2010
  • From: Beaverton, OR
Posted by Ghostrider114 on Thursday, February 28, 2013 3:15 PM

Ok.

This vessel was part of the first full production class to integrate a revolutionary new design, now used in nearly every vessel of this type, and this was the last class of it's type in the US Navy to utilize it's kind of power plant.  The vessel I'm looking for is the last of her class to remain in service, and now serves as part of a museum.

  • Member since
    April 2005
Posted by ddp59 on Thursday, February 28, 2013 10:35 AM

your turn ghostrider.

  • Member since
    March 2004
  • From: Spartanburg, SC
Posted by subfixer on Wednesday, February 27, 2013 11:41 PM

I will vouch for Ghostrider's answer, I always heard the Kidd's being referred to as the Ayatollah class, too. Hardly ever as the Dead Admiral class. Heck, there's so many ships in the USN named for dead admirals that it would be hard to discern which class you were talking about.

I'm from the government and I'm here to help.

  • Member since
    August 2010
  • From: Beaverton, OR
Posted by Ghostrider114 on Wednesday, February 27, 2013 9:35 PM

That is an american nickname for the Kidds, lol.  Another nickname is the "Dead Admiral" class.

  • Member since
    April 2005
Posted by ddp59 on Wednesday, February 27, 2013 7:13 PM

re-read my post.

  • Member since
    August 2010
  • From: Beaverton, OR
Posted by Ghostrider114 on Wednesday, February 27, 2013 1:58 PM

They are also known as the Ayatollah class, because they were being built for Iran before the revolution.

  • Member since
    April 2005
Posted by ddp59 on Wednesday, February 27, 2013 10:54 AM

what is the other american name for the kidd class?

  • Member since
    March 2004
  • From: Spartanburg, SC
Posted by subfixer on Friday, February 22, 2013 9:41 PM

The reason I asked was because you got the last question correctly. It's your turn to ask the next one.

I'm from the government and I'm here to help.

  • Member since
    April 2005
Posted by ddp59 on Friday, February 22, 2013 9:07 PM

no, just commenting on argentina's twin of the sheffield.

  • Member since
    March 2004
  • From: Spartanburg, SC
Posted by subfixer on Friday, February 22, 2013 2:43 PM

Is this your question for the quiz, ddp?

I'm from the government and I'm here to help.

  • Member since
    April 2005
Posted by ddp59 on Wednesday, February 20, 2013 2:20 PM

also did it not sink recently along side a dock in argentina?

  • Member since
    September 2012
Posted by GMorrison on Tuesday, February 19, 2013 2:51 PM

Didn't they have to forfeit their payment for their destroyer as compensation?

 Modeling is an excuse to buy books.

 

  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Barrow in Furness, Cumbria, UK.
Posted by davros on Tuesday, February 19, 2013 2:31 PM

And to  add to the absurd; Argentinian naval personnel were here, in Barrow, for the launch of HMS Sheffield as the keel for their Type 42 was to be laid less than a week after.

  • Member since
    September 2012
Posted by GMorrison on Tuesday, February 19, 2013 2:18 PM

Yes that's it. The other primary target was to be the ARA Veinticinco de Mayo, ne HMS Venerable, ex HNLMS Karel Doorman (Dutch).

And, just to stretch the ridiculous to the absurd, Hawker Siddeley demonstrated the Harrier GR.1 on board the Mayo as a possible sale to Argentina in 1969.

 Modeling is an excuse to buy books.

 

  • Member since
    April 2005
Posted by ddp59 on Tuesday, February 19, 2013 1:45 PM

USS PHOENIX (CL 46)

Renamed GENERAL BELGRANO in 1956

Sunk by the British nuclear attack submarine HMS CONQUEROR (S-48) during the Falklands War on 02 MAY 1982

  • Member since
    September 2012
Posted by GMorrison on Tuesday, February 19, 2013 12:56 PM

Oh just answer the question!!!! The surface unit was originally a USN vessel, but at the time of her sinking was flying a foreign flag. The other vessel was in original country of service flag.

 Modeling is an excuse to buy books.

 

  • Member since
    March 2004
  • From: Spartanburg, SC
Posted by subfixer on Tuesday, February 19, 2013 11:59 AM

In which war? The Falklands, maybe??

I'm from the government and I'm here to help.

  • Member since
    September 2012
Posted by GMorrison on Tuesday, February 19, 2013 11:35 AM

What American surface unit was sunk by a British ship?

 Modeling is an excuse to buy books.

 

  • Member since
    September 2012
Posted by GMorrison on Friday, February 15, 2013 2:51 PM

Thanks, and thanks for the info. My own personal suspicion is that Ron Thunman wore # 21 when he played football at the University of Illinois, but conclusive proof is not yet available. I assure you I will find it, though...

Question soon...

 Modeling is an excuse to buy books.

 

  • Member since
    March 2004
  • From: Spartanburg, SC
Posted by subfixer on Friday, February 15, 2013 1:58 PM

First, you are correct so you get to ask the next question.

GMorrison

.

Not a question for the game since I may be wrong with the above, but why do the Seawolfs start over with low numbers?.

Second, (from Navsite);

  Another mistake is the ship’s number, SSN 21. This number was created by Vice Admiral N. Thunman. He said that the submarine for the 21st century should be named SSN 21. By doing so he made the mistake that every ship’s number can only be given once and the number "21" was already given in 1912.

After that class of boats, the numbering picked back up with SSN-774 USS Virginia, also a lead ship of a new class.

I'm from the government and I'm here to help.

  • Member since
    September 2012
Posted by GMorrison on Friday, February 15, 2013 12:34 PM

SSN-671 USS Narwhal. One particular innovation, and pardon my lack of technical knowledge, is that the reactor cooling system could have the pumps turned off and work on gravity only.

Not a question for the game since I may be wrong with the above, but why do the Seawolfs start over with low numbers?.

 Modeling is an excuse to buy books.

 

  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: Rowland Heights, California
Posted by Duke Maddog on Friday, February 15, 2013 11:02 AM

I was gonna offer the USS Skipjack, but the only innovation I could recall on her was her teardrop hull.

Also, I have no followup question if I'm correct.

  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Washington, DC
Posted by TomZ2 on Thursday, February 14, 2013 10:38 PM

Occasional factual, grammatical, or spelling variations are inherent to this thesis and should not be considered as defects, as they enhance the individuality and character of this document.

JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.